[Quality indicators of diagnosis and therapy in MRI-based neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer - interim analysis of a Prospective Multicentre Observational Study (OCUM)]

Association of certification, improved quality and better oncological outcomes for rectal cancer in a specialized colorectal unit

PURPOSE

Centralization of cancer care is expected to yield superior results. In Germany, the national strategy is based on a voluntary certification process. The effect of centre certification is difficult to prove because quality data are rarely available prior to certification. This observational study aims to assess outcomes for rectal cancer patients before and after implementation of a certified cancer centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients treated for rectal cancer in our certified centre from 2009 to 2017 were retrieved from a prospective database. The dataset was analyzed according to a predefined set of 19 quality indicators comprising 36 quality goals. The results were compared to an identical cohort of patients, treated from 2000 to 2008 just before centre implementation.

RESULTS

In total, 1059 patients were included, 481 in the 2009-2017 interval and 578 in the 2000-2008 interval. From 2009 to 2017, 25 of 36 quality goals were achieved (vs. 19/36). The proportion of anastomotic leaks in low anastomoses was improved (13.5% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.018), as was the local 5-year recurrence rate for stage (y)pIII rectal cancers (7.7% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.085), and quality of mesorectal excision (0.3% incomplete resections vs. 5.5%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, a decrease of abdominoperineal excisions was noted (47.1% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.037). For the 2009-2017 interval, local 5-year recurrence rate in stages (y)p0-III was 4.6% and 5-year overall survival was 80.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Certification as specialized centre and regular audits were associated with an improvement of various quality parameters. The formal certification process has the potential to enhance quality of care for rectal cancer patients.

[Spincter preservation after selective chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer. Interim results of the OCUM study]

BACKGROUND

In a prospective multicenter observational study (OCUM) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nRCT) was selectively administered depending on the risk of local recurrence and based on the distance between tumor and mesorectal fascia in pretherapeutic high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

OBJECTIVE

Frequency and quality of abdominoperineal excision (APE) and sphincter preserving operations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 642 patients treated in 13 hospitals 389 received surgery alone and 253 nRCT followed by surgery. By univariate and multivariate analysis risk factors for APE were determined. Quality parameters were the quality grade of mesorectal excision, the pathohistological involvement of the circumferential resection margin and intraoperative local dissemination of tumor cells.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In 12.8 % of the patients APE was performed. Independent risk factors for APE were tumor location in the lower third of the rectum and the individual hospitals, where APE varied between 0 and 32 %. This variation was chiefly caused by the different case mix. Hospitals with a high APE rate (> 30 %) treated significantly more patients with very low lying carcinomas (< 3 cm above the anal verge) and more advanced tumors. The median height of the tumor in cases of APE was nearly equal in all participating hospitals. Independent on the number of cases the quality of rectal surgery was high. Within the patient groups of primary surgery and nRCT the oncological quality parameter did not significantly differ between sphincter preservation and APE. As far as sphincter preservation is concerned the results justify a selective application of nRCT in patients with rectal carcinoma. The long-term results still have to be awaited.

[Role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer : Is MRI-based selection a future model?]

Following the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) in the curative treatment of rectal cancer, the role of neoadjuvant therapy has evolved. By improving the surgical technique the local recurrence rate could be reduced by TME surgery alone to below 8 %. Even if local control was further improved by additional preoperative irradiation this did not lead to a general survival benefit. Guidelines advocate that all patients in UICC stage II and III should be pretreated; however, the stage-based indications for neoadjuvant therapy have limitations. This is mainly attributable to the facts that patients with T3 tumors comprise a very heterogeneous prognostic group and preoperative lymph node diagnostics lack accuracy. In contrast, in recent years the circumferential resection margin (CRM) has become an important prognostic parameter. Patients with tumors that are very close to or infiltrate the pelvic fascia (positive CRM) have a higher rate of local recurrence and poorer survival. With high-resolution pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in patients with rectal cancer, the preoperative CRM can be determined with a high sensitivity and specificity. Improved T staging and better prediction of the resection margins by pelvic MRI potentially facilitate the selection of patients for study-based treatment strategies omitting neoadjuvant radiotherapy.

Adenocarcinomas of the upper third of the rectum and the rectosigmoid junction seem to have similar prognosis as colon cancers even without radiotherapy, SAKK 40/87

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognosis of adenocarcinomas of the upper third of the rectum and the rectosigmoid-junction without radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients from a multicenter randomized controlled trial from 1987-1993 on adjuvant chemotherapy for R0-resected colorectal cancers with stage I-III disease were retrospectively allocated: cancers of the lower two-thirds of the rectum (11 cm or less from anal-verge, Group A, n = 205), of the upper-third of the rectum and rectosigmoid-junction (>11-20 cm from anal-verge, Group B, n = 142), and of the colon (>20 cm from anal-verge, Group C, n = 378). The total mesorectal excision (TME) technique had not been introduced yet. The adjuvant chemotherapy turned out to be ineffective. None of the patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The patients had a regular follow-up (median, 8.0 years). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 0.54 (95%CI, 0.47-0.60) in Group A, 0.68 (95%CI, 0.60-0.75) in Group B, and 0.69 (95%CI, 0.64-0.74) in Group C. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 0.64 (95%CI, 0.57-0.71) in Group A, 0.79 (95%CI, 0.71-0.85) in Group B, and 0.77 (95%CI, 0.73-0.81) in Group C. Compared with Group C, patients in Group A had a significantly worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] for death 2.10) and a worse DFS (HR for relapse/death 1.93), while patients in Group B had a similar OS (HR 1.12) and DFS (HR 1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Adenocarcinomas of the upper third of the rectum and the rectosigmoid-junction seem to have similar prognosis as colon cancers. Even for surgeons not familiar with the TME technique, preoperative radiotherapy may be avoided for most rectosigmoid cancers above 11 cm from anal-verge.

[Individualization of guidelines. Approach for rectal cancer in UICC stages II and III]

BACKGROUND

The German guidelines for the therapy of rectal carcinoma in Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stages II and III raise questions of overtherapy. This is why we have individualized the therapy in suitable isolated cases (localization in the upper third of the rectum and wider safety margins in cases of small T3).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All 131 patients with rectal cancer stages II and III, who were operated on within a time period of 4 years were retrospectively included in the study. In 30 favorable cases no radiotherapy was given and in 15 of these no chemotherapy. After an average of 57 months follow-up the course of the disease could be clarified in 95 % of the patients.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate in the whole group was 81.5 % with a local recurrence rate of 8 %. Of the patients with no additional therapy (or only adjuvant chemotherapy), 30 had a 5-year survival rate of 100 % (86.7 %) and a local recurrence rate of 6.7 % (6.7 %).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study it could be shown that an individualization of guidelines in special cases does not lead to a higher mortality rate or to a higher rate of local recurrence. The study highlights that chemotherapy and radiotherapy with all the negative consequences could be avoided for several patients.