Establishing transvaginal NOTES for gynecological and surgical indications: benefits, limits, and patient experience

Comparing vNOTES Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Large Uteri

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to compare conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs) with vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomies performed for patients with large uteri (weight >280 g) at our institution, which underwent a change in practice from conventional LH to vNOTES for large uteri.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

French tertiary university hospital.

PATIENTS

Two cohorts: the last 54 patients who underwent vNOTES hysterectomy and the last 52 patients who underwent conventional LH for large uteri.

INTERVENTION

Baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes were assessed, including uterine weight, mode of delivery for previous pregnancies, history of abdominal surgery, indication for hysterectomy, associated procedures, operative time (OT), complications, volume of intraoperative bleeding, and length of postoperative hospital stay.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Both groups were comparable, with a mean uterine weight of 586.4 ± 289.2 g in the laparoscopy group compared with 686.7 ± 374.6 g in the vNOTES group. There was a significant decrease in the OT in the vNOTES group with a median of 99 minutes (66.5-138.5 minutes) compared with 171 minutes (131-208 minutes) in the laparoscopy group, p <.001. The length of hospital stay was also decreased in the vNOTES group with a median of 0.5 nights compared with 2 nights in the laparoscopy group, p <.001. More patients were managed in an ambulatory setting in the vNOTES group (50% vs 3.7%, p <.001). Our study did not find any significant difference in terms of bleeding or the number of conversions to another surgical approach. The frequency of intraoperative and postoperative complications was very low.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the laparoscopic approach, vNOTES hysterectomy for large uteri (>280 g) is associated with decreased OT, a shorter hospital stay, and increased performance in the ambulatory setting.

Feasibility and safety of hybrid transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for colon cancer: Protocol for a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial (vNOTESCA)

Introduction

It has been a decade since the first patient with colon cancer underwent colectomy by hybrid transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (hvNOTES). However, the efficacy and safety of this procedure is not well established.

Methods

This study is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial undertaken at six centers in China. Female patients aged over 18 years and below 80 years old with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, with pathologically proven, resectable, cT1-3N0-2M0 disease who have previously untreated colon cancer are eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint is a composite of major intraoperative and postoperative complications (greater than grade III, the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], version 5.0). Secondary endpoints include conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery, postoperative concentration of C-Reactive Protein and procalcitonine, complete pathological assessment of complete mesocolic excision specimens, postoperative pain, amount of narcotic pain medication administered, time to first flatus after surgery, number of harvested lymph nodes, R0 resection rate, length of hospital stay, sexual function assessment, quality of recovery, satisfaction with surgical scars, quality of life, postoperative recurrence patterns, relapse-free survival, and overall survival.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, China, number: WDRY2022-K053. All patients will receive written information of the trial and provide informed consent before enrollment. The results of this trial will be disseminated in academic conferences and peer-reviewed medical journals.Trial registration number NCT04048421.

Hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy using transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: The role of multichannel abdominal PORT and vaginal support ring

BACKGROUND

Although transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is gaining importance, knowledge on transvaginal NOTES procedures in gynecologic practice is limited.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at evaluating the feasibility and safety of performing hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy (or bilateral salpingectomy) via transvaginal NOTES using a self-developed multichannel abdominal port and vaginal support ring.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, single-center, cohort pilot study was conducted from May to December 2017 in patients with benign uterine diseases or endometrial atypical hyperplasia or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 30) scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy. The procedure was performed using a self-developed five-channel port and a vaginal support ring.

