A 0/1h-algorithm using cardiac myosin-binding protein C for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction

Hemodialysis and biomarkers of myocardial infarction - a cohort study

OBJECTIVES

End-stage renal disease is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular disease. We compared the concentration and prognostic ability of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and I (hs-cTnI) and cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyC) among stable hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Patients were sampled before and after hemodialysis. We measured hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT and cMyC and used Cox regressions to assess the association between quartiles of concentrations and all-cause mortality and a combination of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients were included, 204 males, mean age 66 years (SD 14). Before dialysis, 299 (99 %) had a hs-cTnT concentration above the 99th percentile, compared to 188 (66 %) for cMyC and 35 (11 %) for hs-cTnI. Hs-cTnT (23 %, p<0.001) and hs-cTnI (15 %, p=0.049) but not cMyC (4 %, p=0.256) decreased during dialysis. Follow-up was a median of 924 days (492-957 days); patients in the 3rd and 4th quartiles of hs-cTnT (3rd:HR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.5-5.8, 4th:5.2, 2.7-9.8) and the 4th quartile of hs-cTnI (HR 3.8, 2.2-6.8) had an increased risk of mortality. Both were associated with an increased risk of the combined endpoint for patients in the 3rd and 4th quartiles. cMyC concentrations were not associated with risk of mortality or cardiovascular event.

CONCLUSIONS

Hs-cTnT was above the 99th percentile in almost all patients. This was less frequent for hs-cTnI and cMyC. High cTn levels were associated with a 3-5-fold higher mortality. This association was not present for cMyC. These findings are important for management of hemodialysis patients.

Comparing the utility of clinical risk scores and integrated clinical judgement in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome

AIMS

The utility of clinical risk scores regarding the prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is uncertain. We aimed to directly compare the prognostic performance of five established clinical risk scores as well as an unstructured integrated clinical judgement (ICJ) of the treating emergency department (ED) physician.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-day MACE including all-cause death, life-threatening arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, acute myocardial infarction (including the index event), and unstable angina requiring urgent coronary revascularization were centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists in patients presenting to the ED with acute chest discomfort in an international multicentre study. We compared the prognostic performance of the HEART score, GRACE score, T-MACS, TIMI score, and EDACS, as well as the unstructured ICJ of the treating ED physician (visual analogue scale to estimate the probability of acute coronary syndrome, ranging from 0 to 100). Among 4551 eligible patients, 1110/4551 patients (24.4%) had at least one MACE within 30 days. Prognostic accuracy was high and comparable for the HEART score, GRACE score, T-MACS, and ICJ [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.85-0.87] but significantly lower and only moderate for the TIMI score (AUC 0.79, P < 0.001) and EDACS (AUC 0.74, P < 0.001), resulting in sensitivities for the rule-out of 30-day MACE of 93-96, 87 (P < 0.001), and 72% (P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The HEART score, GRACE score, T-MACS, and unstructured ICJ of the treating physician, not the TIMI score or EDACS, performed well for the prediction of 30-day MACE and may be considered for routine clinical use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00470587.

Extending the no objective testing rules to patients triaged by the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithms

AIMS

After rule-out of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1 h-algorithms, it is unclear which patients require further anatomical or functional cardiac testing. To test the safety and efficacy of the no-objective-testing (NOT)-rules after NSTEMI rule-out by the ESC 0/1 h-algorithms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

International, prospective, diagnostic multicentre study enrolling adult patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department. Central adjudication of final diagnosis by two independent cardiologists using information including cardiac imaging. Primary endpoints were the safety and efficacy of the NOT-rules for the rule-out of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary endpoints included 365-day and 2-year MACE. Among 4804 and 4569 patients with available 0/1 h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn)T-Elecsys or hs-cTnI-Architect concentrations, 2783 (58%) and 2252 (49%) were eligible for application of the NOT-rules after rule-out of NSTEMI by the ESC hs-cTnT/I-0/1h-algorithm. The first rule identified 26% of patients with a sensitivity of 100% (95%CI 98.3-100%) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (95% CI, n.c.). The second and third rules both identified 31% of patients with a sensitivity of 99.5% (95% CI 97.4-99.9%) and a NPV of 99.9% (95% CI 99.2-99.9%). Similar findings emerged for hs-cTnI. High safety was confirmed for rule-out of 365-day and 2-year MACE and proven to be superior to the HEART Score.

CONCLUSION

All three NOT-rules performed very well for rule-out of MACE. The third NOT-rule best balanced feasibility, safety, and efficacy by identifying nearly one out of three patients as low-risk and may not require further cardiac testing. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00470587.

Serial measurements of protein and microRNA biomarkers to specify myocardial infarction subtypes

Background

While cardiac-specific troponin (cTn) allows for rapid diagnosis of acute type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), its performance to differentiate acute myocardial injury (AI) or type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is limited. The objective was to combine biomarkers to improve discrimination of different myocardial infarction (MI) aetiologies.

Methods

We determined levels of cardiac troponin T and I (cTnT, cTnI), cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C), NT-proBNP and ten miRNAs, known to be associated with cardiac pathology in a total of n = 495 serial plasma samples at three time points (on admission, after 1 h and 3 h) from 57 NSTEMI (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction), 18 AI, and 31 STEMI patients, as defined by fourth universal definition of MI (UDMI4) and 59 control individuals. We then applied linear mixed effects model to compare the kinetics of all molecules in these MI sub-types.

Results

Established (cTnT, cTnI) and novel (cMyBP-C) cardiac necrosis markers failed in differentiating T1MI vs T2MI at early time points. All cardiac necrosis markers were higher in T1MI than in T2MI at 3 h after admission. Muscle-enriched miRNAs (miR-1 and miR-133a) were correlated with cardiac necrosis protein markers and did not offer better discrimination. Established cardiac strain marker NT-proBNP differentiated AI and T1MI at all time points but failed to discriminate T2MI from T1MI. However, the combination of NT-proBNP and cTnT along with age returned an overall AUC of 0.76 [95 % CI 0.67-0.84] for differentiating T1MI, T2MI and AI.

Conclusions

Rather than using single biomarkers of myocardial necrosis, a combination of clinical biomarkers for cardiac necrosis (troponin) and cardiac strain (NT-proBNP) might aid in differentiating T1MI, T2MI and AI.