Consensus Guidelines for the Design and In Vitro Preclinical Efficacy Testing N-of-1 Exon Skipping Antisense Oligonucleotides

Between hope and reality: treatment of genetic diseases through nucleic acid-based drugs

Rare diseases (RD) affect a small number of people compared to the general population and are mostly genetic in origin. The first clinical signs often appear at birth or in childhood, and patients endure high levels of pain and progressive loss of autonomy frequently associated with short life expectancy. Until recently, the low prevalence of RD and the gatekeeping delay in their diagnosis have long hampered research. The era of nucleic acid (NA)-based therapies has revolutionized the landscape of RD treatment and new hopes arise with the perspectives of disease-modifying drugs development as some NA-based therapies are now entering the clinical stage. Herein, we review NA-based drugs that were approved and are currently under investigation for the treatment of RD. We also discuss the recent structural improvements of NA-based therapeutics and delivery system, which overcome the main limitations in their market expansion and the current approaches that are developed to address the endosomal escape issue. We finally open the discussion on the ethical and societal issues that raise this new technology in terms of regulatory approval and sustainability of production.

Nucleic Acid Therapeutics: Successes, Milestones, and Upcoming Innovation

Nucleic acid-based therapies have become the third major drug class after small molecules and antibodies. The role of nucleic acid-based therapies has been strengthened by recent regulatory approvals and tremendous clinical success. In this review, we look at the major obstacles that have hindered the field, the historical milestones that have been achieved, and what is yet to be resolved and anticipated soon. This review provides a view of the key innovations that are expanding nucleic acid capabilities, setting the stage for the future of nucleic acid therapeutics.

Preclinical Development of Antisense Oligonucleotides to Rescue Aberrant Splicing Caused by an Ultrarare ABCA4 Variant in a Child with Early-Onset Stargardt Disease

Precision medicine is rapidly gaining recognition in the field of (ultra)rare conditions, where only a few individuals in the world are affected. Clinical trial design for a small number of patients is extremely challenging, and for this reason, the development of N-of-1 strategies is explored to accelerate customized therapy design for rare cases. A strong candidate for this approach is Stargardt disease (STGD1), an autosomal recessive macular degeneration characterized by high genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. STGD1 is caused by pathogenic variants in ABCA4, and amongst them, several deep-intronic variants alter the pre-mRNA splicing process, generally resulting in the insertion of pseudoexons (PEs) into the final transcript. In this study, we describe a 10-year-old girl harboring the unique deep-intronic ABCA4 variant c.6817-713A>G. Clinically, she presents with typical early-onset STGD1 with a high disease symmetry between her two eyes. Molecularly, we designed antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) to block the produced PE insertion. Splicing rescue was assessed in three different in vitro models: HEK293T cells, fibroblasts, and photoreceptor precursor cells, the last two being derived from the patient. Overall, our research is intended to serve as the basis for a personalized N-of-1 AON-based treatment to stop early vision loss in this patient.

Chemically Modified Platforms for Better RNA Therapeutics

RNA-based therapies have catalyzed a revolutionary transformation in the biomedical landscape, offering unprecedented potential in disease prevention and treatment. However, despite their remarkable achievements, these therapies encounter substantial challenges including low stability, susceptibility to degradation by nucleases, and a prominent negative charge, thereby hindering further development. Chemically modified platforms have emerged as a strategic innovation, focusing on precise alterations either on the RNA moieties or their associated delivery vectors. This comprehensive review delves into these platforms, underscoring their significance in augmenting the performance and translational prospects of RNA-based therapeutics. It encompasses an in-depth analysis of various chemically modified delivery platforms that have been instrumental in propelling RNA therapeutics toward clinical utility. Moreover, the review scrutinizes the rationale behind diverse chemical modification techniques aiming at optimizing the therapeutic efficacy of RNA molecules, thereby facilitating robust disease management. Recent empirical studies corroborating the efficacy enhancement of RNA therapeutics through chemical modifications are highlighted. Conclusively, we offer profound insights into the transformative impact of chemical modifications on RNA drugs and delineates prospective trajectories for their future development and clinical integration.

