Topical medical therapy and ocular perfusion pressure in open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Effects of Topical Timolol and Latanoprost on Calculated Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Nonglaucomatous Volunteers

Purpose: To characterize the effects of timolol and latanoprost on calculated ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in a multicenter, prospective, crossover-design study. Methods: Nonglaucomatous volunteers were evaluated at baseline, after 1 week of timolol 0.5% dosed twice daily, and after 1 week of latanoprost 0.005% dosed nightly (randomized treatment order; 6-week washout period). Pneumatonometric intraocular pressure (IOP) and brachial blood pressure (BP) were evaluated at each visit. Using 3 commonly used equations, OPP was calculated based on IOP and BP. The OPPs at each visit were compared by using linear mixed-effects models. Results: This analysis includes 121 participants (242 eyes; 75% female, 87% White, mean age 55 years). Mean OPP (standard deviation) calculated with mean arterial pressure was 46.8 (8.1) mmHg at baseline, 48.5 (7.9) mmHg with timolol (P = 0.005), and 49.6 mmHg (8.2) with latanoprost (P < 0.001). When compared with baseline, OPP calculated with diastolic BP was significantly increased with both timolol (1.3 mmHg) and latanoprost (3.1 mmHg). The OPP calculated with systolic BP was increased with latanoprost (2.8 mmHg) but decreased with timolol (-1.3 mmHg). Timolol reduced systolic BP by 3.2 mmHg. Compared with timolol, latanoprost conferred greater increases in OPP calculated with both systolic and diastolic BP compared with baseline; however, the difference in treatment effects on OPP calculated with mean arterial pressure was not significantly different (P = 0.068). Conclusion: In this crossover study of nonglaucomatous volunteers, latanoprost increased OPP. However, timolol's benefit to OPP may be limited in part because it reduced systolic BP. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT01677507.

Management of the glaucoma patient progressing at low normal intraocular pressure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with glaucoma with disease progression despite low or normal intraocular pressure (IOP) present special challenges to the treating clinician. Treatment goals may depend on whether patients have apparent low IOP with concurrent treatment or have low IOP at baseline without treatment. We review the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Apparent progression at low IOP should start with confirmation of IOP, made easier by devices enabling patient home self-tonometry. Suspected visual field progression should be confirmed by repeat testing prior to advancement of therapy. Trabeculectomy remains the most effective surgical method of achieving long-term success, particularly when there is a low starting IOP. Drainage tube implantation or the use of novel micro-incisional non-bleb-forming procedures are less likely to be successful in achieving low IOP goals.

SUMMARY

Diagnostic testing is important in confirming progressive glaucomatous disease at low IOP levels. The most effective way of slowing the progression of glaucoma in a patient with low IOP is to lower the IOP further, sometimes to single digit levels, which is most often achievable with trabeculectomy.