Custodiol-N™ cardioplegia lowers cerebral inflammation and activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α

Myocardial protection in cardiac surgery-hindsight from the 2020s

Myocardial protection and specifically cardioplegia have been extensively investigated in the beginnings of cardiac surgery. After cardiopulmonary bypass had become routine, more and more cardiac operations were possible, requiring reliable and reproducible protection for times of blood flow interruptions to the most energy-demanding organ of the body. The concepts of hypothermia and cardioplegia evolved as tools to extend cardiac ischaemia tolerance to a degree considered safe for the required operation. A plethora of different solutions and delivery techniques were developed achieving remarkable outcomes with cross-clamp times of up to 120 min and more. With the beginning of the new millennium, interest in myocardial protection research declined and, as a consequence, conventional cardiac surgery is currently performed using myocardial protection strategies that have not changed in decades. However, the context, in which cardiac surgery is currently performed, has changed during this time. Patients are now older and suffer from more comorbidities and, thus, other organs move more and more into the centre of risk assessment. Yet, systemic effects of cardioplegic solutions have never been in the focus of attention. They say hindsight is always 20-20. We therefore review the biochemical principles of ischaemia, reperfusion and cardioplegic extension of ischaemia tolerance and address the concepts of myocardial protection with 'hindsight from the 2020s'. In light of rising patient risk profiles, minimizing surgical trauma and improving perioperative morbidity management becomes key today. For cardioplegia, this means accounting not only for cardiac, but also for systemic effects of cardioplegic solutions.

Relevance and Recommendations for the Application of Cardioplegic Solutions in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery in Pigs

Cardioplegic solutions play a major role in cardiac surgery due to the fact that they create a silent operating field and protect the myocardium against ischemia and reperfusion injury. For studies on cardioplegic solutions, it is important to compare their effects and to have a valid platform for preclinical testing of new cardioplegic solutions and their additives. Due to the strong anatomical and physiological cardiovascular similarities between pigs and humans, porcine models are suitable for investigating the effects of cardioplegic solutions. This review provides an overview of the results of the application of cardioplegic solutions in adult or pediatric pig models over the past 25 years. The advantages, disadvantages, limitations, and refinement strategies of these models are discussed.

Impact of Custodiol-N cardioplegia on acute kidney injury after cardiopulmonary bypass

Myocardial protection during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can be achieved using cardioplegic solutions. Although, acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication following CPB, the effects of cardioplegic solutions on AKI have rarely been investigated. Within this study, the effects of the cardioplegic solutions histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK; Custodiol) and HTK-N (Custodiol-N) on AKI in a large animal model were compared. Therefore, Landrace pigs underwent median sternotomy, CPB at 34°C, 90 minutes of cardiac arrest and 120 minutes of reperfusion. Animals were randomized for single-shot cardioplegia with either HTK (n = 10) or HTK-N (n = 10). Renal biopsies and sera were analyzed to determine AKI biomarkers and apoptosis. Compared to HTK, HTK-N induced a decreased extent of proximal tubule swelling (48.3 ± 1.6 µm vs 52.3 ± 1.1 µm, P = .05) and decreased cytochrome c release (0.26 ± 0.04 vs 0.46 ± 0.08, P = .04) without reaching statistical significance due to Bonferroni correction. Comparing baseline and postreperfusion levels, the hemoglobin (Hb) and blood calcium levels were lower in HTK-N (Hb_baseline : 6.0 ± 0.6 mmol/L, Hb_reperfusion : 6.2 ± 0.7 mmol/L, P = .12; Ca²⁺ _baseline : 1.36 ± 0.05 mmol/L, Ca²⁺ _reperfusion : 1.28 ± 0.05 mmol/L, P = .16) compared to the HTK group (Hb_baseline : 5.9 ± 0.4 mmol/L, Hb_reperfusion : 4.7 ± 0.8 mmol/L, P < .01; Ca²⁺ _baseline : 1.34 ± 0.07 mmol/L, Ca²⁺ _reperfusion : 1.24 ± 0.06 mmol/L, P < .01). The present study showed that HTK-N could positively affect the kidney during CPB. Hb and calcium levels were stabilized. A statistical trend was found showing that AKI-related proximal tubule swelling and cytochrome c release were diminished.