1
|
Krege S, Eckoldt F, Richter-Unruh A. [Differences in sexual development-S2k guideline update]. Urologie 2024; 63:448-455. [PMID: 38573501 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02326-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human beings with a difference in sexual development (DSD) often underwent gender reassignment surgery during early childhood. However, the medical decision was often not congruent with the gender identity that affected persons developed later on. OBJECTIVES To represent the interests of affected persons, an interdisciplinary guideline in cooperation with support groups was written. MATERIALS AND METHODS The revision of the first version of the guideline, published in 2016, was edited by 18 professional societies and working groups as well as 3 support groups. A literature search was performed for each of the 12 chapters. Recommendations and statements created by the working groups were voted on during four consensus conferences. RESULTS The guideline highlights the right of self-determination of affected persons. In this context, new legal requirements are reported. Other than necessary primary diagnostics, medical procedures should be postponed. Most important is the psychological support of parents and patients. Tumor risk of the gonads and protection of fertility are analyzed and discussed in detail. CONCLUSION The content of the guideline represents a paradigm shift in dealing with human beings with a difference of sexual development. Projects as DSD Care and Empower-DSD help to promote the practical implementation of the guideline's recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Krege
- Direktorin der Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Urol. Onkologie, Ev. Kliniken Essen Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - F Eckoldt
- Klinik für Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - A Richter-Unruh
- Triagon Dortmund, Hormonzentrum für Kinder und Jugendliche, Dortmund, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doehn C, Bergmann L, Decker J, Gauler T, Grünwald V, Weikert S, Krege S. [Update of the German S3 guideline on renal cell carcinoma]. Urologie 2024; 63:439-447. [PMID: 38602533 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02328-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal cell carcinoma is the third most common tumor among urological tumors. In Germany more than 14,000 people are affected every year. The sex ratio is 2/3 men and 1/3 women. OBJECTIVES The S3 guideline is intended to provide all disciplines dealing with renal cell carcinoma with the current status of diagnostics, therapy and follow-up care of the patients with this tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS The first version of the German guideline on renal cell carcinoma was published in 2015. The development was carried out at S3 level, which means that a structured, evidence-based literature search was carried out, recommendations and statements were developed in topic-related working groups and were approved by an interdisciplinary group of officials elected by the different medical societies. The chapters were gradually revised in 2017, 2020 and 2021 to reflect new aspects. This article provides information about the most important innovations of the most recent update from 2023. RESULTS In the epidemiology subsection, the substance trichlorethene has been added as a risk factor for the development of renal cell carcinoma. While there were no new data on neoadjuvant therapy, the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab was the first substance to demonstrate improved disease-specific and overall survival in the adjuvant situation. The combination nivolumab plus cabozantinib and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab were included in the chapter on systemic therapy for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. New are the chapters on non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma and hereditary tumors. CONCLUSIONS The S3 guideline provides a structured, evidence-based overview of all aspects of renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Doehn
- Urologikum Lübeck, Am Kaufhof 2, 23566, Lübeck, Deutschland.
| | - L Bergmann
- Privatpraxis für Onkologie und Hämatologie, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - J Decker
- SYNLAB MVZ Humangenetik Freiburg GmbH, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - T Gauler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - V Grünwald
- Uroonkologisches Zentrum, Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - St Weikert
- Klinik für Urologie, Alexianer St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - S Krege
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Urologische Onkologie, Klinken Essen Mitte, Essen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kunz I, Wirtz LM, Roggenbuck U, Krege S, Kroepfl D. Early Postoperative Complications of One-Stage Substitution Urethroplasty with Oral Mucosa Graft: A Monocentric Retrospective Study. Urol Int 2023; 108:20-27. [PMID: 38142682 DOI: 10.1159/000534028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report early postoperative complications (PCs) (≤90 days) of one-stage oral mucosa graft (OMG) urethroplasty in treatment of acquired anterior urethral strictures. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this study, we evaluated 530 males who underwent one-stage substitution urethroplasty (SU) between September 1996 and October 2020. Medical records were reviewed to identify and classify early PCs based on the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). We subdivided the PCs into three groups with different kinds of complications which allowed us a more detailed analysis concerning general surgical complications (GSCs), donor site morbidity (DSM) and complications specific for free graft urethroplasty (CSUs). The influence of patient demographics, stricture characteristics and operative procedure on the occurrence of PCs was analysed. RESULTS Early (90-day) PCs occurred in 90 (16.98%) patients, whereas only 19 patients (3.58%) experienced serious events (CDC grades III and IV). Early complications include 4.5% GSCs, 1.7% DSM and 10.8% CSUs. Only stricture length turned out to be an independent statistically significant risk factor for the occurrence of early PCs. There was a trend towards a higher rate of complications in patients with ASA III compared to ASA I. CONCLUSION The incidence of severe early complications in patients undergoing one-stage SU with OMG is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Kunz
- Centre for Reconstructive Urologic Surgery for Children and Adults, Helios St. Josefhospital Krefeld-Uerdingen, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Lisa-Marie Wirtz
- Centre for Reconstructive Urologic Surgery for Children and Adults, Helios St. Josefhospital Krefeld-Uerdingen, Krefeld, Germany,
| | - Ulla Roggenbuck
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Paediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Darko Kroepfl
- Centre for Reconstructive Urologic Surgery for Children and Adults, Helios St. Josefhospital Krefeld-Uerdingen, Krefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krege S, Oing C, Bokemeyer C. Testicular Tumors. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2023; 120:843-854. [PMID: 37378600 PMCID: PMC10824497 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germ-cell tumors of the testes are the most common type of malignant tumor in men aged 20 to 40. Their incidence in Germany is 10 per 100 000 men per year, with an estimated 4200 new cases annually. METHODS This selective review is based on the recommendations of the German clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care of testicular germ-cell tumors, as well as on pertinent original articles and reviews. RESULTS The treatment of germ-cell tumors requires an interdisciplinary approach comprising resection of the affected testis followed by further steps that depend on the histological type and stage of the tumor, which may include active surveillance, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, further surgery, or some combination of these measures. Two-thirds of germ-cell tumors are diagnosed in clinical stage I, when they are still confined to the testis; one-third are already metastatic when diagnosed, with organ metastases in 10-15%. Stage-based multimodal treatment approaches are associated with cure rates of more than 99% for stage I tumors and 67-95% for advanced metastatic disease, depending on the degree of progression. CONCLUSION For patients with early-stage tumors, overtreatment should be avoided in order to minimize long-term sequelae. For those whose tumors are in advanced stages, it must be decided which patients should receive intensified treatment to optimize the outcome. Multimodal treatment approaches are associated with high cure rates even for patients with metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology, and Urological Oncology, Essen-Mitte Hospital, Essen
- * Joint first authors
| | - Christoph Oing
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Pulmonology Section, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg
- * Joint first authors
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Pulmonology Section, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ohlmann CH, Jäschke M, Jaehnig P, Krege S, Gschwend J, Rexer H, Junker K, Zillmann R, Rüssel C, Hellmis E, Suttmann H, Janssen M, Marin J, Hübner A, Mathers M, Gleißner J, Scheffler M, Feyerabend S, Telle J, Klier J, Stöckle M. Correction to: LHRH sparing therapy in patients with chemotherapy-naïve, mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone: results of the randomized phase II SPARE trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:812. [PMID: 37253975 PMCID: PMC10638078 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00682-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten-Henning Ohlmann
- Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
- Department of Urology, Johanniter-Kliniken Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Michelle Jäschke
- Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | | | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Junker
- Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | | | | | - Eva Hellmis
- Urologicum-Duisburg Fachärztesozietät, Duisburg, Germany
| | | | - Martin Janssen
- Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jens Telle
- Urologische Praxisgemeinschaft, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Klier
- Urologische Partnerschaft, Köln, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Retz M, Kirchhoff FP, von Amsberg G, De Santis M, Krege S, Gschwend JE, Niegisch G. [Sequential therapy of advanced bladder cancer after prior perioperative systemic treatment : Recommendations from the Interdisciplinary Bladder Carcinoma Working Group (IABC) of the DKG e. V.]. Urologie 2023; 62:1064-1069. [PMID: 37264284 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02098-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Guidelines can only give treatment recommendations for defined patient groups if high quality and meaningful evidence is available. However, patients included in clinical trials for the treatment of metastatic and/or locally advanced bladder cancer (mUC) are generally not representative for the spectrum of patients encountered in daily clinical practice. In particular, patients with different systemic pretreatments, variable prestudy responses or variable time to tumor progression are not sufficiently considered in trials and guideline recommendations. Accordingly, recommendations for the treatment of mUC patients with previous perioperative systemic therapy are lacking. To provide some guidance for daily uro-oncological practice despite the limited evidence, we sought to develop expert opinion-based treatment recommendations. These recommendations focus on palliative first-line therapy of mUC. Both perioperative pretreatment with classical cisplatin-based systemic therapy and/or immunotherapy, as well as the time to tumor recurrence have been considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margitta Retz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe BlasenCarcinom (IABC), Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. (DKG), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Florian P Kirchhoff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Deutschland.