Targeting RNA with synthetic oligonucleotides: Clinical success invites new challenges

Synthetic antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and duplex RNAs (dsRNAs) are an increasingly successful strategy for drug development. After a slow start, the pace of success has accelerated since the approval of Spinraza (nusinersen) in 2016 with several drug approvals. These accomplishments have been achieved even though oligonucleotides are large, negatively charged, and have little resemblance to traditional small-molecule drugs-a remarkable achievement of basic and applied science. The goal of this review is to summarize the foundation underlying recent progress and describe ongoing research programs that may increase the scope and impact of oligonucleotide therapeutics.

Possibilities and limitations of antisense oligonucleotide therapies for the treatment of monogenic disorders

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are incredibly versatile molecules that can be designed to specifically target and modify RNA transcripts to slow down or halt rare genetic disease progression. They offer the potential to target groups of patients or can be tailored for individual cases. Nonetheless, not all genetic variants and disorders are amenable to ASO-based treatments, and hence, it is important to consider several factors before embarking on the drug development journey. Here, we discuss which genetic disorders have the potential to benefit from a specific type of ASO approach, based on the pathophysiology of the disease and pathogenic variant type, as well as those disorders that might not be suitable for ASO therapies. We further explore additional aspects, such as the target tissues, intervention time points, and potential clinical benefits, which need to be considered before developing a compound. Overall, we provide an overview of the current potentials and limitations of ASO-based therapeutics for the treatment of monogenic disorders.

A Multistakeholder Perspective on Advancing Individualized Therapeutics

Precision medicine has evolved from the application of pharmacogenetic biomarkers to the prospective development of targeted therapies in patients with specific molecular/genetic subtypes of disease to truly "N-of-1" medicines targeted to very small numbers of patients - in some cases, a single identified patient. This latter iteration of precision medicine presents unprecedented opportunities for patients with severe, life-threatening, or life-limiting diseases. At the same time, these modalities present complex scientific, clinical, and regulatory challenges. To realize the promise of individualized medicines, a multistakeholder approach to streamlining medical diagnoses, advancing the technologies that enable development of these therapeutic modalities, and re-envisioning collaborative environments for access and evidence generation is of critical importance. Herein, we highlight some of these challenges and opportunities.

Experimental Model Systems Used in the Preclinical Development of Nucleic Acid Therapeutics

Preclinical evaluation of nucleic acid therapeutics (NATs) in relevant experimental model systems is essential for NAT drug development. As part of COST Action "DARTER" (Delivery of Antisense RNA ThERapeutics), a network of researchers in the field of RNA therapeutics, we have conducted a survey on the experimental model systems routinely used by our members in preclinical NAT development. The questionnaire focused on both cellular and animal models. Our survey results suggest that skin fibroblast cultures derived from patients is the most commonly used cellular model, while induced pluripotent stem cell-derived models are also highly reported, highlighting the increasing potential of this technology. Splice-switching antisense oligonucleotide is the most frequently investigated RNA molecule, followed by small interfering RNA. Animal models are less prevalent but also widely used among groups in the network, with transgenic mouse models ranking the top. Concerning the research fields represented in our survey, the mostly studied disease area is neuromuscular disorders, followed by neurometabolic diseases and cancers. Brain, skeletal muscle, heart, and liver are the top four tissues of interest reported. We expect that this snapshot of the current preclinical models will facilitate decision making and the share of resources between academics and industry worldwide to facilitate the development of NATs.

Development of tailored splice-switching oligonucleotides for progressive brain disorders in Europe: development, regulation, and implementation considerations

Splice-modulating antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) offer treatment options for rare neurological diseases, including those with very rare mutations, where patient-specific, individualized ASOs have to be developed. Inspired by the development of milasen, the 1 Mutation 1 Medicine (1M1M) and Dutch Center for RNA Therapeutics (DCRT) aim to develop patient-specific ASOs and treat eligible patients within Europe and the Netherlands, respectively. Treatment will be provided under a named patient setting. Our initiatives benefited from regulatory advice from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) with regard to preclinical proof-of-concept studies, safety studies, compounding and measuring benefit and safety in treated patients. We here outline the most important considerations from these interactions and how we implemented this advice into our plan to develop and treat eligible patients within Europe.