TORC1-dependent sumoylation of Rpc82 promotes RNA polymerase III assembly and activity

Translation initiation factor eIF1A rescues hygromycin B sensitivity caused by deleting the carboxy-terminal tail in the GPN-loop GTPase Npa3

The essential yeast protein GPN-loop GTPase 1 (Npa3) plays a critical role in RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) assembly and subsequent nuclear import. We previously identified a synthetic lethal interaction between a mutant lacking the carboxy-terminal 106-amino acid tail of Npa3 (npa3ΔC) and a bud27Δ mutant. As the prefoldin-like Bud27 protein participates in ribosome biogenesis and translation, we hypothesized that Npa3 may also regulate these biological processes. We investigated this proposal by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains episomally expressing either wild-type Npa3 or hypomorphic mutants (Npa3ΔC, Npa3K16R, and Npa3G70A). The Npa3ΔC mutant fully supports RNAPII nuclear localization and activity. However, the Npa3K16R and Npa3G70A mutants only partially mediate RNAPII nuclear targeting and exhibit a higher reduction in Npa3 function. Cell proliferation in these strains displayed an increased sensitivity to protein synthesis inhibitors hygromycin B and geneticin/G418 (npa3G70A > npa3K16R > npa3ΔC > NPA3 cells) but not to transcriptional elongation inhibitors 6-azauracil, mycophenolic acid or 1,10-phenanthroline. In all three mutant strains, the increase in sensitivity to both aminoglycoside antibiotics was totally rescued by expressing NPA3. Protein synthesis, visualized by quantifying puromycin incorporation into nascent-polypeptide chains, was markedly more sensitive to hygromycin B inhibition in npa3ΔC, npa3K16R, and npa3G70A than NPA3 cells. Notably, high-copy expression of the TIF11 gene, that encodes the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A (eIF1A) protein, completely suppressed both phenotypes (of reduced basal cell growth and increased sensitivity to hygromycin B) in npa3ΔC cells but not npa3K16R or npa3G70A cells. We conclude that Npa3 plays a critical RNAPII-independent and previously unrecognized role in translation initiation.

DeSUMOylation of chromatin-bound proteins limits the rapid transcriptional reprogramming induced by daunorubicin in acute myeloid leukemias

Genotoxicants have been used for decades as front-line therapies against cancer on the basis of their DNA-damaging actions. However, some of their non-DNA-damaging effects are also instrumental for killing dividing cells. We report here that the anthracycline Daunorubicin (DNR), one of the main drugs used to treat Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), induces rapid (3 h) and broad transcriptional changes in AML cells. The regulated genes are particularly enriched in genes controlling cell proliferation and death, as well as inflammation and immunity. These transcriptional changes are preceded by DNR-dependent deSUMOylation of chromatin proteins, in particular at active promoters and enhancers. Surprisingly, inhibition of SUMOylation with ML-792 (SUMO E1 inhibitor), dampens DNR-induced transcriptional reprogramming. Quantitative proteomics shows that the proteins deSUMOylated in response to DNR are mostly transcription factors, transcriptional co-regulators and chromatin organizers. Among them, the CCCTC-binding factor CTCF is highly enriched at SUMO-binding sites found in cis-regulatory regions. This is notably the case at the promoter of the DNR-induced NFKB2 gene. DNR leads to a reconfiguration of chromatin loops engaging CTCF- and SUMO-bound NFKB2 promoter with a distal cis-regulatory region and inhibition of SUMOylation with ML-792 prevents these changes.

Mitotic chromosome condensation resets chromatin to safeguard transcriptional homeostasis during interphase

Mitotic entry correlates with the condensation of the chromosomes, changes in histone modifications, exclusion of transcription factors from DNA, and the broad downregulation of transcription. However, whether mitotic condensation influences transcription in the subsequent interphase is unknown. Here, we show that preventing one chromosome to condense during mitosis causes it to fail resetting of transcription. Rather, in the following interphase, the affected chromosome contains unusually high levels of the transcription machinery, resulting in abnormally high expression levels of genes in cis, including various transcription factors. This subsequently causes the activation of inducible transcriptional programs in trans, such as the GAL genes, even in the absence of the relevant stimuli. Thus, mitotic chromosome condensation exerts stringent control on interphase gene expression to ensure the maintenance of basic cellular functions and cell identity across cell divisions. Together, our study identifies the maintenance of transcriptional homeostasis during interphase as an unexpected function of mitosis and mitotic chromosome condensation.

