Effectiveness of fetal fibronectin testing compared with digital cervical assessment of women with preterm contractions

Is cervical length evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography helpful in detecting true preterm labor?

Objective: To investigate whether sonographic cervical markers can identify women in true preterm labor and predict delivery within 7 d and before 34 or 37 gestational weeks.Methods: This was a prospective observational study of women with singleton pregnancies and intact membranes given a diagnosis of preterm labor between 25 and 34 weeks and 6 d of gestation and who underwent transvaginal evaluation of the following characteristics: cervical length (CL), CL zeta score, absence of endocervical glandular echo, presence of cervical funneling, and presence of amniotic fluid sludge. The outcomes of interest were spontaneous delivery within 7 d of preterm labor and spontaneous delivery before 34 or 37 gestational weeks.Results: The inclusion criteria were met by 126 women, 31 (25%) of whom were excluded and 95 were analyzed. The median gestational age at admission was 31.9 weeks. The median CL at preterm labor was 22.3 mm (range: 0-42.8 mm). The delivery occurred within 7 d of presentation in 13 (13.7%) cases. Delivery before 34 weeks occurred in 16 (16.8%) cases and before 37 weeks in 40 (42.1%) cases. Logistic regression analysis showed CL in millimeters was an independent predictor of delivery within 7 d (OR 0.918, 95% CI 0.862-0.978, p = .008). For birth before 34 weeks, the predictor was gestational age at admission (OR 0.683, 95% CI 0.539-0.866, p = .002) and before 37 weeks, the presence of cervical funneling (OR 3.778, 95% CI 1.460-9.773, p = .006). The CL ≤ 15 mm had sensitivity and specificity values of 77 and 77%, respectively, and good accuracy (88%) for prediction of delivery within 7 d.Conclusion: The evaluation of the cervix by transvaginal ultrasound in women in preterm labor predicted delivery within 7 d and helped distinguish between true and false labor. The analysis of CL zeta score was not an independent factor to predict delivery in 7 d.

The fetal fibronectin test: 25 years after its development, what is the evidence regarding its clinical utility? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The identification of women at risk for preterm birth should allow interventions which could improve neonatal outcome. Fetal fibronectin, a glycoprotein which acts normally as glue between decidua and amniotic membranes could be a good marker of impending labour when its concentration in cervicovaginal secretions between 22 and 36 weeks of gestation is ≥50 ng/mL. Many authors worldwide have tested this marker with many different methodologies and clinical settings, but conclusions about its clinical use are mixed. It is time for a comprehensive update through a systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, supplemented by manual search of bibliographies of known primary and review articles, international conference papers, and contact with experts from 1-1990 to 2-2018. We have selected all type of studies involving fetal fibronectin test accuracy for preterm delivery. Two authors independently extracted data about study characteristics and quality from identified publications. Contingency tables were constructed. Reference standards were preterm delivery before 37, 36, 35, 34, and 32 weeks, within 28, 21, 14, or 7 d and within 48 h. Data were pooled to produce summary likelihood ratios for positive and negative tests results.Results: One hundred and ninety-three primary studies were identified allowing analysis of 53 subgroups. In all settings, none of the summary likelihood ratios were >10 or <0.1, thus indicating moderate prediction, particularly in asymptomatic women and in multiple gestations.Conclusions: The fetal fibronectin test should not be used as a screening test for asymptomatic women. For high-risk asymptomatic women, and especially for women with multiple pregnancies, the performance of the fetal fibronectin test was also too low to be clinically relevant. Consensual use as a diagnostic tool for women with suspected preterm labor, the best use policy probably still depends on local contingencies, future cost-effectiveness analysis, and comparison with other more recent available biochemical markers.

The role of cervical length in women with threatened preterm labor: is it a valid predictor at any gestational age?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the predictive accuracy of sonographic cervical length (CL) for preterm delivery (PTD) in women with threatened preterm labor (PTL) is related to gestational age (GA) at presentation.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton pregnancies who presented with PTL at less than 34 + 0 weeks and underwent sonographic measurement of CL in a tertiary medical center between 2007 and 2012. The predictive accuracy of CL for PTD was stratified by GA at presentation.

RESULTS

Overall, 1077 women who presented with PTL have had sonographic measurement of CL and met the study inclusion criteria. Of those, 223 (20.7%) presented at 24 + 0-26 + 6 weeks (group 1), 274 (25.4%) at 27 + 0-29 + 6 weeks (group 2), 283 (26.3%) at 30 + 0-31 + 6 weeks (group 3), and 297 (27.6%) at 32 + 0-33 + 6 weeks (group 4). The overall performance CL as a predictive test for PTD was similar in the 4 GA groups, as reflected by the similar degree of correlation between CL with the examination to delivery interval (r = 0.27, r = 0.26, r = 0.28, and r = 0.29, respectively, P = .8), the similar area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (0.641-0.690, 0.631-0.698, 0.643-0.654, and 0.678-0.698, respectively, P = .7), and a similar decrease in the risk of PTD of 5-10% for each additional millimeter of CL. The optimal cutoff of CL, however, was affected by GA at presentation, so that a higher cutoff of CL was needed to achieve a target negative predictive value for delivery within 14 days from presentation for women who presented later in pregnancy. The optimal thresholds to maximize the negative predictive value for delivery within 14 days were 36 mm, 32.5 mm, 24 mm and 20.5 mm for women who presented at 32 + 0 to 33 + 6 weeks, 30 + 0 to 31 + 6 weeks, 27 + 0 to 29 + 6 weeks and 24 + 0 to 26 + 6, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CL has modest predictive accuracy in women with threatened PTL, regardless of GA at presentation. However, the optimal cutoff of CL for the purpose of clinical decision making in women with PTL needs to be adjusted based on GA at presentation.

The short-term prediction of preterm birth: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fetal fibronectin (fFN), fetal breathing movements (FBM), and cervical length (CL) for the short-term prediction of preterm birth in symptomatic patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic metaanalysis using bivariate methods.

RESULTS

Pooled sensitivities for fFN, FBM, and CL for delivery within 48 hours of testing were 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.78), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.57-0.87) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.54-0.90), respectively. Pooled specificities for fFN, FBM, and CL for delivery within 48 hours were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.86), 0.93 (95% CI, 0.75-0.98) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.91). Pooled sensitivities for fFN, FBM, and CL for delivery within 7 days were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69-0.80), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.43-0.84), and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.58-0.85). Pooled specificities for fFN, FBM, and CL for delivery within 7 days were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), 0.98 (95% CI, 0.83-1.00) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.92). Based on a pretest probability of 10% for delivery within 48 hours, posttest probabilities (positive and negative) were 27% and 5% for fFN, 54% and 3% for fFN, and 42% and 3% for CL. For a pretest probability of 20% for delivery within 7 days, posttest probabilities (positive and negative) were 48% and 7% for fFN, 89% and 8% for FBM, and 63% and 7% for CL.

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic patients, for fFN, absence of FBM, and CL have diagnostic use as predictors of delivery within 48 hours and within 7 days of testing. Absence of FBM appears to be the best test for predicting preterm birth.

Biochemical markers for the prediction of preterm delivery

Preterm delivery is the largest contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality throughout the world. In the United States, nearly 1 in every 8 infants is born prematurely. Although a portion of these births are indicated preterm deliveries, the frequency of spontaneous preterm birth has remained largely constant over the past 50 years.