Feasibility of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation after azacitidine bridge in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and low blast count acute myeloid leukemia: results of the BMT-AZA prospective study

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in MDS patients of older age

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has evolved to an essential treatment in younger and more recently in elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the age group with the highest incidence. Less intense conditioning regimens and improvements in supportive therapy have reduced considerably transplant related mortality and in the same time increased the access to this curative treatment. Timing of HCT in the course of the disease assumes a crucial role. Detection of disease progression, geriatric assessment, comorbidity evaluation, and identification of transplant-specific risks are becoming increasingly important in this context. Novel statistical methods, molecular biomarkers, and quantification of tumor burden pre- and post-HCT will play an essential role in years to come. More effective and less toxic treatments to reduce the tumor burden before and/or after HCT are expected to improve the outcome. In this review article we discuss the current views and what we can expect.

Outcomes of transplant-eligible patients with myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts registered in an observational study: The JALSG-CS11-MDS-SCT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, whether bridging therapy (BRT) including azacitidine (AZA) and combination chemotherapy (CCT) prior to allo-SCT should be performed is unclear. We analyzed BRT and the outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts (MDS-EB) who were ≤ 70 years old at the time of registration for a prospective observational study to clarify the optimal allo-SCT strategy for high-risk MDS. A total of 371 patients were included in this study. Among 188 patients (50.7%) who were considered for allo-SCT, 141 underwent allo-SCT. Among the patients who underwent allo-SCT, 64 received AZA, 29 received CCT, and 26 underwent allo-SCT without BRT as the initial treatment. Multivariate analysis identified BRT as an independent factor influencing overall survival (AZA vs. without BRT, hazard ratio [HR] 3.33, P = 0.005; CCT vs. without BRT, HR 3.82, P = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, BRT was independently associated with progression-free survival (AZA vs. without BRT: HR, 2.23; P = 0.041; CCT vs. without BRT: HR, 2.94; P = 0.010). Transplant-eligible patients with MDS-EB should undergo allo-SCT when clinically acceptable, and upfront allo-SCT without BRT may be superior to AZA or CCT.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Improves Outcome in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Across High-Risk Genetic Subgroups: Genetic Analysis of the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1102 Study

PURPOSE

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) improves overall survival (OS). We evaluated the impact of MDS genetics on the benefit of HCT in a biological assignment (donor v no donor) study.

METHODS

We performed targeted sequencing in 309 patients age 50-75 years with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) intermediate-2 or high-risk MDS, enrolled in the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1102 study and assessed the association of gene mutations with OS. Patients with TP53 mutations were classified as TP53multihit if two alleles were altered (via point mutation, deletion, or copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity).

RESULTS

The distribution of gene mutations was similar in the donor and no donor arms, with TP53 (28% v 29%; P = .89), ASXL1 (23% v 29%; P = .37), and SRSF2 (16% v 16%; P = .99) being most common. OS in patients with a TP53 mutation was worse compared with patients without TP53 mutation (21% ± 5% [SE] v 52% ± 4% at 3 years; P < .001). Among those with a TP53 mutation, OS was similar between TP53single versus TP53multihit (22% ± 8% v 20% ± 6% at 3 years; P = .31). Considering HCT as a time-dependent covariate, patients with a TP53 mutation who underwent HCT had improved OS compared with non-HCT treatment (OS at 3 years: 23% ± 7% v 11% ± 7%; P = .04), associated with a hazard ratio of 3.89; 95% CI, 1.87 to 8.12; P < .001 after adjustment for covariates. OS among patients with molecular IPSS (IPSS-M) very high risk without a TP53 mutation was significantly improved if they had a donor (68% ± 10% v 0% ± 12% at 3 years; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

HCT improved OS compared with non-HCT treatment in patients with TP53 mutations irrespective of TP53 allelic status. Patients with IPSS-M very high risk without a TP53 mutation had favorable outcomes when a donor was available.

What's Next after Hypomethylating Agents Failure in Myeloid Neoplasms? A Rational Approach

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) such as azacitidine and decitabine are a mainstay in the current management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as either single agents or in multidrug combinations. Resistance to HMA is not uncommon, and it can result due to several tumor cellular adaptations. Several clinical and genomic factors have been identified as predictors of HMA resistance. However, the management of MDS/AML patients after the failure of HMA remains challenging in the absence of standardized guidelines. Indeed, this is an area of active research with several potential therapeutic agents currently under development, some of which have demonstrated therapeutic potential in early clinical trials, especially in cases with particular mutational characteristics. Here, we review the latest findings and give a rational approach for such a challenging scenario.

