1
|
Leal T, Kotecha R, Ramlau R, Zhang L, Milanowski J, Cobo M, Roubec J, Petruzelka L, Havel L, Kalmadi S, Ward J, Andric Z, Berghmans T, Gerber DE, Kloecker G, Panikkar R, Aerts J, Delmonte A, Pless M, Greil R, Rolfo C, Akerley W, Eaton M, Iqbal M, Langer C. Tumor Treating Fields therapy with standard systemic therapy versus standard systemic therapy alone in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer following progression on or after platinum-based therapy (LUNAR): a randomised, open-label, pivotal phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:1002-1017. [PMID: 37657460 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00344-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt processes critical for cancer cell survival, leading to immunogenic cell death and enhanced antitumour immune response. In preclinical models of non-small-cell lung cancer, TTFields amplified the effects of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We report primary results from a pivotal study of TTFields therapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS This randomised, open-label, pivotal phase 3 study recruited patients at 130 sites in 19 countries. Participants were aged 22 years or older with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer progressing on or after platinum-based therapy, with squamous or non-squamous histology and ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Previous platinum-based therapy was required, but no restriction was placed on the number or type of previous lines of systemic therapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to TTFields therapy and standard systemic therapy (investigator's choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor [nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab] or docetaxel) or standard therapy alone. Randomisation was performed centrally using variable blocked randomisation and an interactive voice-web response system, and was stratified by tumour histology, treatment, and region. Systemic therapies were dosed according to local practice guidelines. TTFields therapy (150 kHz) was delivered continuously to the thoracic region with the recommendation to achieve an average of at least 18 h/day device usage. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The safety population included all patients who received any study therapy and were analysed according to the actual treatment received. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02973789. FINDINGS Between Feb 13, 2017, and Nov 19, 2021, 276 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive TTFields therapy with standard therapy (n=137) or standard therapy alone (n=139). The median age was 64 years (IQR 59-70), 178 (64%) were male and 98 (36%) were female, 156 (57%) had non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, and 87 (32%) had received a previous immune checkpoint inhibitor. Median follow-up was 10·6 months (IQR 6·1-33·7) for patients receiving TTFields therapy with standard therapy, and 9·5 months (0·1-32·1) for patients receiving standard therapy. Overall survival was significantly longer with TTFields therapy and standard therapy than with standard therapy alone (median 13·2 months [95% CI 10·3-15·5] vs 9·9 months [8·1-11·5]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·74 [95% CI 0·56-0·98]; p=0·035). In the safety population (n=267), serious adverse events of any cause were reported in 70 (53%) of 133 patients receiving TTFields therapy plus standard therapy and 51 (38%) of 134 patients receiving standard therapy alone. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were leukopenia (37 [14%] of 267), pneumonia (28 [10%]), and anaemia (21 [8%]). TTFields therapy-related adverse events were reported in 95 (71%) of 133 patients; these were mostly (81 [85%]) grade 1-2 skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. There were three deaths related to standard therapy (two due to infections and one due to pulmonary haemorrhage) and no deaths related to TTFields therapy. INTERPRETATION TTFields therapy added to standard therapy significantly improved overall survival compared with standard therapy alone in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after progression on platinum-based therapy without exacerbating systemic toxicities. These data suggest that TTFields therapy is efficacious in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and should be considered as a treatment option to manage the disease in this setting. FUNDING Novocure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ticiana Leal
- Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Rodryg Ramlau
- Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Li Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC), Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Manuel Cobo
- Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria University Hospitals, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Jaromir Roubec
- Nemocnice AGEL Ostrava-Vítkovice, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | - Jeffrey Ward
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Zoran Andric
- University Clinical Hospital Centre Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Thierry Berghmans
- Jules Bordet Institute, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David E Gerber
- Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Joachim Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Angelo Delmonte
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori (IRST), Meldola, Italy
| | - Miklos Pless
- Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Richard Greil
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Salzburg, Austria; Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; Cancer Cluster, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christian Rolfo
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute at Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wallace Akerley
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Mussawar Iqbal
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Corey Langer
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meinlschmidt G, Grossert A, Meffert C, Roemmel N, Hess V, Rochlitz C, Pless M, Hunziker S, Wössmer B, Geuter U, Schaefert R. Smartphone-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions in Blended Care of Cancer Survivors: Nested Randomized Clinical Trial. JMIR Cancer 2023; 9:e38515. [PMID: 37639296 PMCID: PMC10495843 DOI: 10.2196/38515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is related to not only physical but also mental suffering. Notably, body image disturbances are highly relevant to cancer-related changes often persisting beyond recovery from cancer. Scalable and low-barrier interventions that can be blended with face-to-face psychotherapy for cancer survivors are highly warranted. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to investigate whether smartphone-based bodily interventions are more effective to improve the mood of patients with cancer than smartphone-based fairy tale interventions (control intervention). METHODS We recruited patients with cancer in 2 Swiss hospitals and conducted daily, fully automated smartphone-based interventions 6 times a week for 5 consecutive weeks, blended with weekly face-to-face group body psychotherapy. We applied 2 types of smartphone-based interventions using a within-subject design, randomly assigning patients daily to either bodily interventions or fairy tales. Each intervention type was presented 3 times a week. For this secondary analysis, 3-level mixed models were estimated with mood assessed by the 3 Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire subscales for good-bad mood, wakefulness, and calmness as key indicators. In addition, the effects on experience of presence, vitality, and burden assessed with visual analog scales were investigated. RESULTS Based on the data from s=732 interventions performed by 36 participants, good-bad mood improved (β=.27; 95% CI 0.062-0.483), and participants became calmer (β=.98; 95% CI 0.740-1.211) following smartphone-based interventions. Wakefulness did not significantly change from pre- to postsmartphone-based intervention (β=.17; 95% CI -0.081 to 0.412). This was true for both intervention types. There was no interaction effect of intervention type with change in good-bad mood (β=-.01; 95% CI -0.439 to 0.417), calmness (β=.22; 95% CI -0.228 to 0.728), or wakefulness (β=.14; 95% CI -0.354 to 0.644). Experience of presence (β=.34; 95% CI 0.271-0.417) and vitality (β=.35; 95% CI 0.268-0.426) increased from pre- to postsmartphone-based intervention, while experience of burden decreased (β=-0.40; 95% CI -0.481 to 0.311). Again, these effects were present for both intervention types. There were no significant interaction effects of intervention type with pre- to postintervention changes in experience of presence (β=.14; 95% CI -0.104 to 0.384), experience of vitality (β=.06; 95% CI -0.152 to 0.265), and experience of burden (β=-.16; 95% CI -0.358 to 0.017). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that both smartphone-based audio-guided bodily interventions and fairy tales have the potential to improve the mood of cancer survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03707548; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03707548. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1186/s40359-019-0357-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunther Meinlschmidt
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Digital and Blended Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, International Psychoanalytic University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Astrid Grossert
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Medical Center of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Psycho-Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Meffert
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Noa Roemmel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Digital and Blended Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Viviane Hess
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Rochlitz
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Winterthur Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Sabina Hunziker
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Ulfried Geuter
- Institute for Sports and Motology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Rainer Schaefert
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
König D, Savic Prince S, Hayoz S, Zens P, Berezowska S, Jochum W, Stauffer E, Braunersreuther V, Trachsel B, Thierstein S, Mark M, Schmid S, Curioni-Fontecedro A, Addeo A, Opitz I, Guckenberger M, Früh M, Betticher DC, Ris HB, Stupp R, Rothschild SI, Bubendorf L, Pless M. Neoadjuvant treatment does not influence PD-L1 expression in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of tumor samples from the trials SAKK 16/96, 16/00, 16/01, and 16/14. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101595. [PMID: 37441877 PMCID: PMC10515281 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The inclusion of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of operable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer is becoming a new standard. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression on tumor cells has emerged as the most important biomarker for sensitivity to ICIs targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-PD-L1 axis. Little is known about the impact of neoadjuvant treatment on PD-L1 expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry (Ventana SP263 assay) on tumor cells in treatment-naive diagnostic tumor samples and matched lung resections from patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer included in the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) trials 16/96, 16/00, 16/01, and 16/14. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with cisplatin/docetaxel, either as single modality (CT), with sequential radiotherapy [chemoradiation therapy (CRT)] or with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab (CT + ICI). RESULTS Overall, 132 paired tumor samples were analyzed from patients with neoadjuvant CT (n = 69), CRT (n = 33) and CT + ICI (n = 30). For CT and CRT, PD-L1 expression before and after neoadjuvant treatment did not differ significantly (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.94). Likewise, no statistically significant difference was observed between CT and CRT for PD-L1 expression after neoadjuvant treatment (P = 0.97). For CT + ICI, PD-L1 expression before and after neoadjuvant treatment also did not differ significantly (Wilcoxon test, P > 0.99). Event-free survival and overall survival for patients with downregulation or upregulation of PD-L1 expression after neoadjuvant treatment were similar. CONCLUSIONS In our cohort of patients neoadjuvant treatment did not influence PD-L1 expression, irrespective of the specific neoadjuvant treatment protocol. Dynamic change of PD-L1 expression did not correlate with event-free survival or overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D König
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel.