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe BlasenCarcinom (IABC), Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. (DKG), Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Gunhild von Amsberg
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe BlasenCarcinom (IABC), Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. (DKG), Berlin, Deutschland
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Onkologisches Zentrum und Martini-Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Maria De Santis
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe BlasenCarcinom (IABC), Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. (DKG), Berlin, Deutschland
- Klinik für Urologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland
- Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Deutschland
| | - Susanne Krege
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe BlasenCarcinom (IABC), Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. (DKG), Berlin, Deutschland
- Klinik für Urologie, Pädiatrische Urologie und Uro-Onkologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe BlasenCarcinom (IABC), Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. (DKG), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Günter Niegisch
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe BlasenCarcinom (IABC), Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. (DKG), Berlin, Deutschland
- Medizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Bereich konservative urologische Onkologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gödde D, Degener S, Walles C, Keller R, Graf K, Tosch M, Krege S, Musch M, Kvasnicka HM, Ackermann M, Störkel S, von Rundstedt FC. Degenerative Changes in Aging Human Pelvic Lymph Nodes-A Reason to Rethink Staging and Therapy of Regional Malignancies? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4754. [PMID: 37835449 PMCID: PMC10571730 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Lymph node metastases are common in pelvic urological tumors, and the age-related remodeling process of the pelvic lymph nodes influences metastatic behavior. The aim of this work is to characterize age-related degenerative changes in the pelvic lymph nodes with respect to their occurrence and extent. A total of 5173 pelvic lymph nodes of 390 patients aged 44 to 79 years (median 68 years, IQR 62-71 years) were histologically examined for degenerative structural changes. Lymph node size, lipomatous atrophy, capsular fibrosis, framework fibrosis, and calcifications were recorded semi-quantitatively and evaluated by age group. Significantly more lymph nodes <10 mm were found in older patients (p = 0.001). The incidence of framework fibrosis, capsular fibrosis, and calcifications increased significantly with increasing patient age (p < 0.001). In lipomatous atrophy, an increase in mild to moderate lipomatous atrophy was observed with increasing age (p < 0.001). In this, the largest study to date on this topic, age-related degenerative changes in pelvic lymph nodes were proven. Due to the consecutive decrease in hte filtration function of pelvic lymph nodes with increasing age, staging and therapy of metastatic pelvic urologic carcinomas should be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gödde
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Stephan Degener
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
- Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Christine Walles
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Rosalie Keller
- Clinic for Otolaryngology, HELIOS-Hospital, 47805 Krefeld, Germany
| | - Katharina Graf
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
- Centre for Clinical Trials, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Marco Tosch
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Musch
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Hans Michael Kvasnicka
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Maximilian Ackermann
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Stephan Störkel
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Friedrich-Carl von Rundstedt
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
- Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Syrafe M, Köhne W, Börgers A, Löwen H, Krege S, Groeben H. Perioperative lung function following flow controlled ventilation for robot-assisted prostatectomies in steep trendelenburg position: an observational study. Intensive Care Med Exp 2023; 11:49. [PMID: 37563521 PMCID: PMC10415243 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-023-00537-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Steep Trendelenburg position combined with capnoperitoneum can lead to pulmonary complications and prolonged affection of postoperative lung function. Changes in pulmonary function occur independent of different modes of ventilation and levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) has not been evaluated yet. We perioperatively measured spirometric lung function parameters in patients undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy under FCV. Our primary hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the ratio of the maximal mid expiratory and inspiratory flow (MEF50/MIF50) after surgery. METHODS In 20 patients, spirometric measurements were obtained preoperatively, 40, 120, and 240 min and 1 and 5 days postoperatively. We measured MEF50/MIF50, vital capacity (VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and intraoperative ventilation parameters. RESULTS MEF50/MIF50 ratio increased from 0.92 (CI 0.73-1.11) to 1.38 (CI 1.01-1.75, p < 0.0001) and returned to baseline within 24 h, while VC and FEV1 decreased postoperatively with a second nadir at 24 h and only normalized by the fifth day (p < 0.0001). Compared to patients with PCV, postoperative lung function changes similarly. CONCLUSION Flow-controlled ventilation led to changes in lung function similar to those observed with pressure-controlled ventilation. While the ratio of MEF50/MIF50 normalized within 24 h, VC and FEV1 recovered within 5 days after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Syrafe
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Wiebke Köhne
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Andre Börgers
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Heinrich Löwen
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology, and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology, and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Harald Groeben
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Krege S. [Will there be a renaissance of surgery in seminomatous lymph node metastases?]. Urologie 2023:10.1007/s00120-023-02113-5. [PMID: 37338545 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02113-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Krege
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Urologische Onkologie, Ev. Kliniken Essen Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huber J, Borgmann H, Miller K, Merseburger AS, Krege S, Gratzke C. [Urology 2030: Why it is key to promote digitisation in urology today to maintain medical care in the future - an expert consensus]. Aktuelle Urol 2023; 54:213-219. [PMID: 37224859 DOI: 10.1055/a-2071-4628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Due to demographic change associated with an increase in patient numbers as well as the existing shortage of medical personnel, the German healthcare system will face a major challenge in patient care. In order to maintain high-quality patient care at a high level, the digitisation of urology should be driven forward promptly and forcefully as digital applications such as online appointment scheduling, video consultations, digital health applications (DiGAs) and others could significantly improve treatment efficiency. The long-planned introduction of the electronic patient record (ePA) will hopefully accelerate this process, and medical online platforms could also become a permanent part of new treatment methods, which could emerge from the urgently needed structural change towards more digital medicine, including questionnaire-based telemedicine. This transformation, which, already today, is urgently needed in the healthcare system, must be demanded and promoted by service providers, but also by policymakers and administration, in order to achieve the positive development of digitisation in (urological) medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Huber
- Klinik für Urologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Borgmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Universitatsmedizin, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kurt Miller
- Urologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Axel S Merseburger
- Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie & Urologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung Essen-Huttrop, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Paffenholz P, Landwehr G, Seidel CA, Poch A, Bokemeyer C, Cathomas R, Pongratanakul P, Hiester A, Albers P, Pichler M, Krege S, Syring I, Heinzelbecker J, Nestler T, Pfister D, Heidenreich A. Relapse-free and overall survival in patients with non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumours with teratoma-free primaries. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
421 Background: Characteristics and outcome of non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumours (NSGCT) with teratoma-containing primaries are still under debate. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis including 557 patients with metastatic NSGCT as a registry study within the "German Testicular Cancer Study Group". Results: Of the eligible 557 patients with NSGCT, 237 (42%) of all orchiectomy specimens had teratoma-containing primaries, while 320 (58%) were teratoma-free. Teratoma-containing primaries had a significantly higher clinical stage (p=0.002) and worse prognosis (p=0.051) compared to teratoma-free specimens. Lymph node metastasis were significantly larger before (4.5 vs 2.5cm; p<0.001) and after chemotherapy (3.5 vs 2.5 cm; p<0.001) in teratoma-containing primaries. Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was performed in 57% of all patients. As teratoma-containing specimens revealed a significantly lower number of complete responses after chemotherapy, PC-PRLND was more often performed, with teratomatous elements being more often present in the PC-RPLND specimens compared to non-teratoma containing primaries. Kaplan-Meier estimates revealed that 19% of all patients relapsed during a median follow-up of 56 months [29-112] with a median time to relapse of 10 months. Teratoma-containing had a significantly lower relapse-free survival (RFS) compared to teratoma-free NSGCT (relapse rate 24% vs 16%, p=0.020). 8% (45/533) of all patients died due to their disease. There was no difference regarding the tumour-specific survival between teratoma-containing NSGCT and teratoma-free NSGCT when looking at the entire cohort of patients (8% vs. 9%, p=0.563), however median overall survival was not reached. Conclusions: In our study, NSGCT patients with teratoma-containing primaries showed a significantly higher clinical stage and worse prognosis at time of presentation compared to teratoma-free primaries. Furthermore, patients with teratoma-containing primaries showed a significantly worse relapse-free survival. Consequently, treating physicians should be aware of these patients portending a dismal prognosis and the presence of teratomatous elements might act as a reliable stratification tool for treatment decision in TGCT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Annika Poch
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Division of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburhg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Andreas Hiester
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Pichler
- Division of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Susanne Krege
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung/Knappschaft GmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Isabella Syring
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Tim Nestler
- University Hospital of Cologne, Department of Urology, Koblenz, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Paffenholz P, Landwehr G, Seidel C, Poch A, Bokemeyer C, Cathomas R, Pongratanakul P, Hiester A, Albers P, Pichler M, Krege S, Syring-Schmandke I, Heinzelbecker J, Nestler T, Pfister D, Heidenreich A. Non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumours with teratoma-free primaries exhibit a superior early relapse-free survival. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)00787-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
13
|
Gödde D, Degener S, Walles C, Keller R, Dreger NM, Graf K, von Rundstedt FC, Kvasnicka HM, Krege S, Störkel S. Influence of lymph node degeneration on metastases in prostate cancer: or why we must look for a needle in a haystack. BMC Urol 2023; 23:6. [PMID: 36609261 PMCID: PMC9824975 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01167-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the incidence of lymph node degeneration and its association with nodal metastatic pattern in prostate cancer. METHODS A retrospective analysis of the submitted lymph node specimen of 390 prostatectomies in 2011 was performed. All lymph nodes were histologically re-evaluated and the degree of lymph node degeneration e.g. lipomatous atrophy, capsular and framework fibrosis, and calcifications as well as the lymph node size were recorded. Lymph node degeneration was compared in the anatomic regions of the pelvis as well as in lymph nodes with and without metastases of prostatic cancer. RESULTS Eighty-one of 6026 lymph nodes demonstrated metastases. Complete histologic examination with analysis of a complete cross-section was possible in 5173 lymph nodes including all lymph nodes with metastases. The incidence of lymph node degeneration was different across the various landing sites. Lymph node metastases were primarily detected in less degenerative and therefore more functional lymph nodes. In metastatic versus non-metastatic lymph nodes low lipomatous atrophy was reported in 84.0% versus 66.7% (p = 0.004), capsular fibrosis in 14.8% versus 35.4% (p < 0.001), calcifications in 35.8% versus 46.1% (p = 0.072) and framework fibrosis in 69.8% versus 75.3% (p = 0.53). Metastases were also identified more frequently in larger than in smaller lymph nodes (63.0% vs. 47.5%; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Degenerative changes in pelvic lymph nodes are commonly detectable but occur with variable frequency in the various nodal landing sites in the pelvis. The degree of lymph node degeneration of single lymph nodes has a significant influence on whether a lymph node is infiltrated by tumor cells and may harbour metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gödde
