Production of Hydroxyl Radicals in Cell Systems Exposed to Haematoporphyrin and Red Light

Oxidative DNA damage: biological significance and methods of analysis

All forms of aerobic life are subjected constantly to oxidant pressure from molecular oxygen and also reactive oxygen species (ROS), produced during the biochemical utilization of O2 and prooxidant stimulation of O2 metabolism. ROS are thought to influence the development of human cancer and more than 50 other human diseases. To prevent oxidative DNA damage (protection) or to reverse damage, thereby preventing mutagenesis and cancer (repair), the aerobic cell possesses antioxidant defense systems and DNA repair mechanisms. During the last 20 years, many analytical techniques have been developed to monitor oxidative DNA base damage. High-performance liquid chromatography-electrochemical detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry are the two pioneering contributions to the field. Currently, the arsenal of methods available include the promising high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique, capillary electrophoresis, 32P-postlabeling, fluorescence postlabeling, 3H-postlabeling, antibody-base immunoassays, and assays involving the use of DNA repair glycosylases such as the comet assay, the alkaline elution assay, and the alkaline unwinding method. Recently, the use of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry has been introduced for the measurement of a number of modified nucleosides in oxidatively damaged DNA. The bulk of available chromatographic methods aimed at measuring individual DNA base lesions require either chemical hydrolysis or enzymatic digestion of oxidized DNA, following extraction from cells or tissues. The effect of experimental conditions (DNA isolation, hydrolysis, and/or derivatization) on the levels of oxidatively modified bases in DNA is enormous and has been studied intensively in the last 10 years.

Hyperthermic sensitization by hematoporphyrin on glioma cells

This study investigated: (1) the effect of Hp as a hyperthermic sensitizer on glioma cells; and (2) the possible mechanism of hyperthermic sensitization by Hp using an exogenous scavenger specific to a particular reactive oxygen species. Hp at nontoxic doses at 37 degrees C significantly enhanced thermal cell damage at 41.5 degrees C and above in a dose-dependent manner. Thermal cell damage enhancement by HP was effectively suppressed by the addition of beta-carotene, a singlet oxygen scavenger, or SOD, a superoxide scavenger, but not by the addition of mannitol or catalase. These results support the following hypothesis: The generation of superoxide is increased in cells treated with Hp in combination with hyperthermia. Thermal cell damage enhancement by Hp is probably mediated by singlet oxygen generated via superoxide in an alternative pathway different from that of photosensitization. Hp has potential as a hyperthermic sensitizer because of the following advantages: (1) its dose-dependent enhancement of thermal cell damage; and (2) the lack of toxicity at physiological temperature at doses of Hp required for hyperthermic sensitization of tumour cells.