Generalist in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for MDS or AML: Epigenetic therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for patients with myeloid malignancies such as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, relapse and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) still affect the survival of patients who receive allo-HSCT, and more appropriate therapeutic strategies should be applied at all stages of transplantation to prevent these adverse events. The use of epigenetics agents, such as hypomethylating agents (HMAs), has been explored to decrease the risk of relapse by epigenetic modulation, which is especially effective among AML patients with poor mutations in epigenetic regulators. Furthermore, epigenetic agents have also been regarded as prophylactic methods for GvHD management without abrogating graft versus leukemia (GvL) effects. Therefore, the combination of epigenetic therapy and HSCT may optimize the transplantation process and prevent treatment failure. Existing studies have investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of using HMAs in the pretransplant, transplant and posttransplant stages among MDS and AML patients. This review examines the application of HMAs as a bridge treatment to reduce the tumor burden and the determine appropriate dose during allo-HSCT. Within this review, we also examine the efficacy and safety of HMAs alone or HMA-based strategies in posttransplant settings for MDS and AML. Finally, we provide an overview of other epigenetic candidates, which have been discussed in the nontransplant setting.

Demethylation and Up-Regulation of an Oncogene after Hypomethylating Therapy

BACKGROUND

Although hypomethylating agents are currently used to treat patients with cancer, whether they can also reactivate and up-regulate oncogenes is not well elucidated.

METHODS

We examined the effect of hypomethylating agents on SALL4, a known oncogene that plays an important role in myelodysplastic syndrome and other cancers. Paired bone marrow samples that were obtained from two cohorts of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome before and after treatment with a hypomethylating agent were used to explore the relationships among changes in SALL4 expression, treatment response, and clinical outcome. Leukemic cell lines with low or undetectable SALL4 expression were used to study the relationship between SALL4 methylation and expression. A locus-specific demethylation technology, CRISPR-DNMT1-interacting RNA (CRISPR-DiR), was used to identify the CpG island that is critical for SALL4 expression.

RESULTS

SALL4 up-regulation after treatment with hypomethylating agents was observed in 10 of 25 patients (40%) in cohort 1 and in 13 of 43 patients (30%) in cohort 2 and was associated with a worse outcome. Using CRISPR-DiR, we discovered that demethylation of a CpG island within the 5' untranslated region was critical for SALL4 expression. In cell lines and patients, we confirmed that treatment with a hypomethylating agent led to demethylation of the same CpG region and up-regulation of SALL4 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

By combining analysis of patient samples with CRISPR-DiR technology, we found that demethylation and up-regulation of an oncogene after treatment with a hypomethylating agent can indeed occur and should be further studied. (Funded by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro and others.).

Low-Dose 5-Aza and DZnep Alleviate Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease With Less Side Effects Through Altering T-Cell Differentiation

Objective

Previous studies showed that hypomethylating agents (HMAs) could alleviate acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), but affect engraftment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The combination of two different HMAs in lower doses might overcome this problem. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of the combination of two HMAs—azacitidine (5-Aza) and histone H3K27 methyltransferase inhibitor 3-deazaneplanocin (DZNep)—for the prophylaxis of aGvHD after allo-HSCT and to explore the possible mechanisms.

Methods

We first optimized the concentrations of individual and combinational 5-Aza and DZNep treatments to ensure no obvious toxicities on activated T cells by evaluating T-cell proliferation, viability, and differentiation. A mouse model of aGvHD was then established to assess the prophylactic efficacy of 5-Aza, DZNep, and their combination on aGvHD. The immunomodulatory effect on T cells and the hematopoietic reconstruction were assessed. Additionally, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Results

Compared with single treatments, the in vitro application of 5-Aza with DZNep could more powerfully reduce the production of T helper type 1 (Th1)/T cytotoxic type 1 (Tc1) cells and increase the production of regulatory T cells (Tregs). In an allo-HSCT mouse model, in vivo administration of 5-Aza with DZNep could enhance the prophylactic effect for aGvHD compared with single agents. The mechanism study demonstrated that the combination of 5-Aza and DZNep in vivo had an enhanced effect to inhibit the production of Th1/Tc1, increase the proportions of Th2/Tc2, and induce the differentiation of Tregs as in vitro. RNA-seq analysis revealed the cytokine and chemokine pathways as one mechanism for the alleviation of aGvHD with the combination of 5-Aza and DZNep.

