Characterization of cardioprotection mediated by AT2 receptor antagonism after ischemia-reperfusion in isolated working rat hearts

Diverse effects of long-term treatment with imidapril and irbesartan on cell growth signal, apoptosis and collagen type I expression in the left ventricle of spontaneously hypertensive rats

To compare diverse effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (irbesartan) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (imidapril) on left ventricular remodeling in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Thirty male SHR were randomly divided into three groups: SHR-IR (treated with irbesartan, 50 mg/kg), SHR-IM (imidapril, 3 mg/kg), SHR-C (placebo). Ten male Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) treated with placebo acted as the control. All treatments were administered once daily from 14 to 27 weeks of age. Imidapril and irbesartan have the similar inhibitor effects on blood pressure and left ventricular mass indexes in SHR. Despite both drugs suppressed ERK-1 protein expression, decreased cardiomyocytes apoptosis index, blocked collagen type I deposition, reduced TGF-beta(1) gene expression in SHR, imidapril elicits a stronger inhibitory effect. Irbesartan had little effect on MKP-1 protein expression, but imidapril decreased it significantly. As a result, the ERK-1/MKP-1 ratio in SHR-IR was significantly greater than that in SHR-IM (P < 0.05). These results suggest that the balance between MKP-1 and ERKs in myocardial tissue is important for cardiac cell proliferation and growth. They also indicate that the similar efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in reducing blood pressure does not predict the similar capacity to control the individual facet of left ventricular remodeling. Irbesartan is more effective in regressing the homeostasis between ERK-1 and MKP-1, however imidapril is superior in suppressing apoptosis and collagen synthesis in cardiac tissue.

Effects of the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonist losartan on functional recovery of isolated rat hearts undergoing global myocardial ischemia-reperfusion

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonist losartan on functional recovery of isolated rat hearts undergoing global myocardial ischemia-reperfusion compared with myocardial protective effects of ischemic preconditioning.

DESIGN

Ex vivo experiment using isolated perfused rat heart.

SETTING

Academic laboratory.

INTERVENTION

Hearts from Sprague-Dawley rats were perfused with oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit buffer and randomized to one of four groups: time control, vehicle, ischemic preconditioning, or losartan.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After randomization, hearts underwent 30 minutes of global ischemia followed by 30 minutes of reperfusion. Changes in end-diastolic pressure (EDP), left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), and infarct size were examined between treatment groups by two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures. Cardiac angiotensin II receptor (ATR) density and infarct size were measured in control hearts and in a subgroup of hearts exposed to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Total ATR density and percentage of myocardial AT1R were increased in hearts exposed to ischemia-reperfusion. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury resulted in a 56% reduction in LVDP from baseline in hearts randomized to vehicle. However, it declined by only 22% and 28% in hearts randomized to ischemic preconditioning and losartan, respectively. Compared with vehicle, both ischemic preconditioning and losartan decreased EDP (ischemic preconditioning 39 +/- 3 mm Hg, losartan 54 +/- 5 mm Hg, vs vehicle 78 +/- 8 mm Hg), and reduced infarct size (ischemic preconditioning 9%, losartan 12%, vs vehicle 36%).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of isolated rat hearts with losartan before ischemia-reperfusion injury resulted in significant cardioprotection similar to that observed with ischemic preconditioning.

Role of angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptors in cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac remodelling

1. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonism has been considered as a specific approach to block the renin-angiotensin system and been demonstrated to be able to prevent or regress LVH by interfering with the remodelling process of the heart. 2. Angiotensin AT1 receptor blockade induces a marked increase in angiotensin (Ang) II, which may stimulate the AT2 receptors. Gene expression of AT1 and AT2 receptors increases in a time-dependent manner in cardiac remodelling following myocardial infarction. 3. Considerable efforts have been made to clarify the role of AT2 receptors in cardiac hypertrophy and remodelling since the mid-1990s, resulting in controversial reports: the AT2 receptor mediates actions either opposite to or in coordination with those of the AT1 receptor. Moreover, there are many reports of no significant effects mediated by AT2 receptors. 4. Based on the studies reviewed in the present article, we assume that the predominant effect of AngII in cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac remodelling is growth promoting and that this effect is mediated mainly via AT1 receptors. The AT2 receptors may affect the hypertrophic process by interacting with other cardiac membrane proteins, enzymes and autacoids. Before coming to a conclusion as to whether AT2 receptor stimulation or antagonism is beneficial to the heart, more studies should be performed in different LVH models, especially long-term treatment protocols in vivo.