Surgeon experience does not influence nodal upstaging during vats lobectomy: Results from a large prospective national database

BACKGROUND

Despite recent improvement in preoperative staging, nodal and mediastinal upstaging occur in about 5% to 15% of cN0 patients. Different clinical and tumor characteristics are associated with upstaging, whereas the role of the surgeon's experience is not well evaluated. This study aimed to investigate if operator experience might influence nodal upstaging during video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomical lung resection.

METHODS

Clinical and pathological data from the prospective video-assisted thoracic surgery Italian nationwide registry were reviewed and analyzed. Patients with incomplete data about tumor and surgical characteristics, ground glass opacities tumors, cN2 to 3, and M+ were excluded. Clinical data, tumor characteristics, and surgeon experience were correlated to nodal and mediastinal (N2) upstaging using Pearson's χ2 statistic or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U and t tests for quantitative variables. A multivariable model was built using logistic regression analysis. Surgeon experience was categorized considering the number of video-assisted thoracic surgery major anatomical resections and years after residency.

RESULTS

Final analysis was conducted on 3,319 cN0 patients for nodal upstaging and 3,471 cN0N1 patients for N2 upstaging. Clinical tumor-nodes-metastasis stage was stage I in 2,846 (81.9%) patients, stage II in 533 (15.3%), and stage III (cT3N1) in 92 (2.8%). Nodal upstaging occurred in 489 (13.1%) patients, whereas N2 upstaging occurred in 229 (6.1%) patients. Years after residency (P = .60 for nodal, P = .13 for N2 upstaging) and a number of video-assisted thoracic surgery procedures(P = .49 for nodal, P = .72 for nodal upstaging) did not correlate with upstaging. Multivariable analysis confirmed cT-dimension (P = .001), solid nodules (P < .001), clinical tumor-nodes-metastasis (P < .001) and maximum standardized uptake values (P < .001) as factors independently correlated to nodal upstaging, whereas cT-dimension (P = .005), clinical tumor-nodes-metastasis (P < .001) and maximum standardized uptake values (P = .028) resulted independently correlated to N2 upstaging.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that surgeon experience did not influence nodal and mediastinal upstaging during -assisted thoracic surgery anatomical resection, whereas cT-dimension, clinical tumor-nodes-metastasis, and maximum standardized uptake values resulted independently correlated to nodal and mediastinal upstaging.

Clinical outcomes of left upper segmentectomy vs. lobectomy for early non-small-cell lung cancer: a nationwide database study in Japan

PURPOSE

Given that left upper lobe and right upper and middle lobes share a similar anatomy, segmentectomy, such as upper division and lingulectomy, should yield identical oncological clearance to left upper lobectomy. We compared the prognosis of segmentectomy with that of lobectomy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the left upper lobe.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 2115 patients who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy for c-stage I (TNM 8th edition) NSCLC in the left upper lobe in 2010. We compared the oncological outcomes of segmentectomy (n = 483) and lobectomy (n = 483) using a propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates in the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups were comparable, irrespective of c-stage IA or IB. Subset analyses according to radiological tumor findings showed that segmentectomy yielded oncological outcomes comparable to those of lobectomy for non-pure solid tumors. In cases where the solid tumor exceeded 20 mm, segmentectomy showed a recurrence-free survival inferior to that of lobectomy (p = 0.028), despite an equivalent overall survival (p = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Segmentectomy may be an acceptable alternative to lobectomy with regard to the overall survival of patients with c-stage I NSCLC in the left upper lobe.