Integration of probabilistic functional networks without an external Gold Standard

BACKGROUND

Probabilistic functional integrated networks (PFINs) are designed to aid our understanding of cellular biology and can be used to generate testable hypotheses about protein function. PFINs are generally created by scoring the quality of interaction datasets against a Gold Standard dataset, usually chosen from a separate high-quality data source, prior to their integration. Use of an external Gold Standard has several drawbacks, including data redundancy, data loss and the need for identifier mapping, which can complicate the network build and impact on PFIN performance. Additionally, there typically are no Gold Standard data for non-model organisms.

RESULTS

We describe the development of an integration technique, ssNet, that scores and integrates both high-throughput and low-throughout data from a single source database in a consistent manner without the need for an external Gold Standard dataset. Using data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae we show that ssNet is easier and faster, overcoming the challenges of data redundancy, Gold Standard bias and ID mapping. In addition ssNet results in less loss of data and produces a more complete network.

CONCLUSIONS

The ssNet method allows PFINs to be built successfully from a single database, while producing comparable network performance to networks scored using an external Gold Standard source and with reduced data loss.

Microarray screening reveals two non-conventional SUMO-binding modules linked to DNA repair by non-homologous end-joining

SUMOylation is critical for numerous cellular signalling pathways, including the maintenance of genome integrity via the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). If misrepaired, DSBs can lead to cancer, neurodegeneration, immunodeficiency and premature ageing. Using systematic human proteome microarray screening combined with widely applicable carbene footprinting, genetic code expansion and high-resolution structural profiling, we define two non-conventional and topology-selective SUMO2-binding regions on XRCC4, a DNA repair protein important for DSB repair by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Mechanistically, the interaction of SUMO2 and XRCC4 is incompatible with XRCC4 binding to three other proteins important for NHEJ-mediated DSB repair. These findings are consistent with SUMO2 forming a redundant NHEJ layer with the potential to regulate different NHEJ complexes at distinct levels including, but not limited to, XRCC4 interactions with XLF, LIG4 and IFFO1. Regulation of NHEJ is not only relevant for carcinogenesis, but also for the design of precision anti-cancer medicines and the optimisation of CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing. In addition to providing molecular insights into NHEJ, this work uncovers a conserved SUMO-binding module and provides a rich resource on direct SUMO binders exploitable towards uncovering SUMOylation pathways in a wide array of cellular processes.

Early Growth Response 1 Strengthens Pol-III-Directed Transcription and Transformed Cell Proliferation by Controlling PTEN/AKT Signalling Activity

RNA polymerase III (Pol III) products play essential roles in ribosome assembly, protein synthesis, and cell survival. Deregulation of Pol-III-directed transcription is closely associated with tumorigenesis. However, the regulatory pathways or factors controlling Pol-III-directed transcription remain to be investigated. In this study, we identified a novel role of EGR1 in Pol-III-directed transcription. We found that Filamin A (FLNA) silencing stimulated EGR1 expression at both RNA and protein levels. EGR1 expression positively correlated with Pol III product levels and cell proliferation activity. Mechanistically, EGR1 downregulation dampened the occupancies of Pol III transcription machinery factors at the loci of Pol III target genes. Alteration of EGR1 expression did not affect the expression of p53, c-MYC, and Pol III general transcription factors. Instead, EGR1 activated RhoA expression and inhibited PTEN expression in several transformed cell lines. We found that PTEN silencing, rather than RhoA overexpression, could reverse the inhibition of Pol-III-dependent transcription and cell proliferation caused by EGR1 downregulation. EGR1 could positively regulate AKT phosphorylation levels and is required for the inhibition of Pol-III-directed transcription mediated by FLNA. The findings from this study indicate that EGR1 can promote Pol-III-directed transcription and cell proliferation by controlling the PTEN/AKT signalling pathway.