| | - S Savic Prince
- Institute of Pathology and Medical Genetics, University Hospital Basel, Basel
| | - S Hayoz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern
| | - P Zens
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern; Graduate School for Health Science, University of Bern, Bern
| | - S Berezowska
- Institute of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne
| | - W Jochum
- Institute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen
| | | | | | - B Trachsel
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern
| | | | - M Mark
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur
| | - S Schmid
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Bern (Inselspital), Bern
| | | | - A Addeo
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, University Hospital Geneva (HUG), Geneva
| | - I Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich
| | - M Früh
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen; University of Bern, Bern
| | - D C Betticher
- Clinics of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Fribourg (HFR), Fribourg
| | - H-B Ris
- Clinics for Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital du Valais, Sion, Switzerland
| | - R Stupp
- Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne
| | - S I Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel; Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden
| | - L Bubendorf
- Institute of Pathology and Medical Genetics, University Hospital Basel, Basel
| | - M Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, Pereira JR, De Marinis F, von Pawel J, Gatzemeier U, Tsao TCY, Pless M, Muller T, Lim HL, Desch C, Szondy K, Gervais R, Manegold C, Paul S, Paoletti P, Einhorn L, Bunn PA. Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2682-2690. [PMID: 37196429 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had a performance status 0 to 2, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, and adequate organ function. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1 with vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV day 1 with dexamethasone every 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS Five hundred seventy-one patients were randomly assigned. Overall response rates were 9.1% and 8.8% (analysis of variance P = .105) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months (P = not significant) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. The 1-year survival rate for each arm was 29.7%. Patients receiving docetaxel were more likely to have grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40.2% v 5.3%; P < .001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% v 1.9%; P < .001), neutropenia with infections (3.3% v 0.0%; P = .004), hospitalizations for neutropenic fever (13.4% v 1.5%; P < .001), hospitalizations due to other drug related adverse events (10.5% v 6.4%; P = .092), use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (19.2% v 2.6%, P < .001) and all grade alopecia (37.7% v 6.4%; P < .001) compared with patients receiving pemetrexed. CONCLUSION Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes, but with significantly fewer side effects compared with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and should be considered a standard treatment option for second-line NSCLC when available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasser Hanna
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Frances A Shepherd
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Frank V Fossella
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Jose R Pereira
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Filippo De Marinis
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Joachim von Pawel
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Ulrich Gatzemeier
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Thomas Chang Yao Tsao
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Miklos Pless
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Thomas Muller
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Hong-Liang Lim
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Christopher Desch
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Klara Szondy
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Radj Gervais
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Christian Manegold
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Sofia Paul
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Paolo Paoletti
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Lawrence Einhorn
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Paul A Bunn
- From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hayoz S, Kasenda B, Schenker AL, Kopp C, Schär S, Thürlimann B, von Moos R, Pless M. Completion and publication of clinical trials in a cooperative group: a cohort study of trials of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068490. [PMID: 37072360 PMCID: PMC10124283 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Premature trial discontinuation and non-publication of trial results are still major issues negatively affecting reliable evidence generation. OBJECTIVES To investigate trial completion and publication rate of cancer trials conducted within the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). DESIGN Cohort study of clinical trials. SETTING Cohort of interventional cancer trials conducted in Switzerland with accrual closure between 1986 and 2021 identified from the SAKK trial management system. OUTCOMES Premature trial discontinuation and publication in peer-reviewed journal. RESULTS We included 261 trials; median number of recruited patients was 150.5 (range 1-8028). Most trials (67.0%) were randomised. Overall, 76 of 261 (29.1%) trials were prematurely closed for accrual. The three main reasons for premature closure were insufficient accrual in 28 trials, followed by stopping for futility in 17 or efficacy in 8 trials. We included 240 trials for the publication status (21 excluded, because 8 still in follow-up, for 10 the primary completion date was less than a year ago and for 3 the manuscript was submitted, but to accepted yet). 216 of 240 (90.0%) were published as a full article, 14 were published in other formats, leading to an overall publication rate of 95.8%. The rate of premature discontinuation declined over time, with 34.2%, 27.8% and 23.5% in trials activated before 2000, between 2000 and 2009, and since 2010, respectively. We observed an increasing publication rate in peer-reviewed journals over time: 79.2% (closed before 2000), 95.7% (closed between 2000 and 2009) and 93.2% (closed after 2010). CONCLUSION Insufficient patient recruitment is still the major reason for premature trial discontinuation. SAKK has continuously improved its quality management of trial conduct over time leading to increased successful trial completion and publication. However, there is still room for improvement to increase the number of trials reaching their target sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Hayoz
- Statistics, Competence Center of SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Christoph Kopp
- Statistics, Competence Center of SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sämi Schär
- Statistics, Competence Center of SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Beat Thürlimann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division Oncology-Haematology, Kantonsspital Sankt Gallen, Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
- Breast Centre, Kantonsspital Sankt Gallen, Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Roger von Moos
- Medical Oncology/Haematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rothschild S, Sobottka-Brillout A, Tochtermann G, Trueb M, Nowak M, Alborelli I, Leonards K, Manzo M, Keller E, Herzig P, Schmid D, Hayoz S, Chiquet S, Schneider M, Pless M, Jermann P, Zippelius A, Prince SS, Koelzer V. 188P SAKK 16/14: Immune profiling of pre-operative biopsies correlates with survival and immune activation in stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s1556-0864(23)00441-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
|
7
|
de Langen AJ, Johnson ML, Mazieres J, Dingemans AMC, Mountzios G, Pless M, Wolf J, Schuler M, Lena H, Skoulidis F, Yoneshima Y, Kim SW, Linardou H, Novello S, van der Wekken AJ, Chen Y, Peters S, Felip E, Solomon BJ, Ramalingam SS, Dooms C, Lindsay CR, Ferreira CG, Blais N, Obiozor CC, Wang Y, Mehta B, Varrieur T, Ngarmchamnanrith G, Stollenwerk B, Waterhouse D, Paz-Ares L. Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer with KRAS G12C mutation: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023; 401:733-746. [PMID: 36764316 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00221-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 95.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sotorasib is a specific, irreversible inhibitor of the GTPase protein, KRASG12C. We compared the efficacy and safety of sotorasib with a standard-of-care treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the KRASG12C mutation who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs. METHODS We conducted a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial at 148 centres in 22 countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, who progressed after previous platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Key exclusion criteria included new or progressing untreated brain lesions or symptomatic brain lesions, previously identified oncogenic driver mutation other than KRASG12C for which an approved therapy is available (eg EGFR or ALK), previous treatment with docetaxel (neoadjuvant or adjuvant docetaxel was allowed if the tumour did not progress within 6 months after the therapy was terminated), previous treatment with a direct KRASG12C inhibitor, systemic anticancer therapy within 28 days of study day 1, and therapeutic or palliative radiation therapy within 2 weeks of treatment initiation. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to oral sotorasib (960 mg once daily) or intravenous docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) in an open-label manner using interactive response technology. Randomisation was stratified by number of previous lines of therapy in advanced disease (1 vs 2 vs >2), ethnicity (Asian vs non-Asian), and history of CNS metastases (present or absent). Treatment continued until an independent central confirmation of disease progression, intolerance, initiation of another anticancer therapy, withdrawal of consent, or death, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was assessed by a blinded, independent central review in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04303780, and is active but no longer recruiting. FINDINGS Between June 4, 2020, and April 26, 2021, 345 patients were randomly assigned to receive sotorasib (n=171 [50%]) or docetaxel (n=174 [50%]). 169 (99%) patients in the sotorasib group and 151 (87%) in the docetaxel group received at least one dose. After a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 16·4-20·1), the study met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant increase in the progression-free survival for sotorasib, compared with docetaxel (median progression-free survival 5·6 months [95% CI 4·3-7·8] vs 4·5 months [3·0-5·7]; hazard ratio 0·66 [0·51-0·86]; p=0·0017). Sotorasib was well tolerated, with fewer grade 3 or worse (n=56 [33%] vs n=61 [40%]) and serious treatment-related adverse events compared with docetaxel (n=18 [11%] vs n=34 [23%]). For sotorasib, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were diarrhoea (n= 20 [12%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (n=13 [8%]), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (n=9 [5%]). For docetaxel, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (n=13 [9%]), fatigue (n=9 [6%]), and febrile neutropenia (n=8 [5%]). INTERPRETATION Sotorasib significantly increased progression-free survival and had a more favourable safety profile, compared with docetaxel, in patients with advanced NSCLC with the KRASG12C mutation and who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs. FUNDING Amgen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melissa L Johnson
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Julien Mazieres
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Jürgen Wolf
- Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hervé Lena
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes-Hopital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, Università Degli Studi Di Torino-San Luigi Hospital Orbassano, Italy
| | - Anthonie J van der Wekken
- Department of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Yuanbin Chen
- Cancer & Hematology Centers of Western Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Solange Peters
- Oncology Department-CHUV, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Enriqueta Felip
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Suresh S Ramalingam
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christophe Dooms
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Colin R Lindsay
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Normand Blais
- Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Luis Paz-Ares
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CNIO-H12o Lung Cancer Unit, Complutense University and Ciberonc, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nie R, Chen F, Provencio M, Wang Y, van den Ende T, van Laarhoven HW, Yuan S, Pless M, Hayoz S, Zhou Z, Li Y, Rothschild SI, Cai M. Predictive value of radiological response, pathological response and relapse-free survival for overall survival in neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials: pooled analysis of 29 clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 2023; 186:211-221. [PMID: 37062625 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of clinical trials are being conducted exploring the efficacy of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. Surrogate end-points for overall survival (OS) are urgently needed. METHODS Phase II or III trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy that reported data on OS and surrogate end-points were identified from January 1, 2000, to November 25, 2022. Individual patient data, and trial-level data were requested from corresponding authors or extracted from eligible trials. At the individual level, correlations between radiological and pathological response and OS were measured by the Cox model and quantified by hazard ratio (HR). C-statistic was used to quantify the predictive performance of radiological and pathological response for OS. The coefficient of determination (R2) between RFS and OS was evaluated by a bivariate survival model. RESULTS A total of 29 trials reporting 2901 patients were included. ORR correlated with improved OS (3-year OS: 87.0% versus 70.4% for ORR versus non-ORR, respectively; HR, 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.68). The HRs for OS in patients achieving MPR and pCR were 0.24 (95% CI, 0.12-0.46) and 0.13 (95% CI, 0.05-0.36). The survival benefit maintained after adjusting tumour type. C-statistics of ORR, MPR and pCR were 0.63, 0.63 and 0.65, respectively. The strength of association between RFS and OS was strong (R2 = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.79-0.94). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that ORR, MPR, pCR and RFS are valid predictors for OS when using neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, MPR, pCR and RFS may be the most optimal surrogates for OS.
Collapse
|
9
|
Grossert A, Meffert C, Hess V, Rochlitz C, Pless M, Hunziker S, Wössmer B, Geuter U, Meinlschmidt G, Schaefert R. Group-based body psychotherapy improves appreciation of body awareness in post-treatment cancer patients: A non-randomized clinical trial. Front Psychol 2023; 14:956493. [PMID: 37089722 PMCID: PMC10117640 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.956493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cancer-related impairments often co-occur with bodily disturbances. Body psychotherapy (BPT) can improve bodily wellbeing, yet evidence in cancer survivors is scarce. Hence, we aimed to evaluate whether blended group BPT alleviates bodily disturbances in post-treatment cancer patients. Methods We conducted a bi-center study (registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, under No. NCT03707548), applying a pre-post convergent parallel design of weekly group BPT interspersed with smartphone-based ambulatory interventions using a waiting-period comparator. We included patients with completed curatively intended treatment for malignant neoplasms, suffering from bodily disturbances. The primary outcome was body image disturbances. Secondary outcomes were experiencing and appreciating body awareness, mental wellbeing, and health-related quality of life. Results Forty patients (mean age 51.7 years) attended group BPT. Mixed-effect linear regression models contrasting intervention with the waiting period did not show statistically significant differences regarding the primary outcome [Pre-post difference contrasts: 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.51 to 4.93, p = 0.339]. However, patients showed greater improvements in appreciating body awareness, measured by the "Body Mindfulness Questionnaire" (BMQ), from pre- to post-intervention as compared to the waiting period (pre-post difference contrasts: 7.31 95% CI: 4.15-10.47, Bonferroni-Holm corrected q = 0.0002). Discussion We found no evidence that blended group BPT was effective in improving body image disturbances in post-treatment cancer patients, but found indications for an increase in body awareness appreciation. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03707548.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Grossert
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Medical Center of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Psycho-Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Meffert
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Viviane Hess
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Rochlitz
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Winterthur Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Sabina Hunziker
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Brigitta Wössmer
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Outpatient Clinic for Psychotherapy, Olten, Switzerland
| | - Ulfried Geuter
- Institute for Sports and Motology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Gunther Meinlschmidt
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Digital and Blended Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, International Psychoanalytic University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rainer Schaefert
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Rainer Schaefert, ; orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-7289