Conclusion

The combination of 5-Aza and DZNep could enhance the prophylactic effect for aGvHD by influencing donor T-cell differentiation through affecting cytokine and chemokine pathways. This study shed light on the effectively prophylactic measure for aGvHD using different epigenetic agent combinations.

OUP accepted manuscript

As in younger patients, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) offers the best chance for durable remission in older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, defining the best treatment strategy (and in particular, whether or not to proceed to alloHSCT) for elderly patients with AML remains a difficult decision for the hematologist, since potential toxicity of conditioning regimens, risks of graft-versus-host disease, impaired immune reconstitution and the need for prolonged immunosuppression may be of major concern in these vulnerable patients with complex needs. Hopefully, significant progress has been made over the past decade in alloHSCT for elderly patients and current evidence suggests that chronological age per se (between 60 and 75) is not a reliable predictor of outcome after alloHSCT. Here, we review the current state of alloHSCT in elderly patients with AML and also discuss the different approaches currently being investigated to improve both accessibility to as well as success of alloHSCT in these patients.

Current status of pretransplant intensive chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents for myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndrome is a heterogeneous disease with survival probabilities ranging from a few months to several years. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only curative treatment. Although access (up to 75 years) and outcome of HCT have improved steadily in recent years, high relapse rates and, to a lower extent, treatment related mortalities are a persisting problem. Reduction of tumor burden before HCT has been shown to decrease relapse incidence and often overall survival (OS) in hematological malignancies but the role of pretransplant therapy in MDS remains controversial. We reviewed the role of pretransplant therapy on outcome in MDS patients. No prospective randomized trial addressed this issue so far. Retrospective studies have shown that pretransplant therapy reduces the risk of relapse, but does not improve survival. In addition, registry studies from diagnosis with standard protocols are proposed in order to exclude patient selection. With the availability of new, more effective and low-toxicity therapies, it may be possible to achieve a significant improvement of OS in the future.

Meta-analysis of the benefit of hypomethylating agents before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelodysplastic syndromes

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are effective therapies in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only way to cure MDS. According to the current literature, it is difficult to confirm whether HMAs bridging therapy is beneficial for MDS patients receiving allo-HSCT. Therefore, we tried to evaluate the effect of HMAs on long-term survival of the MDS patients. Databases, including PubMed, Embase Ovid, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for studies published up to January 10, 2021. Patients who accepted HMAs bridging to allo-HSCT were defined as experimental group, while patients who received the best supportive care (BSC) before allo-HSCT were control group. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. Seven studies were included in the final analysis. The final results showed no OS differences between patients accepted HMAs before allo-HSCT and those received BSC (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.64-1.15, p = 0.32), indicating that MDS patients' long-term survival did not benefit from HMAs bridging therapy before allo-HSCT. This conclusion needs to be further verified by a large number of prospective randomized controlled trials, which have guiding significance for the treatment of MDS patients.

Comparison Between 5-Azacytidine Treatment and Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients With Advanced MDS According to Donor Availability (VidazaAllo Study)

PURPOSE

In contrast to 5-azacytidine (5-aza), allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a curative treatment strategy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but therapy-related mortality (TRM) limits its broader use in elderly patients with MDS. The present prospective multicenter study compared HSCT following 5-aza pretreatment with continuous 5-aza treatment in patients with higher-risk MDS age 55-70 years.