Cell Cycle-Dependent Transcription: The Cyclin Dependent Kinase Cdk1 Is a Direct Regulator of Basal Transcription Machineries

The cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1 is best known for its function as master regulator of the cell cycle. It phosphorylates several key proteins to control progression through the different phases of the cell cycle. However, studies conducted several decades ago with mammalian cells revealed that Cdk1 also directly regulates the basal transcription machinery, most notably RNA polymerase II. More recent studies in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have revisited this function of Cdk1 and also revealed that Cdk1 directly controls RNA polymerase III activity. These studies have also provided novel insight into the physiological relevance of this process. For instance, cell cycle-stage-dependent activity of these complexes may be important for meeting the increased demand for various proteins involved in housekeeping, metabolism, and protein synthesis. Recent work also indicates that direct regulation of the RNA polymerase II machinery promotes cell cycle entry. Here, we provide an overview of the regulation of basal transcription by Cdk1, and we hypothesize that the original function of the primordial cell-cycle CDK was to regulate RNAPII and that it later evolved into specialized kinases that govern various aspects of the transcription machinery and the cell cycle.

OUP accepted manuscript

Tight control of gene expression networks required for adipose tissue formation and plasticity is essential for adaptation to energy needs and environmental cues. However, the mechanisms that orchestrate the global and dramatic transcriptional changes leading to adipocyte differentiation remain to be fully unraveled. We investigated the regulation of nascent transcription by the sumoylation pathway during adipocyte differentiation using SLAMseq and ChIPseq. We discovered that the sumoylation pathway has a dual function in differentiation; it supports the initial downregulation of pre-adipocyte-specific genes, while it promotes the establishment of the mature adipocyte transcriptional program. By characterizing endogenous sumoylome dynamics in differentiating adipocytes by mass spectrometry, we found that sumoylation of specific transcription factors like PPARγ/RXR and their co-factors are associated with the transcription of adipogenic genes. Finally, using RXR as a model, we found that sumoylation may regulate adipogenic transcription by supporting the chromatin occurrence of transcription factors. Our data demonstrate that the sumoylation pathway supports the rewiring of transcriptional networks required for formation of functional adipocytes. This study also provides the scientists in the field of cellular differentiation and development with an in-depth resource of the dynamics of the SUMO-chromatin landscape, SUMO-regulated transcription and endogenous sumoylation sites during adipocyte differentiation.

Kel1 is a phosphorylation-regulated noise suppressor of the pheromone signaling pathway

Mechanisms have evolved that allow cells to detect signals and generate an appropriate response. The accuracy of these responses relies on the ability of cells to discriminate between signal and noise. How cells filter noise in signaling pathways is not well understood. Here, we analyze noise suppression in the yeast pheromone signaling pathway and show that the poorly characterized protein Kel1 serves as a major noise suppressor and prevents cell death. At the molecular level, Kel1 prevents spontaneous activation of the pheromone response by inhibiting membrane recruitment of Ste5 and Far1. Only a hypophosphorylated form of Kel1 suppresses signaling, reduces noise, and prevents pheromone-associated cell death, and our data indicate that the MAPK Fus3 contributes to Kel1 phosphorylation. Taken together, Kel1 serves as a phospho-regulated suppressor of the pheromone pathway to reduce noise, inhibit spontaneous activation of the pathway, regulate mating efficiency, and prevent pheromone-associated cell death.

Knockdown NRPC2, 3, 8, NRPABC1 and NRPABC2 Affects RNAPIII Activity and Disrupts Seed Development in Arabidopsis

RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII) contains 17 subunits forming 4 functional domains that control the different stages of RNAPIII transcription and are dedicated to the synthesis of small RNAs such as 5S rRNA and tRNAs. Here, we identified 23 genes encoding these subunits in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and further analyzed 5 subunits (NRPC2, NRPC3, NRPC8, NRPABC1, and NRPABC2) encoded by 6 genes with different expression patterns and belonging to different sub-complexes. The knockdown of these genes repressed the expression of 5S rRNA and tRNAs, causing seed developmental arrest at different stages. Among these knockdown mutants, RNA-seq analysis revealed 821 common differentially expressed genes (DEGs), significantly enriched in response to stress, abscisic acid, cytokinins, and the jasmonic acid signaling pathway. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) revealed several hub genes involved in embryo development, carbohydrate metabolic and lipid metabolic processes. We identified numerous unique DEGs between the mutants belonging to pathways, including cell proliferation, ribosome biogenesis, cell death, and tRNA metabolic processes. Thus, NRPC2, NRPC3, NRPC8, NRPABC1, and NRPABC2 control seed development in Arabidopsis by influencing RNAPIII activity and, thus, hormone signaling. Reduced expression of these subunit genes causes an insufficient accumulation of the total RNAPIII, leading to the phenotypes observed following the genetic knockdown of these subunits.