Predictability and Utility of Contrast-Enhanced CT on Occult Lymph Node Metastasis for Patients with Clinical Stage IA-IIA Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Double-Center Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

With the advantage of minimizing damage and preserving more functional lung tissue, limited surgery is considered depend on the lymph node (LN) involvement situation. However, occult lymph node metastasis (OLM) may be ignored by limited surgery and become a risk factor for local recurrence after surgical resection. The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors for OLM based on computed tomography enhanced image in patients with clinical lung adenocarcinoma (ADC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2016 to July 2022, 707 patients with clinical stage IA-IIA ADC underwent lobectomy with systematic LN dissection and were divided into training and validation group based on different institution. Univariate analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression were performed to estimate different risk factors of OLM. A predictive model was established with visual nomogram and external validation, and evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were diagnosed with OLM (11.9%), and four independent predictors of LN involvement were identified: larger consolidation diameter (odds ratio [OR], 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06, 5.22, p = 0.013), bronchovascular bundle thickening (OR, 1.99, 95% CI: 1.00, 3.95, p = 0.049), lobulation (OR, 2.92, 95% CI: 1.22, 6.99, p = 0.016) and obstructive change (OR, 1.69, 95% CI: 1.17, 6.16, p = 0.020). The model showed good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit, p = 0.816) with an AUC of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.775, 0.853). For the validation group, the AUC was 0.788 (95% CI: 0.732, 0.806).

CONCLUSION

Our predictive model can non-invasively assess the risk of OLM in patients with clinical stage IA-IIA ADC, enable surgeons perform an individualized prediction preoperatively, and assist the clinical decision-making procedure.

18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics nomogram for predicting occult lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

To investigate the ability of a PET/CT-based radiomics nomogram to predict occult lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stage N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 228 patients with surgically confirmed NSCLC (training set, 159 patients; testing set, 69 patients). ITKsnap3.8.0 was used for image(CT and PET images) segmentation, AK version 3.2.0 was used for radiomics feature extraction, and Python3.7.0 was used for radiomics feature screening. A radiomics model for predicting occult lymph node metastasis was established using a logistic regression algorithm. A nomogram was constructed by combining radiomics scores with selected clinical predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to verify the performance of the radiomics model and nomogram in the training and testing sets.

Results

The radiomics nomogram comprising six selected features achieved good prediction efficiency, including radiomics characteristics and tumor location information (central or peripheral), which demonstrated good calibration and discrimination ability in the training (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.884, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.826-0.941) and testing (AUC = 0.881, 95% CI: 0.8031-0.959) sets. Clinical decision curves demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

Conclusion

The PET/CT-based radiomics nomogram is a noninvasive tool for predicting occult lymph node metastasis in NSCLC.

Definitions of Central Tumors in Radiologically Node-Negative, Early-Stage Lung Cancer for Preoperative Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging: A Dual-Institution, Multireader Study

BACKGROUND

Definitions for central lung cancer (CLC) have been ambiguous in guidelines, causing difficulty in selecting candidates for invasive mediastinal staging among patients with radiologically node-negative, early-stage lung cancer.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the optimal definition for CLC that is robust to interreader and institutional variation to select candidates for invasive mediastinal staging among those with clinical T1N0M0 lung cancer?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Two retrospective cohorts were evaluated for the associations of central lung cancer according to 13 definitions based on chest CT scan with occult nodal metastasis. Univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed with the pathologic N category as an ordinal outcome. Robust definitions, which retained statistical significance across multireader, dual-institutional datasets, were identified. For these definitions, binary diagnostic performance and interreader agreement were investigated.

RESULTS

In the two cohorts, 807 patients (median age, 63 years; interquartile range [IQR], 56-71 years; 410 women; 33 pN1, 48 pN2, and 1 pN3) and 510 patients (median age, 65 years; IQR, 58-71 years; 267 women; 33 pN1, 20 pN2, and no pN3) were included, respectively. Three definitions robust to interreader variation and dataset heterogeneity were identified: definition 7 (concentric lines arising from the midline, inner one-third, medial margin; adjusted OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.13-3.51; P = .02), definition 10 (location index-based inner one-third, center; adjusted OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.49-8.25; P = .003), and definition 12 (location index-based inner one-third, medial margin; adjusted OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.91-6.52; P < .001). Definition 12 showed higher interreader agreement than definition 7 (Cohen κ, 0.80 vs 0.66; P = .005). Nevertheless, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the three definitions were < 50%.

INTERPRETATION

Three definitions exhibited robust associations with occult nodal metastasis. However, selecting candidates for invasive mediastinal staging solely based on a central tumor location would be suboptimal.