METHODS

One hundred ninety patients with a median age of 63 years were enrolled. Patients received 4-6 cycles of 5-aza followed by HLA-compatible HSCT after reduced-intensity conditioning or by continuous 5-aza if no donor was identified.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients did not fulfill inclusion criteria (n = 20), died (n = 2) withdrew informed consent (n = 5), or were excluded for an unknown reason (n = 1). 5-aza induction started in 162 patients, but only 108 (67%) were eligible for subsequent allocation to HSCT (n = 81) or continuation of 5-aza (n = 27) because of disease progression (n = 26), death (n = 12), or other reasons (n = 16). Seven percent died during 5-aza before treatment allocation. The cumulative incidence of TRM after HSCT at 1 year was 19%. The event-free survival and overall survival after 5-aza pretreatment and treatment allocation at 3 years were 34% (95% CI, 22 to 47) and 50% (95% CI, 39 to 61) after allograft and 0% and 32% (95% CI, 14 to 52) after continuous 5-aza treatment (P < .0001 and P = .12), respectively. Fourteen patients progressing after continuous 5-aza received a salvage allograft from an alternative donor, and 43% were alive at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In older patients with MDS, reduced-intensity conditioning HSCT resulted in a significantly improved event-free survival in comparison with continuous 5-aza therapy. Bridging with 5-aza to HSCT before is associated with a considerable rate of dropouts because of progression, mortality, and adverse events.

Pre-transplant therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The value of pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is controversial. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the effects of cytoreduction before transplantation.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Chinese databases were searched to identify studies comparing post-transplant outcomes in MDS patients receiving different pre-transplant therapy. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Eighteen reports were included. Post-transplant outcomes were similar for MDS patients receiving pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy and upfront transplantation in terms of overall survival (OS: HR, 0.92; 95 % CI, 0.79-1.07), relapse-free survival (RFS: HR, 1.18; 95 % CI, 0.94-1.47), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR: HR, 1.08; 95 % CI, 0.88-1.33), and non-relapse mortality (NRM: HR, 0.93; 95 % CI, 0.74-1.18). Pre-transplant hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and chemotherapy were not different regarding post-transplant OS, RFS, CIR, and NRM. Achieving complete remission (CR) before transplantation was associated with increased RFS (HR, 0.80; 95 %CI, 0.63-1.00) and decreased NRM (HR, 0.53; 95 % CI, 0.32-0.90) when compared with upfront transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Timely transplantation is of great value for MDS patients. Suitable pre-transplant cytoreduction could be used during the search for donors.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Who, When, and How?

Although the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy achieve a complete remission (CR), many are destined to relapse if treated with intensive chemotherapy alone. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) represents a pivotally important treatment strategy in fit adults with AML because of its augmented anti-leukemic activity consequent upon dose intensification and the genesis of a potent graft-versus-leukemia effect. Increased donor availability coupled with the advent of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has dramatically increased transplant access and consequently allo-SCT is now a key component of the treatment algorithm in both patients with AML in first CR (CR1) and advanced disease. Although transplant related mortality has fallen steadily over recent decades there has been no real progress in reducing the risk of disease relapse which remains the major cause of transplant failure and represents a major area of unmet need. A number of therapeutic approaches with the potential to reduce disease relapse, including advances in induction chemotherapy, the development of novel conditioning regimens and the emergence of the concept of post-transplant maintenance, are currently under development. Furthermore, the use of genetics and measurable residual disease technology in disease assessment has improved the identification of patients who are likely to benefit from an allo-SCT which now represents an increasingly personalized therapy. Future progress in optimizing transplant outcome will be dependent on the successful delivery by the international transplant community of randomized prospective clinical trials which permit examination of current and future transplant therapies with the same degree of rigor as is routinely adopted for non-transplant therapies.

Comparison of Upfront Transplantation and Pretransplant Cytoreductive Therapy for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative therapy for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the value of pretransplant cytoreduction remains debatable.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of upfront transplantation and pretransplant cytoreduction. Of 69 patients, 39 received upfront allo-HSCT and 30 received pretransplant cytoreduction, including chemotherapy (n = 16), hypomethylating agents (HMAs, n = 6), and HMAs with chemotherapy (n = 8).

RESULTS

The upfront group achieved similar overall survival (OS) and a trend of better progression-free survival (PFS) from diagnosis compared with the cytoreduction group (3-year PFS, 64.0% vs. 44.4%, P = .076). Posttransplant outcomes were comparable between the two groups in terms of OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In patients with ≥2 mutations, the upfront group achieved better OS and PFS (3-year OS, 100.0% vs. 68.6%, P = .044; 3-year PFS: 92.3% vs. 43.9%, P = .016) than the cytoreduction group. Patients achieving remission in the cytoreduction group had outcomes similar to the upfront group, but those without remission before transplantation had a significantly worse posttransplant OS (3-year OS, 46.7% vs. 75.7%, P = .038). Patients with pretransplant HMAs had better PFS than those with chemotherapy or HMAs plus chemotherapy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with pretransplant cytoreduction, upfront allo-HSCT might provide more benefit to some patients with advanced MDS if there are suitable donors. HMAs would be a good alternative during the donor search.