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Storck LJ, Uster A, Gafner L, Ruehlin M, Gaeumann S, Gisi D, Schmocker M, Meffert PJ, Imoberdorf R, Pless M, Ballmer PE. Effect of combined therapies including nutrition and physical exercise in advanced cancer patients: A pooled analysis. Front Nutr 2023; 10:1063279. [PMID: 36937336 PMCID: PMC10014851 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1063279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Although many cancer patients suffer from malnutrition or cancer cachexia, there is no standard of care so far due to limited intervention trials. Pooled data from two combined trials were analyzed regarding nutritional status and survival time. Materials and methods Data from two trials with advanced cancer patients were included. In both trials, patients in the intervention group received at least three times nutritional counseling and supervised training sessions. Patients in the control group continued being treated according to usual care. Nutritional status was measured using BMI, body composition and handgrip strength. Survival time was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model with the period between the beginning of the trial and death as underlying time scale. Results 68 men (61.8%) and 42 women (38.2%) were randomized either to the intervention (n = 56) or the control (n = 54) group. The inter-group difference for changes in BMI and body composition was not statistically significant after 3 months. Handgrip strength improved significantly from 34.4 ± 10.2 kg to 36.3 ± 9.9 kg at 3 months in the intervention compared to 33.9 ± 9.2 kg to 34.9 ± 9.1 kg in the control group (p = 0.006). The analysis of survival time showed no inter-group difference for all patients. A detailed analysis for different diagnoses showed that in patients with lung cancer, the covariates "CRP value," "days from first diagnosis to randomization" as well as "gender" were significantly associated with survival time. Patients with higher CRP value had a shorter survival time and female patients had a shorter survival time than male patients in our analysis. In addition, patients with pancreatic cancer randomized to the control group had a 20% shorter survival time than those in the intervention group (p = 0.048). Conclusion The pooled analysis showed a significant improvement of handgrip strength in advanced cancer patients through the implementation of a combined therapy. Handgrip strength is of prognostic significance in hospitalized patients due to its association with mortality and morbidity. However, no improvements in further tests were detected. There is great need for further investigations examining the effect of nutritional and exercise therapy on survival time with focus on different cancer diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena J. Storck
- Zentrum für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Ernährungstherapie/-Beratung, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Medizinische Kliniken, Klinikum Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Alexandra Uster
- Division of Research, Innovation, and Development, Swiss Cancer League, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lucia Gafner
- Zentrum für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Ernährungstherapie/-Beratung, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Maya Ruehlin
- Zentrum für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Ernährungstherapie/-Beratung, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Gaeumann
- Zentrum für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Ernährungstherapie/-Beratung, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - David Gisi
- Institut für Therapien und Rehabilitation, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Martina Schmocker
- Institut für Therapien und Rehabilitation, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | | - Reinhard Imoberdorf
- Zentrum für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Klinik für Medizinische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Peter E. Ballmer
- Past President GESKES-SSNC, Winterthur, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Peter E. Ballmer,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Papachristofilou A, Bedke J, Hayoz S, Schratzenstaller U, Pless M, Hentrich M, Krege S, Lorch A, Aebersold DM, Putora PM, Berthold DR, Zihler D, Zengerling F, Dieing A, Mueller AC, Schaer C, Biaggi C, Gillessen S, Cathomas R. Single-dose carboplatin followed by involved-node radiotherapy for stage IIA and stage IIB seminoma (SAKK 01/10): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1441-1450. [PMID: 36228644 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00564-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard treatment options for patients with stage IIA or stage IIB seminoma include either para-aortic and pelvic radiotherapy or three to four cycles of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. These options result in 3-year progression free survival rates of at least 90%, but bear risks for acute and late toxic effects, including secondary malignancies. We tested a novel approach combining de-escalated chemotherapy with de-escalated involved node radiotherapy, with the aim of reducing toxicity while preserving efficacy. METHODS In the single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 SAKK 01/10 trial, patients with stage IIA or IIB classic seminoma (either at primary diagnosis or at relapse during active surveillance for stage I) were enrolled at ten centres of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and ten centres of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. WHO performance status 0-2, age 18 years or older, and adequate bone marrow and kidney function were required for eligibility. Treatment comprised one cycle of carboplatin (area under the curve 7) followed by involved-node radiotherapy (30 Gy in 15 fractions for stage IIA disease and 36 Gy in 18 fractions for stage IIB disease). The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival. Efficacy analyses were done on the full analysis set, which comprised all patients who signed the informed consent, were registered in the trial, initiated trial treatment, and met all medically relevant inclusion or exclusion criteria. Safety was assessed in all patients who were treated at least once with one of the trial treatments. The study is ongoing but no longer recruiting, and is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01593241. FINDINGS Between Oct 18, 2012, and June 22, 2018, 120 patients were registered in the study. 116 patients were eligible and started treatment according to the study protocol (46 patients with stage IIA disease and 70 with stage IIB disease). After a median follow-up of 4·5 years (IQR 3·9-6·0), 3-year progression-free survival was 93·7% (90% CI 88·5-96·6). With a target progression-free survival of 95% at 3 years, the primary endpoint was not met. Acute treatment-related adverse events of any grade were noted in 58 (48%) of 116 patients, and grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in the form of neutropenia in five (4%) patients, thrombocytopenia in three (3%) patients, and vomiting in one (1%) patient. No treatment-related deaths and no late treatment-related adverse events were reported. Serious adverse events were reported in five (4%) of 116 patients (one transient creatinine increase and four second primary tumours). INTERPRETATION Despite the fact that the primary endpoint was not met, we observed favourable 3-year progression-free survival with single-dose carboplatin area under the curve 7 and involved-node radiotherapy, with minimal toxic effects. Our findings might warrant discussion with patients about the SAKK 01/10 regimen as an alternative to standard-of-care treatment, but more research on this strategy is needed. FUNDING Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation and Rising Tide Foundation for Clinical Cancer Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Competence Center of SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Miklos Pless
- Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany; Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel-M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Dominik-R Berthold
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Annette Dieing
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Corinne Schaer
- Competence Center of SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christine Biaggi
- Competence Center of SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sobottka B, Tochtermann G, Trueb M, Nowack M, Alborelli I, Leonards K, Manzo M, Keller E, Herzig P, Schmid D, Eboulet E, Hayoz S, Godar G, Schneider M, Jermann P, Savic Prince S, König D, Pless M, Zippelius A, Rothschild S, Koelzer V. MA12.04 SAKK 16/14: CD8 T Cell Positioning Correlates with Survivalin Stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC After Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.07.144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
13
|
Johnson M, de Langen A, Waterhouse D, Mazieres J, Dingemans AM, Mountzios G, Pless M, Wolf J, Schuler M, Lena H, Skoulidis F, Okamoto I, Kim SW, Linardou H, Novello S, Chen Y, Solomon B, Obiozor C, Wang Y, Paz-Ares L. LBA10 Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS G12C mutation: CodeBreaK 200 phase III study. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.08.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
14
|
Cathomas R, Rothschild S, Hayoz S, Spahn M, Özdemir B, Kiss B, Erdmann A, Aeppli S, Mach N, Strebel R, Hadaschik BA, Berthold DR, Pless M, Zihler D, Schmid M, Schneider M, Musilova J, Petrausch U. Perioperative chemoimmunotherapy with durvalumab for operable muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC): Primary analysis of the single arm phase II trial SAKK 06/17. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4515 Background: SAKK 06/17 investigated the addition of perioperative immunotherapy with the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab (Durva) in the multimodality treatment of resectable MIUC. While most similar trials had a primary endpoint of pathological complete remission rate, this study evaluated the clinically more relevant primary endpoint of event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years (yrs). Methods: SAKK 06/17 was an open-label, single-arm phase II study including 61 cisplatin-fit patients (pts) with stage cT2-T4a cN0-1 operable MIUC. Pts received four cycles of neoadjuvant Cis/Gem q3w in combination with 4 cycles Durva 1500mg q3w followed by complete resection. Adjuvant Durva 1500mg q4w was given for 10 cycles or a maximum of 40 weeks. The primary endpoint was EFS at 2 yrs after neoadjuvant trial treatment (NAT) start. An event was defined as progression during NAT, appearance of metastases, locoregional recurrence after surgery or death from any cause. 58 pts were needed based on one-sided type I error 10% and power 80% for H1 EFS at 2 yrs ≥ 65% compared to H0 EFS at 2 yrs ≤ 50%. Secondary endpoints included pathological response, recurrence free survival after R0 resection (RFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. We report the primary analysis of the full analysis set (FAS, received at least one dose of Durva). Results: 61 pts were included between July 2018 and September 2019 at 12 sites. Median follow up is 28.1 months (95%CI 27.8-28.4). FAS consisted of 58 pts (79% male, median age 68 yrs) with bladder cancer (95%) or upper urinary tract/urethral cancer (5%). Clinical T2, T3, T4 stage was present at diagnosis in 69%, 21%, 10%, respectively, and 17% had cN1. Resection was performed in 53 pts (91%; 4 refused, 1 unresectable) with R0 resection in 52 pts (98%). 48 (91%) of resected pts started adjuvant Durva and 32 (67%) completed it. Pathological response < ypT2 ypN0 was achieved in 32 pts (18 pts ypT0 and 14 pts ypT1/a/is), corresponding to 60% of resected pts and 55% of the FAS. EFS at 2 yrs was overall 76.1% (one-sided 90% CI (lower bound): 67.6%; 95% CI 62.3% - 85.3%), for ypT1/a/is 92.9% and for ypT0 100%. RFS at 2 yrs after R0 resection (N=52) was 83.5% (95% CI 69.6% - 91.4%) and OS at 2 yrs for the FAS population was 87.3% (95% CI 73.8% - 94.1%). Grade 1, 2, 3, 4 adverse events attributed to Durva during overall treatment were 14%, 35%, 19%, 7%, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of perioperative Durvalumab to the standard of care for pts with resectable MIUC results in a high EFS, RFS and OS at 2 yrs, especially for pts with downstaging to <ypT2. The null hypothesis for the primary endpoint was clearly rejected. More in-depth analyses for biomarkers (PD-L1, ctDNA) will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03406650.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Cathomas
- Division of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubunden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Sacha Rothschild
- University Hospital Basel, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Medical Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Berna Özdemir
- Department of Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bernhard Kiss
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Stefanie Aeppli
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Mach
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Boris A. Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Martina Schneider
- SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mark M, Rusakiewicz S, Früh M, Hayoz S, Grosso F, Pless M, Zucali P, Ceresoli G, Maconi A, Schneider M, Froesch P, Tarussio D, Benedetti F, Dagher J, Kandalaft L, von Moos R, Tissot-Renaud S, Schmid S, Metaxas Y. Long-term benefit of lurbinectedin as palliative chemotherapy in progressive malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): final efficacy and translational data of the SAKK 17/16 study. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100446. [PMID: 35427834 PMCID: PMC9271468 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The SAKK 17/16 study showed promising efficacy data with lurbinectedin as second- or third-line palliative therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Here, we evaluated long-term outcome and analyzed the impact of lurbinectedin monotherapy on the tumor microenvironment at the cellular and molecular level to predict outcomes. Material and methods Forty-two patients were treated with lurbinectedin in this single-arm study. Twenty-nine samples were available at baseline, and seven additional matched samples at day one of cycle two of treatment. Survival curves and rates between groups were compared using the log-rank test and Kaplan–Meier method. Statistical significance was set at P value <0.05. Results Updated median overall survival (OS) was slightly increased to 11.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.8-13.8 months]. Thirty-six patients (85%) had died. The OS rate at 12 and 18 months was 47% (95% CI 32.1% to 61.6%) and 31% (95% CI 17.8% to 45.0%), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.6-5.5 months). No new safety signals were observed. Patients with lower frequencies of regulatory T cells, as well as lower tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) at baseline, had a better OS. Comparing matched biopsies, a decrease of M2 macrophages was observed in five out of seven patients after exposure to lurbinectedin, and two out of four patients showed increased CD8+ T-cell infiltrates in tumor. Discussion Lurbinectedin continues to be active in patients with progressing malignant pleural mesothelioma. According to our very small sample size, we hypothesize that baseline TAMs and regulatory T cells are associated with survival. Lurbinectedin seems to inhibit conversion of TAMs to M2 phenotype in humans. Lurbinectedin continues to be active in patients with progressing MPM with a median OS of 11.5 months (95% CI 8.8-13.8 months). TAMs and regulatory T cells are associated with survival. Lurbinectedin seems to inhibit conversion of TAMs to M2 phenotype in humans.
Collapse
|
16
|
Joerger M, Metaxas Y, Zaman K, Michielin O, Mach N, Bettini A, Schmitt AM, Cantoni N, Caspar CB, Stettler S, Malval R, Pless M, Britschgi C, Renner C, Koeberle D, Schulz JD, Kopp C, Hayoz S, Stathis A, von Moos R. Outcome and Prognostic Factors of COVID-19 Infection in Swiss Cancer Patients: Final Results of SAKK 80/20 (CaSA). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2191. [PMID: 35565320 PMCID: PMC9104745 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: These are the final results of a national registry on cancer patients with COVID-19 in Switzerland. Methods: We collected data on symptomatic COVID-19-infected cancer patients from 23 Swiss sites over a one-year period starting on 1 March 2020. The main objective was to assess the outcome (i.e., mortality, rate of hospitalization, ICU admission) of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients; the main secondary objective was to define prognostic factors. Results: From 455 patients included, 205 patients (45%) had non-curative disease, 241 patients (53%) were hospitalized for COVID-19, 213 (47%) required oxygen, 43 (9%) invasive ventilation and 62 (14%) were admitted to the ICU. Death from COVID-19 infection occurred in 98 patients, resulting in a mortality rate of 21.5%. Age ≥65 years versus <65 years (OR 3.14, p = 0.003), non-curative versus curative disease (OR 2.42, p = 0.012), ICU admission (OR 4.45, p < 0.001) and oxygen requirement (OR 20.28, p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased mortality. Conclusions: We confirmed high COVID-19 severity and mortality in real-world cancer patients during the first and second wave of the pandemic in a country with a decentralized, high-quality, universal-access health care system. COVID-19-associated mortality was particularly high for those of older age in a non-curative disease setting, requiring oxygen or ICU care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Joerger
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Yannis Metaxas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital, 8596 Muensterlingen, Switzerland;
| | - Khalil Zaman
- Breast Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Olivier Michielin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Nicolas Mach
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Adrienne Bettini
- Department of Medical Oncology, HFR Fribourg-Hôpital Cantonal, 1752 Fribourg, Switzerland;
| | - Andreas M. Schmitt
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Nathan Cantoni
- Oncology, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Cantonal Hospital, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland;
| | - Clemens B. Caspar
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Cantonal Hospital, 5404 Baden, Switzerland;
| | - Sonja Stettler
- Division of Medical Oncology, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland;
| | | | - Miklos Pless
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland;
| | - Christian Britschgi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Christoph Renner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncological Center Zurich, 8038 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Dieter Koeberle
- Department of Oncology, Claraspital, 4058 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Jessica D. Schulz
- SAKK Coordinating Center, 3008 Bern, Switzerland; (J.D.S.); (C.K.); (S.H.)
| | - Christoph Kopp
- SAKK Coordinating Center, 3008 Bern, Switzerland; (J.D.S.); (C.K.); (S.H.)
| | - Stefanie Hayoz
- SAKK Coordinating Center, 3008 Bern, Switzerland; (J.D.S.); (C.K.); (S.H.)