Preoperative 18F-FDG SUVmax >6.3 or Size >2.3 cm of primary lesions predict lymph nodes metastasis with higher negative predictive value in peripheral cT1 non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Sublobar resection is suitable for peripheral cT1N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The traditional PET-CT criterion (lymph node size ≥1.0 cm or SUVmax ≥2.5) for predicting lymph nodes metastasis (LNM) has unsatisfactory performance.

OBJECTIVE

We explore the clinical role of preoperative SUVmax and the size of the primary lesions for predicting peripheral cT1 NSCLC LNM.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 174 peripheral cT1 NSCLC patients underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET-CT and divided into the LNM and non-LNM group by pathology. We compared the differences of primary lesions' baseline characteristics between the two groups. The risk factors of LNM were determined by univariate and multivariate analysis, and we assessed the diagnostic efficacy with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

Of the enrolled cases, the incidence of LNM was 24.7%. The preoperative SUVmax >6.3 or size >2.3 cm of the primary lesions were independent risk factors of peripheral cT1 NSCLC LNM (ORs, 95% CIs were 6.18 (2.40-15.92) and 3.03 (1.35-6.81). The sensitivity, NPV of SUVmax >6.3 or size >2.3 cm of the primary lesions were higher than the traditional PET-CT criterion for predicting LNM (100.0 vs. 86.0%, 100.0 vs. 89.7%). A Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a goodness-of-fit (P = 0.479).

CONCLUSIONS

The excellent sensitivity and NPV of preoperative of the SUVmax >6.3 or size >2.3 cm of the primary lesions based on 18F-FDG PET-CT might identify the patients at low-risk LNM in peripheral cT1 NSCLC.

Quantification of the spatial distribution of primary tumors in the lung to develop new prognostic biomarkers for locally advanced NSCLC

The anatomical location and extent of primary lung tumors have shown prognostic value for overall survival (OS). However, its manual assessment is prone to interobserver variability. This study aims to use data driven identification of image characteristics for OS in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Five stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC patient cohorts were retrospectively collected. Patients were treated either with radiochemotherapy (RCT): RCT1* (n = 107), RCT2 (n = 95), RCT3 (n = 37) or with surgery combined with radiotherapy or chemotherapy: S1* (n = 135), S2 (n = 55). Based on a deformable image registration (MIM Vista, 6.9.2.), an in-house developed software transferred each primary tumor to the CT scan of a reference patient while maintaining the original tumor shape. A frequency-weighted cumulative status map was created for both exploratory cohorts (indicated with an asterisk), where the spatial extent of the tumor was uni-labeled with 2 years OS. For the exploratory cohorts, a permutation test with random assignment of patient status was performed to identify regions with statistically significant worse OS, referred to as decreased survival areas (DSA). The minimal Euclidean distance between primary tumor to DSA was extracted from the independent cohorts (negative distance in case of overlap). To account for the tumor volume, the distance was scaled with the radius of the volume-equivalent sphere. For the S1 cohort, DSA were located at the right main bronchus whereas for the RCT1 cohort they further extended in cranio-caudal direction. In the independent cohorts, the model based on distance to DSA achieved performance: AUC_RCT2 [95% CI] = 0.67 [0.55–0.78] and AUC_RCT3 = 0.59 [0.39–0.79] for RCT patients, but showed bad performance for surgery cohort (AUC_S2 = 0.52 [0.30–0.74]). Shorter distance to DSA was associated with worse outcome (p = 0.0074). In conclusion, this explanatory analysis quantifies the value of primary tumor location for OS prediction based on cumulative status maps. Shorter distance of primary tumor to a high-risk region was associated with worse prognosis in the RCT cohort.

Segmentectomy for inner location small-sized non-small-cell lung cancer: Is it feasible?

