Subsequent primary cancer risk among five-year survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers

Burden of Morbidity and Mortality in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors

There are an estimated 650,00 survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers in the United States, a number that is expected to markedly increase in the coming decades. The recognition of the potential for some cancer treatments to affect the health of patients for many years after the initial diagnosis has prompted investigators to examine the evolving burden of late morbidity and mortality in AYAs with cancer after treatment completion. Studies in large international cohorts of AYA cancer survivors have now shown that the burden of late effects in survivors treated during the past four decades is substantial, affecting the health and well-being of the survivor, health systems' preparedness to meet their health care needs in the future, and societal economic costs that are largely affected by loss of productivity. We highlight the unique considerations for AYA cancer survivors, identify gaps in knowledge for future research, and provide an overview of emerging efforts to mitigate late effects in these survivors. Ongoing multidisciplinary bench-to-bedside collaborations are critical to understanding the biology of late effects in AYA cancer survivors and to developing personalized interventions to mitigate them. The growing population of AYA cancer survivors makes it imperative that these efforts extend across the cancer care continuum, which will allow survivors to ultimately live to their fullest potential.

Health Care Transitions Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer

Survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers, defined as individuals diagnosed with a primary malignancy between age 15 and 39 years, are a growing population with unique developmental, psychosocial, and health-related needs. These individuals are at excess risk of developing a wide range of chronic comorbidities compared with the general population and, therefore, require lifelong, risk-based, survivorship care to optimize long-term health outcomes. The health care needs of survivors of AYA cancers are particularly complicated given the often heterogeneous and sometimes fragmented care they receive throughout the cancer care continuum. For example, AYA survivors are often treated in disparate settings (pediatric v adult) on dissimilar protocols that include different recommendations for longitudinal follow-up. Specialized tools and techniques are needed to ensure that AYA survivors move seamlessly from acute cancer care to survivorship care and, in many cases, from pediatric to adult clinics while still remaining engaged in long-term follow-up. Systematic, age-appropriate transitional practices involving well-established clinical models of care, survivorship care plans, and survivorship guidelines are needed to facilitate effective transitions between providers. Future studies are necessary to enhance and optimize the clinical effectiveness of transition processes in AYA cancer survivors.

Health Care Access Barriers and Self-Reported Health Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors

Purpose: Adolescents and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors (15-39 years at diagnosis) are at risk for treatment-related late effects but face barriers in accessing survivorship care. We examined the prevalence of five health care access (HCA) barriers: affordability, accessibility, availability, accommodation, and acceptability. Methods: We identified AYA survivors from the University of North Carolina (UNC) Cancer Survivorship Cohort who completed a baseline questionnaire in 2010-2016. Participants had a history of cancer, were ≥18 years of age, and receiving care at a UNC oncology clinic. The sample was restricted to AYA survivors who were interviewed ≥1 year postdiagnosis. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) for the association between HCA barriers and self-reported fair or poor health, adjusted for sociodemographic and cancer characteristics. Results: The sample included 146 AYA survivors who were a median age of 39 at the time of the survey. The majority (71%)-and 92% of non-Hispanic Black survivors-reported at least one HCA barrier, including acceptability (40%), accommodation (38%), or affordability (31%). More than one-quarter of survivors (28%) reported fair or poor health. Affordability barriers (PR: 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-3.18) and acceptability barriers (PR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.96-2.66) were associated with a higher prevalence of fair/poor health, as were the cumulative effects of multiple HCA dimensions reported as barriers. Conclusions: Barriers across multiple HCA dimensions were prevalent and associated with worse health in AYA survivors. Findings highlight the need to better understand and target specific barriers to care for diverse AYA survivors to improve their long-term health.

Long-term second primary cancer risk in adolescent and young adult (15-39 years) cancer survivors: a population-based study in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2018

BACKGROUND

Few studies have comprehensively investigated the long-term second cancer risk among adolescent and young adult (AYA, aged 15-39 years) cancer survivors. This study investigated the long-term second cancer risk by including the full range of first and second cancer combinations with at least 10 observations in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2018.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First and second primary cancer data of all 6-month AYA cancer survivors were obtained from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Excess cancer risk compared to the general population was assessed with standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and absolute excess risk (AER) statistics up to 25 years after diagnosis. Cumulative incidences were estimated, using death as a competing risk factor. Analyses were carried out with and without applying multiple cancer rules.