| | - Anastasios Stathis
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland;
| | - Roger von Moos
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden, 7000 Chur, Switzerland;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Furrer K, Weder W, Eboulet EI, Betticher D, Pless M, Stupp R, Krueger T, Perentes JY, Schmid RA, Lardinois D, Furrer M, Früh M, Peters S, Curioni-Fontecedro A, Stahel RA, Rothschild SI, Hayoz S, Opitz I. Extended resection for potentially operable stage III NSCLC patients after neoadjuvant treatment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 164:1587-1602.e5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
18
|
König D, Schär S, Vuong D, Guckenberger M, Furrer K, Opitz I, Weder W, Rothschild SI, Ochsenbein A, Zippelius A, Addeo A, Mark M, Eboulet EI, Hayoz S, Thierstein S, Betticher DC, Ris HB, Stupp R, Curioni-Fontecedro A, Peters S, Pless M, Früh M. Long-term outcomes of operable stage III NSCLC in the pre-immunotherapy era: results from a pooled analysis of the SAKK 16/96, SAKK 16/00, SAKK 16/01, and SAKK 16/08 trials. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100455. [PMID: 35398718 PMCID: PMC9011017 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab consolidation has yielded excellent results in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, it is essential to identify patients who might benefit from a surgical approach. Material and methods Data from 437 patients with operable stage III NSCLC enrolled in four consecutive Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) trials (16/96, 16/00, 16/01, 16/08) were pooled and outcomes were analyzed in 431 eligible patients. All patients were treated with three cycles of induction chemotherapy (cisplatin/docetaxel), followed in some patients by neoadjuvant radiotherapy (44 Gy, 22 fractions) (16/00, 16/01, 16/08) and cetuximab (16/08). Results With a median follow-up time of 9.3 years (range 8.5-10.3 years), 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 37% and 25%, respectively. Overall, 342 patients (79%) underwent tumor resection, with a complete resection (R0) rate of 80%. Patients (n = 272, 63%) with R0 had significantly longer OS compared to patients who had surgery but incomplete resection (64.8 versus 19.2 months, P < 0.001). OS for patients who achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) (n = 66, 15%) was significantly better compared to resected patients without pCR (86.5 versus 37.0 months, P = 0.003). For patients with pCR, the 5- and 10-year event-free survival and OS rates were 45.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.8% to 57.7%] and 28.1% (95% CI 15.2% to 42.6%), and 58.2% (95% CI 45.2% to 69.2%) and 45.0% (95% CI 31.5% to 57.6%), respectively. Conclusion We report favorable long-term outcomes in patients with operable stage III NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel ± neoadjuvant sequential radiotherapy from four prospective SAKK trials. Almost two-third of the patients underwent complete resection after neoadjuvant therapy. We confirm R0 resection and pCR as important predictors of outcome. Combined modality treatment in operable stage III NSCLC results in 5- and 10-year survival rates of 37% and 25%. Long-term survival for patients with incomplete resection is poor. Complete resection and pCR are important predictors for outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D König
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - S Schär
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Vuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - K Furrer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - I Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - W Weder
- Clinics for Thoracic Surgery, Bethanien, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S I Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - A Ochsenbein
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Bern (Inselspital), Bern, Switzerland
| | - A Zippelius
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - A Addeo
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Mark
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - E I Eboulet
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Hayoz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Thierstein
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - D C Betticher
- Clinics of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Fribourg (HFR), Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - H-B Ris
- Clinics for Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital du Valais, Sion, Switzerland
| | - R Stupp
- Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - A Curioni-Fontecedro
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - M Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - M Früh
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lötscher J, Martí I Líndez AA, Kirchhammer N, Cribioli E, Giordano Attianese GMP, Trefny MP, Lenz M, Rothschild SI, Strati P, Künzli M, Lotter C, Schenk SH, Dehio P, Löliger J, Litzler L, Schreiner D, Koch V, Page N, Lee D, Grählert J, Kuzmin D, Burgener AV, Merkler D, Pless M, Balmer ML, Reith W, Huwyler J, Irving M, King CG, Zippelius A, Hess C. Magnesium sensing via LFA-1 regulates CD8 + T cell effector function. Cell 2022; 185:585-602.e29. [PMID: 35051368 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The relevance of extracellular magnesium in cellular immunity remains largely unknown. Here, we show that the co-stimulatory cell-surface molecule LFA-1 requires magnesium to adopt its active conformation on CD8+ T cells, thereby augmenting calcium flux, signal transduction, metabolic reprogramming, immune synapse formation, and, as a consequence, specific cytotoxicity. Accordingly, magnesium-sufficiency sensed via LFA-1 translated to the superior performance of pathogen- and tumor-specific T cells, enhanced effectiveness of bi-specific T cell engaging antibodies, and improved CAR T cell function. Clinically, low serum magnesium levels were associated with more rapid disease progression and shorter overall survival in CAR T cell and immune checkpoint antibody-treated patients. LFA-1 thus directly incorporates information on the composition of the microenvironment as a determinant of outside-in signaling activity. These findings conceptually link co-stimulation and nutrient sensing and point to the magnesium-LFA-1 axis as a therapeutically amenable biologic system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Lötscher
- Department of Biomedicine, Immunobiology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Adrià-Arnau Martí I Líndez
- Department of Biomedicine, Immunobiology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Medicine, CITIID, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK
| | - Nicole Kirchhammer
- Department of Biomedicine, Cancer Immunology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Elisabetta Cribioli
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Greta Maria Paola Giordano Attianese
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marcel P Trefny
- Department of Biomedicine, Cancer Immunology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Markus Lenz
- University of Applied Science Northwestern Switzerland, Institute for Ecopreneurship, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland
| | - Sacha I Rothschild
- Division of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Strati
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Marco Künzli
- Department of Biomedicine, Immune Cell Biology, University and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Lotter
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Susanne H Schenk
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Dehio
- Department of Biomedicine, Immunobiology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jordan Löliger
- Department of Biomedicine, Immunobiology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ludivine Litzler
- Department of Biomedicine, Immune Cell Biology, University and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - David Schreiner
- Department of Biomedicine, Immune Cell Biology, University and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Victoria Koch
- Department of Biomedicine, Cancer Immunology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Page
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dahye Lee
- Department of Biomedicine, Immunobiology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jasmin Grählert
- Department of Biomedicine, Immunobiology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Dmitry Kuzmin
- Hornet Therapeutics Ltd, London SW1Y 5ES, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Anne-Valérie Burgener
- Department of Biomedicine, Immunobiology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Doron Merkler
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, 3008 Bern, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Maria L Balmer
- Department of Biomedicine, Immunobiology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Department for Biomedical Research (DBMR), University Clinic for Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Inselspital, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland; Diabetes Center Berne (DCB), 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Walter Reith
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Huwyler
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Melita Irving
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Carolyn G King
- Department of Biomedicine, Immune Cell Biology, University and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alfred Zippelius
- Department of Biomedicine, Cancer Immunology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Division of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Hess
- Department of Biomedicine, Immunobiology, University of Basel and University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Department of Medicine, CITIID, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
König D, Savic Prince S, Trachsel B, Hayoz S, Pless M. 5P Comparison of PD-L1 expression before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
21
|
Soo RA, Han JY, Dafni U, Cho BC, Yeo CM, Nadal E, Carcereny E, de Castro J, Sala MA, Bernabé R, Coate L, Provencio Pulla M, Garcia Campelo R, Cuffe S, Hashemi SMS, Früh M, Massuti B, Garcia-Sanchez J, Dómine M, Majem M, Sanchez-Torres JM, Britschgi C, Pless M, Dimopoulou G, Roschitzki-Voser H, Ruepp B, Rosell R, Stahel RA, Peters S. A randomised phase II study of osimertinib and bevacizumab versus osimertinib alone as second-line targeted treatment in advanced NSCLC with confirmed EGFR and acquired T790M mutations: the European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP 10-16) BOOSTER trial. Ann Oncol 2021; 33:181-192. [PMID: 34839016 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitising EGFR and acquired T790M mutations, progression inevitably occurs. The angiogenic pathway is implicated in EGFR TKI resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS BOOSTER is an open-label randomised phase II trial investigating the efficacy and safety of combined osimertinib 80 mg daily and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks, versus osimertinib alone, in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and acquired T790M mutations after failure on previous EGFR TKI therapy. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Between May 2017 and February 2019, 155 patients were randomised (combination: 78; osimertinib: 77). At data cut-off of 22 February 2021, median follow-up was 33.8 months [interquartile range (IQR): 26.5-37.6 months] and 129 (83.2%) PFS events were reported in the intention-to-treat population. There was no difference in median PFS between the combination [15.4 months; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.2-18.0 months] and osimertinib arm (12.3 months; 95% CI 6.2-17.2 months; stratified log-rank P = 0.83), [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96; 95% CI 0.68-1.37]. Median OS was 24.0 months (95% CI 17.8-32.1 months) in the combination arm and 24.3 months (95% CI 16.9-37.0 months) in the osimertinib arm (stratified log-rank P = 0.91), (HR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.67-1.56). Exploratory analysis revealed a significant interaction of smoking history with treatment for PFS (adjusted P = 0.0052) with a HR of 0.52 (95% CI 0.30-0.90) for smokers, and 1.47 (95% CI 0.92-2.33) for never smokers. ORR was 55% in both arms and the median time to treatment failure was significantly shorter in the combination than in the osimertinib arm, 8.2 months versus 10.8 months, respectively (P = 0.0074). Safety of osimertinib and bevacizumab was consistent with previous reports with grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) reported in 47% and 18% of patients on combination and osimertinib alone, respectively. CONCLUSIONS No difference in PFS was observed between osimertinib plus bevacizumab and osimertinib alone. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were more common in patients on combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A Soo
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - J-Y Han
- National Cancer Center, Center for Lung Cancer, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - U Dafni
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Frontier Science Foundation Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - B C Cho
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - C M Yeo
- Medical Oncology Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - E Nadal
- Medical Oncology Department, ICO L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Carcereny
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia Badalona Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, B-ARGO Group, Badalona, Spain
| | - J de Castro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - M A Sala
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - R Bernabé
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - L Coate
- Mid-Western Cancer Centre and University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - M Provencio Pulla
- Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda Medical Oncology Service, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Garcia Campelo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Teresa Herrera, La Coruña, Spain
| | - S Cuffe
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S M S Hashemi
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - M Früh
- Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Oncology and Hematology, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - B Massuti
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - J Garcia-Sanchez
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Arnau Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Dómine
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Madrid, Spain
| | - M Majem
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J-M Sanchez-Torres
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Britschgi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Pless
- Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Oncology and Haematology, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - G Dimopoulou
- Frontier Science Foundation Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - H Roschitzki-Voser
- European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP), Coordinating Office, Bern, Switzerland
| | - B Ruepp
- European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP), Coordinating Office, Bern, Switzerland
| | - R Rosell
- Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain; Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Honorary Consultant, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R A Stahel
- European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP), Coordinating Office, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - S Peters
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vuong D, Bogowicz M, Wee L, Riesterer O, Vlaskou Badra E, D'Cruz LA, Balermpas P, van Timmeren JE, Burgermeister S, Dekker A, De Ruysscher D, Unkelbach J, Thierstein S, Eboulet EI, Peters S, Pless M, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S. Quantification of the spatial distribution of primary tumors in the lung to develop new prognostic biomarkers for locally advanced NSCLC. Sci Rep 2021; 11:20890. [PMID: 34686719 PMCID: PMC8536672 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00239-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The anatomical location and extent of primary lung tumors have shown prognostic value for overall survival (OS). However, its manual assessment is prone to interobserver variability. This study aims to use data driven identification of image characteristics for OS in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Five stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC patient cohorts were retrospectively collected. Patients were treated either with radiochemotherapy (RCT): RCT1* (n = 107), RCT2 (n = 95), RCT3 (n = 37) or with surgery combined with radiotherapy or chemotherapy: S1* (n = 135), S2 (n = 55). Based on a deformable image registration (MIM Vista, 6.9.2.), an in-house developed software transferred each primary tumor to the CT scan of a reference patient while maintaining the original tumor shape. A frequency-weighted cumulative status map was created for both exploratory cohorts (indicated with an asterisk), where the spatial extent of the tumor was uni-labeled with 2 years OS. For the exploratory cohorts, a permutation test with random assignment of patient status was performed to identify regions with statistically significant worse OS, referred to as decreased survival areas (DSA). The minimal Euclidean distance between primary tumor to DSA was extracted from the independent cohorts (negative distance in case of overlap). To account for the tumor volume, the distance was scaled with the radius of the volume-equivalent sphere. For the S1 cohort, DSA were located at the right main bronchus whereas for the RCT1 cohort they further extended in cranio-caudal direction. In the independent cohorts, the model based on distance to DSA achieved performance: AUCRCT2 [95% CI] = 0.67 [0.55–0.78] and AUCRCT3 = 0.59 [0.39–0.79] for RCT patients, but showed bad performance for surgery cohort (AUCS2 = 0.52 [0.30–0.74]). Shorter distance to DSA was associated with worse outcome (p = 0.0074). In conclusion, this explanatory analysis quantifies the value of primary tumor location for OS prediction based on cumulative status maps. Shorter distance of primary tumor to a high-risk region was associated with worse prognosis in the RCT cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diem Vuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Marta Bogowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Leonard Wee
