1
|
Hart DP, Matino D, Astermark J, Dolan G, d’Oiron R, Hermans C, Jiménez-Yuste V, Linares A, Matsushita T, McRae S, Ozelo MC, Platton S, Stafford D, Sidonio RF, Tiede A. International consensus recommendations on the management of people with haemophilia B. Ther Adv Hematol 2022; 13:20406207221085202. [PMID: 35392437 PMCID: PMC8980430 DOI: 10.1177/20406207221085202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Haemophilia B is a rare X-linked genetic deficiency of coagulation factor IX (FIX) that, if untreated, can cause recurrent and disabling bleeding, potentially leading to severe arthropathy and/or life-threatening haemorrhage. Recent decades have brought significant improvements in haemophilia B management, including the advent of recombinant FIX and extended half-life FIX. This therapeutic landscape continues to evolve with several non-factor replacement therapies and gene therapies under investigation. Given the rarity of haemophilia B, the evidence base and clinical experience on which to establish clinical guidelines are relatively sparse and are further challenged by features that are distinct from haemophilia A, precluding extrapolation of existing haemophilia A guidelines. Due to the paucity of formal haemophilia B-specific clinical guidance, an international Author Group was convened to develop a clinical practice framework. The group comprised 15 haematology specialists from Europe, Australia, Japan, Latin America and North America, covering adult and paediatric haematology, laboratory medicine and biomedical science. A hybrid approach combining a systematic review of haemophilia B literature with discussion of clinical experience utilized a modified Delphi format to develop a comprehensive set of clinical recommendations. This approach resulted in 29 recommendations for the clinical management of haemophilia B across five topics, including product treatment choice, therapeutic agent laboratory monitoring, pharmacokinetics considerations, inhibitor management and preparing for gene therapy. It is anticipated that this clinical practice framework will complement existing guidelines in the management of people with haemophilia B in routine clinical practice and could be adapted and applied across different regions and countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P. Hart
- The Royal London Hospital Haemophilia Centre, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Whitechapel Road, London E1 2AD, UK
| | - Davide Matino
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University and The Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jan Astermark
- Institution of Translational Medicine and Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Gerard Dolan
- Centre for Haemostasis and Thrombosis, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Roseline d’Oiron
- Centre for Haemophilia and Constitutional Bleeding Disorders, Hôpital Bicêtre AP-HP Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Cédric Hermans
- Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Division of Haematology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Adriana Linares
- Grupo de Oncohematología Pediátrica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
- Programa de Hemofilia, Clínica Infantil Colsubsidio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Tadashi Matsushita
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Simon McRae
- Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS, Australia
| | | | - Sean Platton
- The Royal London Hospital Haemophilia Centre, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Darrel Stafford
- Department of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Robert F. Sidonio
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Andreas Tiede
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Sluijs M, Huyghe N, Wood C, Tawil S. A survey of physicians' treatment switching practice in people on long-term prophylaxis for hemophilia in five European countries. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38:65-73. [PMID: 34634979 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1991901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recombinant factor VIII and factor IX Fc fusion proteins (rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc) were developed with an extended half-life (EHL) to improve the management of people with hemophilia A (PwHA) and B (PwHB), respectively. METHODS This survey gathered physician-reported treatment decisions and physician views on outcomes in PwHA or PwHB who switched to rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc in the 12 months prior to study completion. RESULTS Physicians (N = 37) considered bleeds, pharmacokinetic parameters, joint health and adherence the most important factors to assess both in routine care and when deciding to switch to an EHL therapy. In the 12 months prior to study completion, 37 physicians switched 113 PwHA to rFVIIIFc and 25 physicians switched 36 PwHB to rFIXFc. Most PwH (>90%) had moderate or severe hemophilia and many (>60%) switched within 6 months of the survey. The main reason for switching PwHA to rFVIIIFc was to allow fewer injections (49%), while the main reason for switching PwHB to rFIXFc was the product becoming available for use (36%). Overall, 96% of PwHA and 89% of PwHB who were switched remained on these EHL products at the time of survey. Mean total weekly dose, injection frequency and annualized bleeding rate were reported to have reduced following switching. CONCLUSION This survey provides valuable insight into reasons for, and challenges to, the use of EHL products in clinical practice. Physicians perceived that switching to treatment with rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc can improve quality of life, treatment burden, disease control and adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sally Tawil
- Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mahlangu JN, Blanchette V, Klamroth R. Redefining prophylaxis in the modern era. Haemophilia 2021; 27 Suppl 3:21-27. [PMID: 32469108 DOI: 10.1111/hae.14035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Prophylaxis is the globally accepted standard of care for persons with haemophilia and presents many advantages over episodic treatment. The prophylaxis benefits include bleed reduction, reduction in musculoskeletal complications and improvement in the quality of life. The currently evolving novel therapies for the management of haemophilia has ushered a new era characterized by improved prophylaxis targets and outcomes. These redefined targets and outcomes have necessitated the need to also redefine prophylaxis. In this state-of-the-art review, we redefine prophylaxis in the modern era by revisiting its definition, presenting data to support higher trough levels to achieve with prophylaxis and introducing steady-state haemostasis as a possible new target for prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnny N Mahlangu
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Haemophilia Comprehensive Care, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand and the NHLS, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Victor Blanchette