RESULTS

Hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy (or bilateral salpingectomy) in all 30 cases (mean age: 51.43 ± 4.60 years and body mass index: 23.42 ± 1.45 kg/m² ) were successfully performed completely under transvaginal NOTES. Mean operation time was 95.90 ± 14.60 minutes and mean blood loss during the procedure was 52.50 ± 19.20 mL. Average weight of specimen was 79.97 ± 35.48 g. Only one complication of bladder injury was noted and was rectified accordingly. Visual Analog Score (VAS) at first day after operation was 2.70 ± 0.72. After follow-up for 4.50 ± 1.85 months, all the patients' vaginal stump healed well without scar formation.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that use of multichannel abdominal port could make laparoscopic instruments easier to fix and operate wherein the vaginal support ring reduces the leakage of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. There was no scar on the abdomen and VAS was much lower. This study also demonstrated cosmetic benefits and rapid postoperative recovery.

vNOTES Hysterectomy for Large Uteri: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 114 Patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of hysterectomy through vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in cases with a large uterus.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Belgian teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Women who underwent a vNOTES hysterectomy from March 2015 to March 2020 for benign gynecologic disease with a uterine weight of 280 g or more on pathologic examination (N = 114).

INTERVENTIONS

All women underwent vaginally assisted NOTES hysterectomy. We performed a retrospective analysis of baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The mean age was 50 ± 3.5 years. Twenty-two (19%) patients were obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m²), and 4 (3.5%) were morbidly obese (body mass index ≥40 kg/m²). Thirty-five (31%) patients were nulliparous, and 15 (13%) women had 1 or more cesarean sections in their medical history. Uterine weight varied from 281 g to 3361 g, with a mean weight of 559 ± 425 g. Mean surgical time was 63 ± 34 minutes. Surgical time was positively associated with uterine size. There were 4 complications: 3 bleeding complications in the first 24 hours after surgery and 1 minor late complication. Conversion to laparotomy for specimen extraction was performed in 1 case (conversion rate 0.9%). There were no conversions to laparoscopy. No ureteric, bladder, or intestinal injuries occurred in this case series, and there were neither life-threatening complications nor intensive care unit admissions.

CONCLUSION

The vNOTES technique can offer a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopy or laparotomy in cases with a large to very large uterus, even if the patient has a history of cesarean section, obesity, or nulliparity. In 99% of all women in this study, hysterectomy was successfully performed through vNOTES without conversion. By making use of the advantages of endoscopic surgery, vNOTES might broaden the indications of vaginal hysterectomy. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate whether vaginally assisted NOTES hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy in large uteri cases.

[Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in Germany: Data from the German NOTES registry]

BACKGROUND

The German NOTES registry (GNR) was initiated by the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) as a treatment and outcome database for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

AIM

The aim of this study was the descriptive analysis of all GNR data collected over a 5-year period since its start in 2008 with more than 3000 interventions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The GNR is an online database with voluntary participation available to all German-speaking clinics. Demographic data, therapy details, complications and data on the postoperative course of patients are recorded. All cases in the GNR between March 2008 and November 2013 were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

From a total of 3150 data sets 2992 (95 %) were valid and suited for the analysis. Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy was the most frequently used procedure (88.7 %), followed by hybrid transvaginal/transgastric appendectomy (6.1 %) and hybrid transvaginal/transrectal colon procedures (5.1 %). Intraoperative complications occurred in 1.6 %, postoperative complications in 3.7 % and conversions were reported in 1.5 %. Intraoperative bladder injuries and postoperative urinary tract infections were identified as method-specific complications of transvaginal procedures. Bowel injuries occurred as a rare (0.2 %) but potentially serious complication of transvaginal operations.

CONCLUSION

The German surgical community ensures a safe and responsible introduction of the new NOTES operation techniques with its active participation in the GNR. Despite an overall low complication rate, the high number of procedures in the GNR permitted the identification of method-specific complications. This knowledge can be used to further increase the safety of NOTES in practice.

