Low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin in patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity: an analysis from the COMPASS trial

Bleeding in patients on concurrent treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) compared with SSRI or low-dose ASA alone-A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of this study was to systematically review whether concurrent treatment with an SSRI and low-dose ASA increases the risk of bleeding compared with treatment with an SSRI alone or ASA alone.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Web of Science (from database inception to January 2023) were searched according to PICO: P = patients on treatment with an SSRI and/or low-dose ASA; I = intervention: SSRI + ASA; C = comparison: ASA or SSRI alone; O = outcomes: bleeding/major bleeding. The included articles were assessed using checklists. Studies without major risk of bias formed the basis for the conclusions. Extracted data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to GRADE.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies met the PICO and were included. One randomized and six nonrandomized studies were assessed not to have major risk of bias. Regarding SSRI + ASA vs. ASA only, the pooled hazard ratio of three nonrandomized studies (n = 38 467) was 1.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.10; 1.70; I2 = 0%), and the pooled odds ratio of two nonrandomized studies (n = 28 296) was 0.95 (0.77; 1.19; I2 = 0%). Regarding SSRI + ASA vs. SSRI only, the randomized controlled trial (n = 1048) reported a hazard ratio of 1.82 (0.66; 5.02), the hazard ratio being 1.60 (1.24; 2.06) for ASA vs. placebo in patients without SSRI treatment; and one nonrandomized controlled study (n = 18 920) reported an incidence rate ratio of 1.03 (0.96; 1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The compiled evidence was too uncertain to support an interaction when an SSRI is added to low-dose ASA. Low-dose ASA added to an SSRI may imply an increased risk of bleeding primarily attributable to the initiation of ASA.

Prescribing of low-dose rivaroxaban in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands

AIMS

Low-dose rivaroxaban has been indicated for the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) after recent (2019-2020) updates to European guidelines. We aimed to describe prescription trends of low-dose rivaroxaban in ASCVD patients over the period 2015-2022 in two European countries, to compare the trends before and after guideline changes, and to determine the characteristics of users.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional interrupted time series analysis, utilization of low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg, twice daily) was measured in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum (United Kingdom [UK]) and the PHARMO Database Network (the Netherlands) from 1 January 2015 to 28 February 2022 in patients with an ASCVD diagnosis. Incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of new use (within 182 days) compared to the reference period, 2015-2018, were calculated. Age, sex and comorbidities of users were compared to those of nonusers.

RESULTS

In the UK, from 721 271 eligible subjects the IR of new use of low-dose rivaroxaban in the period 2015-2018, before guideline changes, was 12.4 per 100 000 person-years and after guideline changes in 2020-2022 was 124.0 (IRR 10.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5, 11.8). In the Netherlands from 394 851 subjects, the IR in 2015-2018 was 2.4 per 100 000 person-years and in 2020 was 16.3 (IRR 6.7, 95% CI 4.0, 11.4). Users were younger (UK mean difference [MD] -6.1 years, Netherlands -2.4 years; P < .05) and more likely to be male (UK difference 11.5%, Netherlands 13.4%; P < .001) than nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a statistically significant increase in the use of low-dose rivaroxaban for the management of ASCVD after guideline changes in the UK and the Netherlands. There were international differences, but low-dose rivaroxaban has not been put into widespread practice.

Low dose rivaroxaban for the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is characterized by some risk of major adverse events despite the availability of effective medical therapies for secondary prevention. There is emerging evidence suggesting that thrombin partly contributes to this residual risk. In fact, thrombin (i.e., activated coagulation factor II) triggers not only the conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin but also platelet activation and various pathways responsible for pro-atherogenic and/or pro-inflammatory effects through interaction with protease activated receptors. To reduce the risk associated with thrombin activation, oral anticoagulants antagonists of vitamin K showed promise, but were associated with unacceptable bleeding rates. Direct oral anticoagulants targeting the activated factors X and II carry a lower risk of bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. Rivaroxaban, a direct inhibitor of activated factor X approved at the dose of 20 mg once daily for the prevention of thromboembolic events, has been also investigated at a reduced dose of 2.5 mg twice daily in several alternative scenarios of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, in combination with standard of care. Current guidelines recommend that low-dose rivaroxaban is given in an adjunct to standard therapy to patients with stable atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes at low bleeding risk. Several studies are underway to evaluate its putative benefits in other clinical settings.

Low-dose rivaroxaban: can cardiovascular events be reduced?

Despite available effective guideline-based preventive therapies, patients with vascular diseases remain at high-risk of recurrent ischaemic events. Novel therapeutic strategies are therefore needed in order to further reduce the residual risk that is present in these high-risk patients. The Cardiovascular Outcomes for People using Anticoagulation Strategies trial demonstrated that, in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD), a combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg/bid (vascular dose) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg once daily, the so-called dual pathway inhibition (DPI), reduced cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction by 24% and mortality by 18%, as compared with ASA-alone. The rationale that can explain the improvement of cardiovascular outcome is that platelet aggregation and fibrin formation are involved in arterial thrombosis and rivaroxaban is able to target both ways and has a synergic effect with ASA. The aim of this review is to discuss the potential mechanisms and added benefits of DPI, in patients with PAD and CAD.

Estimated Aggregate Treatment Benefit With Addition of Multiple Novel Medications for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

PURPOSE

Interest in improving residual cardiovascular (CV) risk by targeting multiple causative pathways has been growing. Several medications including icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe have been shown to individually improve outcomes in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) beyond conventional therapy consisting of aspirin and statins. While each drug has been shown to individually improve outcomes, the expected treatment benefit of the combined use of these drugs for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD is not known.

METHODS

In this cross-trial analysis, we estimated the aggregate treatment effect of comprehensive medical therapy consisting of icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe added to background aspirin and statin therapy through established methods of indirect comparisons of the results of three key clinical trials (REDUCE-IT [n = 8,179], COMPASS [n = 27,395], and IMPROVE-IT [n = 18,144]). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke. Secondary endpoints included each individual component of the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The hazard ratio (HR) of the imputed aggregate treatment effects for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD with comprehensive disease modifying therapy compared to aspirin and statin alone for the primary endpoint was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.61). The HR for CV death was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.85), non-fatal MI was 0.52 (95% CI 0.40-0.69), and non-fatal stroke was 0.35 (95% CI 0.23-0.54). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

The estimated aggregate treatment effect of enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD through comprehensive medical therapy is substantial. This exploratory analysis supports further study of comprehensive therapy to reduce residual CV risk for the secondary prevention of ASCVD.