Dynamic sumoylation of promoter-bound general transcription factors facilitates transcription by RNA polymerase II

Transcription-related proteins are frequently identified as targets of sumoylation, including multiple subunits of the RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) general transcription factors (GTFs). However, it is not known how sumoylation affects GTFs or whether they are sumoylated when they assemble at promoters to facilitate RNAPII recruitment and transcription initiation. To explore how sumoylation can regulate transcription genome-wide, we performed SUMO ChIP-seq in yeast and found, in agreement with others, that most chromatin-associated sumoylated proteins are detected at genes encoding tRNAs and ribosomal proteins (RPGs). However, we also detected 147 robust SUMO peaks at promoters of non-ribosomal protein-coding genes (non-RPGs), indicating that sumoylation also regulates this gene class. Importantly, SUMO peaks at non-RPGs align specifically with binding sites of GTFs, but not other promoter-associated proteins, indicating that it is GTFs specifically that are sumoylated there. Predominantly, non-RPGs with SUMO peaks are among the most highly transcribed, have high levels of TFIIF, and show reduced RNAPII levels when cellular sumoylation is impaired, linking sumoylation with elevated transcription. However, detection of promoter-associated SUMO by ChIP might be limited to sites with high levels of substrate GTFs, and promoter-associated sumoylation at non-RPGs may actually be far more widespread than we detected. Among GTFs, we found that TFIIF is a major target of sumoylation, specifically at lysines 60/61 of its Tfg1 subunit, and elevating Tfg1 sumoylation resulted in decreased interaction of TFIIF with RNAPII. Interestingly, both reducing promoter-associated sumoylation, in a sumoylation-deficient Tfg1-K60/61R mutant strain, and elevating promoter-associated SUMO levels, by constitutively tethering SUMO to Tfg1, resulted in reduced RNAPII occupancy at non-RPGs. This implies that dynamic GTF sumoylation at non-RPG promoters, not simply the presence or absence of SUMO, is important for maintaining elevated transcription. Together, our findings reveal a novel mechanism of regulating the basal transcription machinery through sumoylation of promoter-bound GTFs.

Six general transcription factors (GTFs) assemble at promoters of protein-coding genes to enable recruitment of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and facilitate transcription initiation, but little is known about how they are regulated once promoter-bound. Here, we demonstrate that, in budding yeast, some components of GTFs are post-translationally modified by the SUMO peptide specifically when they are assembled at promoters. We determined that the large subunit of TFIIF, Tgf1, is the major target of sumoylation among GTFs and that increasing Tfg1 sumoylation reduces the interaction of TFIIF with RNAPII. Consistent with this, we found that increasing levels of SUMO at promoters of some protein-coding genes, by permanently attaching SUMO to Tfg1, resulted in reduced RNAPII levels associated with those genes. On the other hand, reducing promoter-associated sumoylation, by mutating SUMO-modified residues on Tfg1, also reduced RNAPII occupancy levels. Explaining these apparently contradictory findings, we propose that dynamic sumoylation of promoter-bound GTFs, not merely the presence or absence of SUMO, is important for facilitating rearrangements of promoter-bound GTF components that enhance transcription. Together, our data reveal a novel level of regulating the basal transcription machinery through SUMO modification at promoters of protein-coding genes.

Specific Features of RNA Polymerases I and III: Structure and Assembly

RNA polymerase I (RNAPI) and RNAPIII are multi-heterogenic protein complexes that specialize in the transcription of highly abundant non-coding RNAs, such as ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and transfer RNA (tRNA). In terms of subunit number and structure, RNAPI and RNAPIII are more complex than RNAPII that synthesizes thousands of different mRNAs. Specific subunits of the yeast RNAPI and RNAPIII form associated subcomplexes that are related to parts of the RNAPII initiation factors. Prior to their delivery to the nucleus where they function, RNAP complexes are assembled at least partially in the cytoplasm. Yeast RNAPI and RNAPIII share heterodimer Rpc40-Rpc19, a functional equivalent to the αα homodimer which initiates assembly of prokaryotic RNAP. In the process of yeast RNAPI and RNAPIII biogenesis, Rpc40 and Rpc19 form the assembly platform together with two small, bona fide eukaryotic subunits, Rpb10 and Rpb12. We propose that this assembly platform is co-translationally seeded while the Rpb10 subunit is synthesized by cytoplasmic ribosome machinery. The translation of Rpb10 is stimulated by Rbs1 protein, which binds to the 3′-untranslated region of RPB10 mRNA and hypothetically brings together Rpc19 and Rpc40 subunits to form the αα-like heterodimer. We suggest that such a co-translational mechanism is involved in the assembly of RNAPI and RNAPIII complexes.

