Effect of hydroxychloroquine on angiographic progression in routine treatment of Takayasu arteritis

Medium-vessel and large-vessel vasculitis in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article serves as an up-to-date examination of the latest findings in the field of paediatric large-vessel and medium-vessel vasculitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last 2 years and in the wake of SARS-CoV2 pandemic, a multitude of studies have increased our insight into these conditions. Although large-vessel and medium-vessel vasculitis are uncommon amongst children, they are a complex and multisystem with a constantly evolving landscape. Increasing numbers of reports from low-income and middle-income countries are shaping our understanding of the epidemiology of vasculitis in children. The influence of infectious disease and the microbiome are of particular interest in unravelling pathogenetic aspects. Improved understanding of the genetics and immunology offer opportunities for better diagnostic options and biomarkers of disease as well as targeted therapies.

SUMMARY

In this review, we address recent findings in epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical findings, bio-markers, imaging and treatment that have the potential to offer better management solutions for these uncommon conditions.

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of Takayasu arteritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis

The pharmacotherapy of Takayasu arteritis (TAK) with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is an evolving area. A systematic review of Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed Central, clinical trial databases and recent international rheumatology conferences for interventional and observational studies reporting the effectiveness of DMARDs in TAK identified four randomized controlled trials (RCTs, with another longer-term follow-up of one RCT) and 63 observational studies. The identified trials had some concern or high risk of bias. Most observational studies were downgraded on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale due to lack of appropriate comparator groups. Studies used heterogenous outcomes of clinical responses, angiographic stabilization, normalization of inflammatory markers, reduction in vascular uptake on positron emission tomography, reduction in prednisolone doses and relapses. Tocilizumab showed benefit in a RCT compared to placebo in a secondary per-protocol analysis but not the primary intention-to-treat analysis. Abatacept failed to demonstrate benefit compared to placebo for preventing relapses in another RCT. Pooled data from uncontrolled observational studies demonstrated beneficial clinical responses and angiographic stabilization in nearly 80% patients treated with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, tocilizumab or leflunomide. Certainty of evidence for outcomes from RCTs ranged from moderate to very low and was low to very low for all observational studies. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide the pharmacotherapy of TAK. Future observational studies should attempt to include appropriate comparator arms. Multicentric, adequately powered RCTs assessing both clinical and angiographic responses are necessary in TAK.