RESULTS

The cohort included 99 502 AYA cancer survivors. Male survivors had a 2-fold higher risk of developing any cancer compared to the general population, whereas this was around 1.3-fold in females. AERs were 17.5 and 10.1 per 10 000 person-years for males and females. The long-term excess risk of cancer was significantly higher for most first and second primary cancer combinations, but comparable and lower risk estimates were also observed. Application of the multiple cancer rules resulted in a noticeable risk underestimation in melanoma, testicular, and breast cancer survivors. Risk outcomes remained similar in most cases otherwise. The cumulative incidence of second cancer overall increased over time up to 8.9% in males and 10.3% in females at 25 years' follow-up. Highest long-term cumulative incidences were observed among lymphoma survivors (13.3% males and 18.9% females).

CONCLUSIONS

AYA cancer survivors have a higher cancer risk compared to the general population for most cancers up to 25 years after their initial cancer diagnosis. Additional studies that investigate risk factors for the specific cancer type combinations are needed to develop personalized follow-up strategies.

Have we made progress in taking care of adolescents and young adults with cancer? Results of a European multi-professional survey

BACKGROUND

It is well documented that traditional health care models do not meet the specific needs of Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) cancer patients.

METHODS

We explore a map of the development of age-specific AYA cancer care across Europe, from the perspective of healthcare professionals with an interest in AYA care, in order to understand the specific challenges and map progress over time. An on-line survey was developed by international professional cancer organisations.

RESULTS

We had 377 respondents from 60 countries. The majority of respondents were physicians 298 (79%), a minority of survey respondents (39, 10.4%) work exclusively with AYA patients, most respondents declared substantial and routine clinical service collaborations to provide care and treatment to AYA with cancer. Policy for the multidisciplinary management of AYA cancer patients commonly appears in Europe now, and was reported by 234 (78.52%) respondents. Specific professional training for AYA cancer care is not uniformly available.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable opportunity for many organisations to work together in raising the profile of AYA cancer related issues, in providing education and in encouraging research and collaboration.

Opportunities to Improve HPV Vaccination Among Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors by Engaging both Oncology and Primary Care Teams

The incidence of second primary cancers is rising particularly among pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (PAYA) cancer survivors. While human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers can be prevented by vaccination, their uptake is lower and delayed in this group. Because a recommendation from a health care provider is the strongest predictor of HPV vaccination, there are great opportunities for PAYA cancer care providers to positively impact HPV vaccination rates. Prioritizing PAYA cancer care provider education as well as improving the education of and coordination with primary care providers are viewed as opportunities to encourage HPV vaccine uptake and prevent future cancers. See related article by Garcia et al., p. 581.

Risk of second primary cancers in patients with rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis

Background

While an elevated risk of second primary cancers (SPCs) has been observed in many other cancers, risk of SPCs has not been quantified in patients with rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

Methods

Survivors of primary rectal NENs diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 registries. Relative risk of SPCs was estimated as the standardized incidence ratio (SIR), which was calculated using SEER*Stat software.

Results

Between 2000 and 2018, a total of 15836 patients diagnosed with rectal NENs, of whom 1436 (9.1%) received diagnosis of SPCs (SIR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.13-1.26). The majority of patients were aged 50-69 and had their first cancer diagnosed at the localized stage. Male survivors had a higher propensity for developing SPCs overall, while female survivors exhibited higher risks of specific SPCs. Age at diagnosis of rectal NENs influenced the risk of SPCs, with younger patients having greater risks. A statistically significant increase in the incidence of SPCs was observed among patients aged 30-64 years. Black patients had higher relative risks of certain SPCs, while White patients had a lower risk of subsequent melanoma. Trend analysis revealed that the highest excess burden of SPCs was observed in the years 2000 to 2002. Risk of SPCs remained elevated within the first four years post-diagnosis for survivors of rectal NENs, but diminished thereafter.

Conclusion

The study revealed that individuals who survived rectal NENs were at an elevated risk of developing SPCs compared to the general population. Our results hold important implications for the formulation of lifelong surveillance recommendations for cancer survivors.