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver Riesterer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Center for Radiation-Oncology, KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau AG, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Eugenia Vlaskou Badra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Janita E van Timmeren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon Burgermeister
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - André Dekker
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sandra Thierstein
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eric I Eboulet
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Solange Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alborelli I, Leonards K, Manzo M, Keller E, Herzig P, Trüb M, Schmid D, Eboulet E, Godar G, Pless M, Zippelius A, Jermann P, Prince SS, Rothschild S. MA09.02 SAKK 16/14 - T-Cell Receptor Repertoire Metrics Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Durvalumab in Patients With Stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.08.153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
24
|
Furrer K, Weder W, Eboulet E, Betticher D, Pless M, Stupp R, Krueger T, Perentes J, Schmid R, Lardinois D, Furrer M, Fruh M, Peters S, Curioni-Fontecedro A, Stahel R, Rothschild S, Hayoz S, Thierstein S, Biaggi C, Opitz I. P30.01 Extended Resections for Advanced Stages T3/T4 NSCLC After Neoadjuvant Treatment: Conclusions of SAKK Pooled Analysis (16/96, 16/00, 16/01). J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.08.404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
25
|
Papachristofilou A, Bedke J, Hayoz S, Schratzenstaller U, Pless M, Hentrich M, Krege S, Lorch A, Aebersold D, Putora PM, Berthold D, Zihler D, Azinwi N, Zengerling F, Dieing A, Mueller AC, Schaer C, Biaggi C, Gillessen S, Cathomas R. LBA30 Single-dose carboplatin followed by involved-node radiotherapy as curative treatment for seminoma stage IIA/B: Efficacy results from the international multicenter phase II trial SAKK 01/10. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.2106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
26
|
Oliveira C, Amstutz F, Vuong D, Bogowicz M, Hüllner M, Foerster R, Basler L, Schröder C, Eboulet EI, Pless M, Thierstein S, Peters S, Hillinger S, Tanadini-Lang S, Guckenberger M. Preselection of robust radiomic features does not improve outcome modelling in non-small cell lung cancer based on clinical routine FDG-PET imaging. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:79. [PMID: 34417899 PMCID: PMC8380219 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00809-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiomics is a promising tool for identifying imaging-based biomarkers. Radiomics-based models are often trained on single-institution datasets; however, multi-centre imaging datasets are preferred for external generalizability owing to the influence of inter-institutional scanning differences and acquisition settings. The study aim was to determine the value of preselection of robust radiomic features in routine clinical positron emission tomography (PET) images to predict clinical outcomes in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods A total of 1404 primary tumour radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET scans of stage IIIA/N2 or IIIB NSCLC patients using a training cohort (n = 79; prospective Swiss multi-centre randomized phase III trial SAKK 16/00; 16 centres) and an internal validation cohort (n = 31; single centre). Robustness studies investigating delineation variation, attenuation correction and motion were performed (intraclass correlation coefficient threshold > 0.9). Two 12-/24-month event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) logistic regression models were trained using standardized imaging: (1) with robust features alone and (2) with all available features. Models were then validated using fivefold cross-validation, and validation on a separate single-centre dataset. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Robustness studies identified 179 stable features (13%), with 25% stable features for 3D versus 4D acquisition, 31% for attenuation correction and 78% for delineation. Univariable analysis found no significant robust features predicting 12-/24-month EFS and 12-month OS (p value > 0.076). Prognostic models without robust preselection performed well for 12-month EFS in training (AUC = 0.73) and validation (AUC = 0.74). Patient stratification into two risk groups based on 12-month EFS was significant for training (p value = 0.02) and validation cohorts (p value = 0.03). Conclusions A PET-based radiomics model using a standardized, multi-centre dataset to predict EFS in locally advanced NSCLC was successfully established and validated with good performance. Prediction models with robust feature preselection were unsuccessful, indicating the need for a standardized imaging protocol. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-021-00809-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Oliveira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. .,Division of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center of Southeastern Ontario, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| | - Florian Amstutz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Diem Vuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marta Bogowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Hüllner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert Foerster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lucas Basler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christina Schröder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eric I Eboulet
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Sandra Thierstein
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Solange Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sven Hillinger
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vuong D, Bogowicz M, Wee L, Riesterer O, Vlaskou Badra E, D’Cruz L, Balermpas P, van Timmeren J, Burgermeister S, Dekker A, de Ruysscher D, Unkelbach J, Thierstein S, Eboulet E, Peters S, Pless M, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S. PO-1803 Voxel-wise quantification of anatomical tumor lung location is associated with overall survival. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)08254-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
28
|
Rothschild SI, Zippelius A, Eboulet EI, Savic Prince S, Betticher D, Bettini A, Früh M, Joerger M, Lardinois D, Gelpke H, Mauti LA, Britschgi C, Weder W, Peters S, Mark M, Cathomas R, Ochsenbein AF, Janthur WD, Waibel C, Mach N, Froesch P, Buess M, Bohanes P, Godar G, Rusterholz C, Gonzalez M, Pless M. SAKK 16/14: Durvalumab in Addition to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage IIIA(N2) Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Multicenter Single-Arm Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2872-2880. [PMID: 34251873 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE For patients with resectable stage IIIA(N2) non-small-cell lung cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel followed by surgery resulted in a 1-year event-free survival (EFS) rate of 48% in the SAKK 16/00 trial and is an accepted standard of care. We investigated the additional benefit of perioperative treatment with durvalumab. METHODS Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of three cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and docetaxel 85 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks followed by two doses of durvalumab 750 mg once every 2 weeks. Durvalumab was continued for 1 year after surgery. The primary end point was 1-year EFS. The hypothesis for statistical considerations was an improvement of 1-year EFS from 48% to 65%. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients were enrolled, 67 were included in the full analysis set. Radiographic response rate was 43% (95% CI, 31 to 56) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 58% (95% CI, 45 to 71) after sequential neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Fifty-five patients were resected, of which 34 (62%) achieved a major pathologic response (MPR; ≤ 10% viable tumor cells) and 10 (18%) among them a complete pathologic response. Postoperative nodal downstaging (ypN0-1) was observed in 37 patients (67%). Fifty-one (93%) resected patients had an R0 resection. There was no significant effect of pretreatment PD-L1 expression on MPR or nodal downstaging. The 1-year EFS rate was 73% (two-sided 90% CI, 63 to 82). Median EFS and overall survival were not reached after 28.6 months of median follow-up. Fifty-nine (88%) patients had an adverse event grade ≥ 3 including two fatal adverse events that were judged not to be treatment-related. CONCLUSION The addition of perioperative durvalumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small-cell lung cancer is safe and exceeds historical data of chemotherapy alone with a high MPR and an encouraging 1-year EFS rate of 73%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sacha I Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alfred Zippelius
- Department of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Spasenija Savic Prince
- Pathology, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Betticher
- Department of Oncology, HFR Fribourg-Hôpital fribourgeois, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Adrienne Bettini
- Department of Oncology, HFR Fribourg-Hôpital fribourgeois, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Martin Früh
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Markus Joerger
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Didier Lardinois
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Hans Gelpke
- Department of Thoracic and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Laetitia A Mauti
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Christian Britschgi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Walter Weder
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Solange Peters
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Lausanne CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michael Mark
- Divison of Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Divison of Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | | | - Wolf-Dieter Janthur
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Christine Waibel
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Mach
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Patrizia Froesch
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Martin Buess
- Division of Medical Oncology, St Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Bohanes
- Centre de Chimiothérapie Anti-Cancéreuse, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Michel Gonzalez
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Lausanne CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cathomas R, Rothschild S, Hayoz S, Spahn M, Schardt J, Seiler R, Erdmann A, Aeppli S, Mach N, Strebel R, Hadaschik BA, Berthold DR, Pless M, Zihler D, Schmid M, Schneider M, Maniecka Z, Petrausch U. Safety and efficacy of perioperative cisplatin/gemcitabine (cis/gem) and durvalumab (durva) for operable muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC): SAKK 06/17. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
430 Background: The combination of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is extensively investigated in urothelial carcinoma. Using this combination in the neoadjuvant setting for patients (pts) with MIUC might improve pathological response rate (PaR: <ypT2N0) but carries the risk of increased perioperative morbidity. Methods: SAKK 06/17 is an open-label single arm phase II trial for pts with operable MIUC cT2-T4a cN0-1. Treatment consists of 4 cycles of neoadjuvant cis/gem q3w in combination with 4 cycles durva 1500mg q3w followed by resection. Durva is continued after surgery q4w for 10 cycles. Primary endpoint is event free survival (EFS) at 2 years. 58 pts are needed based on type I error of 10% and a power of 80% for H1 EFS at 2 years ≥ 65% compared to H0 EFS at 2 years ≤ 50%. We report the secondary endoints PaR, pathological complete remission (pCR: ypT0 N0), and safety on the full analysis set (FAS, received at least one dose of durva). Results: 61 pts were included between 7/18 and 9/19 at 12 sites. The FAS consists of 58 pts (79% male, median age 67.5 yrs) with bladder cancer (95%) or upper urinary tract/urethral cancer (5%). Clinical T2, T3, T4 stage were present at diagnosis in 69%, 21%, 10%, respectively, and 17% had cN1. 95% of pts received all 4 doses of neoadjuvant durva, 81% all 4 cycles of cis/gem and 17% switched to carboplatin. In total grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AE) during neoadjuvant treatment occurred in 48% and 27%, respectively. AEs related to durva were G3 in 7 pts (12%) and G4 in one patient (2%). Resection was performed in 53 pts (91%; 51 radical cystectomy, 2 nephroureterectomy), 4 pts refused surgery and one patient was irresectable due to a frozen pelvis. R0 resection was achieved in 52 pts (98%), one had R1. Postoperative complications included Clavien-Dindo III in 13 pts (24%) and IV in 5 pts (9%). PaR was found in 60% (95% CI 46.0%-73.5%) with 18 pts achieving pCR (34%; 95% CI 21.5%-48.3%) and 14 patients (26%) ypT1/ypTis. Conclusions: The first FAS results for neoadjuvant durvalumab in combination with cis/gem for operable MIUC confirm elevated pathological response rates and demonstrate acceptable safety. Postoperative morbidity is relevant but not exceeding the expected frequency or severity. Clinical trial information: NCT03406650.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Cathomas
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Sacha Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Julian Schardt
- University Hospital Bern, Deparment of Oncology, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Stefanie Aeppli
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Mach
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Martina Schneider
- SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Denzler S, Vuong D, Bogowicz M, Pavic M, Frauenfelder T, Thierstein S, Eboulet EI, Maurer B, Schniering J, Gabryś HS, Schmitt-Opitz I, Pless M, Foerster R, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S. Impact of CT convolution kernel on robustness of radiomic features for different lung diseases and tissue types. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20200947. [PMID: 33544646 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of different CT reconstruction kernels on the stability of radiomic features and the transferability between different diseases and tissue types. Three lung diseases were evaluated, i.e. non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and interstitial lung disease related to systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD) as well as four different tissue types, i.e. primary tumor, largest involved lymph node ipsilateral and contralateral lung. METHODS Pre-treatment non-contrast enhanced CT scans from 23 NSCLC, 10 MPM and 12 SSc-ILD patients were collected retrospectively. For each patient, CT scans were reconstructed using smooth and sharp kernel in filtered back projection. The regions of interest (ROIs) were contoured on the smooth kernel-based CT and transferred to the sharp kernel-based CT. The voxels were resized to the largest voxel dimension of each cohort. In total, 1386 features were analyzed. Feature stability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Features above the stability threshold >0.9 were considered stable. RESULTS We observed a strong impact of the reconstruction method on stability of the features (at maximum 26% of the 1386 features were stable). Intensity features were the most stable followed by texture and wavelet features. The wavelet features showed a positive correlation between percentage of stable features and size of the ROI (R2 = 0.79, p = 0.005). Lymph node radiomics showed poorest stability (<10%) and lung radiomics the largest stability (26%). Robustness analysis done on the contralateral lung could to a large extent be transferred to the ipsilateral lung, and the overlap of stable lung features between different lung diseases was more than 50%. However, results of robustness studies cannot be transferred between tissue types, which was investigated in NSCLC and MPM patients; the overlap of stable features for lymph node and lung, as well as for primary tumor and lymph node was very small in both disease types. CONCLUSION The robustness of radiomic features is strongly affected by different reconstruction kernels. The effect is largely influenced by the tissue type and less by the disease type. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The study presents to our knowledge the most complete analysis on the impact of convolution kernel on the robustness of CT-based radiomics for four relevant tissue types in three different lung diseases. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Denzler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Diem Vuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marta Bogowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matea Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Frauenfelder
