Dose build-up curves for cobalt-60 irradiation: a systematic error occurring with pancake chamber measurements

Beam perturbation characteristics of a 2D transmission silicon diode array, Magic Plate

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the performance characteristics of the Magic Plate (MP) system when operated upstream of the patient in transmission mode (MPTM). The MPTM is an essential component of a real‐time QA system designed for operation during radiotherapy treatment. Of particular interest is a quantitative study into the influence of the MP on the radiation beam quality at several field sizes and linear accelerator potential differences. The impact is measured through beam perturbation effects such as changes in the skin dose and/or percentage depth dose (PDD) (both in and out of field). The MP was placed in the block tray of a Varian linac head operated at 6, 10 and 18 MV beam energy. To optimize the MPTM operational setup, two conditions were investigated and each setup was compared to the case where no MP is positioned in place (i.e., open field): (i) MPTM alone and (ii) MPTM with a thin passive contamination electron filter. The in‐field and out‐of‐field surface doses of a solid water phantom were investigated for both setups using a Markus plane parallel (Model N23343) and Attix parallel‐plate, MRI model 449 ionization chambers. In addition, the effect on the 2D dose distribution measured by the Delta⁴ QA system was also investigated. The transmission factor for both of these MPTM setups in the central axis was also investigated using a Farmer ionization chamber (Model 2571A) and an Attix ionization chamber. Measurements were performed for different irradiation field sizes of 5×5 cm2 and 10×10 cm2. The change in the surface dose relative to dmax was measured to be less than 0.5% for the 6 MV, 10 MV, and 18 MV energy beams. Transmission factors measured for both set ups (i & ii above) with 6 MV, 10 MV, and 18 MV at a depth of dmax and a depth of 10 cm were all within 1.6% of open field. The impact of both the bare MPTM and the MPTM with 1 mm buildup on 3D dose distribution in comparison to the open field investigated using the Delta⁴ system and both the MPTM versions passed standard clinical gamma analysis criteria. Two MPTM operational setups were studied and presented in this article. The results indicate that both versions may be suitable for the new real‐time megavoltage photon treatment delivery QA system under development. However, the bare MPTM appears to be slightly better suited of the two MP versions, as it minimally perturbs the radiation field and does not lead to any significant increase in skin dose to the patient.

PACS number(s): 87.50.up, 87.53.Bn, 87.55.N, 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc.

Surface dose measurements with commonly used detectors: a consistent thickness correction method

The purpose of this study was to review application of a consistent correction method for the solid state detectors, such as thermoluminescent dosimeters (chips (cTLD) and powder (pTLD)), optically stimulated detectors (both closed (OSL) and open (eOSL)), and radiochromic (EBT2) and radiographic (EDR2) films. In addition, to compare measured surface dose using an extrapolation ionization chamber (PTW 30‐360) with other parallel plate chambers RMI‐449 (Attix), Capintec PS‐033, PTW 30‐329 (Markus) and Memorial. Measurements of surface dose for 6 MV photons with parallel plate chambers were used to establish a baseline. cTLD, OSLs, EDR2, and EBT2 measurements were corrected using a method which involved irradiation of three dosimeter stacks, followed by linear extrapolation of individual dosimeter measurements to zero thickness. We determined the magnitude of correction for each detector and compared our results against an alternative correction method based on effective thickness. All uncorrected surface dose measurements exhibited overresponse, compared with the extrapolation chamber data, except for the Attix chamber. The closest match was obtained with the Attix chamber (−0.1%), followed by pTLD (0.5%), Capintec (4.5%), Memorial (7.3%), Markus (10%), cTLD (11.8%), eOSL (12.8%), EBT2 (14%), EDR2 (14.8%), and OSL (26%). Application of published ionization chamber corrections brought all the parallel plate results to within 1% of the extrapolation chamber. The extrapolation method corrected all solid‐state detector results to within 2% of baseline, except the OSLs. Extrapolation of dose using a simple three‐detector stack has been demonstrated to provide thickness corrections for cTLD, eOSLs, EBT2, and EDR2 which can then be used for surface dose measurements. Standard OSLs are not recommended for surface dose measurement. The effective thickness method suffers from the subjectivity inherent in the inclusion of measured percentage depth‐dose curves and is not recommended for these types of measurements.

