Mining pharmacovigilance data using Bayesian logistic regression with James-Stein type shrinkage estimation

Improving drug safety: From adverse drug reaction knowledge discovery to clinical implementation

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major public health concern, causing over 100,000 fatalities in the United States every year with an annual cost of $136 billion. Early detection and accurate prediction of ADRs is thus vital for drug development and patient safety. Multiple scientific disciplines, namely pharmacology, pharmacovigilance, and pharmacoinformatics, have been addressing the ADR problem from different perspectives. With the same goal of improving drug safety, this article summarizes and links the research efforts in the multiple disciplines into a single framework from comprehensive understanding of the interactions between drugs and biological system and the identification of genetic and phenotypic predispositions of patients susceptible to higher ADR risks and finally to the current state of implementation of medication-related decision support systems. We start by describing available computational resources for building drug-target interaction networks with biological annotations, which provides a fundamental knowledge for ADR prediction. Databases are classified by functions to help users in selection. Post-marketing surveillance is then introduced where data-driven approach can not only enhance the prediction accuracy of ADRs but also enables the discovery of genetic and phenotypic risk factors of ADRs. Understanding genetic risk factors for ADR requires well organized patient genetics information and analysis by pharmacogenomic approaches. Finally, current state of clinical decision support systems is presented and described how clinicians can be assisted with the integrated knowledgebase to minimize the risk of ADR. This review ends with a discussion of existing challenges in each of disciplines with potential solutions and future directions.

Statistical methods for active pharmacovigilance, with applications to diabetes drugs

Pharmacovigilance aims to identify adverse drug reactions using postmarket surveillance data under real-world conditions of use. Unlike passive pharmacovigilance, which is based on largely voluntary (and hence incomplete) spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions with limited information on patient characteristics, active pharmacovigilance is based on electronic health records containing detailed information about patient populations, thereby allowing consideration of modifying factors such as polypharmacy and comorbidity, as well as sociodemographic characteristics. With the present shift toward active pharmacovigilance, statistical methods capable of addressing the complexities of such data are needed. We describe four such methods here, and demonstrate their application in the analysis of a large retrospective cohort of diabetics taking anti-hyperglycemic medications that may increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events.

Data mining methodologies for pharmacovigilance

Medicines are designed to cure, treat, or prevent diseases; however, there are also risks in taking any medicine - particularly short term or long term adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can cause serious harm to patients. Adverse drug events have been estimated to cause over 700,000 emergency department visits each year in the United States. Thus, for medication safety, ADR monitoring is required for each drug throughout its life cycle, including early stages of drug design, different phases of clinical trials, and postmarketing surveillance. Pharmacovigilance (PhV) is the science that concerns with the detection, assessment, understanding and prevention of ADRs. In the pre-marketing stages of a drug, PhV primarily focuses on predicting potential ADRs using preclinical characteristics of the compounds (e.g., drug targets, chemical structure) or screening data (e.g., bioassay data). In the postmarketing stage, PhV has traditionally involved in mining spontaneous reports submitted to national surveillance systems. The research focus is currently shifting toward the use of data generated from platforms outside the conventional framework such as electronic medical records (EMRs), biomedical literature, and patient-reported data in online health forums. The emerging trend of PhV is to link preclinical data from the experimental platform with human safety information observed in the postmarketing phase. This article provides a general overview of the current computational methodologies applied for PhV at different stages of drug development and concludes with future directions and challenges.

Comparative analysis of pharmacovigilance methods in the detection of adverse drug reactions using electronic medical records

OBJECTIVE

Medication  safety requires that each drug be monitored throughout its market life as early detection of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can lead to alerts that prevent patient harm. Recently, electronic medical records (EMRs) have emerged as a valuable resource for pharmacovigilance. This study examines the use of retrospective medication orders and inpatient laboratory results documented in the EMR to identify ADRs.

METHODS

Using 12 years of EMR data from Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), we designed a study to correlate abnormal laboratory results with specific drug administrations by comparing the outcomes of a drug-exposed group and a matched unexposed group. We assessed the relative merits of six pharmacovigilance measures used in spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs): proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting OR (ROR), Yule's Q (YULE), the χ(2) test (CHI), Bayesian confidence propagation neural networks (BCPNN), and a gamma Poisson shrinker (GPS).

RESULTS

We systematically evaluated the methods on two independently constructed reference standard datasets of drug-event pairs. The dataset of Yoon et al contained 470 drug-event pairs (10 drugs and 47 laboratory abnormalities). Using VUMC's EMR, we created another dataset of 378 drug-event pairs (nine drugs and 42 laboratory abnormalities). Evaluation on our reference standard showed that CHI, ROR, PRR, and YULE all had the same F score (62%). When the reference standard of Yoon et al was used, ROR had the best F score of 68%, with 77% precision and 61% recall.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that EMR-derived laboratory measurements and medication orders can help to validate previously reported ADRs, and detect new ADRs.