Electrographic predictors of successful weaning from anaesthetics in refractory status epilepticus

Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus With Continuous Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs: A Systematic Review

Importance

Multiple continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (CIVADs) are available for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE). There is a paucity of data comparing the different types of CIVADs used for RSE.

Objective

To systematically review and compare outcome measures associated with the initial CIVAD choice in RSE in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Evidence Review

Data sources included English and non-English articles using Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science (January 1994-June 2023) as well as manual search. Study selection included peer-reviewed studies of 5 or more patients and at least 1 patient older than 12 years with status epilepticus refractory to a benzodiazepine and at least 1 standard antiseizure medication, treated with continuously infused midazolam, ketamine, propofol, pentobarbital, or thiopental. Independent extraction of articles was performed using prespecified data items. The association between outcome variables and CIVAD was examined with an analysis of variance or χ2 test where appropriate. Binary logistic regressions were used to examine the association between outcome variables and CIVAD with etiology, change in mortality over time, electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (continuous vs intermittent), and treatment goal (seizure vs burst suppression) included as covariates. Risk of bias was addressed by listing the population and type of each study.

Findings

A total of 66 studies with 1637 patients were included. Significant differences among CIVAD groups in short-term failure, hypotension, and CIVAD substitution during treatment were observed. Non-epilepsy-related RSE (vs epilepsy-related RSE) was associated with a higher rate of CIVAD substitution (60 of 120 [50.0%] vs 11 of 43 [25.6%]; odds ratio [OR], 3.11; 95% CI, 1.44-7.11; P = .006) and mortality (98 of 227 [43.2%] vs 7 of 63 [11.1%]; OR, 17.0; 95% CI, 4.71-109.35; P < .001). Seizure suppression was associated with mortality (OR, 7.72; 95% CI, 1.77-39.23; P = .005), but only a small subgroup was available for analysis (seizure suppression: 17 of 22 [77.3%] from 3 publications vs burst suppression: 25 of 98 [25.5%] from 12 publications). CIVAD choice and EEG type were not predictors of mortality. Earlier publication year was associated with mortality, although the observation was no longer statistically significant after adjusting SEs for clustering.

Conclusions and Relevance

Epilepsy-related RSE was associated with lower mortality compared with other RSE etiologies. A trend of decreasing mortality over time was observed, which may suggest an effect of advances in neurocritical care. The overall data are heterogeneous, which limits definitive conclusions on the choice of optimal initial CIVAD in RSE treatment.

Status epilepticus in the ICU

Status epilepticus (SE) is a common medical emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management that follows published guidelines is best suited to improve outcomes, with the most severe cases frequently being managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Diagnosis of convulsive SE can be made without electroencephalography (EEG), but EEG is required to reliably diagnose nonconvulsive SE. Rapidly narrowing down underlying causes for SE is crucial, as this may guide additional management steps. Causes may range from underlying epilepsy to acute brain injuries such as trauma, cardiac arrest, stroke, and infections. Initial management consists of rapid administration of benzodiazepines and one of the following non-sedating intravenous antiseizure medications (ASM): (fos-)phenytoin, levetiracetam, or valproate; other ASM are increasingly used, such as lacosamide or brivaracetam. SE that continues despite these medications is called refractory, and most commonly treated with continuous infusions of midazolam or propofol. Alternatives include further non-sedating ASM and non-pharmacologic approaches. SE that reemerges after weaning or continues despite management with propofol or midazolam is labeled super-refractory SE. At this step, management may include non-sedating or sedating compounds including ketamine and barbiturates. Continuous video EEG is necessary for the management of refractory and super-refractory SE, as these are almost always nonconvulsive. If possible, management of the underlying cause of seizures is crucial particularly for patients with autoimmune encephalitis. Short-term mortality ranges from 10 to 15% after SE and is primarily related to increasing age, underlying etiology, and medical comorbidities. Refractoriness of treatment is clearly related to outcome with mortality rising from 10% in responsive cases, to 25% in refractory, and nearly 40% in super-refractory SE.

Quantitative burst suppression on serial intermittent EEG in refractory status epilepticus

•

Quantitative burst suppression ratios (QBSR) represent depth of EEG suppression.

•

Deeper QBSR on serial intermittent EEG did not affect survival in RSE.

•

Non-suppressive continuous EEG effects on RSE mortality merits further research.