- grid.412581.b0000 0000 9024 6397Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Stephan Degener
- grid.412581.b0000 0000 9024 6397Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Christine Walles
- grid.412581.b0000 0000 9024 6397Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Rosalie Keller
- Clinic for Otolaryngology, Helios Hospital Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, 47805 Krefeld, Germany
| | - Nici Markus Dreger
- grid.412581.b0000 0000 9024 6397Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Katharina Graf
- grid.412581.b0000 0000 9024 6397Center for Clinical Trials, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Friedrich-Carl von Rundstedt
- grid.412581.b0000 0000 9024 6397Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Hans Michael Kvasnicka
- grid.412581.b0000 0000 9024 6397Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- grid.461714.10000 0001 0006 4176Department of Urology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Stephan Störkel
- grid.412581.b0000 0000 9024 6397Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Papachristofilou A, Bedke J, Hayoz S, Schratzenstaller U, Pless M, Hentrich M, Krege S, Lorch A, Aebersold DM, Putora PM, Berthold DR, Zihler D, Zengerling F, Dieing A, Mueller AC, Schaer C, Biaggi C, Gillessen S, Cathomas R. Single-dose carboplatin followed by involved-node radiotherapy for stage IIA and stage IIB seminoma (SAKK 01/10): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1441-1450. [PMID: 36228644 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00564-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard treatment options for patients with stage IIA or stage IIB seminoma include either para-aortic and pelvic radiotherapy or three to four cycles of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. These options result in 3-year progression free survival rates of at least 90%, but bear risks for acute and late toxic effects, including secondary malignancies. We tested a novel approach combining de-escalated chemotherapy with de-escalated involved node radiotherapy, with the aim of reducing toxicity while preserving efficacy. METHODS In the single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 SAKK 01/10 trial, patients with stage IIA or IIB classic seminoma (either at primary diagnosis or at relapse during active surveillance for stage I) were enrolled at ten centres of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and ten centres of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. WHO performance status 0-2, age 18 years or older, and adequate bone marrow and kidney function were required for eligibility. Treatment comprised one cycle of carboplatin (area under the curve 7) followed by involved-node radiotherapy (30 Gy in 15 fractions for stage IIA disease and 36 Gy in 18 fractions for stage IIB disease). The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival. Efficacy analyses were done on the full analysis set, which comprised all patients who signed the informed consent, were registered in the trial, initiated trial treatment, and met all medically relevant inclusion or exclusion criteria. Safety was assessed in all patients who were treated at least once with one of the trial treatments. The study is ongoing but no longer recruiting, and is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01593241. FINDINGS Between Oct 18, 2012, and June 22, 2018, 120 patients were registered in the study. 116 patients were eligible and started treatment according to the study protocol (46 patients with stage IIA disease and 70 with stage IIB disease). After a median follow-up of 4·5 years (IQR 3·9-6·0), 3-year progression-free survival was 93·7% (90% CI 88·5-96·6). With a target progression-free survival of 95% at 3 years, the primary endpoint was not met. Acute treatment-related adverse events of any grade were noted in 58 (48%) of 116 patients, and grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in the form of neutropenia in five (4%) patients, thrombocytopenia in three (3%) patients, and vomiting in one (1%) patient. No treatment-related deaths and no late treatment-related adverse events were reported. Serious adverse events were reported in five (4%) of 116 patients (one transient creatinine increase and four second primary tumours). INTERPRETATION Despite the fact that the primary endpoint was not met, we observed favourable 3-year progression-free survival with single-dose carboplatin area under the curve 7 and involved-node radiotherapy, with minimal toxic effects. Our findings might warrant discussion with patients about the SAKK 01/10 regimen as an alternative to standard-of-care treatment, but more research on this strategy is needed. FUNDING Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation and Rising Tide Foundation for Clinical Cancer Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Competence Center of SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Miklos Pless
- Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany; Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel-M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Dominik-R Berthold
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Annette Dieing
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Corinne Schaer
- Competence Center of SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christine Biaggi
- Competence Center of SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Krege S, Falhammar H, Lax H, Roehle R, Claahsen-van der Grinten H, Kortmann B, Duranteau L, Nordenskjöld A. Long-Term Results of Surgical Treatment and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia-A Multicenter European Registry Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154629. [PMID: 35956243 PMCID: PMC9369813 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Representatives for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) continue to desire early feminizing surgery in girls with 46,XX-CAH. The aim of this analysis, which included 174 46,XX- individuals with salt-wasting (SW) or simple-virilizing (SV) CAH, a female gender identity, and an age > 16 years participating in a multicenter cross-sectional clinical evaluation study (dsd-LIFE), was to evaluate the long-term results of surgery and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). The gynecological examination (n = 84) revealed some shortcomings concerning surgical feminization. A clitoris was absent in 9.5% of cases, while a clitoral hood was missing in 36.7% of cases. Though all women had large labia, they didn’t look normal in 22.6% of cases. Small labia were absent in 23.8% of cases. There was no introitus vaginae, and the urethra and vagina had no separate opening in 5.1% of cases. A mucosal lining was missing in 15.4% of cases. Furthermore, 86.2% of the women had scars at the region of their external genitalia. A vaginal stenosis was described in 16.5% of cases, and a meatal stenosis was described in 2.6% of cases. Additionally, PRO data showed a very-/high satisfaction rate of 21.3%/40.2% with cosmesis and 23.8%/38.1% with functionality, while 3.3%/10.7% showed a very-/low satisfaction with cosmesis as well as 5.6%/10.3% with functionality. The remaining women—24.6% and 23.8%—were indifferent. Satisfaction concerning sex life was very-/high in 9.6%/27.7%. In 12.0%/16.9% it was very-/low. Furthermore, 33.7% had no opinion. Furthermore, 27.0%/31.6% of the women reported that clitoriplasty, but not clitoridectomy, had a very-/positive influence on their lives, while 1.3%/8.9% felt it to be very-/negative, and 28.4% were indifferent. Vaginoplasty had a very-/positive influence in 25.7%/33.8% and a very-/negative effect in 3.6%/6.8%. 29.7% had no opinion. Additionally, 75.7% of the women preferred feminizing surgery during infancy/childhood, especially concerning clitoreduction. In conclusion, though the majority of the participants (76%) preferred early feminizing surgery and 60% described a positive effect on their lives, about 10% felt it to have been negative. About 15% of the women suffered from insufficient cosmesis and functionality after surgery. Sex life was even described as poor in nearly 30%. Therefore, the decision about early genital surgery in 46,XX-CAH girls should be considered carefully. Parents should get detailed information about possible complications of surgery and should receive support to understand that postponing surgery does not inevitably cause harm for their child. Importantly, genital surgery when performed in children should only be performed in expert centers with a specialized team including surgeons who are trained in feminizing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urooncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-174-29003; Fax: +49-201-174-29000
| | - Henrik Falhammar
- Department of Endocrinology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hildegard Lax
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Robert Roehle
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charite-University Medicine Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Health, Charite-University Medicine Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Barbara Kortmann
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lise Duranteau
- Department of Medical Gynaecology and Reference Centre for Rare Diseases of Genital Development, Bicetre Hospital, APHP Paris Saclay University, 94270 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
| | - Agneta Nordenskjöld
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Center of Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Astrid Lindgren Children’s Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zraik I, Krege S. [Follow-up in superficial and metastatic bladder cancer]. Urologe A 2022; 61:477-483. [PMID: 35381866 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01813-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Concerning follow-up in bladder cancer, it must be distinguished between superficial, muscle-invasive, and metastatic tumors. In superficial bladder cancer, urethrocystoscopy is still standard for follow-up. Frequency depends on the risk classification. Even muscle-invasive carcinomas, which underwent a R0 resection, will metastasize in about 30% of cases. These tumors as well as primarily metastasized cancer cannot be cured. Therefore, in these cases, one should not speak about follow-up but therapeutic control. Nonetheless, even in these cases the S3 guideline recommends regular follow-up examinations because new therapeutic options can clearly improve patient survival. Possible complications of urinary diversions need consideration during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Zraik
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Urologische Onkologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - Susanne Krege
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Urologische Onkologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dieckmann KP, Pokrivcak T, Geczi L, Niehaus D, Dralle-Filiz I, Matthies C, Dienes T, Zschäbitz S, Paffenholz P, Gschliesser T, Pichler R, Mego M, Bader P, Zengerling F, Heinzelbecker J, Krausewitz P, Krege S, Aurilio G, Aksoy C, Hentrich M, Seidel C, Törzsök P, Nestler T, Majewski M, Hiester A, Buchler T, Vallet S, Studentova H, Schönburg S, Niedersüß-Beke D, Ring J, Trenti E, Heidenreich A, Wülfing C, Isbarn H, Pichlmeier U, Pichler M. Single-course bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (1xBEP) as adjuvant treatment in testicular nonseminoma clinical stage 1: outcome, safety, and risk factors for relapse in a population-based study. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221086813. [PMID: 35386956 PMCID: PMC8977693 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221086813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminomatous (NS) germ cell tumors involve a 30% probability of relapse upon surveillance. Adjuvant chemotherapy with one course of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (1xBEP) can reduce this risk to <5%. However, 1xBEP results are based solely on five controlled trials from high-volume centers. We analyzed the outcome in a real-life population. Patients and Methods: In a multicentric international study, 423 NS CS1 patients receiving 1xBEP were retrospectively evaluated. Median follow-up was 37 (range, 6–89) months. Primary end points were relapse-free and overall survival evaluated after 5 years. We also looked at associations of relapse with clinico-pathological factors using stratified Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox regression models. Treatment modality and outcome of recurrences were analyzed descriptively. Results: The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 96.2%. Thirteen patients (3.1%; 95% confidence interval, 1.65–5.04%) relapsed after a median time of 13 months, of which 10 were salvaged (77%). Relapses were mostly confined to retroperitoneal nodes. Three patients succumbed, two to disease progression and one to toxicity of chemotherapy. Pathological stage >pT2 was significantly associated with relapse rate. Conclusion: The relapse rate of 3.1% found in this population of NS CS1 patients treated with 1xBEP at the routine care level was not inferior to the median rate of 2.3% reported from a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Also, the cure rate of relapses of 77% is consistent with the previously reported rate of 80%. This study clearly shows that the 1xBEP regimen represents a safe treatment for NS CS1 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus-Peter Dieckmann