SUMO and Transcriptional Regulation: The Lessons of Large-Scale Proteomic, Modifomic and Genomic Studies

One major role of the eukaryotic peptidic post-translational modifier SUMO in the cell is transcriptional control. This occurs via modification of virtually all classes of transcriptional actors, which include transcription factors, transcriptional coregulators, diverse chromatin components, as well as Pol I-, Pol II- and Pol III transcriptional machineries and their regulators. For many years, the role of SUMOylation has essentially been studied on individual proteins, or small groups of proteins, principally dealing with Pol II-mediated transcription. This provided only a fragmentary view of how SUMOylation controls transcription. The recent advent of large-scale proteomic, modifomic and genomic studies has however considerably refined our perception of the part played by SUMO in gene expression control. We review here these developments and the new concepts they are at the origin of, together with the limitations of our knowledge. How they illuminate the SUMO-dependent transcriptional mechanisms that have been characterized thus far and how they impact our view of SUMO-dependent chromatin organization are also considered.

Novel Links between TORC1 and Traditional Non-Coding RNA, tRNA

Target of rapamycin (TOR) is a serine/threonine kinase that modulates cell growth and metabolism in response to environmental changes. Transfer RNA (tRNA) is an abundant and ubiquitous small non-coding RNA that is essential in the translation of mRNAs. Beyond its canonical role, it has been revealed that tRNAs have more diverse functions. TOR complex 1 (TORC1), which is one of the two TOR complexes, regulates tRNA synthesis by controlling RNA polymerase III. In addition to tRNA synthesis regulation, recent studies have revealed hidden connections between TORC1 and tRNA, which are both essential players in eukaryotic cellular activities. Here, we review the accumulating findings on the regulatory links between TORC1 and tRNA-particularly those links in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

A SUMO-dependent pathway controls elongating RNA Polymerase II upon UV-induced damage

RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is the workhorse of eukaryotic transcription and produces messenger RNAs and small nuclear RNAs. Stalling of RNAPII caused by transcription obstacles such as DNA damage threatens functional gene expression and is linked to transcription-coupled DNA repair. To restore transcription, persistently stalled RNAPII can be disassembled and removed from chromatin. This process involves several ubiquitin ligases that have been implicated in RNAPII ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation. Transcription by RNAPII is heavily controlled by phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain of its largest subunit Rpb1. Here, we show that the elongating form of Rpb1, marked by S2 phosphorylation, is specifically controlled upon UV-induced DNA damage. Regulation of S2-phosphorylated Rpb1 is mediated by SUMOylation, the SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase Slx5-Slx8, the Cdc48 segregase as well as the proteasome. Our data suggest an RNAPII control pathway with striking parallels to known disassembly mechanisms acting on defective RNA polymerase III.

Post-transcriptional gene regulation regulates germline stem cell to oocyte transition during Drosophila oogenesis

During oogenesis, several developmental processes must be traversed to ensure effective completion of gametogenesis including, stem cell maintenance and asymmetric division, differentiation, mitosis and meiosis, and production of maternally contributed mRNAs, making the germline a salient model for understanding how cell fate transitions are mediated. Due to silencing of the genome during meiotic divisions, there is little instructive transcription, barring a few examples, to mediate these critical transitions. In Drosophila, several layers of post-transcriptional regulation ensure that the mRNAs required for these processes are expressed in a timely manner and as needed during germline differentiation. These layers of regulation include alternative splicing, RNA modification, ribosome production, and translational repression. Many of the molecules and pathways involved in these regulatory activities are conserved from Drosophila to humans making the Drosophila germline an elegant model for studying the role of post-transcriptional regulation during stem cell differentiation and meiosis.

