Ingrowth and device disintegration in an intralobar abscess cavity during endosponge therapy for esophageal anastomotic leakage

Technical Review on Endoscopic Treatment Devices for Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Postsurgical Leaks

Upper gastrointestinal postsurgical leaks are challenging to manage and often require radiological, endoscopic, or surgical intervention. Nowadays, endoscopy is considered the first-line approach for their management, however, there is no definite consensus on the most appropriate therapeutic approach. There is a wide diversity of endoscopic options, from close-cover-divert approaches to active or passive internal drainage approaches. Theoretically, all these options can be used alone or with a multimodality approach, as each of them has different mechanisms of action. The approach to postsurgical leaks should always be tailored to each patient, taking into account the several variables that may influence the final outcome. In this review, we discuss the important developments in endoscopic devices for the treatment of postsurgical leaks. Our discussion specifically focuses on principles and mechanism of action, advantages and disadvantages of each technique, indications, clinical success, and adverse events. An algorithm for endoscopic approach is proposed.

Secondary wound closure with a new transparent negative-pressure dressing

Secondary healing surgical wounds can be treated with negative-pressure therapy. Dressing changes can be painful due to the strong adherence of the polyurethane foam placed in the wound. After debridement and conditioning of the wound bed, secondary surgical wound closure with a surgical suture can be performed. Cutaneous negative-pressure therapy is used preventively after primary surgical suturing. Descriptions for secondary wound closure without a surgical suture are not known to date. The preparation and handling of an innovative transparent dressing for the cutaneous application of negative-pressure therapy is demonstrated here. The dressing assembly consists of a transparent drainage film and a transparent occlusion film. Negative pressure is applied via a tubing connector using a negative pressure pump. A new method of secondary wound closure using the transparent negative-pressure dressing is presented based on a case example. The treatment cycle with instructions for making the dressing is shown in a video.

[Secondary wound closure with a new transparent negative pressure dressing]

Secondarily healing surgical wounds can be treated with negative pressure dressings. Dressing changes can be painful due to the strong adherence of the polyurethane foam placed in the wound. After debridement and conditioning of the wound bed, secondary surgical wound closure with a surgical suture can be performed. Cutaneous negative pressure treatment is used preventively after primary surgical suturing. Descriptions for secondary wound closure without a surgical suture are not known to date. The preparation and handling of an innovative transparent dressing for the cutaneous application of negative pressure treatment is demonstrated. The dressing assembly consists of a transparent drainage film and a transparent occlusion film. Negative pressure is applied via a tubing connection using a negative pressure pump. A new method of secondary wound closure using the transparent negative pressure dressing is presented based on a case example. The treatment cycle with instructions for making the dressing is shown in a video.

Endoscopic Management of Postoperative Esophageal and Upper GI Defects-A Narrative Review

Anastomotic defects are deleterious complications after either oncologic or bariatric surgery, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Besides surgical revision in early stages or instable patients, endoscopic treatment has become the mainstay. To date, many options for endoscopic treatment in this setting exist, including fully covered metal stent placement, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), endoscopic internal drainage with pigtail placement (EID), leak closure with through the scope or over the scope clips, endoluminal suturing, fibrin glue sealing and a combination of all these techniques. Current evidence is mostly based on retrospective single and multicenter studies. No guidelines exist in this important field. Treatment options have to be chosen upon each case individually, taking into account clinical and anatomic criteria, such as timing, size, infectious wound complications and hemodynamic stability. Local expertise and availability of treatment devices need to be taken into account whenever choosing a treatment strategy. This review aimed to present current treatment options in terms of effectiveness, advantages and disadvantages in order to guide the clinician for his decision making. Additionally, we aimed to provide a treatment algorithm.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) after oesophagectomy and oesophageal perforations are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive endoscopy is often used as first-line treatment, particularly endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT). The aim was to assess the performance of the first commercially available endoluminal vacuum device (Eso-Sponge®) in the management of AL and perforation of the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT).