- Department of Urology, Hodentumorzentrum, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Paul Ehrlich Straße 1, 22763 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Albertinen-Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tomas Pokrivcak
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lajos Geczi
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - David Niehaus
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Cord Matthies
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tamas Dienes
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Stefanie Zschäbitz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michal Mego
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Pia Bader
- Department of Urology, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - Julia Heinzelbecker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Centre, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Philipp Krausewitz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Gaetano Aurilio
- Medical Oncology Division of Urogenital and Head and Neck Tumours, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cem Aksoy
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Seidel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Division of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Péter Törzsök
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tim Nestler
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Hiester
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tomas Buchler
- Department of Oncology, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Sonia Vallet
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Universitätsklinikum Krems, Krems, AustriaDepartment of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Studentova
- Department of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Sandra Schönburg
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Julia Ring
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Emanuela Trenti
- Department of Urology, Central Hospital Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Hendrik Isbarn
- Martini-Klinik, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Pichlmeier
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Pichler
- Division of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Siefker-Radtke AO, Necchi A, Park SH, García-Donas J, Huddart RA, Burgess EF, Fleming MT, Rezazadeh Kalebasty A, Mellado B, Varlamov S, Joshi M, Duran I, Tagawa ST, Zakharia Y, Akapame S, Santiago-Walker AE, Monga M, O'Hagan A, Loriot Y, Loriot Y, Park SH, Tagawa S, Flechon A, Alexeev B, Varlamov S, Huddart R, Burgess E, Rezazadeh A, Siefker-Radtke A, Vano Y, Gasparro D, Hamzaj A, Kopyltsov E, Gracia Donas J, Mellado B, Parikh O, Schatteman P, Culine S, Houédé N, Zanetta S, Facchini G, Scagliotti G, Schinzari G, Lee JL, Shkolnik M, Fleming M, Joshi M, O'Donnell P, Stöger H, Decaestecker K, Dirix L, Machiels JP, Borchiellini D, Delva R, Rolland F, Hadaschik B, Retz M, Rosenbaum E, Basso U, Mosca A, Lee HJ, Shin DB, Cebotaru C, Duran I, Moreno V, Perez Gracia JL, Pinto A, Su WP, Wang SS, Hainsworth J, Schnadig I, Srinivas S, Vogelzang N, Loidl W, Meran J, Gross Goupil M, Joly F, Imkamp F, Klotz T, Krege S, May M, Schultze-Seemann W, Strauss A, Zimmermann U, Keizman D, Peer A, Sella A, Berardi R, De Giorgi U, Sternberg CN, Rha SY, Bulat I, Izmailov A, Matveev V, Vladimirov V, Carles J, Font A, Saez M, Syndikus I, Tarver K, Appleman L, Burke J, Dawson N, Jain S, Zakharia Y. Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:248-258. [PMID: 35030333 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00660-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Erdafitinib, a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was shown to be clinically active and tolerable in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and prespecified FGFR alterations in the primary analysis of the BLC2001 study at median 11 months of follow-up. We aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of the selected regimen of erdafitinib determined in the initial part of the study. METHODS The open-label, non-comparator, phase 2, BLC2001 study was done at 126 medical centres in 14 countries across Asia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, at least one prespecified FGFR alteration, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and progressive disease after receiving at least one systemic chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy or were ineligible for cisplatin. The selected regimen determined in the initial part of the study was continuous once daily 8 mg/day oral erdafitinib in 28-day cycles, with provision for pharmacodynamically guided uptitration to 9 mg/day (8 mg/day UpT). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all treated patients who received at least one dose of erdafitinib. This is the final analysis of this study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02365597. FINDINGS Between May 25, 2015, and Aug 9, 2018, 2328 patients were screened, of whom 212 were enrolled and 101 were treated with the selected erdafitinib 8 mg/day UpT regimen. The data cutoff date for this analysis was Aug 9, 2019. Median efficacy follow-up was 24·0 months (IQR 22·7-26·6). The investigator-assessed objective response rate for patients treated with the selected erdafitinib regimen was 40 (40%; 95% CI 30-49) of 101 patients. The safety profile remained similar to that in the primary analysis, with no new safety signals reported with longer follow-up. Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events of any causality occurred in 72 (71%) of 101 patients. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events of any cause were stomatitis (in 14 [14%] of 101 patients) and hyponatraemia (in 11 [11%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION With longer follow-up, treatment with the selected regimen of erdafitinib showed consistent activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and prespecified FGFR alterations. FUNDING Janssen Research & Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene O Siefker-Radtke
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jesús García-Donas
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundacion Hospital de Madrid and IMMA Medicine Faculty, San Pablo CEU University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robert A Huddart
- Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Earle F Burgess
- Medical Oncology Department, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Mark T Fleming
- Medical Oncology Department, Virginia Oncology Associates, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | | | - Begoña Mellado
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergei Varlamov
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Altai Regional Cancer Center, Barnaul, Russia
| | - Monika Joshi
- Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Scott T Tagawa
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yousef Zakharia
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | | | - Manish Monga
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Anne O'Hagan
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ohlmann CH, Jäschke M, Jaehnig P, Krege S, Gschwend J, Rexer H, Junker K, Zillmann R, Rüssel C, Hellmis E, Suttmann H, Janssen M, Marin J, Hübner A, Mathers M, Gleißner J, Scheffler M, Feyerabend S, Telle J, Klier J, Stöckle M. LHRH sparing therapy in patients with chemotherapy-naïve, mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone: results of the randomized phase II SPARE trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022; 25:778-784. [PMID: 35430584 PMCID: PMC9705242 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00533-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the benefit of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) continuation in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains controversial, clinical evidence is lacking. Recent results indicated that treatment with abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone (P) further suppresses serum testosterone levels over ADT alone, suggesting that continuation of ADT in the treatment of mCRPC may not be necessary. METHODS In this exploratory phase 2 study, mCRPC patients were randomized with a 1:1 ratio to receive either continued ADT plus AA + P (Arm A) or AA + P alone (Arm B). The primary endpoint was the rate of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) at month 12. Secondary endpoints included PSA-response rate, objective response, time to PSA progression and safety. RESULTS A total of 68 patients were equally randomized between the two study arms. Median testosterone-levels remained below castrate-levels throughout treatment in all patients. According to the intention-to-treat analysis the rPFS rate was 0.84 in Arm A and 0.89 in Arm B. Moderate and severe treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 72% of the patients in Arm A and for 85% of the patients in Arm B. CONCLUSIONS AA + P treatment without ADT may be effective in mCRPC patients and ADT may not be necessary in patients receiving AA + P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten-Henning Ohlmann
- grid.411937.9Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany ,Department of Urology, Johanniter-Kliniken Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michelle Jäschke
- grid.411937.9Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | | | - Susanne Krege
- grid.461714.10000 0001 0006 4176Department of Urology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Gschwend
- grid.6936.a0000000123222966Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Junker
- grid.411937.9Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | | | | | - Eva Hellmis
- Urologicum-Duisburg Fachärztesozietät, Duisburg, Germany
| | | | - Martin Janssen
- grid.411937.9Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany ,grid.5949.10000 0001 2172 9288Department of Urology, University Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jens Telle
- Urologische Praxisgemeinschaft, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Klier
- Urologische Partnerschaft, Köln, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- grid.411937.9Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Papachristofilou A, Bedke J, Hayoz S, Schratzenstaller U, Pless M, Hentrich M, Krege S, Lorch A, Aebersold D, Putora PM, Berthold D, Zihler D, Azinwi N, Zengerling F, Dieing A, Mueller AC, Schaer C, Biaggi C, Gillessen S, Cathomas R. LBA30 Single-dose carboplatin followed by involved-node radiotherapy as curative treatment for seminoma stage IIA/B: Efficacy results from the international multicenter phase II trial SAKK 01/10. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.2106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
21
|
Krege S, Schmidt S, Ribal M, Plass K. [Guidelines-a European project]. Urologe A 2021; 60:1117-1124. [PMID: 34398254 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01604-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Clinical guidelines represent the latest standard of medical knowledge concerning diagnostics, treatment and follow up of diseases and should support doctors and patients to choose the best treatment. Depending on the prevalence of a disease there exist less or more published data. Therefore, several levels of guidelines are possible. In case of few data the expertise of the attending physicians is of greater importance (S1, S2-guidelines). In case of a huge amount of literature, especially phase III studies or metaanalyses, a S3-guideline can be written. The article describes the process of developing a guideline in Germany under the guidance of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) in comparison to the process by the European Association of Urology (EAU). The aim for the future is to join resources. Another aspect of the article is to inform about different procedures how to control the implementation of the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Krege
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Urologische Onkologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - S Schmidt
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - M Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spanien
| | - K Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnheim, Niederlande
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Krege S, Protzel C. [Testicular and penile cancer]. Urologe A 2021; 60:845-846. [PMID: 34255115 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01577-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Krege
- Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung Essen-Huttrop, Evang. Krankenhaus Essen-Werden, Evang. Krankenhaus Essen-Steele, KEM
- Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte gGmbH, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - Chris Protzel