SUMOylation down-regulates rDNA transcription by repressing expression of upstream-binding factor and proto-oncogene c-Myc

Ribosome biogenesis is critical for proliferating cells and requires the coordinated activities of three eukaryotic RNA polymerases. We recently showed that the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) system controls the global level of RNA polymerase II (Pol II)-controlled transcription in mammalian cells by regulating cyclin-dependent kinase 9 activity. Here, we present evidence that the SUMO system also plays a critical role in the control of Pol I transcription. Using an siRNA-based knockdown approach, we found that multiple SUMO E3 ligases of the PIAS (protein inhibitor of activated STAT) family are involved in SUMO-mediated repression of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene transcription. We demonstrate that endogenous SUMO represses rDNA transcription primarily by repressing upstream-binding factor and proto-oncogene c-Myc expression and that ectopic overexpression of SUMO-associated enzymes additionally represses rDNA transcription via c-Myc SUMOylation and its subsequent degradation. The results of our study reveal a critical role of SUMOylation in the control of rDNA transcription, uncover the underlying mechanisms involved, and indicate that the SUMO system coordinates Pol I- and Pol II-mediated transcription in mammalian cells.

Desumoylation of RNA polymerase III lies at the core of the Sumo stress response in yeast

Post-translational modification by small ubiquitin-like modifier (Sumo) regulates many cellular processes, including the adaptive response to various types of stress, referred to as the Sumo stress response (SSR). However, it remains unclear whether the SSR involves a common set of core proteins regardless of the type of stress or whether each particular type of stress induces a stress-specific SSR that targets a unique, largely nonoverlapping set of Sumo substrates. In this study, we used MS and a Gene Ontology approach to identify differentially sumoylated proteins during heat stress, hyperosmotic stress, oxidative stress, nitrogen starvation, and DNA alkylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Our results indicate that each stress triggers a specific SSR signature centered on proteins involved in transcription, translation, and chromatin regulation. Strikingly, whereas the various stress-specific SSRs were largely nonoverlapping, all types of stress tested here resulted in desumoylation of subunits of RNA polymerase III, which correlated with a decrease in tRNA synthesis. We conclude that desumoylation and subsequent inhibition of RNA polymerase III constitutes the core of all stress-specific SSRs in yeast.

The TFIIE-related Rpc82 subunit of RNA polymerase III interacts with the TFIIB-related transcription factor Brf1 and the polymerase cleft for transcription initiation

Rpc82 is a TFIIE-related subunit of the eukaryotic RNA polymerase III (pol III) complex. Rpc82 contains four winged-helix (WH) domains and a C-terminal coiled-coil domain. Structural resolution of the pol III complex indicated that Rpc82 anchors on the clamp domain of the pol III cleft to interact with the duplex DNA downstream of the transcription bubble. However, whether Rpc82 interacts with a transcription factor is still not known. Here, we report that a structurally disordered insertion in the third WH domain of Rpc82 is important for cell growth and in vitro transcription activity. Site-specific photo-crosslinking analysis indicated that the WH3 insertion interacts with the TFIIB-related transcription factor Brf1 within the pre-initiation complex (PIC). Moreover, crosslinking and hydroxyl radical probing analyses revealed Rpc82 interactions with the upstream DNA and the protrusion and wall domains of the pol III cleft. Our genetic and biochemical analyses thus provide new molecular insights into the function of Rpc82 in pol III transcription.

Cdk1 gates cell cycle-dependent tRNA synthesis by regulating RNA polymerase III activity

tRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII). During recent years it has become clear that RNAPIII activity is strictly regulated by the cell in response to environmental cues and the homeostatic status of the cell. However, the molecular mechanisms that control RNAPIII activity to regulate the amplitude of tDNA transcription in normally cycling cells are not well understood. Here, we show that tRNA levels fluctuate during the cell cycle and reveal an underlying molecular mechanism. The cyclin Clb5 recruits the cyclin dependent kinase Cdk1 to tRNA genes to boost tDNA transcription during late S phase. At tDNA genes, Cdk1 promotes the recruitment of TFIIIC, stimulates the interaction between TFIIIB and TFIIIC, and increases the dynamics of RNA polymerase III in vivo. Furthermore, we identified Bdp1 as a putative Cdk1 substrate in this process. Preventing Bdp1 phosphorylation prevented cell cycle-dependent recruitment of TFIIIC and abolished the cell cycle-dependent increase in tDNA transcription. Our findings demonstrate that under optimal growth conditions Cdk1 gates tRNA synthesis in S phase by regulating the RNAPIII machinery, revealing a direct link between the cell cycle and RNAPIII activity.