Total Vaginal NOTES Hysterectomy: A New Approach to Hysterectomy

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of a total hysterectomy performed entirely by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES). Conventional, reusable laparoscopic instruments were used, inserted through an inexpensive, self-constructed single-port device. Ten total vaginal NOTES hysterectomies (TVNHs) were performed by a single surgeon. The self-constructed single-port device was made by assembling a surgical glove, a wound protector or modified laryngeal mask airway, 1 reusable 10-mm trocar, and 4 reusable 5-mm trocars. This gloveport was inserted into the vagina to create a pneumovagina. The conventional steps of a vaginal hysterectomy were followed, but performed endoscopically with standard reusable endoscopic instruments. The patient and perioperative data were analyzed. No conversion to standard laparoscopy or laparotomy was necessary in any of the 10 patients who underwent a TVNH. Mean operation time was 97 min (range: 60-120); mean drop in hemoglobin level was 1.5 g/dL (range: 0.5-2.4). There were no operative complications, and postoperative pain scores were very low. This first report on a small number of patients demonstrates that TVNH is possible. By incorporating the advantages of endoscopic surgery, TVNH broadens the indications for vaginal hysterectomy and helps overcome its limitations. At the same time, the NOTES approach avoids abdominal wall wounds and trocar-related complications. TVNH is feasible, even when performed with reusable, conventional laparoscopic instruments. This frugally innovative technique also enables surgeons to perform hysterectomies by vNOTES in low resource settings.

Complications of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a series of 102 patients. Ann Surg. 2014;259:744-749. [PMID: 23598384 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182916138]

OBJECTIVE

To review the complications encountered in our facility and in previously published studies of transvaginal (TV) natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) to date.

BACKGROUND

TV NOTES is currently observed with critical eyes from the surgical community, despite encouraging data to suggest improved short-term recovery and pain.

METHODS

All TV NOTES procedures performed in female patients between 18 and 65 years of age were included. The median follow-up was 90 days. The TV appendectomies and ventral hernia repairs were pure NOTES, through a SILS port in the vagina, whereas TV cholecystectomies were hybrid procedures with the addition of a 5-mm port in the umbilicus.

RESULTS

A total of 102 TV NOTES procedures, including 72 TV cholecystectomies, 24 TV appendectomies, and 6 TV ventral hernia repairs, were performed. The average age was 37 years old and body mass index was 29 kg/m. Three major and 7 minor complications occurred. The first major complication was a rectal injury during a TV access port insertion. The second major complication was an omental vessel bleed after a TV cholecystectomy. The third complication was an intra-abdominal abscess after a TV appendectomy. Seven minor complications were urinary retention (4), transient brachial plexus injury, dislodgement of an intrauterine device, and vaginal granulation tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

As techniques in TV surgery are adopted, inevitably, complications may occur due to the inherent learning curve. Laparoscopic instruments, although adaptable to TV approaches, have yet to be optimized. A high index of suspicion is necessary to identify complications and optimize outcomes for patients.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complications in Transvaginal Approach in Laparoscopic Surgery

Transvaginal access is the most popular natural orifice translumenal technique in the minimally invasive surgery. Reviews on non-gynecological transvaginal approach morbidities reveal that rates vary greatly. A systematic review of transvaginal approach in non-gynecological intraabdominal procedures was carried out to assess the risk of complications. A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library from the inception of these databases to March 2012. The following keywords were searched: "transvaginal", "NOTES", "single incision", and "single port". From the total of 231 potentially eligible abstracts, 87 papers were retrieved and evaluated as fulfilling the eligibility criteria. The final analysis included 32 articles. The overall complications rate was 4.4 %, and complications related to the transvaginal port reached 2.4 %. Conversion rate to open surgery was 3.4 %. The incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection was 0.8 %. The mean operative time was 119 min. The mean hospital stay was 3.1 days (range 6 h-12 days). The technique of transvaginal access can offer several advantages for a patient and is associated with an acceptable rate of complications.

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for clinical management of intra-abdominal diseases

Clinical research on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has been increasingly reported over the past 5 years and more than 1200 patients have received various NOTES procedures. The present article reviews the clinical practice of NOTES for the treatment of intra-abdominal diseases, and was carried out through systematic search with specific keywords in major databases for NOTES-related clinical literature. The last date of the search was 15 August, 2012. Transvaginal cholecystectomy is the commonest NOTES procedure reported, and its clinical feasibility and safety was established through prospective case series and randomized trials. There is a regional difference in NOTES development with the majority of NOTES fromCaucasian countries being transvaginal cholecystectomy and most reports from Asian countries being NOTES-related procedures. Safe closure of gastrointestinal access remains challenging, and novel endoscopic instruments are essential to enhance future development of NOTES.

