Novel approaches and methods for quantifying Phytophthora cinnamomi in avocado tree roots

Effect of Sampling Time, Quantification Method, and Tree Sample Pooling on Phytophthora cinnamomi Root Quantities in South African Avocado Orchards

Phytophthora cinnamomi is a destructive soilborne pathogen causing Phytophthora root rot on avocados worldwide. Little is known about the effect of root sampling time, root quantification method (quantitative real-time PCR [qPCR] versus baiting), and tree sample pooling strategies on the quantification of the pathogen in roots in avocado orchard trees. This was investigated in six avocado orchards in two climatically different production regions (Mooketsi and Letaba) in the Limpopo Province, South Africa, over a 2-year period. Two different tree sample pooling strategies, consisting of either a four-pooled group (four groups each containing five pooled trees) or a single-pooled group (20 trees pooled) per 1 ha, were both shown to be suitable for quantifying P. cinnamomi in tree roots using qPCR or root baiting. P. cinnamomi root quantities from the two tree sample pooling strategies were significantly correlated for both quantification methods. Both quantification methods were suitable for quantifying the pathogen in roots, although qPCR was superior to root baiting at identifying significant differences in P. cinnamomi quantities among root sampling time points. The effect of sampling time was dependent on the investigated year. In 2017, root quantities, which were only evaluated using qPCR, did not reveal a consistent trend of a specific sampling time yielding the highest root quantities for most of the orchards. However, five of the orchards in 2018, based on the qPCR analyses, contained significantly higher P. cinnamomi root quantities in May (late autumn) than in March (early autumn), August (late winter), and October/November (late spring). In 2018, P. cinnamomi root DNA quantities were significantly positively correlated with the number of soil temperature hours at 20 to 24 and 20 to 29°C 2 months preceding the root sampling dates and negatively correlated with the number of hours at 15 to 19°C 2 months preceding root sampling. Our study has identified P. cinnamomi root quantification methods and tree sample pooling strategies, which will be useful for understanding the biology of the pathogen and when disease management strategies should be in place.

Bacillus mycoides A1 and Bacillus tequilensis A3 inhibit the growth of a member of the phytopathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex in avocado

BACKGROUND

Avocado is affected by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing anthracnose. Antagonistic microorganisms against C. gloeosporioides represent an alternative for biological control. Accordingly, in the present study, we focused on the isolation and characterization of potential antagonist bacteria against a member of the C. gloeosporioides species complex with respect to their possible future application.

RESULTS

Samples of avocado rhizospheric soil were aquired from an orchard located in Ocuituco, Morelos, Mexico, aiming to obtain bacterial isolates with potential antifungal activity. From the soil samples, 136 bacteria were isolated and they were then challenged against a member of the C. gloeosporioides species complex; only three bacterial isolates A1, A2 and A3 significantly diminished mycelial fungal growth by 75%, 70% and 60%, respectively. Two of these isolates were identified by 16S rRNA as Bacillus mycoides (A1 and A2) and the third was identified as Bacillus tequilensis (A3). Bacillus mycoides bacterial cell-free supernatant reduced the mycelial growth of a member of the C. gloeosporioides species complex isolated from avocado by 65%, whereas Bacillus tequilensis A3 supernatant did so by 25% after 3 days post inoculation. Bacillus tequilensis mycoides A1 was a producer of proteases, indolacetic acid and siderophores. Preventive treatment using a cell-free supernatant of B. mycoides A1 diminished the severity of anthracnose disease (41.9%) on avocado fruit.

CONCLUSION

These results reveal the possibility of using B. mycoides A1 as a potential biological control agent. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.