- Klinik für Urologie, Helios Kliniken Schwerin GmbH, Wismarsche Straße 393-397, 19049, Schwerin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rapp M, Duranteau L, van de Grift TC, Schober J, Hirschberg AL, Krege S, Nordenstrom A, Roehle R, Thyen U, Bouvattier C, Kreukels BPC, Nordenskjold A. Self- and proxy-reported outcomes after surgery in people with disorders/differences of sex development (DSD) in Europe (dsd-LIFE). J Pediatr Urol 2021; 17:353-365. [PMID: 33358555 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery is performed in many individuals with disorders/differences of sex development (DSD). Irreversibility of some surgical procedures, lack of information about the procedures, and lack of follow-up care for physical and psychological outcomes, lead to wish for more knowledge from both surgeons and patients. After the consensus conference in 2006, multidisciplinary care is provided to a higher degree with psychological support and more restricted surgical procedures. Outcome studies after genital surgery often lack of patient's perspective. OBJECTIVE To describe surgical procedures in relation to diagnosis, to evaluate the outcomes of surgery through genital examination, and through patient's and observer's satisfaction with the anatomical and functional result after genital surgery. STUDY DESIGN In a cross-sectional clinical study performed in six European countries in 2014/15, we have included 500 participants where surgery was performed, from a total of 1040 adolescents (≥16years) and adults with a DSD. Diagnoses included Turner syndrome (n = 301), mixed gonadal dysgenesis (45,XO/46,XY; n = 45), Klinefelter syndrome (n = 218), XYY (n = 1), 46, XY DSD (n = 222) and 46, XX DSD (n = 253). Study protocol included clinical report files, an optional gynecological or urological examination, patient reported outcomes including received surgical interventions, satisfaction with appearance and function after surgery, and impact of the surgical procedure on life. RESULTS Five hundred participants had received genital or breast surgery, with the highest rate in 46, XY DSD and the lowest in Turner syndrome. Altogether; 240 participants had feminizing surgery, 112 had masculinizing surgery, and 217 underwent gonadectomy. Physicians evaluated anatomical appearance at genital examination as poor in less than 10%. Dissatisfaction with anatomical appearance was reported by 22% of the participants, dissatisfaction with function by 20%. Being (very) dissatisfied with anatomical appearance and function was reported by 13% of the study participants. Most participants reported no impact, or positive impact, of the surgical procedures on their lives, but 29% experienced a negative effect of gonadectomy on their life. DISCUSSION There might be a selection bias and/or a recall bias for participating in our studies. Due to poor data quality about surgical procedures performed in the past, we also relied on participants memory about surgical procedures in their past. Ideally, patient reported outcomes should be evaluated both before and after surgical procedures. CONCLUSION A vast majority are satisfied with appearance and function, but still genital or breast surgery have a long-lasting effect on patient's life. Self-reported satisfaction is usually lower than the observer's evaluation regarding both appearance and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Rapp
- Klinik fur Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitat zu Lubeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lubeck, 23538, Germany.
| | - Lise Duranteau
- Adolescent and Young Adult Gynecology Unit, Centre de Reference des Maladies Rares du Développement Génital, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP.HP Paris Saclay University, 78 rue du General Leclerc, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.
| | - Tim C van de Grift
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam. 1007, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1007, the Netherlands.
| | - Justine Schober
- UPMC Hamot, Department of Urology, 201 State St. Erie, PA, 16550, USA.
| | - Angelica L Hirschberg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden.
| | - Susanne Krege
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik fur Urologie, Kinderurologie und urologische Onkologie, Evangelische Huyssens Stiftung/Knappschaft GmbH, Essen, 45136, Germany.
| | - Anna Nordenstrom
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden.
| | - Robert Roehle
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Coordinating Center for Clinical Studies, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
| | - Ute Thyen
- Klinik fur Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitat zu Lubeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lubeck, 23538, Germany.
| | - Claire Bouvattier
- Endocrinologie pediatrique, Centre de Reference des Maladies Rares du Développement Génital, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay (Bicêtre), 78 rue du General Leclerc, Le Kremlin Bicetre, 94270, France.
| | - Baudewijntje P C Kreukels
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1007, the Netherlands.
| | - Agneta Nordenskjold
- Department of Women's and Children's Health and Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pediatric Surgery, Astrid Lindgren Children Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kliesch S, Schmidt S, Wilborn D, Aigner C, Albrecht W, Bedke J, Beintker M, Beyersdorff D, Bokemeyer C, Busch J, Classen J, de Wit M, Dieckmann KP, Diemer T, Dieing A, Gockel M, Göckel-Beining B, Hakenberg OW, Heidenreich A, Heinzelbecker J, Herkommer K, Hermanns T, Kaufmann S, Kornmann M, Kotzerke J, Krege S, Kristiansen G, Lorch A, Müller AC, Oechsle K, Ohloff T, Oing C, Otto U, Pfister D, Pichler R, Recken H, Rick O, Rudolph Y, Ruf C, Schirren J, Schmelz H, Schmidberger H, Schrader M, Schweyer S, Seeling S, Souchon R, Winter C, Wittekind C, Zengerling F, Zermann DH, Zillmann R, Albers P. Management of Germ Cell Tumours of the Testes in Adult Patients: German Clinical Practice Guideline, PART II - Recommendations for the Treatment of Advanced, Recurrent, and Refractory Disease and Extragonadal and Sex Cord/Stromal Tumours and for the Management of Follow-Up, Toxicity, Quality of Life, Palliative Care, and Supportive Therapy. Urol Int 2021; 105:181-191. [PMID: 33486494 DOI: 10.1159/000511245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We developed the first German evidence- and consensus-based clinical guideline on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of germ cell tumours (GCT) of the testes in adult patients. We present the guideline content in 2 separate publications. The present second part summarizes therecommendations for the treatment of advanced disease stages and for the management of follow-up and late effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS An interdisciplinary panel of 42 experts including 1 patient representative developed the guideline content. Clinical recommendations and statements were based on scientific evidence and expert consensus. For this purpose, evidence tables for several review questions, which were based on systematic literature searches (last search in March 2018), were provided. Thirty-one experts, who were entitled to vote, rated the final clinical recommendations and statements. RESULTS Here we present the treatment recommendations separately for patients with metastatic seminoma and non-seminomatous GCT (stages IIA/B and IIC/III), for restaging and treatment of residual masses, and for relapsed and refractory disease stages. The recommendations also cover extragonadal and sex cord/stromal tumours, the management of follow-up and toxicity, quality-of-life aspects, palliative care, and supportive therapy. CONCLUSION Physicians and other medical service providers who are involved in the diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up of GCT (all stages, outpatient and inpatient care as well as rehabilitation) are the users of the present guideline. The guideline also comprises quality indicators for measuring the implementation of the guideline recommendations in routine clinical care; these data will be presented in a future publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Kliesch
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Department of Clinical and Surgical Andrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Stefanie Schmidt
- UroEvidence, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Doris Wilborn
- UroEvidence, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clemens Aigner
- Ruhrlandklinik, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Walter Albrecht
- Department of Urology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Beyersdorff
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Busch
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Classen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radiological Oncology, and Palliative Medicine, St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Maike de Wit
- Clinic for Internal Medicine - Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Medicine, Vivantes Clinic Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Diemer
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology, and Andrology, University Hospital Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Anette Dieing
- Clinic for Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Clinics Am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Oliver W Hakenberg
- Urological Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Kathleen Herkommer
- Urological Clinic and Polyclinic of the Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sascha Kaufmann
- Department for Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marko Kornmann
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Susanne Krege
- KEM, Protestant Hospital Essen-Mitte, Clinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urological Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Karin Oechsle
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timur Ohloff
- German Foundation for Young Adults with Cancer, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Oing
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Otto
- Urological Competence Centre for Rehabilitation, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Heinrich Recken
- Hamburger Fern-Hochschule Studienzentrum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Oliver Rick
- Klinik Reinhardshöhe GmbH, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | | | - Christian Ruf
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Hans Schmelz
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Rainer Souchon
- Department for Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - D H Zermann
- Vogtland-Klinik Bad Elster, Bad Elster, Germany
| | | | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany,
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kliesch S, Schmidt S, Wilborn D, Aigner C, Albrecht W, Bedke J, Beintker M, Beyersdorff D, Bokemeyer C, Busch J, Classen J, de Wit M, Dieckmann KP, Diemer T, Dieing A, Gockel M, Göckel-Beining B, Hakenberg OW, Heidenreich A, Heinzelbecker J, Herkommer K, Hermanns T, Kaufmann S, Kornmann M, Kotzerke J, Krege S, Kristiansen G, Lorch A, Müller AC, Oechsle K, Ohloff T, Oing C, Otto U, Pfister D, Pichler R, Recken H, Rick O, Rudolph Y, Ruf C, Schirren J, Schmelz H, Schmidberger H, Schrader M, Schweyer S, Seeling S, Souchon R, Winter C, Wittekind C, Zengerling F, Zermann DH, Zillmann R, Albers P. Management of Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis in Adult Patients. German Clinical Practice Guideline Part I: Epidemiology, Classification, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Fertility Preservation, and Treatment Recommendations for Localized Stages. Urol Int 2021; 105:169-180. [PMID: 33412555 DOI: 10.1159/000510407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This is the first German evidence- and consensus-based clinical guideline on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up on germ cell tumours (GCTs) of the testis in adult patients. We present the guideline content in two publications. Part I covers the topic's background, methods, epidemiology, classification systems, diagnostics, prognosis, and treatment recommendations for the localized stages. METHODS An interdisciplinary panel of 42 experts including 1 patient representative developed the guideline content. Clinical recommendations and statements were based on scientific evidence and expert consensus. For this purpose, evidence tables for several review questions, which were based on systematic literature searches (last search was in March 2018) were provided. Thirty-one experts entitled to vote, rated the final clinical recommendations and statements. RESULTS We provide 161 clinical recommendations and statements. We present information on the quality of cancer care and epidemiology and give recommendations for staging and classification as well as for diagnostic procedures. The diagnostic recommendations encompass measures for assessing the primary tumour as well as procedures for the detection of metastases. One chapter addresses prognostic factors. In part I, we separately present the treatment recommendations for germ cell neoplasia in situ, and the organ-confined stages (clinical stage I) of both seminoma and nonseminoma. CONCLUSION Although GCT is a rare tumour entity with excellent survival rates for the localized stages, its management requires an interdisciplinary approach, including several clinical experts. Quality of care is highly related to institutional expertise and can be reassured by established online-based second-opinion boards. There are very few studies on diagnostics with good level of evidence. Treatment of metastatic GCTs must be tailored to the risk according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaboration Group classification after careful diagnostic evaluation. An interdisciplinary approach as well as the referral of selected patients to centres with proven experience can help achieve favourable clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Kliesch
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Department of Clinical and Surgical Andrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany,
| | | | - Doris Wilborn
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clemens Aigner
- Ruhrlandklinik at University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Walter Albrecht