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of segmentectomy for inner small-sized non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. We aimed to elucidate whether segmentectomy for inner small-sized NSCLC, defined using novel three-dimensional measuring method, yields feasible oncological outcomes compared to segmentectomy for outer lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with small-sized (<2cm) cN0 NSCLC who underwent segmentectomy between January 2007 and December 2020. Tumor centrality ratio, which was measured by using three dimensional reconstruction software, was evaluated, with the location of tumor origin confirmed pathologically. Cases with a ratio below and above 2/3 were allocated to the 'Inner group' and 'Outer group', respectively. Oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Our cohort was divided into the 'Inner group' (n=75) and 'Outer group' (n=127). The proximal distance from a tumor exceeded 20 mm in all cases. Tumor centrality ratio was associated with the pathological origin of a tumor. The rate of unforeseen positive lymph node metastasis was significantly higher in the 'Inner group' (p=0.04). There were no significant differences in the 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS; 91% versus 87%, p=0.67). Univariate analysis identified age, consolidation/tumor ratio, the presence of ground-glass-opacity (GGO) and lymphovascular invasion, but not tumor centrality, as significant prognostic factors for RFS. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of GGO and lymphovascular invasion remained significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding oncological outcomes, segmentectomy with a safety proximal distance could be feasible, even for inner small-sized NSCLC. Tumor invasiveness, not tumor centrality, may influence tumor recurrence. (242 words).

The importance of anatomical localization of non-small cell lung carcinoma in predicting mediastinal lymph node metastasis

Bronchopulmonary segmental location of non-small lung carcinomas is closely related to metastatic lymph node foci in the mediastinum. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between the anatomical locations of pulmonary masses on the bronchopulmonary segmental base and metastatic lymph node regions in non-small cell lung cancer using preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT images. Ninety patients newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung carcinoma and referred to PET/CT imaging for staging were included in the study. Tumoral masses that could be evaluated visually and mediastinal node metastases were identified in 18F-FDG PET/CT images, then the relationship between them was investigated statistically. The diagnostic power of 18F-FDG PET/CT of mediastinal nodes was also revealed. Seventy-four males (82.2%) and sixteen females (17.8%) were enrolled in the study. Half of the patients were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma (50%). Investigation of the tumor location and mediastinal metastatic nodes revealed a statistically significant relationship between the apicoposterior segment of the left superior lobe and the left upper and lower paratracheal, subaortic, paraaortic, and left hilar regions according to the IASLC map. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the mediastinal nodes were 69.2%, 66.6%, and 68%, respectively. There was no statistically significant relationship between tumor location and 8th TNM Stage. Anatomical locations of non-small cell lung carcinomas can affect the disease stage and prognosis because of their tendency to metastasize to some mediastinal regions. However, this relationship needs to be investigated in larger study groups.

The association of nodal upstaging with surgical approach and its impact on long-term survival after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Proponents of open thoracotomy (OPEN) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) claim its oncological superiority over video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in terms of the accuracy of lymph node staging.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing lobectomy without neoadjuvant therapy from 2010 to 2014. Nodal upstaging rates were compared using a surgical approach. Overall survival adjusted for confounding variables was examined using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 64 676 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. The number of patients who underwent lobectomy by RATS, VATS and OPEN approaches was 5470 (8.5%), 17 545 (27.1%) and 41 661 (64.4%), respectively. The mean number of lymph nodes examined for each of these approaches was 10.9, 11.3 and 10 (P < 0.01) and upstaging rates were 11.2%, 11.7% and 12.6% (P < 0.01), respectively. For patients with clinical stage I disease (N = 46 826; RATS = 4338, VATS = 13 416 and OPEN = 29 072), the mean lymph nodes examined were 10.6, 10.8 and 9.4 (P < 0.01), and upstaging rates were 10.8%, 11.1% and 12.1% (P < 0.01), respectively. A multivariable analysis suggested an association with improved survival with RATS and VATS compared with OPEN surgery [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.89 and 0.89, respectively; P < 0.01] for patients with all stages. In stage I disease, VATS but not RATS was associated with increased overall survival compared with the OPEN approach (HR = 0.81; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

RATS lobectomy is not superior to VATS lobectomy with respect to lymph node yield or upstaging of NSCLC. Increased nodal upstaging by the OPEN approach does not confer a survival advantage in any stage of NSCLC and may be associated with decreased overall survival.