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Britta Maurer
- Department of Rheumatology, Center of Experimental Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Janine Schniering
- Department of Rheumatology, Center of Experimental Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hubert Szymon Gabryś
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Schmitt-Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Robert Foerster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rothschild SI, Nachbur R, Herzog N, Passweg JR, Pless M. Second-line therapy improves overall survival in primary refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100013. [PMID: 33422767 PMCID: PMC7809381 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The effect of palliative chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well established. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising efficacy in NSCLC patients. However, little is known about the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients whose tumors are refractory to first-line chemotherapy. We investigated the outcome of all consecutive and unselected patients receiving palliative chemotherapy in a single institution to assess the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in primary refractory NSCLC. Patients and methods Patients with metastatic NSCLC diagnosed between 1990 and 2016 were assessed. Outcome parameters were collected and patients were characterized as either having primary progressive disease or clinical benefit [CB; defined as complete/partial remission (CR, PR) or stable disease (SD)]. Probabilities of survival were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. The log-rank test was used for comparing groups. Cox models were used to explore the prognostic value of covariables. Results The analysis included 576 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.47-10.47]; 62.7% of patients were treated with a platinum-based first-line therapy. Two hundred twenty-two patients (38.5%) were primary refractory to first-line therapy. Median OS was significantly shorter for those patients [7.4 versus 11.5 months, hazard ratio (HR) 1.61 (95% CI 1.34-1.93), P < 0.0001]. Poorer initial performance status was significantly associated with primary refractory disease (P = 0.015). Eighty-one (36.5%) primary refractory patients received a second-line therapy. Median OS was significantly longer for refractory patients receiving second-line therapy versus best supportive care [10.1 versus 5.0 months, HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.40-0.72), P < 0.0001]. Conclusions Nearly 40% of patients are primary refractory to palliative first-line therapy and have a poor prognosis. Active second-line therapy can significantly improve the outcome. Therefore, patients with primary refractory NSCLC should be offered further active therapy. These real-life data for primary refractory patients form the basis for further research in sequencing of current palliative treatment options. Unselected patients with metastatic NSCLC have a poor outcome despite recent therapeutic advances. A substantial number of NSCLC patients in a real-world setting is refractory to primary treatment. Primary refractory patients have a poor prognosis. It is unclear whether patients with primary refractory NSCLC should receive further active systemic treatment. Our work shows that further treatment of primary refractory patients can lead to an improvement of the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S I Rothschild
- Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Lung Cancer Center Basel, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - R Nachbur
- Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - N Herzog
- Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - J R Passweg
- Division of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Pless
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vuong D, Tanadini-Lang S, Wu Z, Marks R, Unkelbach J, Hillinger S, Eboulet EI, Thierstein S, Peters S, Pless M, Guckenberger M, Bogowicz M. Radiomics Feature Activation Maps as a New Tool for Signature Interpretability. Front Oncol 2020; 10:578895. [PMID: 33364192 PMCID: PMC7753181 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.578895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In the field of personalized medicine, radiomics has shown its potential to support treatment decisions. However, the limited feature interpretability hampers its introduction into the clinics. Here, we propose a new methodology to create radiomics feature activation maps, which allows to identify the spatial-anatomical locations responsible for signature activation based on local radiomics. The feasibility of this technique will be studied for histological subtype differentiation (adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using computed tomography (CT) radiomics. Materials and Methods Pre-treatment CT scans were collected from a multi-centric Swiss trial (training, n=73, IIIA/N2 NSCLC, SAKK 16/00) and an independent cohort (validation, n=32, IIIA/N2/IIIB NSCLC). Based on the gross tumor volume (GTV), four peritumoral region of interests (ROI) were defined: lung_exterior (expansion into the lung), iso_exterior (expansion into lung and soft tissue), gradient (GTV border region), GTV+Rim (GTV and iso_exterior). For each ROI, 154 radiomic features were extracted using an in-house developed software implementation (Z-Rad, Python v2.7.14). Features robust against delineation variability served as an input for a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Model performance was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and verified using five-fold cross validation and internal validation. Local radiomic features were extracted from the GTV+Rim ROI using non-overlapping 3x3x3 voxel patches previously marked as GTV or rim. A binary activation map was created for each patient using the median global feature value from the training. The ratios of activated/non-activated patches of GTV and rim regions were compared between histological subtypes (Wilcoxon test). Results Iso_exterior, gradient, GTV+Rim showed good performances for histological subtype prediction (AUCtraining=0.68-0.72 and AUCvalidation=0.73-0.74) whereas GTV and lung_exterior models failed validation. GTV+Rim model feature activation maps showed that local texture feature distribution differed significantly between histological subtypes in the rim (p=0.0481) but not in the GTV (p=0.461). Conclusion In this exploratory study, radiomics-based prediction of NSCLC histological subtypes was predominantly based on the peritumoral region indicating that radiomics activation maps can be useful for tracing back the spatial location of regions responsible for signature activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diem Vuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ze Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sven Hillinger
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eric Innocents Eboulet
- Department of Clinical Trial Management, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sandra Thierstein
- Department of Clinical Trial Management, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Solange Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marta Bogowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Storck L, Uster A, Ruehlin M, Gaeumann S, Gisi D, Schmocker M, Meffert P, Imoberdorf R, Pless M, Ballmer P. Nutritional status and survival time after 3-months of physical exercise and nutritional therapy in advanced cancer patients: a pooled analysis. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.09.171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
34
|
Storck LJ, Ruehlin M, Gaeumann S, Gisi D, Schmocker M, Meffert PJ, Imoberdorf R, Pless M, Ballmer PE. Effect of a leucine-rich supplement in combination with nutrition and physical exercise in advanced cancer patients: A randomized controlled intervention trial. Clin Nutr 2020; 39:3637-3644. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
35
|
Häfliger S, Seidel AK, Schoch E, Reichmann J, Wild D, Steinmann-Schwager S, Pless M. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for a Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumor. Case Rep Oncol 2020; 13:1373-1380. [PMID: 33442358 PMCID: PMC7772845 DOI: 10.1159/000510334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor-induced osteomalacia is a very rare paraneoplastic syndrome. It can be caused by phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (PMT), a generally benign tumor that produces fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), which can cause a severe renal phosphate wasting syndrome. Upon complete surgical removal of the tumor, FGF-23 normalizes and the osteomalacia is cured. In cases in which surgery is not feasible, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the treatment of choice. We describe a case with a PMT situated in the sacrum, in close proximity to the sacral plexus. Both surgery and RFA were considered potentially nerve damaging. Since the tumor showed expression of somatostatin receptors, we opted for a peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATOC. However, the therapy did not show the expected success, since the FGF-23 level had even temporarily increased. The patient was then successfully treated with RFA. A partial remission of the tumor was achieved and FGF-23 levels nearly normalized. Despite some severe neurological side effects, the patient showed a remarkable clinical improvement, with no symptoms of osteomalacia within a few weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Häfliger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Ann-Katrin Seidel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Eric Schoch
- Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Jan Reichmann
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Damian Wild
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Peters S, Felip E, Dafni U, Tufman A, Guckenberger M, Álvarez R, Nadal E, Becker A, Vees H, Pless M, Martinez-Marti A, Lambrecht M, Andratschke N, Tsourti Z, Piguet AC, Roschitzki-Voser H, Gasca-Ruchti A, Vansteenkiste J, Stahel RA, De Ruysscher D. Progression-Free and Overall Survival for Concurrent Nivolumab With Standard Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Stage IIIA-B NSCLC: Results From the European Thoracic Oncology Platform NICOLAS Phase II Trial (European Thoracic Oncology Platform 6-14). J Thorac Oncol 2020; 16:278-288. [PMID: 33188912 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The NICOLAS study is the first completed single-arm phase II trial in stage III NSCLC evaluating hierarchically first the safety and then the efficacy of adding nivolumab concurrently to standard definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The safety end point was reported earlier; here, we present the efficacy results. METHODS Stage IIIA-B unresectable treatment-naive patients with NSCLC received three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy (66 Gy, 33 fractions), along with nivolumab (360 mg, 3-weekly). Nivolumab was continued as monotherapy consolidation for a maximum of 1 year (480 mg, 4-weekly). The primary end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), with a target improvement compared with historical data of at least 15%, from 45% to 60%. To test this efficacy hypothesis, a sample size of 74 assessable patients provided a power of 83% with a one-sided alpha of 5%. RESULTS A total of 79 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 21.0 months (interquartile range: 15.8-25.8 mo) for the primary PFS analysis. A total of 35.4% of the patients had stage IIIA, and 63.3% had stage IIIB disease. The 1-year PFS was 53.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.0%-64.0%) and the median PFS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 10.1-22.8 mo). Because 37 PFS events occurred in the first year posttreatment among the first 74 assessable patients, a 1-year PFS rate of at least 45% could not be rejected (p = 0.23). At an extended follow-up (median 32.6 mo), 37 deaths have been recorded, with a median overall survival (OS) of 38.8 months (95% CI: 26.8 mo-not estimable) and a 2-year OS rate of 63.7% (95% CI: 51.9%-73.4%). The OS of patients with stage IIIA disease was found to be significantly higher than patients with stage IIIB disease, with a 2-year OS of 81% and 56%, respectively (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS PFS and OS are arithmetically higher in studies involving the same population. However, on the basis of the formal hierarchical efficacy analysis, we could not reject that the 1-year PFS rate is at least 45%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solange Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Enriqueta Felip
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Urania Dafni
- Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Lung Research Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ruth Álvarez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Virgen De La Salud, Toledo, Spain
| | - Ernest Nadal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Annemarie Becker
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hansjörg Vees
- Radiation Oncology, Clinic Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Alex Martinez-Marti
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maarten Lambrecht
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Zoi Tsourti
- Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Johan Vansteenkiste
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rolf A Stahel
- European Thoracic Oncology Platform, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mark M, Froesch P, Eboulet EI, Addeo A, Pless M, Rothschild SI, Janthur WD, Burmeister H, Friedlaender A, Schneider M, Metaxas Y, Joerger M, Wannesson L, Schwitter M, Baudoux N, Weindler S, Biaggi-Rudolf C, Früh M. SAKK 19/17: safety analysis of first-line durvalumab in patients with PD-L1 positive, advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2020; 70:1255-1262. [PMID: 33130956 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02757-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The safety of first-line (1L) durvalumab in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 (PS2) is unknown. This is an interim unplanned safety analysis of the study SAKK 19/17 for patients with metastatic NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in ≥ 25% of tumor cells and an ECOG PS2 treated with 1L durvalumab. This safety analysis was triggered by the SAKK data and safety monitoring board due to a high mortality rate observed after the recruitment of the first 21 patients. METHODS This single-arm phase II study recruited patients with metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 in ≥ 25% and ECOG PS2. Patients received durvalumab 1500 mg every four weeks. The trial aims to recruit 48 patients in total. This report includes safety analyses only. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE) Version 5.0. Efficacy data including the primary endpoint overall survival at 6 months and secondary endpoints (objective response rate, progression-free survival, and quality of life) will be reported at a later time point. RESULTS The data from 21 patients were available at this interim safety analysis. Among these, 13 deaths (13/21; 62%) were reported, including one treatment-related fatal colonic perforation at 9 months after treatment initiation (1/13; 8%). Twelve deaths were not treatment-related (12/13; 92%), and mostly attributed to tumor progression (10/13; 77%). Of note, seven deaths (7/13; 54%) occurred during the first 5 weeks (range 0.6-4.7 weeks) after treatment initiation. Four (4/7; 57%) were respiratory failures attributed to tumor progression. One of these patients (25%) had pre-existing COPD, and three (75%) had baseline dyspnea grade 2-3 related to the tumor. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) included colonic perforation (grade 5), abdominal pain, and colitis (grade 3 each) in one patient, and fatigue (grade 3) in another. Other Grade ≥ 3 AEs unrelated to treatment were all of pulmonary origin: lung infections (19%), dyspnea (24%), cough (5%), and bronchial obstruction (5%). CONCLUSIONS 1L durvalumab in patients with ECOG PS2 and metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 25% resulted in an unexpectedly high number of fatal early events due to rapid tumor progression. We recommend to avoid treatment with 1 L durvalumab of patients who are highly symptomatic from the tumor, particularly those with respiratory symptoms. The study is continuing its accrual after an amendment excluding these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mark
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Loestrasse 170, 7000, Chur, Switzerland.
