Ocular disorders in multiple myeloma patients: cross-sectional study of prevalence and association with treatment

Incidental multiple myeloma in a patient with neuroretinitis: a case report

BACKGROUND

Neuroretinitis is classically defined as a clinical triad of unilateral, painless vision loss, accompanied by optic disc edema and characteristic macular star formation. The causes of neuroretinitis can be categorized as infectious, non-infectious, and idiopathic, therefore differential diagnosis and careful evaluation are required, owing to the various etiologies and masqueraders.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 54-year-old woman presented to the clinic with blurred vision in both eyes. A complete ophthalmic examination revealed optic disc edema with blurred margins and macular exudates, intraretinal edema in the temporal peripapillary area, and subretinal fluid with neurosensory retinal detachment in the macular area. Systemic laboratory investigations showed no signs of infection or inflammation. However, bone marrow suppression was suspected based on the results of the complete blood count test, and the patient was diagnosed with multiple myeloma.

CONCLUSION

Although neuroretinitis is rarely accompanied by hematological malignancy, it is important to be mindful of the latter because ophthalmic manifestations are a common feature of hematological malignancies and lesions occur in nearly every ocular structure.

Ocular Manifestations in Hematological Disorders

Background

Ophthalmic manifestations are a common feature in hematological malignancies and may be divided into two groups: those attributable to the disease's infiltration of the eye, and the ocular consequences due to blood abnormalities. This study aims to determine the prevalence of ocular manifestations and their association with the different hematological disease subgroups.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective and observational study enrolling 137 consecutive patients on active treatment or follow-up for hematological malignancies from January 2016 to January 2020 at the Cheikh Khalifa International University Hospital. All patients underwent a standardized and comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation.

Results

Ocular involvement was primarily disclosed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), and multiple myeloma (MM). We herein report the different ocular changes divided into anterior segment manifestations, posterior segment manifestations, dry eye disease, and ocular adnexa findings. Patients with leukemia had a significantly higher rate of lesions in the ocular posterior segment (p < 0.001). Despite the high prevalence of anterior segment and ocular adnexa findings in lymphoma patients, no significant association emerged between these lesions and the aforementioned condition. In addition, dry eye disease was found in all instances without any association with the disease itself.

Conclusions

Awareness of ocular pathology in hematological malignancies is important as it may precede systemic diagnosis or be a sign of recurrence. We should also be concerned about the side effects of treatments, predominantly, dry eye disease. Therefore, periodic ophthalmic assessment throughout the disease's course, as well as interdisciplinary coordination of care, is crucial to promote early diagnosis and treatment, hence improving long-term outcomes.

Monoclonal gammopathy of ocular significance (MGOS) - a short survey of corneal manifestations and treatment outcomes

Monoclonal gammopathy of ocular significance (MGOS) is a rare subset of monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance occurring secondary to plasma cell disorders and causing ocular manifestations. We identified 23 patients with paraproteinemic keratopathy (PPK) in the setting of monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS, 10), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM, 3) or multiple myeloma (MM, 10). Many of these patients with PPK (11/23) presented decreased vision. All patients with MM and 40% of those with other diagnoses such as SMM and MGUS received systemic therapy with or without autologous stem cell transplantation. Four eyes of four patients were treated by penetrating keratoplasty. In most cases, neither ocular nor hematologic treatment afforded a durable improvement in the visual acuity (recurrence after a median of 11 months), despite initial responses. Further studies will be required to determine the optimal strategy to treat and prevent the relapse of ocular symptoms in patients with PPK.

Management of Adverse Events and Supportive Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Simple Summary

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with relapsing and/or refractory (RR) disease are exposed for a prolonged time to multiple drugs, which increase the risk of toxicity. In addition to tumor response, preserving the quality of life represents an important goal for this patient population. Therefore, supportive therapy plays a pivotal role in their treatment by limiting disease- and drug-related complications. The aim of this review is to outline current standards and future strategies to prevent and treat renal insufficiency, anemia, bone disease, and infection, including COVID-19, in RRMM patients. In addition, the incidence and treatment of side effects of novel anti-MM agents will be discussed.

Abstract

Relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM) patients are a fragile population because of prolonged drug exposure and advanced age. Preserving a good quality of life is of high priority for these patients and the treatment of disease- and treatment-related complications plays a key role in their management. By preventing and limiting MM-induced complications, supportive care improves patients’ outcome. Erythropoietin-stimulating agents and bisphosphonates are well-established supportive strategies, yet novel agents are under investigation, such as anabolic bone agents and activin receptor-like kinase (ALK) inhibitors. The recent dramatic changes in the treatment landscape of MM pose an additional challenge for the routine care of RRMM patients. Multidrug combinations in first and later lines increase the risk for long-lasting toxicities, including adverse cardiovascular and neurological events. Moreover, recently approved first-in-class drugs have unique side-effect profiles, such as ocular toxicity of belantamab mafodotin or gastrointestinal toxicity of selinexor. This review discusses current standards in supportive treatment of RRMM patients, including recommendations in light of the recent SARS-CoV-19 pandemic, and critically looks at the incidence and management of side effects of standard as well as next generation anti-MM agents.

Myasthenia gravis with anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies during therapy for multiple myeloma: a case report

BACKGROUND

The onset of myasthenia (MG) gravis with anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies most commonly peaks in the fourth decade of life, and MG with MuSK antibodies (MuSK-MG) rarely coexists with a malignant tumor. To date, MuSK-MG has not been reported in multiple myeloma (MM).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 60-year-old male with MM who was receiving treatment with bortezomib and thalidomide presented diplopia, ptosis, and limb weakness. A diagnosis of MM with Bence-Jones proteinuria was established when he was 56 years old, and he received chemotherapy with four courses of bortezomib and dexamethasone. Although he received thalidomide as maintenance therapy, it was discontinued a year before hospital admission because of sensory neuropathy as a side effect. Six months before hospital admission, he developed mild diplopia. One month before admission, his chemotherapy was interrupted because of viral infection and fatigability. Then he developed neck weakness and bilateral ptosis. A diagnosis of MuSK-MG was made based on neurological and serological examinations. According to the previous relevant literature, this is the first report of MuSK-MG in a patient with MM.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MM, the possibility of co-existing of autoimmune disease, including MuSK-MG, should be considered. This case emphasizes the need to still consider testing for anti-MuSK antibodies in older MM patients where there is clinical suspicion for possible MG despite negative anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies and lacking classic MuSK MG phenotype at onset.