Optimizing Transplant Approaches and Post-Transplant Strategies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is the commonest indication for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) worldwide. The increasingly important role of allo-SCT in the management of AML has been underpinned by two important advances. Firstly, improvements in disease risk stratification utilizing genetic and Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) technologies permit ever more accurate identification of allo-mandatory patients who are at high risk of relapse if treated by chemotherapy alone. Secondly, increased donor availability coupled with the advent of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has substantially expanded transplant access for patients with high risk AML In patients allografted for AML disease relapse continues to represent the commonest cause of transplant failure and the development of novel strategies with the potential to reduce disease recurrence represents a major unmet need.

Epigenetic-based therapy in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Novel opportunities for personalized treatment

Current management of patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) lacks immunosuppressant drugs able to block the host immune response toward the graft antigens. Novel treatments may include epigenetic compounds (epidrugs) some of which have been yet approved by the Food and Drugs Administration for the treatment of specific blood malignancies. The most investigated in clinical trials for allo-HSCT are DNA demethylating agents (DNMTi), such as azacitidine (Vidaza) and decitabine (Dacogen) as well as histone deacetylases inhibitors (HDACi), such as vorinostat (Zolinza) and panobinostat (Farydak). Indeed, azacitidine monotherapy before allo-HSCT may reduce the conventional chemotherapy-related complications, whereas it may reduce relapse risk and death after allo-HSCT. Besides, a decitabine-containing conditioning regimen could protect against graft versus host disease (GVHD) and respiratory infections after allo-HSCT. Regarding HDACi, the addition of vorinostat and panobinostat to the conditioning regimen after allo-HSCT seems to reduce the incidence of acute GVHD. Furthermore, panobinostat alone or in combination with low-dose decitabine may reduce the relapse rate in high-risk patients with acute myeloid leukemia patients after allo-HSCT. We discuss the phase 1 and 2 clinical trials evaluating the possible beneficial effects of repurposing specific epidrugs which may guide personalized therapy in the setting of allo-HSCT.

Pre-transplantation cytoreduction does not benefit advanced myelodysplastic syndrome patients after myeloablative transplantation with grafts from family donors

BACKGROUND

The role of pre-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) cytoreduction with either induction chemotherapy (IC) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in treating advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains debatable. We aimed to evaluate pre-HSCT strategies by comparing the endpoints related to disease control between advanced MDS patients with pre-HSCT cytoreduction and those with best supportive care.

METHODS

We described 228 consecutive advanced MDS patients who received HSCT from a haploidentical donor (HID, n = 162) or matched related donor (MSD, n = 66) with uniform myeloablative conditioning regimens between January 2015 and December 2018. Of these 228 patients, 131 (57.5%) were treated exclusively with pre-HSCT best supportive care (BSC), 49 (22.5%) were given HMA, and 48 (21.1%) received both IC and HMA. Propensity score-matching analysis, multivariate analyses, and subgroup analyses were performed to elucidate the impact of pre-HSCT strategies on transplant outcomes.

RESULTS

The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 78.2% and 70.0% for the BSC and cytoreduction cohorts (P = 0.189) and were 78.2%, 66.7%, and 73.2% for the BSC, HMA, and HMA+IC groups, respectively (P = 0.269). A propensity score-matching analysis confirmed that the 3-year RFS rates were 81.9%, 87.5%, and 66.9% for BSC, cytoreduction complete remission (CR), and cytoreduction non-CR groups, respectively (P = 0.051). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that pre-HSCT cytoreduction, older patient age, monosomal karyotype, and interval between diagnosis and HSCT were poor prognostic factors for RFS. In the subgroup analyses, BSC was associated with longer RFS compared to cytoreduction among the younger patients, those with international prognostic scoring system intermediate-2/high risk at diagnosis, and those with intermediate/poor cytogenetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Different pre-HSCT therapies did not yield discrepant post-HSCT outcomes. No benefit in terms of post-HSCT outcomes were correlated with pre-HSCT cytoreduction in advanced MDS even for cytoreduction CR patients. Early referral to HSCT is essential for advanced MDS patients.