PACS number: 87.56.‐v

Monte Carlo-based treatment planning for a spoiler system with experimental validation using plane-parallel ionization chambers

A beam spoiler is often used to increase the build-up dose near the surface for treatment of superficial treatment areas. Photon-beam spoilers produce a large amount of contaminant electrons, conditions for which standard, commercial treatment-planning system dose-calculation algorithms are inadequate for producing accurate dose calculations. In this study, we implemented a Monte Carlo (MC) dose-calculation algorithm for this spoiler system. With and without a spoiler of 1 cm Lucite, depth doses and transverse profiles in the build-up region were measured for field sizes of 5 x 5 cm2 and 10 x 10 cm2 at the spoiler-to-surface distances (STSDs) of 6, 10 and 15 cm. An Attix chamber and a Markus chamber were used for depth doses, whereas a diode detector was used for transverse profiles. An MC simulation using BEAM/DOSXYZ was used to compare the calculated and the measured data. The MC calculations agreed with the Attix chamber measurements within 2% for all STSDs and field sizes, whereas the Markus data--even with corrections made-showed a discrepancy of about 3.5% with a maximum difference of 7.3% for a field size of 10 x 10 cm2 at an STSD of 6 cm. The MC treatment-planning system was successfully applied to a head-and-neck case using 6 MV photon beams with a beam spoiler.

Plane-parallel ionization chamber response in the buildup region of obliquely incident photon beams

Fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers have been shown to overestimate the dose in the buildup region of normally incident high-energy photon beams. This work shows that these ionization chambers exhibit an even greater over-response in the buildup region of obliquely incident photon beams. This over-response at oblique incidence is greatest at the surface of the phantom and increases with increasing angle of beam incidence. In addition, the magnitude of the over-response depends on field size, beam energy, and chamber construction. This study shows that plane-parallel ionization chambers can over-respond by more than a factor of 2.3 at the phantom surface for obliquely incident high-energy photon fields.

Surface dose measurements in clinical photon beams

Surface dose measurements have been made with different dosemeters routinely in clinical practice such as thermoluminescence (TL) dosemeters of different thicknesses or Si-diodes. The results obtained are compared with surface dose measurements made with an extrapolation chamber. TL-dosemeters with a thickness of 0.13 mm are shown to be suitable for skin dose estimations and accurate within 5% if appropriate correction factors are applied. The measured dose obtained for 60Co, 6 MV and 21 MV x-rays should, for these dosemeters, be multiplied by 0.82, 0.90 and 1.0 respectively to obtain the correct surface dose. Thicker dosemeters are inaccurate because they overestimate the surface dose inside the beam and underestimate it outside the beam and the deviation from the correct dose varies with irradiation geometry.

Some methodological problems in estimating radiobiological parameters from clinical data. Alpha/beta ratios and electron RBE for cutaneous reactions in patients treated with postmastectomy radiotherapy

A number of biological, dosimetric, and statistical problems encountered in the determination of alpha/beta ratios and the relative biological efficiency (RBE) of high energy electrons are discussed. The analysis is based on isoeffect dose determination from logit analysis of dose-response data. Monte Carlo simulations of the logit analysis show that the estimated isoeffect dose may be treated as a normally distributed random variable. Under this assumption, formulae for the standard error of the derived radiobiological parameters are presented. The importance of specifying not only parameter estimates but also their confidence limits is emphasized. As a practical example, the dose-response relationships for severe erythema and subcutaneous fibrosis are discussed in two series of patients treated with postmastectomy irradiation with electrons and photons in two fractionation schedules. Because of a different dose per fraction in the electron and photon fields, a determination of RBE requires a fraction size correction. This is performed using the alpha/beta formalism. The present analysis suggests a high energy electron RBE for severe erythema of 0.93 (95% confidence limits 0.89 and 0.96) and for subcutaneous fibrosis of 0.84 (95% confidence limits 0.77 and 0.92).