Endometriosis and oocyte quality: an analysis of 13 614 donor oocyte recipient and autologous IVF cycles

Live Birth After Oocyte Donation In Vitro Fertilization Cycles in Women With Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Although multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain the infertility related to endometriosis, there are no conclusive data on the association of endometriosis with endometrial receptivity. The oocyte donation model in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles can clarify this issue.

Objective

To explore the association of a history of endometriosis with ART outcomes in recipients of oocyte donation.

Data Sources

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases were searched from inception until August 31, 2023, using combinations of relevant keywords. Moreover, we retrieved data from the databases of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in the US and the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in the United Kingdom.

Study Selection

Observational studies were included if they investigated the impact of endometriosis on ART outcomes with donor oocytes.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Publicly available data related to ART from various sources were gathered, and a retrospective aggregate and nonaggregate analysis using registries of in vitro fertilization cycles with oocyte or embryo donation was conducted.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR) following oocyte donor cycles. The effect measures of comparisons between groups are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% CI.

Results

This study analyzed 7212 oocyte donation cycles from 4 studies for the meta-analysis, along with 162 082 cycles from 2 registries (137 182 from SART and 24 900 from HFEA). No significant differences between the groups were observed in the meta-analysis of published data after adjusting for confounding factors (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.19-1.57). A statistically significant lower LBR was identified in women with endometriosis when analyzing the aggregate data from SART and HFEA databases (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found a modest decrease in LBR among women with a history of endometriosis, although only results from the pooled analysis of registry data and not those from the meta-analysis reached statistical significance. These findings suggest that a marginal impairment of uterine receptivity may contribute to infertility mechanisms in women affected by endometriosis.

Impact of moderate-to-severe endometriosis on IVF cumulative live birth rate: a retrospective matched cohort study

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does moderate-to-severe endometriosis have an impact on cumulative live birth rates (cLBR) and IVF outcomes?

DESIGN

In this retrospective matched cohort study, women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis undergoing IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment from January 2015 to December 2020 were matched 1:2 to women with other causes of infertility (control group). The main outcome was cLBR per cycle and per woman, and secondary outcomes were number of oocytes retrieved and number of mature oocytes, fertilization rate, total number of embryos and usable embryos, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate per cycle.

RESULTS

In total, 195 women with endometriosis were matched with 390 women without endometriosis (323 and 646 cycles, respectively). Women with endometriosis had significantly fewer oocytes retrieved than women in the control group (P=0.003) despite higher doses of gonadotropins, but had a similar number of mature oocytes, fertilization rate, and total number of embryos and usable embryos. cLBR per cycle and per women did not differ significantly between the endometriosis group and the control group (19.8% versus 24.3%, P = 0.12; 32.3% versus 37.2%, P = 0.24, respectively). In women with endometrioma, a history of cystectomy did not impact cLBR per cycle (28.3% versus 31.9%, P = 0.68). We did not observe any significant impact of tobacco use in the endometriosis group compared with the control group (16.4% versus 25.9%, P = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

This matched cohort study did not observe a significant impact of moderate-to-severe endometriosis on cLBR among women undergoing IVF. These data are reassuring for the counselling of infertile women with endometriosis before IVF.

Oocyte donation outcomes in endometriosis patients with multiple IVF failures

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the reproductive outcomes and the prognostic factors of live birth rates in patients with endometriosis referred to oocyte donation after multiple IVF failures?

DESIGN

Observational cohort study including all women with endometriosis-related infertility and two or more failed IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles referred to oocyte donation between January 2013 and June 2022. Endometriosis was diagnosed based on published imaging criteria, and was confirmed histologically in women who had a history of surgery for endometriosis. The main outcome measured was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The characteristics of women who had a live birth were compared with those who did not using univariate and multivariate analysis to identify determinant factors of fertility outcome.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients underwent 90 oocyte donation cycles after 244 failed autologous IVF cycles. The mean ± SD age of the population was 36.8 ± 3.3 years, with a mean duration of infertility of 3.6 ± 2.2 years, and a mean number of autologous IVF/ICSI cycles of 4.4 ± 2.3 cycles per patient. Three patients (5.3%) had superficial peritoneal endometriosis, two patients (3.5%) had ovarian endometriomas, and 52 patients (91.2%) had deep infiltrating endometriosis, among which 30 patients (57.7%) had bowel lesions. Thirty patients (52.6%) had associated adenomyosis. Overall, CLBR per patient was 36/57 (63.2%). After multivariate analysis, only being nulligravida (P=0.002) remained an independent negative predictive factor of the live birth rate. Previous surgery did not impact reproductive outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that oocyte donation appears to be a viable option to optimize the live birth rate in women with endometriosis-related infertility and recurrent IVF failures.

Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometriosis

Several mechanisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of endometriosis-related infertility. For patients considering surgery, the risk of iatrogenic injury is among the most important factors in the context of fertility preservation, along with age and individual reproductive goals. In the case of endometrioma excision, evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates the negative impact of surgery on ovarian reserve, with significant reductions in antimullerian hormone (up to 30% in unilateral versus up to 44% in bilateral endometriomas). The surgical endometriosis patient should be thoroughly counseled regarding fertility preservation and discussion should include tissue, embryo, and oocyte cryopreservation options. For the latter, data support cryopreservation of 10-15 oocytes in women ≤35 years and over 20 for those >35 years for a realistic chance to achieve one or more live births. When performing surgical interventions for endometriosis, reproductive surgeons should employ fertility-conserving surgical methods to reduce the likelihood of postoperative iatrogenic diminished ovarian reserve.

Endometriosis, Oocyte, and Embryo Quality

Endometriosis is a common finding among women with infertility, and women who are diagnosed with endometriosis are almost twice as likely to experience infertility. Mechanisms by which endometriosis causes infertility remain poorly understood. In this review, we evaluate the current literature on the impact of endometriosis on oocyte and embryo quality. The presence of endometriosis evidently reduces ovarian reserve, oocyte quality, and embryo quality; however, this does not appear to translate to a clear clinical impact. Analysis of data from large assisted reproduction technology registries has shown that women with endometriosis have a lower oocyte yield but no reduction in reproductive outcomes. There is a need for future studies in the form of well-designed randomized controlled trials to further evaluate the role of surgical and medical treatment options in women with endometriosis undergoing assisted conception.

Endometriosis-associated infertility: From pathophysiology to tailored treatment

Despite the clinically recognized association between endometriosis and infertility, the mechanisms implicated in endometriosis-associated infertility are not fully understood. Endometriosis is a multifactorial and systemic disease that has pleiotropic direct and indirect effects on reproduction. A complex interaction between endometriosis subtype, pain, inflammation, altered pelvic anatomy, adhesions, disrupted ovarian reserve/function, and compromised endometrial receptivity as well as systemic effects of the disease define endometriosis-associated infertility. The population of infertile women with endometriosis is heterogeneous, and diverse patients' phenotypes can be observed in the clinical setting, thus making difficult to establish a precise diagnosis and a single mechanism of endometriosis related infertility. Moreover, clinical management of infertility associated with endometriosis can be challenging due to this heterogeneity. Innovative non-invasive diagnostic tools are on the horizon that may allow us to target the specific dysfunctional alteration in the reproduction process. Currently the treatment should be individualized according to the clinical situation and to the suspected level of impairment. Here we review the etiology of endometriosis related infertility as well as current treatment options, including the roles of surgery and assisted reproductive technologies.