Emerging treatment options for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis with peripheral blood cytopenias, dysplastic cell morphology, and a variable risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine and decitabine have been used for over a decade in MDS treatment and lead to a modest survival benefit. However, response rates are only around 40% and responses are mostly transient. For HMA-refractory patients the prognosis is poor and there are no therapies approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration.

Combinations of HMAs, especially along with immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown promising signals in both the frontline and HMA-refractory setting. Several other novel agents including orally available and longer acting HMAs, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax, oral agents targeting driver mutations (IDH1/2, FLT3), immunotherapies, and new options for intensive chemotherapy have been studied with variable success and will be reviewed herein. Except for the minority of patients with targetable driver mutations, HMAs – likely as part of combination therapies – will remain the backbone of frontline MDS treatment. However, the wider use of genetic testing may enable a more targeted and individualized therapy of MDS patients.

Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Are We Now?

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1 negative (aCML) is a rare myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) with a high rate of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia, and poor survival. Until now, the diagnosis has been based on morphological grounds only, possibly making the real frequency of the disease underestimated. Only recently, new insights in the molecular biology of MDS/MPN syndromes have deepened our knowledge of aCML, enabling us to have a better molecular profile of the disease. The knowledge gleaned from next generation sequencing has complemented morphologic and laboratory WHO criteria for myeloid neoplasms and can provide greater specificity in distinguishing aCML from alternative MDS/MPN or MPNs. The most commonly mutated genes (>20%) in aCML are SETBP1, ASXL1, N/K-RAS, SRSF2, and TET2, and less frequently (< 10%) CBL, CSFR3, JAK2, EZH2, and ETNK1. Several of these mutations affect the JAK-STAT, MAPK, and ROCK signaling pathways, which are targetable by inhibitors that are already in clinical use and may lead to a personalized treatment of aCML patients unfit for allogeneic transplant, which is currently the only curative option for fit patients. In this review, we present two emblematic clinical cases and address the new molecular findings in aCML and the available treatment options.

Acute myeloid leukemia with inv(3)(q21.3q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2): Study of 61 patients treated with intensive protocols

INTRODUCTION

Inv(3)(q21.3q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2) is a rare poor prognosis cytogenetic abnormality present in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other myeloid neoplasms.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of a cohort of 61 patients with newly diagnosed AML with inv(3)/t(3;3) treated with homogeneous intensive chemotherapy protocols conducted by the Spanish PETHEMA and CETLAM cooperative groups between 1999 and 2017.

METHODS

In this retrospective study the main clinical and biologic parameters were collected. The complete response (CR) rate, the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and the overall survival (OS) were calculated. An analysis of prognostic factors for survival was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients received induction and only 18 (29%) achieved CR (median age, 46 years). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) was performed in 36 patients (59%), 15 with active disease. One- and 4-year CIR were 52% and 56%. One- and 4-year OS probabilities were 41% and 13%. By multivariate analysis monosomal karyotype (MK) was associated with poorer OS (HR 2.0, P = .017).

CONCLUSION

Inv(3)/t(3;3) AML is a poor prognosis entity with low response to standard chemotherapy and to alloHSCT because of frequent and early relapse. MK was associated with a poorer prognosis. Improved therapeutic strategies are clearly needed.

In MDS, is higher risk higher reward?

Patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) are defined by the original or revised International Prognostic Scoring System and specific genetic features. Treatment of HR-MDS is challenging. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only curative approach, is feasible in a minority of fit or intermediate fitness patients aged <70 to 75 years who are willing to face the risks of the procedure. Response to azacitidine and decitabine, the only approved drugs for HR-MDS and considered the standard of care, is partial and transient in most patients. The development of novel more personalized and efficient drugs is an unmet medical need. During the last decade, there have been substantial advances in understanding the multiple molecular, cellular, and immunological disturbances involved in the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndrome. As a result, a number of clinical and translational studies of new more focused treatment approaches for HR-MDS patients are underway. In contrast to acute myeloid leukemia, they have not resulted in any new drug approval. This review addresses the benefits and limitations of current treatment alternatives, offers a practical individualized treatment approach, and summarizes the clinical trials in progress for HR-MDS.