Risk of second primary malignancies in survivors of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from 2000 to 2018

BACKGROUND AND AIM

As a result of improved survival, cancer survivors continue to remain at risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs). However, the association between first primary pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) and SPMs has not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-18 database, patients histologically diagnosed with PanNENs as their first malignancy between 2000 and 2018 were identified. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and excess absolute risks per 10 000 person-years of SPMs were calculated to estimate the risk of being diagnosed with subsequent cancers compared with the general population.

RESULTS

A total of 489 (5.7%) PanNENs survivors developed an SPM during the follow up, with a median latency between first and second cancer diagnoses of 32.0 months. The overall SIR of SPMs was 1.30 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.42) and the excess absolute risk was 35.67 cases per 10 000 person-years in comparison with the general population. Age 25-64 years at PanNENs diagnosis was associated with statistically higher risks for SPMs of all cancers combined. Latency stratification was significant for elevated SPMs risk between 2-23 and 84+ months after diagnosis. White patients were found to have a significantly increased incidence of SPMs (SIR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.35), mainly owing to the higher risk of stomach, small intestine, pancreas, kidney and renal pelvis, and thyroid cancers.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms survivors experience a significant increase in the burden of SPMs compared with the reference population. The heightened relative risk calls for careful long-term scrutiny as part of survivorship care plans.

Reducing Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Outcome Disparities Through Optimized Care Delivery: A Blueprint from the Children's Oncology Group

Achieving equitable, high-quality cancer care delivery across socioeconomically and biologically diverse populations requires multilevel interventions, including those at the patient, provider, institution, and policy levels that influence cost, quality, and access to care. For adolescent and young adults (AYAs), who experience suboptimal health outcomes compared with younger and older people with cancer, cancer care delivery is influenced by additional contextual factors unique to the patients' developmental stage, psychosocial and economic status, and cancer subtype. In this review, we highlight the most pressing research needs in AYA cancer care delivery and opportunities to improve outcomes for this population.

Sex differences in comorbid conditions, health behaviors, health care utilization, and health-related quality of life among young adult cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Although cancer experiences and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) differ by sex, little is known about how sex affects comorbid conditions, health behaviors, health service utilization, and HRQOL in young adult (YA) cancer survivors. We sought to determine the relationship of sex to these factors in this population.

METHODS

This matched case-control, cross-sectional study used data from the Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for 2015-2019. YA survivors aged 18-39 years, were matched to controls. Chi-square and multiple logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between sex and the measured factors.

RESULTS

The analysis included 276 YA survivors and 828 controls. Male survivors were more likely than male controls to have a depressive disorder (OR = 3.06, p = 0.007), smoke (OR = 3.87, p < 0.001), and forgo health care because of cost (OR = 5.60, p < 0.001). Female survivors were more likely than female controls to have at least one comorbidity (OR = 3.52, p < 0.001), forgo health care because of cost (OR = 3.03, p < 0.001), and report poorer HRQOL (aORs = 1.52-2.22, p < 0.05). Female survivors were more likely to have at least one comorbid condition (aOR = 1.70, p = 0.02) than male survivors.

CONCLUSION

YA cancer survivors differed in their health outcomes from both the general population and by sex. Tailored, sex-based interventions are needed to decrease long-term morbidity and improve HROQL in this population.

Adolescent and young adult cancers: unmet needs and closing the gaps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a growing population of adolescent and young adult (AYA, ages 15-39 years) cancer patients and survivors, and the field of AYA oncology is rapidly evolving. Despite an increased focus on survival and quality of life for AYAs, gaps in knowledge remain. The current review focuses on what is known across several domains unique to AYA cancer care as well as areas of improvement and future directions in research and intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Due to the developmental stages included in the AYA age range, a cancer diagnosis and treatment can affect relationships, education and employment, finances, and long-term health differently than diagnoses in younger or older populations. Recent studies that have focused on these unique aspects of AYA cancer care, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), fertility, financial toxicity, barriers to clinical trial enrollment, genetic predisposition, and survivorship care are included in the current review.

SUMMARY

Although studies have described many of the challenges faced by AYAs across the cancer continuum from diagnosis to survivorship, more work is needed, particularly in systematically measuring HRQoL, eliminating barriers to clinical trial enrollment, addressing financial toxicity, and increasing access to fertility preservation and high-quality survivorship care.