Methods

The Eso-Sponge® registry was designed in 2014 as a prospective, observational, national, multicentre registry. Patients were recruited with either AL or perforation within the upper GIT. Data were collected with a standardized form and transferred into a web-based platform. Twenty hospitals were enrolled at the beginning of the study (registration number NCT02662777; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). The primary endpoint was successful closure of the oesophageal defect.

Results

Eleven out of 20 centres recruited patients. A total of 102 patients were included in this interim analysis; 69 patients with AL and 33 with a perforation were treated by EVT. In the AL group, a closure of 91 per cent was observed and 76 per cent was observed in the perforation group. The occurrence of mediastinitis (P = 0.002) and the location of the defect (P = 0.008) were identified as significant predictors of defect closure.

Conclusions

The Eso-Sponge® registry offers the opportunity to collate data on EVT with a uniform, commercially available product to improve standardization. Our data show that EVT with the Eso-Sponge® is an option for the management of AL and perforation within the upper GIT.

VACStent: Combining the benefits of endoscopic vacuum therapy and covered stents for upper gastrointestinal tract leakage

Background and study aims  Endoscopic treatment has markedly improved the high morbidity and mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract leakage. Most procedures employ either covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) or endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), both with good clinical success but also with concomitant significant shortcomings inherent in each technique. A newly developed device, the VACStent, combines the fully covered SEMS with a polyurethane sponge cylinder anchored on the outside. This allows endoluminal EVT while keeping the intestinal lumen patent. The benefit is prevention of stent migration because the suction force of the sponge-cylinder immobilizes the VACStent on the intestinal wall, while at the same time, the attached external vacuum pump suctions off any secretions and improves healing with negative-pressure wound treatment (NPWT). Patients and methods  In this pilot study, the first patients to receive the VACStent were assessed. Outcomes included the applicability and stability of the VACStent system together with the clinical course. Results  Three patients with different clinical courses were managed with the VACStent. The first patient suffered anastomotic leakage following subtotal esophagectomy and was successfully treated with two postoperative VACStents for 12 days. The second patient received a covered SEMS for 14 days for acute Boerhaave syndrome. Due to persistent leakage, management was converted to EVT. Seven days, later a VACStent was inserted to allow oral nutrition while the leak finally closed. In the third patient, a LINX Reflux Management System had to be removed for erosion, leaving the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) with a full-thickness gap. After VACstent insertion, successful closure was achieved within 4 days. Conclusions  These clinical cases demonstrate the applicability and efficacy of the VACstent in management of esophageal and anastomotic leakage. With its vacuum sponge, the stent fosters wound healing while the covered SEMS keeps the passage patent for nutrition.

Endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) in head and neck surgery: first experiences in treatment of postoperative salivary fistulas and cervical esophageal perforations

INTRODUCTION

Iatrogenic cervical esophageal perforations (CEP) and postoperative salivary fistulas (PSF) are some of the complications requiring treatment in head and neck surgery. Conservative, surgical and endoscopic therapeutic techniques are used. Both CEP and PSF are potentially life-threatening complications and require intensive treatment. Endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) is an innovative endoscopic surgical procedure for the treatment of transmural intestinal defects throughout the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). In this retrospective study, we demonstrate its application in head and neck surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In ENPT, open-pore drains are placed endoscopically in the wound area. The drains can be inserted in an intraluminal position spanning the length of the defect (intraluminal ENPT), or through the defect into the extraluminal wound cavity (intracavitary ENPT). An electronic suction pump applies and maintains a continuous negative pressure of - 125 mmHg over a period of several days. The endoscopic drains are changed at regular intervals every few days until stable intracorporeal wound healing by secondary intention or defect closure is achieved. Between 06/2008 and 05/2019 ten patients (f = 3, m = 7; 46-78 years old) were treated with ENPT for CEP or PSF. Five patients had postoperative wound defects with consecutive PSF after total laryngectomy or floor of mouth resection. In five patients iatrogenic CEP was found following endoscopic procedures.

RESULTS

In all patients treated with ENPT, healing of the perforation defect or fistula was achieved (cure rate 100%). The median treatment duration was 13.7 days (range 4-42 days). No relevant treatment-associated complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

ENPT is a new, minimally invasive method for treating PSF and CEP.

