Outcome of removal of intrauterine devices with flexible hysteroscopy in early pregnancy

Hysteroscopic Removal of Intrauterine Device in Pregnancy: A Scoping Review to Guide Personalized Care

Background and objectives: Pregnancies that occur with an intrauterine device (IUD) in situ are at increased risk for developing severe conditions which may affect the fetus and the mother. The incidence of such adverse consequences significantly drops after device removal. A scoping review of the literature was performed to highlight the risks, benefits, and outcomes of hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices in early pregnancy. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. The review included all reports from 1990 to October 2022. The research strategy adopted included different combinations of the following terms: (“hysteroscopy”) AND (“pregnancy”) AND (“intrauterine device” or “IUD”) AND (“intrauterine system” or “IUS”). A scoping review of the hysteroscopic removal of IUDs during pregnancy was performed. All studies identified were listed by citation, title, authors, and abstract. Duplicates were identified by an independent manual screening performed by two researchers and then removed. For the eligibility process, two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of all non-duplicated papers and excluded those not pertinent to the topic. Results: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Nine manuscripts were detected, accounting for 153 patients. Most IUD removals occurred during the first trimester of pregnancy. Most of the time, the procedure was safe and without consequences. Conclusions: This review highlights the safety and efficacy of operative hysteroscopy as a method of IUD removal in early pregnancy. We recommend using a 3 to 5 mm hysteroscope, avoiding cervical dilation, and maintaining low infusion pressure during the procedure to avoid potential damage to the gestational sac and IUD fragment displacement. Heating the distension media to 30 °C should be considered.

Outpatient hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices in early pregnancy: feasibility and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To describe our experience with outpatient hysteroscopy for removal of intrauterine devices (IUDs) in pregnant patients, along with the pregnancy-related outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospectively and prospectively collected data between January 2015 and April 2021.

SETTING

Hysteroscopic outpatient clinic (See and Treat Clinic) at a university affiliated, tertiary medical center.

PATIENT(S)

Forty-one patients with an inadvertent but desired pregnancy up to 12 weeks + 6 days gestational age with an IUD in situ, with documented failed attempts of IUD removal.

INTERVENTION(S)

After ultrasonographic confirmation of IUD location, gestational age, and viability, a small-caliber hysteroscope was introduced via a vaginoscopic approach. The uterus was distended using 0.9% normal saline until a clear view was achieved. On visualization, the IUD was grasped by its strings, tail, or lateral arm using a semirigid hysteroscopic grasper. Oral antibiotic prophylaxis was prescribed in all cases.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome of interest was term delivery, from 37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported tolerability and satisfaction, and procedure-related and pregnancy related complications.

RESULT(S)

The procedure was completed successfully in all 41 patients. Thirty-three patients continued their pregnancies, resulting in 32 full-term singleton deliveries and 1 singleton preterm delivery at 33 + 4 weeks. Median gestational age at delivery was 39 weeks, with a median birthweight of 3,450 grams. Eight patients (19.5%) miscarried, 4 of these within a week of the procedure.

CONCLUSION(S)

In cases of desired pregnancy with an IUD, outpatient hysteroscopic removal of the IUD is a safe and effective management option. Broader uptake of outpatient hysteroscopy and development of hysteroscopic skills will allow more clinicians to offer patients this effective solution.

In-office Hysteroscopic Extraction of Intrauterine Devices in Pregnant Patients Who Underwent Prior Ultrasound-guided Extraction Failure

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine an effective method of intrauterine device (IUD) retrieval from pregnant women who had previous unsuccessful ultrasound-guided IUD extraction failure.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study (Canadian task force classification II-1).

SETTING

A gynecology department of an outpatient clinic.

PATIENTS

Pregnant patients in their first trimester with IUD in situ who underwent prior unsuccessful ultrasound-guided IUD extraction.

INTERVENTIONS

Hysteroscopic IUD extraction guided by transabdominal ultrasound.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2014, 7 of 8 pregnant patients who had undergone previous failed attempts at IUD retrieval via ultrasound guidance underwent successful removal via ultrasound-guided hysteroscopy performed without anesthesia. The sole patient with extraction failure was in her 12th week of pregnancy, and the procedure was concluded to avoid risk to the fetus. Minimal vaginal bleeding was experienced by 2 patients after the procedure. Seven of 8 patients delivered at term without any obstetric complications. One patient had a miscarriage in her 8th week of pregnancy, 2 weeks after successful IUD removal.