- Department of Urology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Beyersdorff
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Busch
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Classen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radiological Oncology and Palliative Medicine, St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Maike de Wit
- Clinic for Internal Medicine - Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Vivantes Clinic Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Diemer
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Anette Dieing
- Clinic for Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Clinics Am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Oliver W Hakenberg
- Urological Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Kathleen Herkommer
- Urological Clinic and Polyclinic of the Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sascha Kaufmann
- Department for Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marko Kornmann
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- KEM, Protestant Hospital Essen-Mitte, Clinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urological Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Karin Oechsle
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timur Ohloff
- Advisor, German Foundation for Young Adults with Cancer, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Oing
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Otto
- Urological Competence Centre for Rehabilitation, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Heinrich Recken
- HFH, Hamburger Fern-Hochschule Studienzentrum Essen (Distance Learning University, Essen Study Centre), Essen, Germany
| | - Oliver Rick
- Klinik Reinhardshöhe GmbH, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | | | - Christian Ruf
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus (German Federal Armed Forces Hospital), Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Hans Schmelz
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus (German Federal Armed Forces Hospital), Koblenz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Rainer Souchon
- Department for Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Krege S, Hess J, Güldenring A, Richter E, Lederbogen S, Mengel M, Seppel T, Hetkamp M, Küntscher M, Sollenböhmer K, Henkel UM, Möller B, Romer G, Löwenberg H, Riechardt S. Symposium Genderdysphorie. Urologe A 2020; 59:1320-1330. [DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01336-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
28
|
Krege S, Heß J. Urologie (m/w/d) sucht: … Antworten! Urologe A 2020; 59:1311. [DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01364-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
29
|
Goebell PJ, Ivanyi P, Bedke J, Bergmann L, Berthold D, Boegemann M, Busch J, Doehn C, Krege S, Retz M, Amsberg GV, Grimm MO, Gruenwald V. Consensus paper: current state of first- and second-line therapy in advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Future Oncol 2020; 16:2307-2328. [PMID: 32964728 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The therapy of advanced (clear-cell) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has recently experienced tremendous changes. Several new treatments have been developed, with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibition being the backbone of therapy. Diverse immunotherapy combinations change current first-line standards. These changes also require new approaches in subsequent lines of therapy. In an expert panel, we discussed the new treatment options and how they change clinical practice. While first-line immunotherapies introduce a new level of response rates, data on second-line therapies remains poor. This scenario poses a challenge for clinicians as guideline recommendations are based on historical patient cohorts and agents may lack the appropriate label for their in guidelines recommended use. Here, we summarize relevant clinical data and consider appropriate treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Goebell
- Division of Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ivanyi
- Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, D-30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University, D-72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lothar Bergmann
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Medical Clinic II, D-60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Dominik Berthold
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Martin Boegemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, D-48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Jonas Busch
- Department of Urology, Charité-University Medicine, D-10117, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology & Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, D-45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Gunhild von Amsberg
- Department of Oncology & Hematology, University Cancer Center Hamburg & Martini-Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc-Oliver Grimm
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, D-07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Viktor Gruenwald
- Interdisciplinary GU Oncology, Clinic for Medical Oncology & Clinic for Urology, University Hospital Essen, D-45147, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Witjes JA, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, De Blok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Mir MC, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Lauridsen SV, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Rivera FAV, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Willemse PPM, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Horwich A. Corrigendum to 'EAU-ESMO Consensus Statements on the Management of Advanced and Variant Bladder Cancer-An International Collaborative Multistakeholder Effort Under the Auspices of the EAU-ESMO Guidelines Committees' [European Urology 77 (2020) 223-250]. Eur Urol 2020; 78:e48-e50. [PMID: 32446863 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicholas James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Juan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tom Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London, UK; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Maria J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Theo Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Tom Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aristotle Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alison Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada
| | - Bernard H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michel Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble-Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Iris Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Max Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Departement Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, HUEP, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Simon Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Stephane Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Willem De Blok
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center, Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Jurgen J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bogdan Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Shaista Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Dickon Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Virginia Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Harry Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - Jorge Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anne E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Pedro C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque, Spain; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - Annemarie Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Vibeke Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Richard Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | | | | | - James N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Jorg R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Susanne Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manish I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Mesut Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n_5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antti Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Finland
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Shomik Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Amir Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå university, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Robert J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anita Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Susanne Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Mihai D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Erik Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antoni Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Franklin A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System New York City, New York, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center, Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alan Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hiester A, Fingerhut A, Niegisch G, Siener R, Krege S, Schmelz HU, Dieckmann KP, Heidenreich A, Kwasny P, Pechoel M, Lehmann J, Kliesch S, Koehrmann KU, Fimmers R, Loy VV, Wittekind C, Hartmann M, Albers P. Late toxicities and recurrences in patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor after one cycle of adjuvant BEP versus primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: A 13-years follow-up analysis of a phase III trial cohort. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.5512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5512 Background: One cycle of adjuvant BEP has shown superiority in recurrence free survival over RPLND in patients (pts) with clinical stage (CS) I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis (NSGCT) (JCO 2008). We report recurrences and late toxicities of this randomized trial after 13 yrs of follow-up (FU). Methods: Questionnaires of 382 unselected pts with CS I NSGCT treated within a phase III trial comparing recurrence rate after 1 cycle of adjuvant BEP (arm A) vs. RPLND (arm B) were evaluated regarding recurrences and late toxicity. Overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was calculated by Kaplan-Meier and arms were compared using logrank test. Categorial data were analyzed by chi-square test (PRISM v8). Results: In each arm 191 pts were analyzed as intention-to-treat with a median FU of 13.75 yrs (0-22.9 yrs); 3/191 pts (1.6 %) in arm A and 16/191 pts (8.4 %) in arm B had a recurrence. 20-yrs PFS in arm A / B was 97 % (CI 96-99 %) / 92 % (CI 90-95 %), ( p = .0049). 20-yrs OS in arm A / B was 90 % (CI 86-94 %) / 88 % (CI 86-94 %), ( p = .83). 23/382 (6 %) pts have died, 22/23 not related to testis cancer, 1/23 died of a recurrence in arm B. 8/191 pts (4.2 %) in arm A and 4/191 pts (2.1 %) in arm B showed metachronous secondary testis cancer ( p = .26). 5/191 pts (2.6 %) in arm A and 4/191 pts (2.1 %) in arm B developed other malignancies. 170/382 questionnaires were evaluable (arm A: 95; arm B: 75). 45 pts were lost to FU. There were no significant differences comparing both treatment arms regarding potentially treatment-related late toxicities. However, excluding pre-existing complaints, ototoxicity (9/95 (9 %) vs. 4/75 (5 %) pts, p = .31) was reported more frequently in arm A. Excluding pre-existing neurological conditions, peripheral neuropathy of all grades was more frequently reported in arm A (15/95 pts; 16 % vs. 9/75 pts; 12 % pts; p = .48). Retrograde ejaculation occurred more frequently after RPLND (9/95 pts; 9% vs. 18/75 pts; 24 %, p = .01). Conclusions: After more than 13 yrs of FU, recurrences in non-risk factor selected pts with CS I NSGCT remain to be significantly more frequent with RPLND. No excess mortality due to secondary malignancies was observed. Late toxicities did not differ between 1 cycle of BEP and RPLND. Only retrograde ejaculation was observed significantly more frequent after RPLND. With long-term observation, 1 cycle of BEP has not only a high efficacy to prevent recurrence but also seems to be tolerated without clinically relevant long-term toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Hiester
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Anna Fingerhut
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Guenter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Roswitha Siener
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Hans U. Schmelz
- Department of Urology, Federal Armed Services Hospital, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology and Uro-Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Kwasny
- Department of Urology, Städtisches Klinikum Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Maik Pechoel
- Department of Urology, Ernst-Moritz Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jan Lehmann
- Department of Urology, Städtisches Krankenhaus, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sabine Kliesch
- Department of Clinical and Surgical Andrology, University Hospital, Muenster, Germany
| | | | - Rolf Fimmers
- Department of Medical Biometry, Informatics, and Epidemiology, University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Krege S, Michel MS. Welche Praxisrelevanz haben Leitlinien? Urologe A 2020; 59:531-532. [DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01196-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
33
|
Grimm MO, Doehn C, Krege S. Erratum zu: Nierenzellkarzinom. Urologe A 2020; 59:487. [DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01171-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
34
|
Affiliation(s)
- Marc-Oliver Grimm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Lessingstraße 1, 07743, Jena, Deutschland.