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment

Anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe complications after esophagectomy and is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Several projects ranging from small retrospective studies to large collaborations have aimed to identify potential pre- and perioperative risk factors and to improve the diagnostic processes and management. Despite the increase in available literature, many aspects of anastomotic leakage are still debated, without the existence of widely accepted guidelines. The purpose of this review is to provide a cutting edge overview of the recent literature regarding the definition and classification of anastomotic leakage, risk factors, novel diagnostic modalities, and emerging therapeutic options for treatment and prevention of anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy.

Tips and tricks for endoscopic negative pressure therapy

Endoscopic negative-pressure therapy (ENPT) is becoming a valuable tool in surgical complication management of transmural intestinal defects and wounds in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Innovative materials for drains have been developed, endoscopic techniques adapted, and new indications for ENPT have been found. Based on our broad clinical experience, numerous tips and tricks are described, which contribute to the safety of dealing with the new therapy. The aim of this work is to present these methods. The focus is on describing the treatment in the esophagus.

Open-pore film drainage (OFD): a new multipurpose tool for endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT)

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) has been developed to treat gastrointestinal leakages. Up to now, ENPT has usually been performed with open-pore polyurethane foam drains (OPD). A big disadvantage of the OPDs is their large diameter. We have developed a new, small-bore open-pore film drainage (OFD). Herein we report our first experience in a case series of 16 patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 OFD is constructed with a drainage tube and a very thin double-layered open-pore drainage film (Suprasorb CNP, Drainage Film, Lohmann & Rauscher International, Germany). The distal end of the tube is wrapped with only one layer of film. OFD is placed into the gastrointestinal leakage site with common endoscopic techniques. The tube is connected to an electronic vacuum device and continuous negative pressure of -125 mmHg applied.

RESULTS

 From 2013 to 2016, 16 patients were treated with the new OFD device. In 10 patients, transmural intestinal defects (4 esophageal, 4 rectum/colon, 1 duodenal, 1 pancreatic cyst) were closed with ENPT in median time of 12 days (range 3 - 34 days). Five of the 10 patients were treated solely with OFD devices. In five patients ENPT started with ODP and changed to OFD when the cavity was shrunken to a channel with a small opening. In four patients postoperative gastric reflux was eliminated for 5 to 16 days.

CONCLUSIONS

 Small-bore OFD opens up promising new treatment options within ENPT. OFD can be used in endoscopic closure management of intestinal leakages in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Gastric reflux can be eliminated in an active manner. OFD can be inserted nasally. OFD may be an adequate substitute for OPD, especially when placement of the larger OPD is difficult.

Systematic review of the use of endo-luminal topical negative pressure in oesophageal leaks and perforations

Topical negative pressure is widely used in the management of superficial wounds. The use of this technology in the management of oesophageal perforations is becoming increasingly common. This systematic review aims to capture available evidence about its use in this setting. Medline and Embase were searched using MeSH terms and free text: esophageal perforation; esophageal injury; vacuum assisted closure; vacuum therapy device; esophagus; wounds penetrating; esophageal perforation; wound healing; negative pressure wound therapy. Searches were carried out between April and November 2015. Case series, cohort trials and controlled trials were included. Additional studies were found by hand searching reference lists. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria with 180 patients. Nine of the studies were case series and two were retrospective comparisons of negative pressure with stents or clips. Healing of the perforation occurred in 163/179 patients and the overall mortality was 12.8%. Compared with published data on mortality from oesophageal perforation, the application of negative pressure appears to be beneficial. The studies are, however, limited to case series and retrospective cohort studies. The number of patients in each study is small and in the absence of randomized trials demonstrating a lack of bias firm conclusions cannot be made.

[Endoscopic vacuum therapy of perforations and anastomotic insufficiency of the esophagus]

BACKGROUND

The high morbidity and mortality of esophageal defects show that the clinical challenge in the treatment of this disease still remains. An innovative method which has been developed in recent years for esophageal leakage is endoscopic vacuum therapy.

OBJECTIVES

A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for esophageal perforation with endoscopic vacuum therapy in our department was carried out.