| | - Patrizia Froesch
- Department of Medical Oncology, EOC-Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | - Alfredo Addeo
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Sacha I Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Henning Burmeister
- Department of Medical Oncology, Spital STS AG Thun/Onko-Netz, Thun, Switzerland
| | - Alex Friedlaender
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Yannis Metaxas
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Loestrasse 170, 7000, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Markus Joerger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Luciano Wannesson
- Department of Medical Oncology, EOC-Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Michael Schwitter
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Loestrasse 170, 7000, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Nathalie Baudoux
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Susanne Weindler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Martin Früh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.,University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rothschild S, Zippelius A, Eboulet E, Savic Prince S, Betticher D, Bettini A, Früh M, Joerger M, Britschgi C, Peters S, Mark M, Ochsenbein A, Janthur WD, Waibel C, Mach N, Gonzalez M, Froesch P, Godar G, Rusterholz C, Pless M. 1237MO SAKK 16/14: Anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) – A multicenter single-arm phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
39
|
Vuong D, Bogowicz M, Denzler S, Oliveira C, Foerster R, Amstutz F, Gabryś HS, Unkelbach J, Hillinger S, Thierstein S, Xyrafas A, Peters S, Pless M, Guckenberger M, Tanadini‐Lang S. Comparison of robust to standardized CT radiomics models to predict overall survival for non‐small cell lung cancer patients. Med Phys 2020; 47:4045-4053. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Diem Vuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Marta Bogowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Sarah Denzler
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Carol Oliveira
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
- Department of Oncology Cancer Center of Southeastern Ontario Queen’s University Kingston Ontario Canada
| | - Robert Foerster
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Florian Amstutz
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Hubert S. Gabryś
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Sven Hillinger
- Department of Thoracic Surgery University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Sandra Thierstein
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center Bern Switzerland
| | - Alexandros Xyrafas
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center Bern Switzerland
| | - Solange Peters
- Department of Oncology Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) Lausanne Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology Kantonsspital Winterthur Winterthur Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini‐Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
König D, Meier UR, Klaeser B, Savic S, Pless M. Successful Treatment of a Resistant Subclone in ALK-Rearranged NSCLC. Case Rep Oncol 2020; 13:729-732. [PMID: 32774266 PMCID: PMC7383154 DOI: 10.1159/000507850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are established effective therapies in patients with ALK-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Upon progressive disease, patients normally receive a subsequent ALK TKI. However, when disease progression occurs in a limited number of sites, an oligoprogressive approach is a treatment option. In our case, FDG-PET/CT scan detected a progressive site in a patient with ceritinib therapy. Biopsy of the lesion was not possible because of its location. Progression was therefore confirmed by liquid biopsy with identification of the resistant subclone ALK G1202R. Definitive radiotherapy of the progressive site led to the disappearance of the ALK-resistant mutation. Meanwhile, ceritinib therapy was continued. The absence of disease both on repeated imaging and liquid biopsy indicates that eradication of a resistant subclone with an oligoprogressive treatment approach might be possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David König
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Urs R Meier
- Department of Radio-Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Bernd Klaeser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Spasenija Savic
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Peters S, Danson S, Hasan B, Dafni U, Reinmuth N, Majem M, Tournoy KG, Mark MT, Pless M, Cobo M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Falchero L, Moran T, Ortega Granados AL, Monnet I, Mohorcic K, Sureda BM, Betticher D, Demedts I, Macias JA, Cuffe S, Luciani A, Sanchez JG, Curioni-Fontecedro A, Gautschi O, Price G, Coate L, von Moos R, Zielinski C, Provencio M, Menis J, Ruepp B, Pochesci A, Roschitzki-Voser H, Besse B, Rabaglio M, O'Brien MER, Stahel RA. A Randomized Open-Label Phase III Trial Evaluating the Addition of Denosumab to Standard First-Line Treatment in Advanced NSCLC: The European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) SPLENDOUR Trial. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15:1647-1656. [PMID: 32565388 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Receptor activator of NF-kB ligand stimulates NF-kB-dependent cell signaling and acts as the primary signal for bone resorption. Retrospective analysis of a large trial comparing denosumab versus zoledronic acid in bone metastatic solid tumors suggested significant overall survival (OS) advantage for patients with lung cancer with denosumab (p = 0.01). The randomized open-label phase III SPLENDOUR trial was designed to evaluate whether the addition of denosumab to standard first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy improved OS in advanced NSCLC. METHODS Patients with stage IV NSCLC were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy with or without denosumab (120 mg every 3-4 wks), stratified by the presence of bone metastases (at diagnosis), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histology, and region. To detect an OS increase from 9 to 11.25 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80), 847 OS events were required. The trial closed prematurely owing to decreasing accrual rate. RESULTS A total of 514 patients were randomized, with 509 receiving one or more doses of the assigned treatment (chemotherapy: 252, chemotherapy-denosumab: 257). The median age was 66.1 years, 71% were men, and 59% were former smokers. Bone metastases were identified in 275 patients (53%). Median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 8.7 (7.6-11.0) months in the control arm versus 8.2 (7.5-10.4) months in the chemotherapy-denosumab arm (HR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.78-1.19; one-sided p = 0.36). For patients with bone metastasis, HR was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.77-1.35), whereas for those without, HR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.66-1.23). Adverse events grade 3 or greater were observed in 40.9%, 5.2%, 8.7% versus 45.5%, 10.9%, 10.5% of patients. Conditional power for OS benefit was less than or equal to 10%. CONCLUSIONS Denosumab was well-tolerated without unexpected safety concerns. There was no OS improvement for denosumab when added to chemotherapy in the intention-to-treat population and the subgroups with and without bone metastases. Our data do not provide evidence of a clinical benefit for denosumab in patients with NSCLC without bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solange Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Sarah Danson
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism & Sheffield Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Sheffield, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Baktiar Hasan
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Urania Dafni
- School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens & Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - Niels Reinmuth
- Asklepios Kliniken GmbH, Asklepios Fachkliniken Muenchen, Gauting, Germany
| | - Margarita Majem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Spanish lung cancer group (Grupo Español de Cancer de Pulmón (GECP)), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kurt G Tournoy
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Ghent University and Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis (OLV), Aalst, Belgium
| | - Michael T Mark
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Cobo
- Spanish lung cancer group (Grupo Español de Cancer de Pulmón (GECP)), Barcelona, Spain; Unidad Gestion Intercentros of Medical Oncology. Regional and Virgen de la Victoria University Hospitals (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu
- Spanish lung cancer group (Grupo Español de Cancer de Pulmón (GECP)), Barcelona, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Lionel Falchero
- Department of Pneumology and Thoracic Oncology, Hopital Nord-Ouest, Villefranche-sur-Saône Cedex, France
| | - Teresa Moran
- Spanish lung cancer group (Grupo Español de Cancer de Pulmón (GECP)), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) Badalona, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Laura Ortega Granados
- Spanish lung cancer group (Grupo Español de Cancer de Pulmón (GECP)), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain
| | - Isabelle Monnet
- Department of Pneumology, Centre Hopitalier Intercommunal De Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Katja Mohorcic
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Bartomeu Massutí Sureda
- Spanish lung cancer group (Grupo Español de Cancer de Pulmón (GECP)), Barcelona, Spain; El Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (SABIAL), Hospital Universitario Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Daniel Betticher
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital (HFR), Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Ingel Demedts
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium
| | - Jose Antionio Macias
- Spanish lung cancer group (Grupo Español de Cancer de Pulmón (GECP)), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
| | - Sinead Cuffe
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Medical Oncology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Andrea Luciani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Milano, Italy
| | - Jose Garcia Sanchez
- Spanish lung cancer group (Grupo Español de Cancer de Pulmón (GECP)), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Department for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Gautschi
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucern, Switzerland
| | - Gillian Price
- Department of Medical Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Coate
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Mid-Western Cancer Centre, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Roger von Moos
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Zielinski
- Clinical Division of Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Central European Cooperative Oncology Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mariano Provencio
- Spanish lung cancer group (Grupo Español de Cancer de Pulmón (GECP)), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jessica Menis
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Medical Oncology Department, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padova, Italy
| | - Barbara Ruepp
- European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pochesci
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Benjamin Besse
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Center Villejuif, Paris Saclay University, Orsay, France
| | | | - Mary E R O'Brien
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Rolf A Stahel
- Department for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Glatzer M, Horber D, Montemurro M, Winterhalder R, Inauen R, Berger MD, Pestalozzi B, Pederiva S, Pless M, Putora PM. Choice of first line systemic treatment in pancreatic cancer among national experts. Pancreatology 2020; 20:686-690. [PMID: 32299764 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment options for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer depend on various factors, including performance status, tumor burden and patient preferences. Metastatic pancreatic cancer is incurable and many systemic treatment options have been investigated over the past decades. This analysis of patterns of practice was performed to identify decision criteria and their impact on the choice of first-line management of metastatic pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Members of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Gastrointestinal Cancer Group were contacted and agreed to participate in this analysis. Decision trees for the first line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer from 9 centers in Switzerland were collected and analyzed based on the objective consensus methodology to identify consensus and discrepancies in clinical decision-making. RESULTS The final treatment algorithms included 3 decision criteria (comorbidities, performance status and age) and 5 treatment options: FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX, gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine mono and best supportive care. CONCLUSION We identified multiple decision criteria relevant to all participating centers. We found consensus for the treatment of young (age below 65) patients with good performance status with FOLFIRINOX. For patients with increasing age and reducing performance status there was a decreasing trend to use gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel. Gemcitabine monotherapy was typically offered to patients in the presence of comorbidities. For patients with ECOG 3-4, most of the experts recommended BSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Glatzer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| | - D Horber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - M Montemurro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - R Winterhalder
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - R Inauen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Münsterlingen, Switzerland
| | - M D Berger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - B Pestalozzi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S Pederiva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - M Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - P M Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rothschild S, Zippelius A, Eboulet EI, Savic S, Betticher DC, Bettini A, Frueh M, Joerger M, Britschgi C, Peters S, Mark MT, Ochsenbein A, Janthur WD, Waibel C, Mach N, Gonzalez M, Froesch P, Godar G, Rusterholz C, Pless M. SAKK 16/14: Anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—A multicenter single-arm phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.9016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9016 Background: For patients (pts) with resectable stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemo) with 3 cycles cisplatin (cis)/docetaxel (doc) followed by surgery is an accepted standard of care leading to a 1-year (yr) event-free survival (EFS) of 48% and a 5-yr overall survival (OS) of 37%. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have recently shown to lead to high response rates in resectable NSCLC. Methods: SAKK 16/14 is an open-label single-arm phase II study including 68 pts with resectable NSCLC stage IIIA(N2) (T1-3 N2 M0), irrespective of histological subtype, genomic aberrations or PD-L1 expression status. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of 3 cycles of cis 100 mg/m2 and doc 85 mg/m2 q3w followed by 2 cycles of durvalumab 750 mg q2w. Durvalumab was continued after surgery q2w for 1 yr. The primary endpoint is EFS at 1 yr. The statistical hypothesis is to improve EFS at 1 yr from 48% based on the SAKK 16/00 study to 65%. Here, we report the primary endpoint and response data from 67 evaluable pts included in the study. Results: 68 pts were included from 06/16 to 01/19 and 67 pts (35 males, 32 females) were evaluable. Median age was 61 yrs (range, 41-74). 52 pts (77.6%) had a WHO PS of 0. 95.5% were current or former smokers. The majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma (55.2%) followed by squamous cell histology (32.8%). Clinical stage T1, T2 and T3 were present at diagnosis in 22.4%, 49.3% and 28.4%, respectively. 81.1% of pts underwent resection. The main reason for not undergoing surgery was disease progression (33.3%). Pneumonectomy was performed in 5 pts (9.1%), 43 pts underwent lobectomy and 7 pts bilobectomy. 30-day postoperative mortality was observed in one patient (1.8%). One patient died due to a bleeding complication after surgery most likely not related to neoadjuvant therapy. Radiographic response was 44.8% (95%CI: 32.6-57.4) after neoadjuvant chemo and 59.7% (95%CI: 46.4-71.9) after additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy. 1-yr EFS was 73.3% (90%CI: 62.5-81.4). Results for pathologic remission rate as well as correlation with PD-L1 status will be presented during the meeting. Conclusions: We report on treatment outcomes of the largest cohort of pts with resectable stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC receiving perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The addition of perioperative durvalumab to standard of care cis/doc is safe and leads to a high response rate and a very encouraging 1-yr EFS rate that appears substantially higher than with chemo alone. Clinical trial information: NCT 02572843.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sacha Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alfred Zippelius
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Spasenija Savic
- Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel C. Betticher
- Department of Oncology, HFR Fribourg–Hôpital Fribourgeois, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Adrienne Bettini
- Department of Oncology, HFR Fribourg–Hôpital Fribourgeois, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Martin Frueh
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Markus Joerger
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Britschgi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Solange Peters
- Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michael Thomas Mark
- Divison of Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | | | - Wolf Dieter Janthur
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Christine Waibel
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Mach