CONCLUSION

A novel, easy outpatient hysteroscopic technique without anesthesia is presented in case of failure of previous ultrasound-guided IUD removal in early pregnancy. Results are encouraging in this difficult context.

Saline Hysteroscopy for Removal of Retained Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices in Early Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancies complicated by a retained intrauterine device (IUD) are at increased risk for adverse outcomes such as miscarriage and preterm labour. There is limited evidence to guide the management of retained IUDs in pregnancy when the strings are not visible at the external cervical os. We describe a method for IUD retrieval in such cases.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients underwent saline hysteroscopy with or without concurrent ultrasound guidance for retrieval of a retained IUD in early pregnancy between 2002 and 2015. We retrospectively evaluated procedural and pregnancy-related outcomes in this case series.

RESULTS

The average gestational age at the time of the procedure was 11+0 weeks. Successful IUD retrieval occurred in 22 of 26 cases (84.6%). There were 23 live births, including 20 full term and three preterm deliveries. The average gestational age at delivery was 38+4 weeks. There was one miscarriage and one elective termination of pregnancy following the procedure. There were no complications directly related to the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Saline hysteroscopy is a safe and effective method for retrieval of a retained IUD in early pregnancy. It appears that concurrent ultrasound guidance can facilitate IUD localization, but more cases are needed to confirm this. Pregnancy outcomes after IUD retrieval were favourable, with a low rate of miscarriage and preterm labour.

Successful retrieval of an intrauterine device with "missing strings" using a manual vacuum aspirator in a desired early pregnancy: case report

Intrauterine pregnancy in the presence of an intrauterine device (IUD) is a rare event. If the pregnancy is desired, IUD removal must be negotiated so that the risk of pregnancy disruption is minimized. Cases in which the IUD strings are "missing" present further challenges. We report successful removal of a copper T380A IUD with missing strings using a hand-held manual vacuum aspirator in the setting of a desired pregnancy. Under real-time abdominal ultrasound guidance, the IUD was removed from the lower cervical canal using a 6-mm cannula attached to a manual vacuum aspirator. Fetal cardiac activity was undisturbed throughout the procedure. The patient subsequently delivered a healthy full-term infant via spontaneous vaginal delivery. Manual vacuum aspiration, a simple office-based procedure, may be a useful approach to removal of an IUD with missing strings.

Development of hysteroscopy: From a dream to a reality, and its linkage to the present and future

Hysteroscopy today represents 200 years of salient innovations in instrumentation, new clinical applications for existing instruments, and continual modification of techniques, all aiming at observing, diagnosing, and treating pathologic conditions of the uterine cavity. Pioneers established the fundamental principles of intrauterine observation that steady technological advances would simplify and refine, all the way to the instrumentation and ancillary equipment now in use. Homage should be given and tribute paid to predecessors who made instrumentation, intrauterine distention, and illumination safe and practical for diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy. Their accomplishments are remembered as we look with optimism to the many advances that undoubtedly will mark the future of hysteroscopy.

Lost intrauterine devices during pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcome after ultrasound-guided extraction. An analysis of 82 cases

OBJECTIVES

It is generally agreed that intrauterine devices (IUDs) with visible strings in pregnancy should be removed because of the increased risk of miscarriage, septic complications and premature delivery. The precise management of pregnancies in association with so-called 'lost IUDs', and especially the technique of their removal, has remained controversial. We present our experience of the management of intrauterine pregnancies with a lost IUD.

METHODS

Ultrasound-guided extraction of a lost IUD was performed in 82 intrauterine pregnancies. The subsequent outcome of the pregnancies is described.

RESULTS

There were no intra- or post-procedure maternal complications. Although the miscarriage rate in the first 3 weeks after the procedure was higher than that in normal pregnancy, the complication rate approached that of normal pregnancy as the pregnancies progressed. The total miscarriage rate of 22% was comparable to that following extraction of IUDs with visible filaments. The rate of live births was 77.0%. Delivery before 37 weeks occurred in 13.5% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided extraction is a minimally invasive and inexpensive procedure that is associated with few postoperative complications. It has a high success rate and is associated with a moderate miscarriage rate and no maternal complications.