A retrospective analysis of the use of tap water iontophoresis for focal hyperhidrosis at a district general hospital: the patients’ perspective

Comparison of the Efficacy of Tap Water Iontophoresis Versus Aluminum Chloride Hexahydrate in the Treatment of Palmoplantar Hyperhidrosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of tap water iontophoresis (TWI) versus aluminum chloride (AC) hexahydrate in the treatment of palmoplantar hyperhidrosis.

METHODS

The study was a randomized control trial performed at the dermatology department of Pakistan Navy Station (PNS) Shifa Hospital, Karachi from March 2022 to September 2022. A total of 70 palmoplantar hyperhidrosis patients were included in the study after getting approval from the ethical committee. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A patients were treated with TWI three times a week for four weeks. Group B patients were treated with a 20% AC topical solution applied at night to the affected areas for four weeks. The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) score for both groups was calculated at baseline, one, two, three, and four weeks. The final response was labeled at four weeks by comparing mean HDSS reduction in both groups. SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Mean HDSS was compared for both groups at the end of the study, which showed a significant reduction in the mean score from 3.40 ± 0.65 to 1.48 ± 0.78 in group A, as compared to a decline in scores in group B from 3.28 ± 0.67 to 2.14 ± 0.94 (p = 0.002). In group A, zero, one, two, and three points HDSS improvement was 2.9%, 25.7%, 48.6%, and 22.9%, respectively. Whereas in group B, it was 34.3%, 22.9%, 34.3%, and 8.6%, respectively (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

As compared to AC topical solution, TWI is an effective, safe, and inexpensive management option for palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. It causes more improvement in HDSS scores and has lesser side effects.

Treatment of Hyperhidrosis: An Update

Hyperhidrosis is a dermatosis presenting as pathologically excessive focal or generalized sweating. The stigmatizing nature of hyperhidrosis may cause patients to feel embarrassment and apprehension about their symptoms and experience a significant decrease in well-being. Severe cases of hyperhidrosis can also increase the risk of developing psychiatric and somatic comorbidities. Conventional non-surgical treatments of hyperhidrosis include aluminum salts, iontophoresis, botulinum toxin injections, and oral glycopyrronium. In recent years, new topical anticholinergic medications and devices have emerged that may improve the patients' symptoms and even prevent the development of comorbidities. The treatment of hyperhidrosis can be a complex matter and may require the combination of several therapies. The purpose of this paper was to firstly review the literature on existing non-surgical treatment options for hyperhidrosis, and secondly provide a stepwise approach to investigating and treating patients with hyperhidrosis.

The Association Between Hyperhidrosis and Dementia: A Community-Based Research

BACKGROUND

Dementia and hyperhidrosis (HH) are common in the elderly while there is little research to investigate the association between them.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify a possible association between HH and dementia in population of adults ≥65 years old in China.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey for elderly adults ≥65 years old was conducted from April to December 2019. A total of 5,958 participants were analyzed after two phases investigation. Goodness-of-fit tests (Pearson and deviance) were used to estimate the dispersion parameter and examine the adequacy of the models. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between HH and dementia.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of all-cause dementia was 10.17%, that of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) was 1.41%, and HH was 14.97%. Prevalence rates of HH were higher in participants with dementia and DLB. There was a significant positive relationship between HH duration and MMSE score (r = 0.207, p < 0.001, Durbin-Watson test = 1.806). Participants with HH were 1.275 (95% CI: 1.015-1.601, p = 0.037) times to have dementia, and 3.616 (95% CI: 2.267-5.767, p < 0.001) times to suffer from DLB than those without HH. Pearson and deviance chi square tests did not indicate overdispersion (p > 0.05 in the logistic regression models).

CONCLUSION

HH was common in the Chinese population ≥65 years old. It can increase the risk of dementia, particularly in DLB, in the elderly. It is important to improve the awareness of HH among dermatologists and neurologists.

The complementary effects of galvanic current electrical stimulation associated with conservative treatment to increase vasodilation in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness of an electrotherapy intervention with galvanic current on symptoms associated with Raynaud's phenomenon.

DESIGN

Single-blind randomized controlled trial, parallel design (1:1 ratio) and intention-to-treat analysis.

SETTING

Virgen de las Nieves Hospital, Granada, Spain.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-four participants with Raynaud's phenomenon, with a mean (SD) age of 43.43 (17.62) years.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were randomly assigned to a control group with conservative treatment (anti-inflammatory, vasodilatory and analgesic drugs) or an intervention group that received conservative treatment and vasodilatory electrical stimulation during seven weeks, three times/week for a total of 20 sessions.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was the number of attacks. Secondary outcomes were pain, peripheral blow flow, oxygen saturation, upper limb disability, central sensitization, pain catastrophizing and temperature recovery. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, posttreatment and at two months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The galvanic current electrotherapy group showed significantly greater improvements in the number of attacks (mean difference = 26.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 14.4 to 38.3), pre-cold stress pain (95% CI = 0.6 to 2.4), radial artery blood flow (95% CI = -7.8 ⩾ x ⩽ 1.3), ulnar artery blood flow (95% CI = -8.63 to 0.60), oxygen saturation (95% CI = -1.7 ⩾ x ⩽ -0.29), upper limb disability (95% CI = 1.1 to 22.3), central sensitization (95% CI = 6.7 to 18.2) and temperature recovery (95% CI = -5.7 ⩾ x ⩽ -0.32) than the conservative treatment group.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that a complementary treatment with galvanic current in combination to conservative approach is superior to conservative applied as isolate, in reducing the clinical manifestations and disability in Raynaud's phenomenon.