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Klamroth
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hemophilia Treatment Centre, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al-Janabi R, Salih A, Alwan M. Evaluation of efficacy of twice-weekly prophylactic treatment with BeneFIX® (recombinant factor IX) followed by once weekly in children with severe hemophilia B: Six-year data from a local registry. Iraqi J Hematol 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/ijh.ijh_51_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
5
|
Aiello A, Mancuso ME, Colombo A, Teruzzi C, Berto P. Budget impact analysis of extended half-life recombinant factor IX (rFIXFc) in the treatment of haemophilia B. Glob Reg Health Technol Assess 2020; 7:40-9. [PMID: 36627960 DOI: 10.33393/grhta.2020.2113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prophylaxis with factor IX (FIX) concentrates, produced by recombinant DNA technology (rFIX) or human plasma-derived concentrates, is the treatment of choice for haemophilia B (HB); rFIX covalently fused to the Fc domain of human immunoglobulin G1 (rFIXFc) allows for prophylaxis/treatment with one infusion every 7-14 days. The purpose of this study is to quantify the financial impact of prophylaxis with rFIXFc vs. other approved rFIX and reimbursed for treatment of HB in Italy. Methods The number of patients was estimated according to Italian epidemiological data and use of rFIX. Dose and frequency of administration used for weekly prophylaxis were those recommended in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC), while clinical trials and literature data were used to calculate bleeding rates and management. Drug costs were calculated using regional ex-factory net prices. In the model, a reference scenario (Reference) vs. an alternative scenario (Alternative) were created to account for introduction of rFIXFc, estimating an increasing trend of the market share of rFIXFc in a 3-year timeframe. The analysis was developed in the perspective of the National Health Service and included healthcare costs related to rFIX for prophylaxis and resolution of bleeding events. Results The model estimated an overall cumulative expenditure (years 1-3) of €209,453,646 for the Reference and €207,465,568 for Alternative scenarios, with calculated cumulative savings of €1,988,068. Conclusions The increasing use of rFIXFc as a substitute for other rFIX concentrates in the treatment of HB can represent a financially viable choice for the Italian National Health Service while ensuring effective control of bleeding.
Collapse
|
6
|
Davis J, Yan S, Matsushita T, Alberio L, Bassett P, Santagostino E. Systematic review and analysis of efficacy of recombinant factor IX products for prophylactic treatment of hemophilia B in comparison with rIX-FP. J Med Econ 2019; 22:1014-1021. [PMID: 31094591 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1620246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Aims: Prophylaxis with standard-acting recombinant factor IX (rFIX) in hemophilia B patients requires frequent injections. Extended half-life (EHL) products allow for prolonged dosing intervals, and so reduce this treatment burden. Three technologies are employed to extend the half-life of FIX; glycopegylation, Fc-fusion, and albumin fusion. rIX-FP is a novel albumin fusion protein, which allows for a prolonged dosing interval of up to 14 days. A systematic review and indirect statistical comparison was performed to evaluate the efficacy of both EHL and standard-acting rFIX products compared with rIX-FP in Phase III trials for prophylaxis in adult hemophilia B patients. Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in both EMBASE and PubMed to identify Phase III trials of prophylactic rFIX treatment in previously treated hemophilia B patients aged ≥12 years (FIX ≤2%). Annualized bleeding rate (ABR), spontaneous ABR (AsBR), and joint ABR (AjBR) data were extracted from each study. A z-test was performed using the mean of each parameter, and the mean difference in outcome between studies was calculated. Results: Seven articles investigating six rFIX products were identified. Median ABR, AsBR, and AjBR ranged from 0-3.0, 0-1.0, and 0-1.1 (means = 0.8-4.26, 0.13-2.6, and 0.34-2.85), respectively. rIX-FP achieved the lowest median and mean values in all three parameters. Z-tests showed that mean ABR was significantly lower for rIX-FP 7-day prophylaxis compared with the majority of standard-acting and other EHL rFIX products. Limitations: The low number of appropriate trials available for comparison limits the quantity of data available for comparison, and restricts the use of methods of adjustment for variance in study design or patient characteristics. However, these limitations are shared with similar analyses published in this field. Conclusion: This indirect comparison of Phase III trials indicates that rIX-FP efficacy compares favorably vs other rFIX products for prophylaxis in hemophilia B.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Davis
- University of Miami Hemophilia Treatment Center , Miami , FL , USA
| | | | - Tadashi Matsushita
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital , Nagoya , Japan
| | - Lorenzo Alberio
- Division of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | | | - Elena Santagostino
- Foundation IRCCS Ca ' Granda Maggiore Hospital Policlinico, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center , Milan , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The health benefits of prophylactic dosing regimens for clotting factor therapy in patients with hemophilia include reduced joint damage and improved quality of life; as such, prophylaxis is recommended in treatment guidelines. However, many patients with hemophilia B are treated on demand, and prophylaxis has been utilized less frequently than in hemophilia A. Areas covered: This review discusses the opportunities and evidence for prophylaxis in hemophilia B, in the context of treatment guidelines and with regard to factor IX (FIX) replacement therapies, including long-acting recombinant FIX (rFIX). Expert commentary: Long-acting rFIX concentrates may increase uptake of and adherence to prophylaxis regimens through attainment of higher trough levels with longer dosing intervals. In this new era of hemophilia B treatment, physicians may be able to achieve better clinical outcomes for their patients and reconsider treatment goals. Maintaining higher FIX trough levels will undoubtedly have long-term benefits for patients, such as preserving joint function. The long-acting rFIX concentrates support robust prophylaxis regimens and offer physician's flexibility in treating patients to best suit their needs, whether to enable an active lifestyle, to achieve higher trough levels for better bleed protection, or simply to decrease the burden of treatment by reducing injection frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Castaman
- a Center for Bleeding Disorders , Careggi University Hospital , Florence , Italy
| |
Collapse
|