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michel Gonzalez
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Lausanne CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Patrizia Froesch
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Locarno, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hecht JR, Pless M, Cubillo A, Calvo A, Chon HJ, Liu C, Snyder W, Chan E, Chaney MF, Chesney JA, Prat A. Early safety from a phase I, multicenter, open-label clinical trial of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) injected (inj) into liver tumors in combination with pembrolizumab (pem). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.3015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3015 Background: T-VEC is a genetically modified, oncolytic HSV-1 designed to selectively replicate within tumors and produce GM-CSF to enhance systemic antitumor immunity. The safety and efficacy of T-VEC in treatment of advanced melanoma has been demonstrated as monotherapy and in combination with checkpoint inhibitors (Andtbacka JCO 2015, Chesney JCO 2017, Ribas Cell 2017). T-VEC has also demonstrated tolerable safety for intrahepatic inj (Hecht JCO 2018). This phase 1b, multicenter, open-label, dose escalation study (NCT02509507) evaluates the safety of intrahepatic inj of T-VEC in combination with intravenous (IV) pem in patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases (mets). Methods: The primary objective is to assess the maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) of T-VEC inj into liver tumors based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). DLT rate was evaluated with the mTPI up-and-down design. Eligible pts were ≥ 18 years, had progressive HCC or breast cancer, colorectal cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, or renal cell cancer liver mets, with measurable liver tumors suitable for inj. This dose escalation study comprised 2 groups: A (non-HCC) and B (HCC). T-VEC was given initially at 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL followed by up to 4 mL of 107 PFU/mL (cohort 5) or 108 PFU/mL (cohort 6) every 21 (±3) days (Q21D). Inj volume was based on lesion size. Pem (200 mg) was given IV Q21D. Results: Here we report on three cohorts: A5 (107 PFU/mL T-VEC + pem), A6 (108 PFU/mL T-VEC + pem), and B5 (107 PFU/mL T-VEC + pem). Twenty-nine pts were treated: 7 in A5, 17 in A6, 5 in B5. Median age was 61 years (range: 30, 76). Median number of inj was 4 and median treatment duration was 88 days. One DLT of cholestatic hepatitis was observed out of 6 DLT evaluable pts in cohort A5. No DLTs were observed in cohort A6 and B5. MTC was 108 PFU/mL in non-HCC patients; exploration of MTC in the HCC population is ongoing. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent across cohorts. The most common treatment-emergent treatment-related adverse events (TETRAE) were pyrexia (79.3%), chills (37.9%), and nausea (37.9%). Eight pts (27.6%) had grade 3/4 TEAEs: 2pts (6.9%) related to the combination therapy and the rest not related to treatment. No fatal AEs were observed. Conclusions: T-VEC intrahepatic inj in combination with IV pem at standard doses has thus far been demonstrated as feasible and tolerable to continue further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02509507 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Randolph Hecht
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | | - Aitana Calvo
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hong Jae Chon
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - Jason Alan Chesney
- James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cathomas R, Schardt J, Pless M, Llado A, Mach N, Riklin C, Haefeli J, Fear S, Stenner F. Swiss experience of atezolizumab for platinum-pretreated urinary tract carcinoma: the SAUL study in real-world practice. Swiss Med Wkly 2020; 150:w20223. [PMID: 32399958 DOI: 10.4414/smw.2020.20223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS OF THE STUDY Atezolizumab is an approved therapy for urothelial carcinoma based on results from the IMvigor 210 and IMvigor211 phase II and III trials. The global SAUL study evaluated atezolizumab in a broader patient population more representative of real-world populations. Among approximately 1000 patients treated in SAUL, 25 were treated in Swiss oncology centres. We evaluated outcomes in these patients to provide a better understanding of atezolizumab treatment for urinary tract carcinoma in Swiss clinical practice. METHODS Eligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic urothelial or non-urothelial urinary tract carcinoma that had progressed during or after one to three prior therapies for inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic disease. Patient populations typically excluded from clinical trials (e.g., patients with renal impairment, treated central nervous system [CNS] metastases, stable controlled autoimmune disease or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2) were also eligible. All patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). RESULTS All 25 Swiss patients had previously received a gemcitabine/platinum doublet. Disease had progressed within 12 months of platinum-based therapy in all but one patient, and 19 (76%) had received one prior line of therapy for metastatic disease. The median duration of atezolizumab therapy was six cycles (range 1–27) corresponding to 3.6 months. Five patients (20%) had received >20 cycles and four (16%) remained on treatment at the data cut-off. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 13 patients (52%) and were considered to be treatment-related in four patients (16%; liver enzyme increases, musculoskeletal pain, diverticulitis and autoimmune hepatitis). There was one grade 4 AE (hypercalcaemia) and no grade 5 AEs. After median follow-up of 17.3 months, median OS was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3–not evaluable), the 1-year OS rate was 47% (95% CI 27–65%), the ORR was 12% (95% CI 3–31%) and the DCR was 40% (95% CI 21–61%). Durable clinical benefit (>1 year on treatment) was observed in seven patients (28%), including one with CNS metastases and one with small-cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS Atezolizumab is an active treatment option for platinum-pretreated urinary tract carcinoma, including patients with conditions that typically exclude them from clinical trials. (Trial registration no.: NCT02928406).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Cathomas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Julian Schardt
- University Hospital for Medical Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Anna Llado
- Istitut Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Mach
- Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian Riklin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | | | - Simon Fear
- F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Molina-Vila MA, Stahel RA, Dafni U, Jordana-Ariza N, Balada-Bel A, Garzón-Ibáñez M, García-Peláez B, Mayo-de-las-Casas C, Felip E, Curioni Fontecedro A, Gautschi O, Peters S, Massutí B, Palmero R, Ponce Aix S, Carcereny E, Früh M, Pless M, Popat S, Cuffe S, Bidoli P, Kammler R, Roschitzki-Voser H, Tsourti Z, Karachaliou N, Rosell R. Evolution and Clinical Impact of EGFR Mutations in Circulating Free DNA in the BELIEF Trial. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15:416-425. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
47
|
Cathomas R, Petrausch U, Hayoz S, Schneider M, Schardt JA, Seiler R, Erdmann A, Rothschild S, Aeppli S, Mach N, Strebel R, Hadaschik BA, Berthold DR, Pless M, Zihler D, Schmid M, Biaggi Rudolf C, Spahn M. Perioperative chemoimmunotherapy with durvalumab (Durva) in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine (Cis/Gem) for operable muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC): Preplanned interim analysis of a single-arm phase II trial (SAKK 06/17). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.6_suppl.499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
499 Background: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is the standard of care for patients (pts) with MIUC but relapse rates remain high. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). We hypothesize that the integration of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab into perioperative management of MIUC improves outcome. Methods: SAKK 06/17 is an open label single arm phase II study including 61 pts. Operable MIUC cT2-T4a cN0-1 pts without contraindication for Cis were eligible. Four cycles of preoperative Cis/Gem q3w are administered in combination with 4 cycles Durva 1500mg q3w starting at cycle 2. Durva is continued after surgery q4w for 10 cycles. Primary endpoint is event free survival at 2 years. We report a preplanned interim analysis of the secondary endpoints safety, pathological complete remission ypT0 N0 (pCR,) and pathological response rate (PaR, defined as ≤ypT1N0) on the first 30 resected pts. Results: Among 34 eligible pts (27M, 7F; median age 70, range 41-81 years) included from 07/18 – 02/19, 33 pts (97%) had primary bladder cancer and 1 pt had upper tract UC. Clinical T2, T3, T4 and TxN1 stage were present at diagnosis in 68%, 18%, 15% and 15%, respectively. Four cycles of chemo-immunotherapy were completed per protocol in 34 pts (100%). No tumor progression was noted at preoperative restaging. AE related to Durvalumab were G3 in 5 pts (15%) and G4 in 3 pts (9%). Surgery was performed as planned in 30 pts (88%), 3 pts refused surgery and 1 pt had a frozen pelvis. Operation technique was open in 20 pts (67%) and laparoscopic/robot-assisted in 10 pts (33%). Postoperative complications included Clavien-Dindo III in 6 pts (20%) and IV in 2 pts (7%) with infections being most common (5 pts, 17%). pCR was found in 9 pts (30%) and additional 6 pts (20%) had ypT1/ypTis for a PaR of 50%. Conclusions: The combination of Cis/Gem and Durva as neoadjuvant treatment for MIUC is feasible with manageable toxicities and pCR and PaR rates in the expected range. The rate of postoperative complications warrants further close follow up. Clinical trial information: 2017-003565-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Cathomas
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | | | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martina Schneider
- SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Sacha Rothschild
- Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Aeppli
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Mach
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Boris A. Hadaschik
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany and Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Metaxas Y, Früh M, Eboulet EI, Grosso F, Pless M, Zucali PA, Ceresoli GL, Mark M, Schneider M, Maconi A, Perrino M, Biaggi-Rudolf C, Froesch P, Schmid S, Waibel C, Appenzeller C, Rauch D, von Moos R. Lurbinectedin as second- or third-line palliative therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: an international, multi-centre, single-arm, phase II trial (SAKK 17/16). Ann Oncol 2020; 31:495-500. [PMID: 32085891 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic second- and third-line therapies for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) result in a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of <2 months and median overall survival (mOS) of 6-9 months. Lurbinectedin binds to the DNA of the regulatory region while inhibiting tumour-associated macrophage transcription. In early trials, encouraging outcomes occurred in patients (pts) with MPM treated with lurbinectedin. We aimed to generate lurbinectedin efficacy and safety data among pts with progressive MPM. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pts with progressing MPM treated with first-line platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy received lurbinectedin monotherapy. Treatment was given intravenously at 3.2 mg/m2 dose every 3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Using Simon's two-stage design, the primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks (PFS12wks), was met if achieved by ≥21 pts (p0 ≤35% versus p1 ≥55%). RESULTS Forty-two pts from nine centres across Switzerland and Italy were recruited. Histology was epithelioid in 33 cases, sarcomatoid in 5, and biphasic in 4. Overall 10/42 (23.8%) underwent prior immunotherapy and 14/42 (33.3%) had progressed ≤6 months after first-line chemotherapy. At data cut-off PFS12wks was met by 22/42 pts (52.4%; 90% confidence interval (CI): 38.7% to 63.5%; P = 0.015) with an mPFS of 4.1 months and mOS of 11.1 months. The best response was complete and partial remission observed in one patient each and stable disease in 20 pts. The duration of disease control was 6.6 months (95% CI: 5.2-7.4). No significant difference in PFS12wks, mPFS, and mOS was recorded in epithelioid versus non-epithelioid cases and pts with prior immunotherapy versus those without. Similar mPFS but shorter mOS were observed among pts who progressed within ≤6 months after first-line chemotherapy. Lurbinectedin-related grade 3-4 toxicity was seen in 21 pts, mostly being neutropenia (23.8%) and fatigue (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS The primary efficacy endpoint was reached with acceptable toxicity. Lurbinectedin showed promising activity regardless of histology, prior immunotherapy, or outcome on prior treatment. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT03213301.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Metaxas
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.
| | - M Früh
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - F Grosso
- Mesothelioma Unit - Oncology, SS. Antonio and C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - M Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - P A Zucali
- Humanitas Cancer Centre, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - G L Ceresoli
- Oncology Unit, Humanitas Clinic Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Mark
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | | | - A Maconi
- Scientific Research and Development Department, SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, General Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - M Perrino
- Humanitas Cancer Centre, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - P Froesch
- Department of Oncology, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - S Schmid
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - C Waibel
- Division of Haematology and Oncology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - C Appenzeller
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - D Rauch
- Oncology Centre, Hospital STS AG, Thun, Switzerland
| | - R von Moos
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Grossert A, Meffert C, Hess V, Rochlitz C, Pless M, Hunziker S, Wössmer B, Geuter U, Meinlschmidt G, Schaefert R. A clinical trial of group-based body psychotherapy to improve bodily disturbances in post-treatment cancer patients in combination with randomized controlled smartphone-triggered bodily interventions (KPTK): study protocol. BMC Psychol 2019; 7:90. [PMID: 31888741 PMCID: PMC6936033 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-019-0357-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disturbances in bodily well-being represent one key source of suffering and impairment related to cancer. There is growing evidence that body psychotherapy (BPT) is efficacious for the treatment of various mental disorders. However, with regard to cancer patients, evidence is scarce. The aims of this project are to evaluate whether bodily disturbances in post-treatment cancer patients can be improved by group BPT, and to estimate the efficacy of intermittent smartphone-triggered bodily interventions. METHODS The project is a bi-center study with two participating centers in Switzerland, applying a pre-post convergent parallel design of a weekly group BPT using a waiting-period comparator, including a nested RCT during the group BPT phase. During the BPT phase, either a smartphone-triggered bodily intervention or a smartphone-triggered control intervention is provided at random over 5 consecutive weeks, on 6 days weekly. Patients who had received curatively intended treatment for any malignant neoplasm (treatment being completed ≥3 months) and are suffering from bodily disturbances are screened to assess eligibility. Sample size estimation is based on an a priori power analysis. We plan to include a total of N = 88 subjects, aiming at at least 52 completers. Patients are surveyed three times (baseline assessment (T0), pre- (T1) and post-intervention assessment (T2)), and on a daily basis along BPT during five consecutive weeks. The primary outcome, bodily disturbances, is assessed using the 'Body Image Scale'(BIS). For the secondary outcomes standardized questionnaires are used to assess changes in experience of presence and vitality, mood, body mindfulness, somatic symptoms and somatic symptom disorder, quality of life, anxiety, and depression including suicidal tendency, vitality and mental health, as well as group cohesion. Using semi standardized interviews (at T0 and T2), we aim to explore the relation of BPT with bodily disturbances and body image in post-treatment cancer patients, as well as the acceptance and burden of the intervention. DISCUSSION The proposed study has strong potential benefits for cancer patients, as it may pave the way for new therapeutic approaches to treat bodily disturbances, which persist despite curative tumor therapy. These may considerably improve patients' biopsychosocial well-being and quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03707548 (registered 9 October 2018; retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Grossert
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Meffert
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Viviane Hess
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Rochlitz
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Miklos Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology, Winterthur Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Sabina Hunziker
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Ulfried Geuter
- Institute for Sports and Motology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Gunther Meinlschmidt
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, International Psychoanalytic University, Berlin, Germany.,Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rainer Schaefert
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ceresoli G, Pless M, Weinberg U. P1.06-21 Safety Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials Delivering Tumor Treating Fields to the Upper Torso. J Thorac Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.1008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|