Shaping the System - The DRG Evaluation Project of the German Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG)

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: how does training for surgeons in a standardized operation affect hospitals and patients?

PURPOSE

Surgical training usually means inexperienced physicians initially doing operations supervised by an experienced physician, to gain the experience and skills needed to conduct surgery independently. Various issues arise here for both hospitals and patients. Are training procedures associated with higher complication rates, blood losses, and transfusion rates? What does training in the operating room ultimately cost in terms of valuable surgical time? Do longer hospitalization periods potentially mean financial losses for the hospital under the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system?

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was carried out of data for 571 patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in the Department of Gynecology at the University of Erlangen from 2009 to 2012, with/without adnexectomy, due to benign indication; and of data for 255 patients who underwent the same procedures in Karlsruhe Municipal Hospital in 2013-2014. The patients were classified into two groups: those in whom surgery was carried out by experienced specialists who had carried out at least 40 independent operations; and those in whom it was carried out by a trainee resident who had personally done fewer than 40 operations.

RESULTS

In the two groups, the patients had similar mean body mass indexes, uterus weights, and blood losses. Patients in the specialist group were slightly older. There were no differences in complication rates. Over two-thirds of complications occurred in patients with previous surgery. Procedures by residents took significantly longer. Hospitalization periods in both groups were still below the mean threshold length of stay under Germany's DRG system, so that no income losses occurred even with training procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Training and teaching operations supervised by experienced surgeons are just as safe as operations by experienced surgeons themselves. Interpretation of these data is of course limited by the retrospective study design; patients treated by specialists tended to have more prior operations and were older, with a trend toward larger uteri. Surgical training, as the example of TLH in benign indication shows here, involves an additional time of approximately 10-20 min per operation. With regard to the revenue situation, the hospitalization periods in both groups were within the profit zone for the hospital concerned.

Peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischaemia: still poor outcomes and lack of guideline adherence

AIMS

Only few and historic studies reported a bad prognosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and critical limb ischaemia (CLI). The contemporary state of treatment and outcomes should be assessed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From the largest public health insurance in Germany, all in- and outpatient diagnosis and procedural data were retrospectively obtained from a cohort of 41 882 patients hospitalized due to PAD during 2009-2011, including a follow-up until 2013. Patients were classified in Rutherford categories 1-3 (n = 21 197), 4 (n = 5353), 5 (n = 6916), and 6 (n = 8416). The proportions of patients with classical risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and smoking declined with higher Rutherford categories (each P < 0.001) while diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and chronic heart failure increased (each P < 0.001). Angiographies and revascularizations were performed less often in advanced PAD (each P < 0.001). In-hospital amputations increased continuously from 0.5% in Rutherford 1-3 to 42% in Rutherford 6, as also myocardial infarctions, strokes, and deaths (each P < 0.001). Among 4298 amputated patients with CLI, 37% had not received any angiography or revascularization neither during index hospitalization nor the 24 months before. During follow-up (mean 1144 days), 7825 patients were amputated and 10 880 died. Kaplan-Meier models projected 4-year mortality risks of 18.9, 37.7, 52.2, and 63.5% in Rutherford 1-3, 4, 5, and 6, and for amputation of 4.6, 12.1, 35.3, and 67.3%, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression models, PAD categories were significant predictors of death, amputation, myocardial infarction, and stroke (each P < 0.001). Length of in-hospital stay (5.8 ± 6.7 days, 10.7 ± 11.1days, 15.2 ± 13.8 days and 22.1 ± 20.3 days; P < 0.001) and mean case costs (3662 ± 3186 €, 5316 ± 6139 €, 6021 ± 4892 €, and 8461 ± 8515 €; P < 0.001) increased continuously in Rutherford 1-3, 4, 5, and 6. While only 49% of the patients suffered from CLI, these produced 65% of in-hospital costs (141 million €), and 56% during follow-up (336 million €).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of recent advances in PAD treatment, current outcomes remain poor especially in CLI. Despite overwhelming evidence for reduction of limb loss by revascularization, CLI patients still received significantly less angiographies and revascularizations.

Gynaecology - Quo vadis? Situation Analysis, National and International Perspectives

In a large and heavily networked specialty like gynaecology it is a particular challenge with regard to future status to achieve excellent patient care, research and teaching. At the same time not only hospitals but also research facilities are experiencing increasing pressure from performance and competition sides in terms of survival and further development on the clinical, scientific and economic fronts. The numerous changes, including paradigm shifts, in medicine, society, the health-care system and scientific innovations present new challenges to the specialty. This leads to questions about priority, problem areas and weaknesses as well as to new opportunities for the field and the overall question if it will be possible to meet the paradigm shifts and problems by the creation of new structures. In the light of the need for and the potential of design measures, this article presents a SWOT analysis of the specialty's situation as a whole and in particular for gynaecology in German universities. One sees additional demands that add up to an expansion of the tasks. At the same time the shortage of new recruits becomes apparent. A broadening of the perspectives on women's health and individualised medicine come into focus. Partial solutions include new supporting structures, capacity measurements as well as even structural options. In particular, the department structure, that is common abroad, opens an opportunity for specialisation while maintaining unity for a broader further training and strengthened research. Chances and strengths of the specialty are especially effective in coordinated and concerted activities.