Repression of yeast RNA polymerase III by stress leads to ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation of its largest subunit, C160

Respiratory growth and various stress conditions repress RNA polymerase III (Pol III) transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we report a degradation of the largest Pol III catalytic subunit, C160 as a consequence of Pol III transcription repression. We observed C160 degradation in response to transfer of yeast from fermentation to respiration conditions, as well as treatment with rapamycin or inhibition of nucleotide biosynthesis. We also detected ubiquitylated forms of C160 and demonstrated that C160 protein degradation is dependent on proteasome activity. A comparable time-course study of Pol III repression upon metabolic shift from fermentation to respiration shows that the transcription inhibition is correlated with Pol III dissociation from chromatin but that the degradation of C160 subunit is a downstream event. Despite blocking degradation of C160 by proteasome, Pol III-transcribed genes are under proper regulation. We postulate that the degradation of C160 is activated under stress conditions to reduce the amount of existing Pol III complex and prevent its de novo assembly.

Centromeres License the Mitotic Condensation of Yeast Chromosome Arms

During mitosis, chromatin condensation shapes chromosomes as separate, rigid, and compact sister chromatids to facilitate their segregation. Here, we show that, unlike wild-type yeast chromosomes, non-chromosomal DNA circles and chromosomes lacking a centromere fail to condense during mitosis. The centromere promotes chromosome condensation strictly in cis through recruiting the kinases Aurora B and Bub1, which trigger the autonomous condensation of the entire chromosome. Shugoshin and the deacetylase Hst2 facilitated spreading the condensation signal to the chromosome arms. Targeting Aurora B to DNA circles or centromere-ablated chromosomes or releasing Shugoshin from PP2A-dependent inhibition bypassed the centromere requirement for condensation and enhanced the mitotic stability of DNA circles. Our data indicate that yeast cells license the chromosome-autonomous condensation of their chromatin in a centromere-dependent manner, excluding from this process non-centromeric DNA and thereby inhibiting their propagation.

Defective RNA polymerase III is negatively regulated by the SUMO-Ubiquitin-Cdc48 pathway

Transcription by RNA polymerase III (Pol III) is an essential cellular process, and mutations in Pol III can cause neurodegenerative disease in humans. However, in contrast to Pol II transcription, which has been extensively studied, the knowledge of how Pol III is regulated is very limited. We report here that in budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pol III is negatively regulated by the Small Ubiquitin-like MOdifier (SUMO), an essential post-translational modification pathway. Besides sumoylation, Pol III is also targeted by ubiquitylation and the Cdc48/p97 segregase; these three processes likely act in a sequential manner and eventually lead to proteasomal degradation of Pol III subunits, thereby repressing Pol III transcription. This study not only uncovered a regulatory mechanism for Pol III, but also suggests that the SUMO and ubiquitin modification pathways and the Cdc48/p97 segregase can be potential therapeutic targets for Pol III-related human diseases.

The yeast Ty1 retrotransposon requires components of the nuclear pore complex for transcription and genomic integration

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) orchestrate cargo between the cytoplasm and nucleus and regulate chromatin organization. NPC proteins, or nucleoporins (Nups), are required for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gene expression and genomic integration of viral DNA. We utilize the Ty1 retrotransposon of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) to study retroviral integration because retrotransposons are the progenitors of retroviruses and have conserved integrase (IN) enzymes. Ty1-IN targets Ty1 elements into the genome upstream of RNA polymerase (Pol) III transcribed genes such as transfer RNA (tRNA) genes. Evidence that S. cerevisiae tRNA genes are recruited to NPCs prompted our investigation of a functional role for the NPC in Ty1 targeting into the genome. We find that Ty1 mobility is reduced in multiple Nup mutants that cannot be accounted for by defects in Ty1 gene expression, cDNA production or Ty1-IN nuclear entry. Instead, we find that Ty1 insertion upstream of tRNA genes is impaired. We also identify Nup mutants with wild type Ty1 mobility but impaired Ty1 targeting. The NPC nuclear basket, which interacts with chromatin, is required for both Ty1 expression and nucleosome targeting. Deletion of components of the NPC nuclear basket causes mis-targeting of Ty1 elements to the ends of chromosomes.