Hematological malignancies and molecular targeting therapy

Recent genetic analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) vastly improved the understanding of molecular mechanism of hematological malignancies. Many molecular targeting drugs have since been used in the clinic, which is timely as clinical outcomes using conventional chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) reached a plateau. The first memorable success in this field was imatinib, a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which has been applied in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) since 2001. Imatinib drastically changed CML treatment and many CML patients no longer require HSCT. Recently, the second generation TKIs, dasatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib, have also been available for CML patients. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is sub-categorized based on cytogenetic or molecular genetic abnormalities. Chemotherapy and HSCT combined with TKI improved the event-free survival rate from 20% to 80% in Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-positive ALL. Reportedly, another Ph-like ALL subgroup with poor prognosis can also be treated by TKIs; additionally, cell therapies that include bispecific T-cell engagers or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy are emerging. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous disease and FMS-like related tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3)-internal tandem duplication, is the most robust marker for poor prognosis. Several first-generation TKIs have been studied for clinical use. Notably, chemotherapy plus midostaurin improved survival compared with chemotherapy alone. Therefore, midostaurin was approved to treat adult AML patients with FLT3-ITD in 2017. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, a selective anti-CD33 antibody-calicheamicin conjugate, is approved for clinical practice. Many molecular targeting agents are now being used for hematological malignancies.

Increased opportunity for prolonged survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients aged 60-69 years with myelodysplastic syndrome

We conducted a nationwide retrospective study to evaluate the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in 651 patients aged 60-69 years with de novo myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We divided patients into two groups: 152 and 499 patients with an early and advanced disease status, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with an early disease status was 45.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.0 to 54.2%). A multivariate analysis revealed five adverse factors for OS: performance status (PS) 2-4 (hazard ratio [HR] 4.48; P < .001), poor cytogenetic risk group (HR 1.83; P = .041), male recipient (HR 2.58; P = .003), use of HLA-mismatched related grafts (HR 4.75; P = .003), and unrelated cord blood (HR 2.47; P = .023). The 3-year OS rate of patients with an advanced disease status was 37.2% (95% CI 32.4 to 41.9%). Five factors correlated with worse OS: PS 2-4 (HR 1.72; P = .003), poor cytogenetic risk group (HR 1.49; P = .003), use of HLA-mismatched related grafts (HR 1.96; P = .015), unrelated cord blood (HR 2.05; P < .001), and the high number of red blood cell transfusions before transplantation (HR 1.85; P = .018). The present results revealed the more frequent utilization of allo-HSCT for MDS patients aged 60-69 years, which increases the curative potential.

Treatment of MDS

The heterogeneous nature of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) demands a complex and personalized variety of therapeutic approaches. Among them, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only potentially curative option and is accessible to only a small number of fit patients. For the majority of patients with MDS, treatment strategies are nonintensive and risk-adapted (by the revised version of the International Prognostic Scoring System), ranging from iron chelation and growth factors to lenalidomide and hypomethylating agents. These approaches are noncurative and aimed instead at improving cytopenias and quality of life and delaying disease progression. These limitations underpin the need for more translational research-based clinical trials in well-defined subgroups of patients with MDS. Indeed, much progress has been made over the past decade in understanding the complex molecular mechanisms underlying MDS. Unfortunately, this has not yet translated into approval of novel treatment options. There is a particularly urgent medical need in patients failing current first-line therapies, such as with erythropoiesis-stimulating or hypomethylating agents. Nevertheless, actual developments are expected to pave the way for exciting novel therapeutic opportunities. This review provides an overview of the current therapeutic landscape in MDS focusing on recent advances in clinical and translational research.

Induction chemotherapy followed by allogeneic HCT versus upfront allogeneic HCT for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: A propensity score matched analysis

To reduce post-transplant relapse, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) type remission induction chemotherapy has been attempted to reduce disease burden before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the efficacy of induction chemotherapy before HCT is unclear. We retrospectively analyzed the Japanese registration data of 605 adult patients, who had received allogeneic HCT for advanced MDS between 2001 and 2016, to compare the post-transplant relapse between patients who received induction chemotherapy followed by allogeneic HCT and those who received upfront HCT. Propensity score matching identified 230 patients from each cohort. There were no significant differences in overall survival and non-relapse mortality between the two groups. The cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly higher in patients who received induction chemotherapy than those who received upfront HCT. In the subgroup analyses, upfront HCT had a significantly reduced relapse incidence among patients with poor cytogenetics, those with higher international prognostic scoring system at diagnosis, and those who received reduced-intensity conditioning. Our results suggested that AML type remission induction chemotherapy before HCT did not improve post-transplant relapse and survival for adult patients with advanced MDS. Upfront HCT is preferable for patients with a poor karyotype.