Objectives

In refractory status epilepticus (RSE), the optimal degree of suppression (EEG burst suppression or merely suppressing seizures) remains unknown. Many centers lacking continuous EEG must default to serial intermittent recordings where uncertainty from lack of data may prompt more aggressive suppression. In this study, we sought to determine whether the quantitative burst suppression ratio (QBSR) from serial intermittent EEG recording is associated with RSE patient outcome.

Methods

We screened the EEG database to identify non-anoxic adult RSE patients for EEG and chart review. QBSR was calculated per 10-second EEG epoch as the percentage of time during which EEG amplitude was <3 µV. Patients who survived 1–3 months after discharge from ICU and hospital comprised the favorable group. Further to initial unadjusted univariate analysis of all pooled QBSR, we conducted multivariate analyses to account for individual patient confounders (“per-capita analysis”), uneven number of EEG recordings (“per-session analysis”), and uneven number of epochs (“per-epoch analysis”). We analyzed gender, anesthetic number, and adjusted status epilepticus severity score (aSTESS) as confounders.

Results

In 135,765 QBSR values over 160 EEG recordings (median 2.17 h every ≥24 h) from 17 patients on Propofol, Midazolam, and/or Ketamine, QBSR was deeper in the favorable group (p < 0.001) on initial unadjusted analysis. However, on adjusted multivariate analysis, there was consistently no association between QBSR and outcome. Higher aSTESS consistently associated with unfavorable outcome on per-capita (p = 0.033), per-session (p = 0.048) and per-epoch (p < 0.001) analyses. Greater maximal number of non-barbiturate anesthetic associated with favorable outcome on per-epoch analysis (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

There was no association between depth of EEG suppression using non-barbiturate anesthetic and RSE patient outcome based on QBSR from serial intermittent EEG. A per-epoch association between non-barbiturate anesthetic and favorable outcome suggests an effect from non-suppressive time-varying EEG content.

Significance

Targeting and following deeper burst suppression through non-barbiturate anesthetics on serial intermittent EEG monitoring of RSE is of limited utility.

Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign NIH Symposium: Challenging the Future of Research for Coma and Disorders of Consciousness

Coma and disorders of consciousness (DoC) are highly prevalent and constitute a burden for patients, families, and society worldwide. As part of the Curing Coma Campaign, the Neurocritical Care Society partnered with the National Institutes of Health to organize a symposium bringing together experts from all over the world to develop research targets for DoC. The conference was structured along six domains: (1) defining endotype/phenotypes, (2) biomarkers, (3) proof-of-concept clinical trials, (4) neuroprognostication, (5) long-term recovery, and (6) large datasets. This proceedings paper presents actionable research targets based on the presentations and discussions that occurred at the conference. We summarize the background, main research gaps, overall goals, the panel discussion of the approach, limitations and challenges, and deliverables that were identified.

Special Report on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinical EEG and Research and Consensus Recommendations for the Safe Use of EEG

INTRODUCTION

The global COVID-19 pandemic has affected the economy, daily life, and mental/physical health. The latter includes the use of electroencephalography (EEG) in clinical practice and research. We report a survey of the impact of COVID-19 on the use of clinical EEG in practice and research in several countries, and the recommendations of an international panel of experts for the safe application of EEG during and after this pandemic.

METHODS

Fifteen clinicians from 8 different countries and 25 researchers from 13 different countries reported the impact of COVID-19 on their EEG activities, the procedures implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and precautions planned or already implemented during the reopening of EEG activities.

RESULTS

Of the 15 clinical centers responding, 11 reported a total stoppage of all EEG activities, while 4 reduced the number of tests per day. In research settings, all 25 laboratories reported a complete stoppage of activity, with 7 laboratories reopening to some extent since initial closure. In both settings, recommended precautions for restarting or continuing EEG recording included strict hygienic rules, social distance, and assessment for infection symptoms among staff and patients/participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic interfered with the use of EEG recordings in clinical practice and even more in clinical research. We suggest updated best practices to allow safe EEG recordings in both research and clinical settings. The continued use of EEG is important in those with psychiatric diseases, particularly in times of social alarm such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

All in the numbers? Computational prediction of optimal anaesthetic weaning in status epilepticus

This scientific commentary refers to ‘Electrographic predictors of successful weaning from anaesthetics in refractory status epilepticus’, by Rubin etal. (doi:10.1093/brain/awaa069).