A Phase I/II Study of a 72-h Continuous Infusion of Etoposide in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Chemotherapeutic drugs for soft tissue sarcomas: a review

Despite the low incidence of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), hundreds of thousands of new STS cases are diagnosed annually worldwide, and approximately half of them eventually progress to advanced stages. Currently, chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for advanced STSs. There are difficulties in selecting appropriate drugs for multiline chemotherapy, or for combination treatment of different STS histological subtypes. In this study, we first comprehensively reviewed the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of STSs, and then described the current status of sensitive drugs for different STS subtypes. anthracyclines are the most important systemic treatment for advanced STSs. Ifosfamide, trabectedin, gemcitabine, taxanes, dacarbazine, and eribulin exhibit certain activities in STSs. Vinca alkaloid agents (vindesine, vinblastine, vinorelbine, vincristine) have important therapeutic effects in specific STS subtypes, such as rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma family tumors, whereas their activity in other subtypes is weak. Other chemotherapeutic drugs (methotrexate, cisplatin, etoposide, pemetrexed) have weak efficacy in STSs and are rarely used. It is necessary to select specific second- or above-line chemotherapeutic drugs depending on the histological subtype. This review aims to provide a reference for the selection of chemotherapeutic drugs for multi-line therapy for patients with advanced STSs who have an increasingly long survival.

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions in second- or later-line treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend anthracycline-based chemotherapy primarily with doxorubicin either as monotherapy or in combination with ifosfamide as the first-line treatment for most advanced STS subtypes. Therapeutic options after failure of doxorubicin and/or ifosfamide are limited. This study aimed to comprehensively review available data on the activity and safety of interventions in second- or later-line treatment of advanced STS.

METHODS

Electronic literature databases (Embase®, MEDLINE®, MEDLINE® In-Process, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were searched from 1980 to 01 March 2012 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies (both prospective and retrospective) evaluating pharmacological interventions in patients with advanced STS pre-treated with anthracycline- and/or ifosfamide-based therapy.

RESULTS

The review identified six RCTs (one phase III and five phase II trials) and 94 non-randomised studies. Based on the primary trial endpoints, RCTs demonstrated favourable efficacy for pazopanib over placebo (PFS: 4.6 months vs. 1.6 months), gemcitabine plus dacarbazine over dacarbazine monotherapy (3-month PFS rate: 54.2% vs. 35.2%), and trabectedin 3-weekly schedule over weekly schedule (TTP: 3.7 months vs. 2.3 months. The non-randomised studies demonstrated heterogeneity in efficacy and safety results.

CONCLUSIONS

Across the RCTs, pazopanib over placebo, gemcitabine-dacarbazine over dacarbazine, and trabectedin 3-weekly over weekly regimen clearly demonstrated a PFS advantage in the second- and later-line treatment of advanced STS. With only one phase III trial in this setting, there is a clear need for additional comparative trials to better understand the risk: benefit ratios of available agents and combinations.

The treatment of distant metastases in soft tissue sarcoma

This article reviews the current standard approaches to the treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and evaluates new chemotherapy agents and novel approaches. A computerized search strategy was used to identify articles examining the role of chemotherapy and surgery in metastatic STS, which were published between January 1992 and December 1998. This search was supplemented by key articles from our files published before 1992. In selecting articles for inclusion in this review, emphasis was placed on randomized data and novel approaches. Only three agents-doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine-have shown significant activity in metastatic STS. Numerous studies have examined the efficacy and toxicity of combining the known active agents in standard doses or in high doses with cytokine support. Promising results, in terms of increased response rates, often have not been reproduced in randomized trials, and there is no convincing evidence of enhanced overall survival. New regimens should be evaluated in randomized trials incorporating quality-of-life endpoints. High-dose chemotherapy with bone marrow/stem cell rescue remains an investigational procedure of uncertain efficacy. Pilot studies have established the feasibility of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, after cytoreductive surgery, in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis. To date, the efficacy of this approach has not been validated in phase II or III trials. The role of surgery in the treatment of isolated pulmonary metastases is well established. Results of small series raise the possibility that resection of hepatic metastases is beneficial in selected patients. Current chemotherapy options for patients with STS are limited. There is reason to hope that the situation will change with the further development of new agents that have novel and specific mechanisms of action.