How do we Classify a Central Tumor? Results of a Multidisciplinary Survey from the SEPAR Thoracic Oncology Area

INTRODUCTION

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and normal mediastinal imaging tests, centrally located tumors have greater occult mediastinal involvement. Clinical guidelines, therefore, recommend invasive mediastinal staging in this situation. However, definitions of centrality in the different guidelines are inconsistent. The SEPAR Thoracic Oncology area aimed to evaluate the degree of familiarity with various concepts related to tumor site among professionals who see patients with NSCLC in Spain.

METHODS

A questionnaire was distributed to members of Spanish medical societies involved in the management of NSCLC, structured according to the 3 aspects to be evaluated: 1) uniformity in the definition of central tumor location; 2) uniformity in the classification of lesions that extend beyond dividing lines; and 3) ability to delineate lesions in the absence of dividing lines.

RESULTS

A total of 430 participants responded. The most voted definition of centrality was «lesions in contact with hilar structures» (49.7%). The lines most often chosen to delimit the hemitorax were concentric hilar lines (89%). Most participants (92.8%) classified tumors according to the side of the dividing line that contained most of their volume. Overall, 78.6% were able to correctly classify a central lesion in the absence of dividing lines.

CONCLUSIONS

In our survey, the most widely accepted definition of centrality is not one of the proposals specified in the clinical guidelines. The results reflect wide variability in the classification of tumor lesions.

Occult lymph node metastasis in radiologic stage I non-small cell lung cancer: The role of endobronchial ultrasound

RATIONALE

The use of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is currently recommended for staging non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in centrally located tumors, tumors >3 cm, or with radiologic evidence of lymph node (LN) metastasis. Current guidelines do not recommend staging EBUS-TBNA in patients with stage I NSCLC who do not have any of the aforementioned conditions.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize that using EBUS-TBNA is useful for detecting occult metastasis in radiologic stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective study, charts of patients ≥18 years old who underwent staging EBUS-TBNA from January 2005 to May 2019 were reviewed. Only patients with combined positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) scans consistent with radiologic stage I NSCLC were included. Identified variables included: age, gender, personal history of any cancer, smoking history, tumor location, tumor centrality, tumor size, tumor PET activity, histopathologic type of NSCLC, and LN biopsy results. Patients whose LN samples showed a diagnosis other than NSCLC were excluded. The association between LN positivity, and each of the variables was assessed using Pearson's correlation for categorical variables, and logistic regression analysis for continuous variables.

RESULTS

From the 2,892 initially screened patients, 188 were included. Of those, 13 (6.9%; 95% CI, 4%-11%) had a malignancy-positive LN biopsy. The number needed to test (NNT) in order to detect one case of any occult metastasis was 15. Among the included variables, a significant association was found between LN positivity and tumor centrality, with central tumors found in 61.5% of patients with positive LN (n = 8) (p < 0.01). This association stayed significant after adjusting for age, gender, smoking history, tumor size, tumor location, and PET activity (p = 0.015). Among patients with malignancy-positive LN biopsies, five (38.5%; 95% CI, 17.6%-64.6%) were upstaged to N1, and eight (61.5%; 95% CI, 35.4%-82.4%) were upstaged to N2, with NNT of 23 to detect one case of occult N2 metastasis. Subgroup analysis comparing LN-positive patients based on their N stage did not show statistically significant association with any of the variables.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results and along with the existing evidence, EBUS-TBNA should be recommended as part of the routine staging in all patients with radiologic stage I NSCLC.

