Not all performance validity tests are created equal: The role of recollection and familiarity in the Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test

Multitasking Effects on Perception and Memory in Older Adults

Performing multiple tasks in parallel is detrimental to performance, a phenomenon generically referred to as dual-task interference (DTi). Several variables can modulate DTi at the individual level, and increasing age is typically described as negatively affecting response costs. In this study, we investigated, in 252 healthy adults aged between 50 and 89 years, how age modulates the detrimental effect of DTi during the encoding of images. We combined a visual memory task and a sustained attention task (i.e., an auditory version of the continuous performance task, ACPT) in three separate blocks. In the first block, participants had to perform a four-alternative forced-choice recognition of previously memorized images without having attended to ACPT sounds during the encoding. In the second block, during memorization, participants had to press a response key when detecting the letter “X” within a stream of letters (Low Load). In the third block, they had to respond only when the letter “X” was preceded by the letter “A” (High Load). The results showed that overall performance linearly decreased with age. In contrast with our predictions, DTi was stable across different ages. Finally, using a cluster-based approach, we found that participants who paid the highest costs when dual-tasking also demonstrated, on a self-administered cognitive screening significantly lower scores than peers. These new types of tests, which ask for concurrent task performance, might become useful for detecting outlier performance that might anticipate or correlate with aging–related cognitive decline.

The Effects of Cognitive Load on Strategy Utilization in a Forced-Choice Recognition Memory Performance Validity Test

Abstract. Despite the importance of detecting feigned cognitive impairment, we have a limited understanding of the theoretical foundation of the phenomenon and the factors that affect it. Studies regarding the formation and implementation of feigning strategies during neuropsychological assessments are numbered, though there are indications that they tax cognitive resources. The current study assessed the effect of cognitive load manipulation on feigning strategies. To achieve this aim, we utilized a 2 × 2 experimental design; condition (simulators/honest responders) and cognitive load (load/no load) were manipulated while participants ( N = 154) performed a well-established performance validity test (PVT). The cognitive load manipulation reduced the quantity of feigning strategies, while also affecting their composition (i.e., strategies tended to be more intuitive). This suggests that reduced cognitive resources among those feigning cognitive impairment may impact the use of in-vivo feigning strategies. These findings, though preliminary, will hopefully encourage further research that will uncover the cognitive factors involved in the utilization of feigning strategies in neuropsychological assessments.

Identifying Feigned Cognitive Impairment: Investigating the Utility of Diffusion Model Analyses

Forced-choice performance validity tests are routinely used for the detection of feigned cognitive impairment. The drift diffusion model deconstructs performance into distinct cognitive processes using accuracy and response time measures. It thereby offers a unique approach for gaining insight into examinees' speed-accuracy trade-offs and the cognitive processes that underlie their performance. The current study is the first to perform such analyses using a well-established forced-choice performance validity test. To achieve this aim, archival data of healthy participants, either simulating cognitive impairment in the Word Memory Test or performing it to the best of their ability, were analyzed using the EZ-diffusion model (N = 198). The groups differed in the three model parameters, with drift rate emerging as the best predictor of group membership. These findings provide initial evidence for the usefulness of the drift diffusion model in clarifying the cognitive processes underlying feigned cognitive impairment and encourage further research.

Comparison of the Word Memory Test and the Test of Memory Malingering in detecting invalid performance in neuropsychological testing

Given the prevalence of compensation seeking patients who exaggerate or fabricate their symptoms, the assessment of performance and symptom validity throughout testing is vital in neuropsychological evaluations. Two of the most commonly utilized performance validity tests (PVTs) are the Word Memory Test (WMT) and the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). While both have proven successful in detecting invalid performance, some studies suggest greater sensitivity in the WMT relative to the TOMM. To improve upon previous research, this study compared performance in individuals who completed both the WMT and TOMM during a neuropsychological evaluation. Participants included 268 cases from a clinical private practice consisting of primarily disability claimants. One-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) compared neuropsychological performance of participants who passed both PVTs (n = 198) versus those who failed the WMT but passed the TOMM (n = 70). Global suppression of neuropsychological scores was found for participants who failed the WMT but passed the TOMM, as well as more psychiatric symptoms reported on questionnaires, relative to those who passed both PVTs. These findings suggest that those passing the TOMM but failing the WMT demonstrated performance invalidity, which illustrates the WMT's enhanced sensitivity.