1
|
Heyder R; NUM Coordination Office, NUKLEUS Study Group, NUM-RDP Coordination, RACOON Coordination, AKTIN Coordination, GenSurv Study Group. [The German Network of University Medicine: technical and organizational approaches for research data platforms]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2023; 66:114-25. [PMID: 36688978 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-022-03649-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The Network University Medicine (NUM) consists of 36 university clinics in Germany. It was set up to coordinate COVID-19 university medicine research activities on a national level. This required, among other things, common infrastructures for the collection, storage, and use of medical research data. These infrastructures were not available in the required form when the NUM started in April 2020. Medical research data are extremely heterogeneous and reach far beyond "real world data" from patient care. There was no "one size fits all" solution, so NUM built five infrastructures for different types of data, different ways of obtaining data, and different data origination settings. To prevent the creation of new data silos, all five infrastructures operate based on FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable). In addition, NUM is implementing an overarching governance framework to manage the evolution of these five infrastructures. The article describes the current state of development and possible perspectives with a strong focus on technical and organizational aspects.
Collapse
|
2
|
Gruendner J, Deppenwiese N, Folz M, Köhler T, Kroll B, Prokosch HU, Rosenau L, Rühle M, Scheidl MA, Schüttler C, Sedlmayr B, Twrdik A, Kiel A, Majeed RW. Architecture for a feasibility query portal for distributed COVID-19 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) patient data repositories: Design and Implementation Study (Preprint). JMIR Med Inform 2022; 10:e36709. [PMID: 35486893 PMCID: PMC9135115 DOI: 10.2196/36709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An essential step in any medical research project after identifying the research question is to determine if there are sufficient patients available for a study and where to find them. Pursuing digital feasibility queries on available patient data registries has proven to be an excellent way of reusing existing real-world data sources. To support multicentric research, these feasibility queries should be designed and implemented to run across multiple sites and securely access local data. Working across hospitals usually involves working with different data formats and vocabularies. Recently, the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard was developed by Health Level Seven to address this concern and describe patient data in a standardized format. The Medical Informatics Initiative in Germany has committed to this standard and created data integration centers, which convert existing data into the FHIR format at each hospital. This partially solves the interoperability problem; however, a distributed feasibility query platform for the FHIR standard is still missing. Objective This study described the design and implementation of the components involved in creating a cross-hospital feasibility query platform for researchers based on FHIR resources. This effort was part of a large COVID-19 data exchange platform and was designed to be scalable for a broad range of patient data. Methods We analyzed and designed the abstract components necessary for a distributed feasibility query. This included a user interface for creating the query, backend with an ontology and terminology service, middleware for query distribution, and FHIR feasibility query execution service. Results We implemented the components described in the Methods section. The resulting solution was distributed to 33 German university hospitals. The functionality of the comprehensive network infrastructure was demonstrated using a test data set based on the German Corona Consensus Data Set. A performance test using specifically created synthetic data revealed the applicability of our solution to data sets containing millions of FHIR resources. The solution can be easily deployed across hospitals and supports feasibility queries, combining multiple inclusion and exclusion criteria using standard Health Level Seven query languages such as Clinical Quality Language and FHIR Search. Developing a platform based on multiple microservices allowed us to create an extendable platform and support multiple Health Level Seven query languages and middleware components to allow integration with future directions of the Medical Informatics Initiative. Conclusions We designed and implemented a feasibility platform for distributed feasibility queries, which works directly on FHIR-formatted data and distributed it across 33 university hospitals in Germany. We showed that developing a feasibility platform directly on the FHIR standard is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Gruendner
- Chair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Noemi Deppenwiese
- Center of Medical Information and Communication Technology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Folz
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thomas Köhler
- Federated Information Systems, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Björn Kroll
- IT Center for Clinical Research, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hans-Ulrich Prokosch
- Chair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lorenz Rosenau
- IT Center for Clinical Research, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Mathias Rühle
- Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marc-Anton Scheidl
- Chair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christina Schüttler
- Chair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Brita Sedlmayr
- Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Twrdik
- Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander Kiel
- Federated Information Systems, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Raphael W Majeed
- Institute for Medical Informatics, University Clinic Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, German Centre For Lung Research, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|