Clinical impact and utility of positron emission tomography on occult lymph node metastasis and survival: radical surgery for stage I lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The surgical result of early-staged lung cancer is not satisfactory due to unexpected postoperative lymph node metastasis and recurrence. This study aimed to investigate which preoperative factors-including the standard uptake value max (SUV_max) of positron emission tomography-could predict occult lymph node metastasis and survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 598 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer who underwent surgery, and examined their preoperative clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 1586 patients had surgery for primary lung cancer between 2006 and 2019; 598 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer were the study inclusion; occult lymph node metastasis was detected in 102 (17.1%). Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that SUV_max ≥ 3 (P < 0.001), clinical invasive tumor size ≥ 2 cm (P = 0.009), and carcinoembryonic antigen > 5 (P = 0.03) were associated with significant risk factors rated (%) for occult lymph node metastasis, as follows: high-risk group (three factors), moderate-risk group (two factors) and low-risk group (one factor or none) corresponding to 32.2 (28/87), 22.8 (41/180) and 7.3 (19/262), respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rates (%) of patients without lymph node metastasis holding SUV_max 6 or over were as poor as those of patients with lymph node metastasis (72.0% vs 64.1%; P = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

We might consider wedge resection or segmentectomy, omitting lymphadenectomy, for the low-risk group; adjuvant therapy is indicated for patients without lymph node metastasis having SUV_max 6 or over.

Central location and risk of imaging occult mediastinal lymph node involvement in cN0T2-4 non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Appropriate pre-operative staging is a cornerstone in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Central location and size greater than 3 cm are amongst indications for pre-operative invasive mediastinal staging but the quality of the evidence behind this recommendation is low.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all cases of cT2-4N0M0 NSCLCL after CT and TEP-CT which underwent surgical resection with lymph node dissection or had a positive invasive pre-operative mediastinal staging in our institution from 2014 to 2018.

Results

Three hundred and ten patients met inclusion criteria, 79 (25.5%) central and 231 (74.5%) peripheral tumors. Central tumor location was associated with a higher prevalence of pN2-3 disease (17.7% vs. 6.1%, P<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, central tumor location remained the only factor statistically associated with imaging occult mediastinal disease (OR 3.23, 95% CI: 1.45–7.18). NPV of PET-CT for occult mediastinal disease was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72–0.90) in central and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90–0.97) in peripheral tumor. Central location was also associated with a higher prevalence of occult N1 to N3 disease (43.0% vs. 15.2%, P<0.001).

Conclusions

This study suggests that invasive mediastinal staging is required in central cT2-4N0 NSCLC but can be questioned in peripheral one, especially in cT2N2 subgroup if the patient is a candidate for lobar resection.

Is invasive mediastinal staging necessary in intermediate risk patients with negative PET/CT?

Background

Tumor involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes is of high importance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Invasive mediastinal staging is recommended in selected patients without evidence of mediastinal involvement on staging by imaging. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of invasive mediastinal staging in reducing pN2, its impact on survival and the risk factors for occult pN2.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC tumors larger than 3 cm, central tumors or cN1 cases treated in our institution between 2013 and 2018 were prospectively included in the study. Incidence of pN2 and overall survival was compared among invasively staged (IS) and non-invasively staged groups (NIS). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors of pN2.

Results

A total of 201 patients were included in the study, 79 (39.3%) of whom were not invasively staged (NIS group) and 122 (60.7%) were invasively staged (IS group). Incidence of cN1 and mean PET/CT uptake was different among both groups. Prevalence of pN2 was similar in both groups (7.6% in NIS vs. 12.6% in IS; P>0.05). Median survival in IS-pN2 patients was 11 months longer than in NIS-pN2 group (33.6 vs. 22.5 months; P=0.245). cN1 emerged as the only a risk factor for pN2.

Conclusions

Invasive staging does not reduce the incidence of pN2. However, this finding could be biased because in our series cN1 patients were more often staged and cN1 has been detected as a risk factor for pN2. In addition patient better selection after invasive staging might have an impact on overall survival. To conclude, invasive mediastinal staging in intermediate risk patients for positive mediastinal nodes is justified.