Bridging Strategies to Allogeneic Transplant for Older AML Patients

Treatment options for older patients with intermediate or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain unsatisfactory. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation, the treatment of choice for the majority of younger AML patients, has been hampered in elderly patients by higher treatment related mortality, comorbidities and lack of a suitable donor. With the higher availability of suitable donors as well as of reduced intensity conditioning regimens, novel low intensity treatments prior to transplantation and optimized supportive care, the number of older AML patients being successfully transplanted is steadily increasing. Against this background, we review current treatment strategies for older AML patients planned for allogeneic stem cell transplantation based on clinical trial data, discussing differences between approaches with advantages and pitfalls of each. We summarize pre-treatment considerations that need to be taken into account in this highly heterogeneous older population. Finally, we offer an outlook on areas of ongoing clinical research, including novel immunotherapeutic approaches that may improve access to curative therapies for a larger number of older AML patients.

Infections in Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Relation to Stage and Therapy

Infections remain a significant problem in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in treated as well in non-treated patients and assume a particular complexity. The susceptibility to infections is due, in the absence of intensive chemotherapies, mainly to functional defects in the myeloid lineage with or without neutropenia. Furthermore, MDS includes a heterogeneous group of patients with very different prognosis, therapy and risk factors regarding survival and infections. You should distinguish risk factors related to the disease, like as neutrophils function impairment, neutropenia, unfavorable cytogenetics and bone marrow insufficiency; factors related to the patient, like as age and comorbidities, and factors related to the therapy. When the patients with MDS are submitted to intensive chemotherapy with and without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), they have a risk factor for infection very similar to that of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and mostly related to neutropenia. Patients with MDS treated with supportive therapy only or with demethylating agent or lenalidomide or immunosuppressive drugs should have a tailored approach. Most of the infections in MDS originate from bacteria, and the main risk factors are represented by neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and unfavorable cytogenetics. Thus, it is reasonable to give antibacterial prophylaxis to patients who start the therapy with demethylating agents with a number of neutrophils <500 × 10⁹/L, or with thrombocytopenia and unfavorable cytogenetics. The antifungal prophylaxis is not considered cost/benefit adequate and should be taken into consideration only when there is an antecedent fungal infection or presence of filamentous fungi in the surveillance cultures. Subjects submitted to immunosuppression with ATG+CSA have a high rate of infections, and when severely neutropenic should ideally be nursed in isolation, should be given prophylactic antibiotics and antifungals, regular mouth care including an antiseptic mouthwash.

How and when to decide between epigenetic therapy and chemotherapy in patients with AML

Remission induction with chemotherapy has long been the frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, intensive therapy is limited in frail patients by its associated toxicity and higher rates of failure or relapse in patients with chemoresistant disease, such as secondary AML or poor-risk cytogenetics. Frailty and chemoresistance are more frequent in older adults with AML. In recent years, epigenetic therapies with the hypomethylating agents decitabine and azacitidine have been thoroughly explored in AML. The results of two pivotal studies carried out with these agents in older adults with newly diagnosed AML have challenged the role of intensive chemotherapy as the frontline treatment option in this high-risk population. Here, we review the results of treatment with intensive chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents in older patients with AML; discuss the patient- and disease-specific criteria to integrate into treatment decision making; and also, highlight the methodological limitations of cross-study comparison in this population.

DNA-hypomethylating agents as epigenetic therapy before and after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelodysplastic syndromes and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal bone marrow disorder, typically of older adults, which is characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral blood cytopenias and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is an aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm occurring in young children. The common denominator of these malignant myeloid disorders is the limited benefit of conventional chemotherapy and a particular responsiveness to epigenetic therapy with the DNA-hypomethylating agents 5-azacytidine (azacitidine) or decitabine. However, hypomethylating therapy does not eradicate the malignant clone in MDS or JMML and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment option. An emerging concept with intriguing potential is the combination of hypomethylating therapy and HSCT. Possible advantages include disease control with good tolerability during donor search and HSCT preparation, improved antitumoral alloimmunity, and reduced risk of relapse even with non-myeloablative regimens. Herein we review the current role of pre- and post-transplant therapy with hypomethylating agents in MDS and JMML.