| | - Christian Doehn
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.
| | - Susanne Krege
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und urologische Onkologie, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evang. Huyssens Stiftung/Knappschaft GmbH, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Papachristofilou A, Bedke J, Hayoz S, Fischer N, Schiel X, Schratzenstaller U, Krege S, Lorch A, Aebersold DM, Putora PM, Berthold DR, Zihler D, Azinwi NC, Zengerling F, Dieing A, Mueller AC, Cathomas R. Treatment compliance and early toxicity in SAKK 01/10: Single-dose carboplatin and involved-node radiotherapy for treatment of stage IIA/B seminoma. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.6_suppl.405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
405 Background: Standard treatment options for stage IIA/B seminoma include either extensive paraaortal/pelvic radiotherapy or intensive chemotherapy with 3x BEP or 4x EP. Both treatment modalities are associated with excellent efficacy but also a high rate of acute and late toxicities. Therefore, de-escalation strategies appear warranted for this patient group aiming to minimize acute and long-term toxicities while maintaining efficacy. SAKK 01/10 is a joint project of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. Methods: Patients with stage IIA/B seminoma (de novo or relapse on active surveillance) were eligible for participation in this single arm phase II trial. A repeat scan was advised in patients with equivocal lymph node enlargement. Treatment consisted of one cycle carboplatin AUC7 followed by involved-node radiotherapy with 30 Gy in stage IIA and 36 Gy in stage IIB disease. The primary endpoint of the trial is 3-year progression free survival. We report on treatment compliance and early toxicity during treatment and within 30 days. Results: 120 patients with stage IIA/B seminoma were recruited from 10/12 until 06/18 in 20 study centers in Switzerland and Germany. 116 patients were eligible and initiated treatment per protocol (40% stage IIA, 60% stage IIB). All patients received chemotherapy (CT) with a median applied dose of 984 mg (range: 560-1920 mg). The median planning target volume (PTV) for radiotherapy (RT) was 297 cm3 (range: 24-1047 cm3). RT was delayed/interrupted in two patients due to adverse events. During CT, grade 2 and grade 3 adverse events were seen in 21% and 2% of all patients respectively (most common grade 2 events: neutropenia 6%, nausea 5%). During RT, grade 2 and grade 3 adverse events were seen in 26% and 6% of all patients respectively (most common grade 2 events: neutropenia 15%, nausea 6%). One case of transient creatinine increase was reported as a severe adverse event, resolving without sequelae. Conclusions: Treatment with one cycle carboplatin AUC7 and 30-36 Gy involved-node radiotherapy for stage IIA/B seminoma is feasible and demonstrates a very favorable early toxicity profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01593241.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Xaver Schiel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Palliative Medicine and Internal Medicine, München Klinik Harlaching, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Schratzenstaller
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Ngwa C. Azinwi
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Friedemann Zengerling
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Annette Dieing
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinik am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Richard Cathomas
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Witjes JA, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Der Kwast TV, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, De Blok W, J L De Visschere P, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Mir MC, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, J G Oyen W, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Lauridsen SV, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Rivera FAV, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Horwich A. EAU-ESMO Consensus Statements on the Management of Advanced and Variant Bladder Cancer-An International Collaborative Multistakeholder Effort †: Under the Auspices of the EAU-ESMO Guidelines Committees. Eur Urol 2020; 77:223-250. [PMID: 31753752 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts prior to voting during a consensus conference. SETTING Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), and 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these statements, 33 (28%) achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease, and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time when further evidence is available to guide our approach. PATIENT SUMMARY This report summarises findings from an international, multistakeholder project organised by the EAU and ESMO. In this project, a steering committee identified areas of bladder cancer management where there is currently no good-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions. From this, they developed a series of proposed statements, 71 of which achieved consensus by a large group of experts in the field of bladder cancer. It is anticipated that these statements will provide further guidance to health care professionals and could help improve patient outcomes until a time when good-quality evidence is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicholas James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Juan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tom Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London, UK; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Maria J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Theo Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Tom Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aristotle Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alison Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada
| | - Bernard H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michel Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble - Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Iris Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Max Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Departement Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon hospital, HUEP, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Simon Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Stephane Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Willem De Blok
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Jurgen J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bogdan Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Shaista Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Dickon Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Virginia Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Harry Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - Jorge Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anne E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Pedro C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - Annemarie Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Vibeke Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Richard Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | | | | | - James N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Jorg R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Susanne Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manish I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Mesut Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antti Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Finland
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Shomik Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Amir Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå university, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Robert J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anita Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Susanne Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Mihai D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Erik Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antoni Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Franklin A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System New York City, New York, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrew Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alan Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Horwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, DeBlok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Carmen Mir M, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Vahr Lauridsen S, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Vives Rivera FA, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Witjes JA. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1697-1727. [PMID: 31740927 PMCID: PMC7360152 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - M Babjuk
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - H M Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - T M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - N James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - S Maclennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S F Shariat
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - N Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, USA
| | - T Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - P C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - B H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble - Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - J L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - I Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - M Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - D Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - R Cathomas
- Department Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - A Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, HUEP, Paris; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - S Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris
| | - B De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - W DeBlok
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
| | - K Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Dimitropoulos
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J L Dominguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - J J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - B Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, USA
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - D Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - A M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - V Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - K Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - J Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - V Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - S Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - P C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque, Canarias; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - A Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - V Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Y Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - R Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - H Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - A-C Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C R Müller
- Cancer Treatment Centre, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - J N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - J R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - W J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - L Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - H Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - K Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - M Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - F Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - J E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - M Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris
| | - O Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - C Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - R J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - A Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - G N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
| | - B Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - H Van Poppel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - E Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - A Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - P Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - R Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J A Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Krafft U, Tschirdewahn S, Hess J, Harke NN, Hadaschik B, Olah C, Krege S, Nyirády P, Szendröi A, Szücs M, Módos O, Székely E, Reis H, Szarvas T. Validation of survivin and HMGA2 as biomarkers for cisplatin resistance in bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:810.e7-810.e15. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 04/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
39
|
Krege S. Response to the letter to the Editor re 'Variations of sex development: The first German interdisciplinary consensus paper'. J Pediatr Urol 2019; 15:586. [PMID: 31586541 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Krege
- Dpt. of Urology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Krege S, Goebell PJ. [Guideline adherence]. Urologe A 2019; 58:1016-1018. [PMID: 31451880 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-019-0994-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Krege
- Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung Essen-Huttrop, Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie & Urologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - P J Goebell
- Urologische und Kinderurologische Klinik, Friedrich‑Alexander Universität, Rathsberger Straße 57, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Stein R, Krege S. Operative Versorgungskonzepte für Menschen mit Varianten der Geschlechtsentwicklung. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s00112-019-0715-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
42
|
Krege S. Response to commentaries on 'Variations of sex development first German interdisciplinary consensus paper'. J Pediatr Urol 2019; 15:296. [PMID: 31072763 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
43
|
Krege S, Eckoldt F, Richter-Unruh A, Köhler B, Leuschner I, Mentzel HJ, Moss A, Schweizer K, Stein R, Werner-Rosen K, Wieacker P, Wiesemann C, Wünsch L, Richter-Appelt H. Variations of sex development: The first German interdisciplinary consensus paper. J Pediatr Urol 2019; 15:114-123. [PMID: 30713084 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The term variations of sex development subsumes a large number of congenital conditions including chromosomal mosaics and variations of chromosomal, gonadal, and phenotypic sex. A situation of this nature may cause severe distress to both, parents and affected persons. One of the reasons for this is the binary form of gender classification in the society. In the past, because of a fear of possible stigmatization and an inability to cope with complex situations, it has been medical policy and practice for newborns to undergo early, mostly 'feminizing' elective surgery with the aim of achieving an outer genital appearance that is unambiguously male or female. Protests by advocacy groups for the most part as well as the results of outcome studies have shown that the development of affected persons may be very different to what has been expected and often does not result in the intended clear female or male gender identity as had been intended. It, therefore, seemed a matter of urgency to implement this new awareness as well as the ethical and personal human rights perspectives in the recommendations for the medical and psychosocial management of diverse sex development (DSD) in the future. STUDY DESIGN In 2012, an interdisciplinary group of German academics engaged in the field of DSD decided to work on a consensus paper for this topic. It involved the participation of all faculties and non-scientific groups dealing with DSD, in particular advocacy and service-user groups. In a structured consensus, process recommendations were developed based on scientific literature as well as personal experiences of clinicians and affected individuals. RESULTS Finally, 37 recommendations were agreed on. The strength of consensus is reflected in the degree of agreement as expressed in percentages. CONCLUSION The introduction of the consensus paper reflects on the emerging paradigm shift and the necessity for a more open view of gender within society. The paper is intended to aid the performance of appropriate diagnostics in DSD-affected newborns and especially to help parents and affected persons cope with the biological and social consequences of DSD. With regard to medical or surgical therapy, it gives information about the most recent treatment trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Krege
- Dept. of Urology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany.