Geometrical Measurement of Central Tumor Location in cT1N0M0 NSCLC Predicts N1 but Not N2 Upstaging

BACKGROUND

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and normal mediastinum, the central tumor location predicts occult nodal disease (both N1 and N2). We evaluated a novel definition of central location based on a geometrical measurement of the tumor location within the lung that could predict N2, N1, or both.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with confirmed NSCLC, radiologically and metabolically staged T1 N0 M0, who underwent invasive mediastinal staging and/or lung resection. The central tumor location was measured considering 2 ratios. The inner margin ratio (IMR) and outer margin ratio (OMR) were both calculated as the distance from the inner margin of the lung to both margins of the tumor (inner [IMR], outer [OMR]) divided by the lung width. Optimal cutoffs for IMR and OMR were calculated. Tumors with values lower than the cutoffs were considered central. Prevalences of N1 and N2 upstaging were estimated and bivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the odds of N1 and N2 upstaging using IMR and OMR cutoffs.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients were included. The prevalence of N1 and N2 upstaging was 11% and 5.3%, respectively. Cutoffs of 0.5 for IMR and 0.64 for OMR were estimated. Both ratios predicted N1 upstaging (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 4.2 [1.5-12]; P < .007; area under the curve, 0.65) but did not predict N2 upstaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Central tumor location can be assessed by means of IMR and OMR and predicts N1 upstaging in patients with radiologically and metabolically T1 N0 M0 tumors. This is important for the selection of patients for therapies that require N0 tumors.

Preoperative staging of the mediastinum is an essential and multidisciplinary task

Mediastinal staging is a crucial step in the management of patients with NSCLC. With the recent development of novel techniques, mediastinal staging has evolved from an activity of interest mainly for thoracic surgeons to a joint effort carried out by many specialists. In this regard, the debate of cases in MDT sessions is crucial for optimal management of patients. Current evidence-based clinical guidelines for preoperative NSCLC staging recommend that mediastinal staging should be performed with increasing invasiveness. Image-based techniques are the first approach, although they have limited accuracy and findings must be confirmed by pathology in almost all cases. In this setting, the advent of radiomics is promising. Invasive staging depends on procedural factors rather than diagnostic performance. The choice between endoscopy-based or surgical procedures should depend on the local expertise of each centre. As the extension of mediastinal disease in terms of number of involved lymph nodes and nodal stations affects prognosis and the choice of treatment, systematic samplings are preferred over random targeted samplings. Following this approach, a diagnosis of single mediastinal nodal involvement can be unreliable if all reachable mediastinal nodal stations have not been assessed. The performance of confirmatory mediastinoscopy after a negative endoscopy-based procedure is controversial but currently recommended. Current indications of invasive staging in patients with radiologically normal mediastinum have to be re-evaluated, especially for central tumour location.

Centrally located lung cancer and risk of occult nodal disease: an objective evaluation of multiple definitions of tumour centrality with dedicated imaging software

Introduction

Current guidelines recommend invasive mediastinal staging in patients with centrally located radiographic stage T1N0M0 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The lack of a specific definition of a central tumour has resulted in discrepancies among guidelines and heterogeneity in practice patterns.

Methods

Our objective was to study specific definitions of tumour centrality and their association with occult nodal disease. Pre-operative chest computed tomography scans from patients with clinical (c) T1N0M0 NSCLC were processed with a dedicated software system that divides the lungs in thirds following vertical and concentric lines. This software accurately assigns tumours to a specific third based both on the location of the centre of the tumour and its most medial aspect, creating eight possible definitions of central tumours.

Results

607 patients were included in our study. Surgery was performed for 596 tumours (98%). The overall pathological (p) N disease was: 504 (83%) N0, 56 (9%) N1, 47 (8%) N2 and no N3. The prevalence of N2 disease remained relatively low regardless of tumour location. Central tumours were associated with upstaging from cN0 to any N (pN1/pN2). Two definitions were associated with upstaging to any N: concentric lines, inner one-third, centre of the tumour (OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.85–8.26; p<0.001) and concentric lines, inner two-thirds, most medial aspect of the tumour (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.23–2.97; p=0.004).

Conclusions

We objectively identified two specific definitions of central tumours. While the rate of occult mediastinal disease was relatively low regardless of tumour location, central tumours were associated with upstaging from cN0 to any N.