METHODS

From November 2006 to October 2013 a total of 35 patients were treated with this method and of these 21 had anastomotic leakage, 7 had iatrogenic perforation due to flexible or rigid endoscopy and 7 patients had esophageal defects of various other origins. Drainage systems with an open pore polyurethane tip were placed using a standard endoscope. The vacuum drainage may be positioned either in the esophageal lumen onto the defect or through the defect into the extraluminal wound cavity. The intraluminal or intracavitary vacuum drainage is connected to an electronically controlled vacuum device and a continuous negative pressure of 125 mmHg is maintained for several days. The esophageal lumen or wound cavity collapses around the drainage resulting in intraluminal evacuation and closure of the defect. Under endoscopic monitoring the vacuum system is changed regularly until stable secondary healing of the intracorporeal wound or closure of the transmural defect is achieved.

RESULTS

In 32 out of 35 patients (91.4 %) healing of defects was achieved after median treatment duration of 11 days (range 4-78 days). The postoperative anastomotic leakage healed in 20 out of 21 patients (95.2 %) after a median of 11 days (range 4-46 days) of therapy. The defects in the 7 patients who were treated for iatrogenic perforation all healed (100 %) after a median treatment time of 5 days (range 4-7 days). There was one case of a recurrent fistula 75 days after treatment. The 90-day mortality in this series of 35 patients was 5.7 %.

DISCUSSION

The results of this retrospective study emphasize the increasing importance of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the current literature as an endoscopic treatment method in the management of esophageal perforation and anastomotic leakage.

Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy in esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:1029-1035. [PMID: 24444874 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.11.014]

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation is a serious disease with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is a new endoscopic treatment option, which is used to treat anastomotic leakages after rectal and esophageal resections. We report on 10 patients treated with EVT for esophageal perforation.

METHODS

Clinical and therapy-related data such as age, sex, duration of intensive care stay, length of hospital stay, reasons for perforation, EVT-associated complications, mortality, need for alternative treatment options, and course of infectious variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ten patients were treated with 54 vacuum sponges that were placed in upper gastrointestinal defects. Causes for perforation were iatrogenic, spontaneous, or foreign body-associated. Mean number of sponge insertions was 5.4 (range, 2 to 12) with a mean period of 19 ± 14.26 days. Successful therapy was achieved in 9 of 10 patients. After successful primary treatment, 1 patient died during therapy as a result of general failure of the cardiovascular system. In 1 patient, surgical resection was necessary after repeated Mallory-Weiss lesions and minor perforations during the course of immunosuppressive therapy. In a third patient an endoscopic stent was inserted in the clean wound cavity after primary EVT.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small trial EVT has been shown to be a safe and feasible therapy option for perforations of the upper gastrointestinal tract. If necessary, EVT can be combined with operative revision for better control of the local septic focus or used as a bridging procedure for wound conditioning before aggressive surgical treatment.

Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is a life-threatening complication. No comparative outcome analyses for the different treatment regimens are yet available.

METHODS

In a single-center study, data from all esophagectomy patients from January 1995 to January 2012, including tumor characteristics, surgical procedure, postoperative anastomotic leakage, leakage therapy regimens, APACHE II scores, and mortality, were collected, and predictors of patient survival after anastomotic leakage were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 366 resected patients, 62 patients (16 %) developed an anastomotic leak, 16 (26 %) of whom died. Therapy regimens included surgical revision (n = 18), endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy (n = 17), endoscopic stent application (n = 12), and conservative management (n = 15). APACHE II score at the initiation of treatment for leakage was the strongest predictor of in-hospital mortality (p < 0.0017). Conservatively managed patients showed mild systemic illness (mean APACHE II score 5) and no mortality. In systemically ill patients matched for APACHE II scores (mean, 14.4), endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy patients had lower mortality (12 %) compared to surgically treated (50 %, p = 0.01) cases and patients managed by stent placement (83 %, p = 00014, log rank test). No other clinical or laboratory parameters significantly influenced patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy was the best treatment of anastomotic leakage in systemically ill patients after esophagectomy in this retrospective analysis. It should therefore be considered an important instrument in the management of this disorder.