| | - F Eckoldt
- Dept. of Pediatric Surgery, University of Jena, Germany
| | - A Richter-Unruh
- Dept. of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of Münster, Germany
| | - B Köhler
- Dept. of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Charite - University of Berlin, Germany
| | - I Leuschner
- Dept. of Pathology, University of Kiel, Germany
| | - H-J Mentzel
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, University of Jena, Germany
| | - A Moss
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Dept. of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Ulm, Germany
| | - K Schweizer
- Institute for Sex Research and Forensic Psychiatry, University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - R Stein
- Department of Pediatric, Adolescent and reconstructive Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - P Wieacker
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Münster, Germany
| | - C Wiesemann
- Institute of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Göttingen, Germany
| | - L Wünsch
- Dept. of Pediatric Surgery, University of Lübeck, Germany
| | - H Richter-Appelt
- Institute for Sex Research and Forensic Psychiatry, University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dieckmann KP, Radtke A, Geczi L, Matthies C, Anheuser P, Eckardt U, Sommer J, Zengerling F, Trenti E, Pichler R, Belz H, Zastrow S, Winter A, Melchior S, Hammel J, Kranz J, Bolten M, Krege S, Haben B, Loidl W, Ruf CG, Heinzelbecker J, Heidenreich A, Cremers JF, Oing C, Hermanns T, Fankhauser CD, Gillessen S, Reichegger H, Cathomas R, Pichler M, Hentrich M, Eredics K, Lorch A, Wülfing C, Peine S, Wosniok W, Bokemeyer C, Belge G. Serum Levels of MicroRNA-371a-3p (M371 Test) as a New Biomarker of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Results of a Prospective Multicentric Study. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1412-1423. [PMID: 30875280 PMCID: PMC6544462 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies suggested that serum levels of microRNA (miR)-371a-3p (so-called M371 test) have a much higher sensitivity and specificity than the classic markers of testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) and are applicable toward both seminoma and nonseminoma. We sought to confirm the usefulness of this test as a novel biomarker for GCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a prospective, multicentric study, serum samples of 616 patients with testicular GCTs and 258 male controls were examined for serum levels of miRNA-371a-3p (miR levels) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The GCT population encompassed 359 patients with seminoma and 257 with nonseminoma; 371 had clinical stage I disease, 201 had systemic disease, and 46 had relapses. Paired measurements before and after orchiectomy were performed in 424 patients; 118 with systemic disease had serial measurements during treatment. miR levels were compared with those of β-human chorionic gonadotropin, α-fetoprotein, and lactate dehydrogenase. RESULTS For the primary diagnosis of GCT, the M371 test showed a sensitivity of 90.1%, a specificity of 94.0%, an area under the curve of 0.966 upon receiver operating characteristic analysis, and a positive predictive value of 97.2%. α-Fetoprotein, β-human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase had sensitivities of less than 50% in seminoma and slightly higher sensitivities in nonseminomas. miR levels were significantly associated with clinical stage, primary tumor size, and response to treatment. Relapses had elevated miR levels that subsequently dropped to normal upon remission. Teratoma did not express miR-371a-3p. CONCLUSION The M371 test outperforms the classic markers of GCT with both a sensitivity and a specificity greater than 90%. All histologic subgroups, except teratoma, express this marker. The test could be considered for clinical implementation after further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus-Peter Dieckmann
- Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany.,2 Albertinen-Krankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Lajos Geczi
- 4 National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hanjo Belz
- 11 Zeisigwaldkliniken, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Stefan Zastrow
- 12 Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Susanne Krege
- 17 Klinikum Essen-Mitte Huyssenstiftung, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anja Lorch
- 31 Urologische Universitätsklinik der Heinrich Heine Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Sven Peine
- 24 Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hupe M, Merseburger A, de Wit M, Rexer H, Gschwend J, Krege S. [Practice Pattern of Systemic Therapy for Urothelial Cancer in Germany - A Survey of the German Cancer Society]. Aktuelle Urol 2018; 49:346-354. [PMID: 30086593 DOI: 10.1055/a-0645-1076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2016, the first German guideline for bladder cancer was introduced. This survey evaluates current management of bladder cancer in Germany, focusing on systemic therapies and compares this to the guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS More than 4000 urologists and oncologists in Germany received a questionnaire assessing surgical and systemic therapeutic management of bladder cancer. We received 278 evaluable responses. RESULTS This is the largest nationwide survey evaluating current bladder cancer management in Germany. Management can be optimised of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer including intravesical instillation therapies, as well as of muscle invasive bladder cancer including (neo)adjuvant chemotherapies, particularly with respect to the numbers of chemotherapy courses. Management of metastasised bladder cancer is predominantly performed according to the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to bladder cancer guidelines in Germany can be optimised and could possibly decrease cancer-specific mortality, supported by the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Hupe
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck
| | - Axel Merseburger
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck
| | - Maike de Wit
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin
| | | | - Jürgen Gschwend
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Technische Universität München, Universitätsklinikum rechts der Isar, München
| | - Susanne Krege
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Urologische Onkologie, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung/Knappschaft GmbH, Essen
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kunz I, Musch M, Vogel A, Maek M, Roggenbuck U, Krege S, Kroepfl D. Experience with One-Stage Repair of Urethral Strictures Using the Augmented Anastomotic Repair Technique. Urol Int 2018; 100:386-396. [PMID: 29719299 DOI: 10.1159/000481267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 09/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report the results of augmented anastomotic repair (AAR) in the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective study, we evaluated 71 consecutive patients who had undergone AAR between June 2004 and June 2013. Medical records were reviewed to identify early postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Self-developed standardized questionnaires sent to the patients and referring urologists were used to collect data on late complications (>90) days. Stricture recurrence (SR) was defined as any postoperative endoscopic or open surgical intervention on the urethra. The influence of patient demographics, stricture characteristics, and operative procedure performed on the occurrence of SR was analyzed. RESULTS Early postoperative complications were rare events (11.3%) with only one severe CDC complication. Late complications were reported in 46.5% cases. At a median follow-up of 17 months (range 3-114 months), however, 64 patients had no evidence of SR and required no further intervention, giving an overall success rate of 90.1%. Seven patients with SR had a higher body mass index, were older, and had been operated on by less experienced surgeon(s). Most SRs occurred within the first year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS AAR was an effective and safe operative technique that allowed one-stage repair in our patients with anterior urethral strictures who needed resection of the scarred urethra and otherwise were not suitable for primary anastomosis or simple substitution urethroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Kunz
- Section of Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Musch
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Anne Vogel
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Mirko Maek
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulla Roggenbuck
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Darko Kroepfl
- Section of Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Horn T, Krege S, Retz M. [Advanced bladder cancer : From chemo- to immunotherapy]. Urologe A 2018; 57:686-692. [PMID: 29637216 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-018-0626-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
In November 2016, the results of a phase III clinical trial with the protein cell death (PD)-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab for second-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma were published and showed an overall survival benefit in comparison with conventional chemotherapy with vinflunine, docetaxel, or paclitaxel. In a similar trial the PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab showed no significant benefit in comparison to chemotherapy in the subgroup of PD-L1-positive patients and, thus, missed its primary endpoint. For other PD-1/PD-L1 directed substances, large phase I/II trials reported data concerning response rates and overall survival. This substance class will most likely become the new treatment standard in second-line treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer. Currently, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are also being tested within randomized phase III trials for first-line treatment using different approaches either as a monotherapy or a combination with conventional chemotherapy or cytotoxic T‑lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)-4 inhibitors. Whereas data from single-arm phase II clinical trials have already been published, preliminary phase III data are expected in 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Horn
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
| | - S Krege
- Abteilung für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Urologische Onkologie, Klinikum Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland
| | - M Retz
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
van der Sluis WB, Pavan N, Liguori G, Bucci S, Bizic MR, Kojovic V, Hess J, Meijerink WJ, Mullender MG, Özer M, Smit JM, Buncamper ME, Krege S, Djordjevic ML, Trombetta C, Bouman MB. Ileal vaginoplasty as vaginal reconstruction in transgender women and patients with disorders of sex development: an international, multicentre, retrospective study on surgical characteristics and outcomes. BJU Int 2018; 121:952-958. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter B. van der Sluis
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Urology Clinic; Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science; University of Trieste; Trieste Italy
| | - Giovanni Liguori
- Urology Clinic; Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science; University of Trieste; Trieste Italy
| | - Stefano Bucci
- Urology Clinic; Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science; University of Trieste; Trieste Italy
| | - Marta R. Bizic
- School of Medicine; University of Belgrade; Belgrade Serbia
| | | | - Jochen Hess
- Department of Urology; University Hospital Essen; Essen Germany
| | - Wilhelmus J.H.J. Meijerink
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery and Advanced Laparoscopy; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Operation Rooms; Radboud University Medical Centre; Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Margriet G. Mullender
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Müjde Özer
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Jan Maerten Smit
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Marlon E. Buncamper
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology; Kliniken Essen Mitte; Essen Germany
| | | | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urology Clinic; Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science; University of Trieste; Trieste Italy
| | - Mark-Bram Bouman
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Krege S. Management of Clinical Stage I (CSI) Disease in Testicular Cancer. Urol Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42603-7_5-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
50
|
Lang C, Schwerfeld-Bohr J, Ebel T, Kröpfl D, Krege S. [Unusual tumor of the kidney]. Urologe A 2017; 56:793-795. [PMID: 28508941 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0390-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C Lang
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und urologische Onkologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - J Schwerfeld-Bohr
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und urologische Onkologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland
| | - T Ebel
- Zentrum für Pathologie Essen-Mitte, Essen, Deutschland
| | - D Kröpfl
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und urologische Onkologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland
| | - S Krege
- Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und urologische Onkologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|