The lack of influence of IVS5-91 G>A polymorphism of the SCN1A gene on efficacy of lamotrigine in patients with focal epilepsy

Association between SCN1A polymorphism and risk of epilepsy in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder in children. Numerous studies have demonstrated the association between SCN1A polymorphisms and risk of epilepsy in adults, but their role in epilepsy in children has just gained traction and results have remained inconsistent. In this work, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between SCN1A polymorphisms and risk for epilepsy in children. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet, Wanfang and VIP databases to identify eligible studies up to June 2023. Quantitative data synthesis was then performed under five genetic models: dominant, recessive, homozygous, heterozygous, and allele. Five studies involving 1380 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. Among many SCN1A polymorphisms reported, only rs2298771 was repeatedly studied in these reports. Pooled analysis demonstrated that there was no significant association between the polymorphism and risk of epilepsy in children (P>0.05). In conclusion, SCN1A rs2298771 polymorphism was not significantly associated with the risk of epilepsy in children.

Polymorphisms Affecting the Response to Novel Antiepileptic Drugs

Epilepsy is one of the most frequent chronic neurologic disorders that affects nearly 1% of the population worldwide, especially in developing countries. Currently, several antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are available for its therapy, and although the prognosis is good for most patients, 20%-30% amongst them do not reach seizure freedom. Numerous factors may explain AED-resistance such as sex, age, ethnicity, type of seizure, early epilepsy onset, suboptimal dosing, poor drug compliance, alcohol abuse, and in particular, genetic factors. Specifically, the interindividual differences in drug response can be caused by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding for drug efflux transporters, for the brain targets of AEDs, and for enzymes involved in drug metabolism. In this review, we used the PubMed database to retrieve studies that assessed the influence of SNPs on the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and efficacy of new antiepileptic drugs. Our results showed that polymorphisms in the ABCB1, ABCC2, UGT1A4, UGT2B7, UGT2B15, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 genes have an influence on the PK and efficacy of AEDs, suggesting that a genetic pre-evaluation of epileptic patients could help clinicians in prescribing a personalized treatment to improve the efficacy and the safety of the therapy.

Association Between SCN1A rs2298771, SCN1A rs10188577, SCN2A rs17183814, and SCN2A rs2304016 Polymorphisms and Responsiveness to Antiepileptic Drugs: A Meta-Analysis

Background:SCN1A and SCN2A genes have been reported to be associated with the efficacy of single and combined antiepileptic therapy, but the results remain contradictory. Previous meta-analyses on this topic mainly focused on the SCN1A rs3812718 polymorphism. However, meta-analyses focused on SCN1A rs2298771, SCN1A rs10188577, SCN2A rs17183814, or SCN2A rs2304016 polymorphisms are scarce or non-existent.

Objective: We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the effects of SCN1A rs2298771, SCN1A rs10188577, SCN2A rs17183814, and SCN2A rs2304016 polymorphisms on resistance to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WANFANG, and CNKI databases up to June 2020 to collect studies on the association of SCN1A and SCN2A polymorphisms with reactivity to AEDs. We calculated the pooled odds ratios (ORs) under the allelic, homozygous, heterozygous, dominant, and recessive genetic models to identify the association between the four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and resistance to AEDs.

Results: Our meta-analysis included 19 eligible studies. The results showed that the SCN1A rs2298771 polymorphism was related to AED resistance in the allelic, homozygous, and recessive genetic models (G vs. A: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.012–1.424; GG vs. AA: OR = 1.567, 95% CI: 1.147–2.142; GG vs. AA + AG: OR = 1.408, 95% CI: 1.053–1.882). The homozygous model remained significant after Bonferroni correction (P < 0.0125). Further subgroup analyses demonstrated the significance of the correlation in the dominant model in Caucasians (South Asians) after Bonferroni correction (GG + GA vs. AA: OR = 1.620, 95% CI: 1.165–2.252). However, no association between SCN1A rs2298771 polymorphism and resistance to AEDs was found in Asians or Caucasians (non-South Asians). For SCN1A rs10188577, SCN2A rs17183814, and SCN2A rs2304016 polymorphisms, the correlations with responsiveness to AEDs were not significant in the overall population nor in any subgroup after conducting the Bonferroni correction. The results for SCN1A rs2298771, SCN1A rs10188577, and SCN2A rs2304016 polymorphisms were stable and reliable according to sensitivity analysis and Begg and Egger tests. However, the results for SCN2A rs17183814 polymorphism have to be treated cautiously owing to the significant publication bias revealed by Begg and Egger tests.

Conclusions: The present meta-analysis indicated that SCN1A rs2298771 polymorphism significantly affects resistance to AEDs in the overall population and Caucasians (South Asians). There were no significant correlations between SCN1A rs10188577, SCN2A rs17183814, and SCN2A rs2304016 polymorphisms and resistance to AEDs.

Pharmacogenetics and the treatment of epilepsy: what do we know?

Seizure control with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as well as susceptibility to adverse drug reactions varies among individuals with epilepsy. This interindividual variability is partly determined by genetic factors. However, genetic testing to predict the efficacy and toxicity of AEDs is limited and genetic variability is, as yet, largely unexplainable. Accordingly, genetic testing can only be advised in a very limited number of cases in clinical routine. Currently, by applying different methodologies, many trials have been undertaken to evaluate cost benefits of preventive pharmacogenetic analysis for patients. There is significant progress in sequencing technologies, and focus is on next-generation sequencing-based methods, like exome and genome sequencing. In this review, an overview of the current scientific knowledge considering the pharmacogenetics of AEDs is given.