Targeting the SUMO Pathway Primes All-trans Retinoic Acid-Induced Differentiation of Nonpromyelocytic Acute Myeloid Leukemias

Differentiation therapies using all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) are highly efficient at treating acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, their efficacy, if any, is limited in the case of non-APL AML. We report here that inhibition of SUMOylation, a posttranslational modification related to ubiquitination, restores the prodifferentiation and antiproliferative activities of retinoids in non-APL AML. Controlled inhibition of SUMOylation with the pharmacologic inhibitors 2-D08 or anacardic acid, or via overexpression of SENP deSUMOylases, enhanced the ATRA-induced expression of key genes involved in differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis in non-APL AML cells. This activated ATRA-induced terminal myeloid differentiation and reduced cell proliferation and viability, including in AML cells resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs. Conversely, enhancement of SUMOylation via overexpression of the SUMO-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 dampened expression of ATRA-responsive genes and prevented differentiation. Thus, inhibition of the SUMO pathway is a promising strategy to sensitize patients with non-APL AML to retinoids and improve the treatment of this poor-prognosis cancer.Significance: SUMOylation silences key ATRA-responsive genes in nonpromyelocytic acute myeloid leukemias. Cancer Res; 78(10); 2601-13. ©2018 AACR.

Signaling to and from the RNA Polymerase III Transcription and Processing Machinery

RNA polymerase (Pol) III has a specialized role in transcribing the most abundant RNAs in eukaryotic cells, transfer RNAs (tRNAs), along with other ubiquitous small noncoding RNAs, many of which have functions related to the ribosome and protein synthesis. The high energetic cost of producing these RNAs and their central role in protein synthesis underlie the robust regulation of Pol III transcription in response to nutrients and stress by growth regulatory pathways. Downstream of Pol III, signaling impacts posttranscriptional processes affecting tRNA function in translation and tRNA cleavage into smaller fragments that are increasingly attributed with novel cellular activities. In this review, we consider how nutrients and stress control Pol III transcription via its factors and its negative regulator, Maf1. We highlight recent work showing that the composition of the tRNA population and the function of individual tRNAs is dynamically controlled and that unrestrained Pol III transcription can reprogram central metabolic pathways.

Novel layers of RNA polymerase III control affecting tRNA gene transcription in eukaryotes

RNA polymerase III (Pol III) transcribes a limited set of short genes in eukaryotes producing abundant small RNAs, mostly tRNA. The originally defined yeast Pol III transcriptome appears to be expanding owing to the application of new methods. Also, several factors required for assembly and nuclear import of Pol III complex have been identified recently. Models of Pol III based on cryo-electron microscopy reconstructions of distinct Pol III conformations reveal unique features distinguishing Pol III from other polymerases. Novel concepts concerning Pol III functioning involve recruitment of general Pol III-specific transcription factors and distinctive mechanisms of transcription initiation, elongation and termination. Despite the short length of Pol III transcription units, mapping of transcriptionally active Pol III with nucleotide resolution has revealed strikingly uneven polymerase distribution along all genes. This may be related, at least in part, to the transcription factors bound at the internal promoter regions. Pol III uses also a specific negative regulator, Maf1, which binds to polymerase under stress conditions; however, a subset of Pol III genes is not controlled by Maf1. Among other RNA polymerases, Pol III machinery represents unique features related to a short transcript length and high transcription efficiency.

Regulation of tRNA synthesis by posttranslational modifications of RNA polymerase III subunits

RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII) transcribes tRNA genes, 5S RNA as well as a number of other non-coding RNAs. Because transcription by RNAPIII is an energy-demanding process, its activity is tightly linked to the stress levels and nutrient status of the cell. Multiple signaling pathways control RNAPIII activity in response to environmental cues, but exactly how these pathways regulate RNAPIII is still poorly understood. One major target of these pathways is the transcriptional repressor Maf1, which inhibits RNAPIII activity under conditions that are detrimental to cell growth. However, recent studies have found that the cell can also directly regulate the RNAPIII machinery through phosphorylation and sumoylation of RNAPIII subunits. In this review we summarize post-translational modifications of RNAPIII subunits that mainly have been identified in large-scale proteomics studies, and we highlight several examples to discuss their relevance for regulation of RNAPIII.