Prospective evaluation of transvaginal assisted cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy (TVC) has so far not been prospectively evaluated using an internationally recognized health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment. We report the results of a prospectively studied cohort of patients with clinical and quality of life data.

METHODS

Prospectively controlled study of 128 patients undergoing TVC and 147 patients with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Data reported include patient demography, body mass index, anesthetic risk score (ASA), laboratory data, surgical times, length of hospital stay, pain score, analgesic medication used, complications, and quality of life scores using the combined method of SF-36 and GIQoL.

RESULTS

Ninety-five TVC and 96 CLC patients fully completed pre- and postoperative HRQoL questionnaires. Patients with incomplete or missing questionnaires were excluded as well as patients with signs of acute cholecystitis. Differences included cardiovascular comorbidity and previous surgical procedures, but there was no difference in age (p = 0.4), body mass index (p = 0.4), ASA grade (p = 0.4), or preoperative quality of life. No difference was seen in laboratory data, surgical times, or length of hospital stay. Pain score and analgesic medication showed a clear trend and significant differences in favor of TVC. There was no difference in complications. Quality of life and postoperative sexual function did not show any differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to report HRQoL outcomes after TVC using a recognized combined HRQoL assessment method. Although differences do exist in patient comorbidity and previous surgical experience, both groups were comparable. Less postoperative pain and no difference in HRQoL in TVC patients underlines this new procedure as a feasible standard approach in female patients. This study also is the first to differentiate between acute cholecystitis and symptomatic cholecystolithiasis in patients undergoing TVC.

Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in adnexal procedures

From August 2010 to June 2011, 10 consecutive patients underwent transvaginal NOTES of the adnexa, including tubal sterilization in 3, salpingectomy because of ectopic pregnancy in 3, and ovarian tumor enucleation in 4. The mean (SD; 95% CI) age of the patients was 34.8 (9.7; 27.9-41.8) years, and their body mass index was 21.6 (2.8; 19.4-23.8). In 9 of the 10 patients, the procedure was completed. The 3 tubal sterilization procedures were completed in 18 to 30 minutes, with negligible blood loss. Operative time for the 3 salpingectomies because of ectopic pregnancy was 62 to 116 minutes. One of these procedures included management of 2000 mL hemoperitoneum. Three of the 4 attempts at ovarian enucleation were successfully completed within 64 to 162 minutes, with estimated blood loss ≤ 50 mL. One NOTES procedure failed because of a misdiagnosed peritoneal mucinous tumor located anterior to the uterus and inaccessible, leading to subsequent conversion to transabdominal laparoscopy. Our preliminary results show that purely transvaginal NOTES is feasible and safe for use in performing uterine adnexal procedures in selected patients. However, the procedure cannot be used in patients with cul-de-sac disease, and could have limited use in treating lesions located anterior to the uterus.

Surgical outcome and midterm follow-up after transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: analysis of a prospective clinical series

BACKGROUND

In the last 3 years transvaginal hybrid cholecystectomy (TV-ChE) has gained widespread interest as a potential alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, substantial doubts about the transvaginal access and possibly associated complaints and complications have been raised.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective clinical series of 80 consecutive female patients, nonrandomly chosen and without a control group, who underwent a TV-ChE. All patients were evaluated with special regard to outcome data such as surgical complications and gynecological complaints. Perioperative clinical data were collected and a gynecological examination was performed 3 weeks after surgery as well as a follow-up survey 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The TV-ChE was performed in all patients without conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery. Two surgical complications occurred (1 urinary bladder injury and 1 case of bleeding). No infections of the surgical wound or any other complications were seen in the gynecological follow-up examination 3 weeks after the operation. After a follow-up of 3 months, 4% of the patients under 50 years of age reported slight and temporary problems after transvaginal cholecystectomy (dyspareunia and episodes of unclear lower abdominal pain), whereas such phenomena were seen in about 9% of women over 50 years of age (P < .05). A 33-year-old woman became pregnant 3 weeks after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

TV-ChE is a safe and less invasive surgical technique. Doubts about this operating technique with regard to an increased risk of infection or surgical complications as well as subsequent gynecological problems seem to be unfounded.