Safety and mid-term outcome of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in octogenarians

Clinical and Laboratory Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes after Catheter Ablation for a Ventricular Electrical Storm

Background

Ventricular electrical storm (VES) is characterized by the occurrence of multiple episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) over a short period of time. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been reported as an effective treatment in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT).

Objective

The aim of the present study was to indicate the short-term and long-term predictors of recurrent VA after RFA was performed due to VES.

Methods

A retrospective, single-centre study included patients, who had undergone RFA due to VT between 2012 and 2021. In terms of the short-term (at the end of RFA) effectiveness of RFA, the following scenarios were distinguished: complete success: inability to induce any VT; partial success: absence of clinical VT; failure: inducible clinical VT. In terms of the long-term (12 months) effectiveness of RFA, the following scenarios were distinguished: effective ablation: no recurrence of any VT; partially successful ablation: VT recurrence; ineffective ablation: VES recurrence.

Results

The study included 62 patients. Complete short-term RFA success was obtained in 77.4% of patients. The estimated cumulative VT-free survival and VES-free survival were, respectively, 28% and 33% at the 12-month follow-up. Ischemic cardiomyopathy and complete short-term RFA success were predictors of long-term RFA efficacy. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were associated with VES recurrence. NLR ≥2.95 predicted VT and/or VES recurrence with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 72.2%.

Conclusion

Ischemic cardiomyopathy and short-term complete success of RFA were predictors of no VES recurrence during the 12-month follow-up, while NLR and GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were associated with VES relapse.

Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in elderly patients with structural heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Data regarding the age-specific outcomes of VT ablation in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) are scarce. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of VT ablation in elderly vs. younger patients with SHD.

METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar and references comparing VT ablation in elderly vs. younger patients were screened and studies included if matching inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Five retrospective studies enrolling 2778 SHD patients (868 elderly vs. 1910 younger) were included. Compared to younger subjects, the elderly showed similar results in terms of acute ablation success (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.54-1.13, p = 0.189) and minor complications (OR 1.74, 95% CI 0.74-4.09, p = 0.205), a trend toward a higher risk of major complications (OR 2.30, 95% CI 0.83-6.40, p = 0.110) and significantly higher rates of all complications (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.51-4.71, p = 0.001) and periprocedural mortality (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24-3.01, p = 0.004). At a mean follow-up of 18 months, elderly patients showed similar long-term VT recurrence rate (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.85-1.22, p = 0.861) and higher all-cause mortality (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.40-2.86, p < 0.001). In elderly patients, urgent VT ablation is associated with higher risk of major complications (beta = 0.06, p < 0.001) and periprocedural mortality (beta = 0.03, p = 0.029), while advanced age is associated with higher risk of major complications (beta = 0.29 with p = 0.009) and all complications + periprocedural mortality (beta = 0.17 with p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to younger patients, VT ablation in elderly showed similar results in terms of acute ablation success and long-term VT recurrence rate with a significantly higher risk of all complications, periprocedural mortality, and long-term mortality, especially when the procedure is performed urgently and in the most aged patients. Large prospective multicenter randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.

Cardiac stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for control of refractory ventricular tachycardia: initial UK multicentre experience

Background

Options for patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs and/or catheter ablation remain limited. Stereotactic radiotherapy has been described as a novel treatment option.

Methods

Seven patients with recurrent refractory VT, deemed high risk for either first time or redo invasive catheter ablation, were treated across three UK centres with non-invasive cardiac stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Prior catheter ablation data and non-invasive mapping were combined with cross-sectional imaging to generate radiotherapy plans with aim to deliver a single 25 Gy treatment. Shared planning and treatment guidelines and prospective peer review were used.

Results

Acute suppression of VT was seen in all seven patients. For five patients with at least 6 months follow-up, overall reduction in VT burden was 85%. No high-grade radiotherapy treatment-related side effects were documented. Three deaths (two early, one late) occurred due to heart failure.

Conclusions

Cardiac SABR showed reasonable VT suppression in a high-risk population where conventional treatment had failed.

Outcome of catheter ablation in the very elderly-insights from a large matched analysis

Background

Ablation emerged as first line therapy in the treatment of various arrhythmias. Nevertheless, in older patients (pts), decision is often made pro drug treatment as more complications and less benefit are suspected.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that different kind of ablations can be performed safely regardless of the pts age.

Methods

We enrolled all pts aged >80 years (yrs) who underwent ablation for three different arrhythmias (atrial flutter [AFL], atrioventricular nodal re‐entry tachycardia [AVNRT], ventricular tachycardia [VT]) between August 2002 and December 2018. Procedural data and outcome were compared with matched groups aged 60 to 80 years and 40 to 60 years, respectively. Periprocedural and in‐hospital complications were analyzed.

Results

The analysis included 1191 patients (397 pts per group: 63% AFL, 23% AVNRT, 14% VT) who underwent ablation. Acute success was high in all types of arrhythmias irrespective of age (>80, 60‐80, 40‐60 years: AFL 97%/98%/98%, AVNRT 97%/95%/97%, VT 82%/86%/93%). Rate of periprocedural complications were similar in all groups treated for AFL and AVNRT. For VT ablations significant differences were noted between pts > 80 or 60 to 80 years and those aged 40‐60 years (16.1%/14.3%/3.6%). Most complications were infections and groin haematoma. No strokes, iatrogenic atrioventricular blocks and deaths related to the ablation occurred.

Conclusion

Ablation appears safe in pts > 80 years. Success rates were comparable to matched younger cohorts. A significant difference was observed for VT patients.

[Current strategies in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia by catheter ablation : A review]

The treatment of ventricular tachycardia has recently undergone relevant changes as certain interventional treatment options, such as radiofrequency catheter ablation, have gained in importance. Numerous current publications have demonstrated the advantages of catheter ablation compared to conventional therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs in terms of effectiveness and morbidity. Improving the ablation technique and identifying those patient collectives who are most likely to benefit from ablation are still the objectives of current research. The treatment of ventricular tachycardia in the setting of different cardiac and non-cardiac conditions can be challenging and requires understanding of the current procedures and the recommendations for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. This review succinctly summarizes the current research in this evolving field of interventional cardiology.

[Catheter ablation of ventricular extrasystoles and ventricular tachycardia in the elderly]

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of structural heart disease increases with higher age, and thereby the basis for ventricular arrhythmias is created. Catheter ablation has been shown to be an effective therapy option that is very safe and achieves good long-term results in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). Data regarding ablation in patients older than 75 years is sparse, although this patient group was included as a minority in most published VT ablation studies. Data from younger patient collectives may not be transferable to older patient cohorts due to differences in patient comorbidities and baseline characteristics.

METHODS

Studies with patient collectives ≥75 years or even ≥80 years show comparable efficacy of catheter ablation for VT; however, the complication rate is higher, mainly due to groin complications, increases. Catheter ablation of ischemic VT appears effective and safe even in ≥75 year olds; however, extensive data for other structural heart diseases are lacking. Epicardial procedures are also possible and safe in older patients (≥80 years). Due to the significant challenges of VT ablation in older patients, including the consideration of complex comorbidities, these should be performed in specialized centers with high expertise.

CONCLUSION

The aim of catheter ablation in older patients is, above all, to improve quality of life and morbidity. Long-term survival is significantly lower due to the "near end of life" situation than in younger patients. Careful consideration of alternative therapy options, chances for success of the catheter ablation, and their risks, taking into account specific patient conditions and symptoms, is crucial in these patients.