Hemodialysis nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practices in managing vascular access: A cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia

Hemodialysis continues to be the primary approach for renal replacement therapy. Vascular access (VA), particularly arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft, is the preferred technique for establishing hemodialysis access due to its lower risk of infection and central venous stenosis compared to catheters. The aim of this cross-sectional investigation was to examine hemodialysis nurses' knowledge, confidence, and practices in managing VA in Saudi Arabia. This is an online cross-sectional survey study that was conducted in Saudi Arabia between June and August 2023. This study utilized a previously validated questionnaire. Examined dialysis nurses' knowledge, attitude, practice, and self-efficacy pertaining to VA cannulation and evaluation. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of better knowledge of dialysis VA. A total of 197 participants were involved in this study. Around one-third of the study participants (37.0%) reported that they have received specialized training in managing VA. Participants agreement (answered agree or strongly agree) on statements that examined attitudes toward dialysis VA cannulation and management was high and ranged between 75.0% and 93.0%. The majority of participants (97.5%) reported that they perform this assessment. Most nurses (65%) preferred the rope-ladder technique. Participants agreement on statements that examined self-efficacy on dialysis VA cannulation and management was high and ranged between 72.1% and 98.0%. The most commonly agreed upon statement was that "they have confident in performing hemodialysis access (arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft) assessment before cannulation." With 98.0% (answered agree and strongly agree). The mean knowledge score for our study sample was 6.4 (SD: 2.0) out of 12 (53.3%); which reflects marginal-level of knowledge on dialysis VA. Binary logistic regression analysis identified that nurses who have undergraduate degree are 92% more likely to be knowledgeable on dialysis VA compared to others (P < .05). Concerning VA, the level of knowledge among hemodialysis nurses working in Saudi Arabia was inadequate. Nurses who hold an undergraduate degree are presumed to have a more extensive understanding of dialysis VA. Further education programs are necessary for HD nurses to enhance their knowledge of VA, thereby optimizing their professional practices and enhancing the outcomes for their patients.

Comparison of puncture methods in patients with hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft is essential to long-term survival and quality of life in patients receiving hemodialysis. To date, no research has examined the clinical impacts of different puncture methods. This study compared the rope ladder and area puncture techniques in terms of vascular patency, pain, and quality of life among patients receiving hemodialysis.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal study was performed with 6-month follow-up. A total of 98 participants recruited from a hemodialysis center in Taiwan were randomly assigned to receive the rope ladder technique (experimental group) or the area puncture technique (control group). Vascular patency was assessed by examining access flow and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty rate. Pain and quality of life were measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Kidney Disease Quality of Life Instrument (KDQOL-36™), respectively. All outcome variables were measured repeatedly and analyzed using a generalized estimating equation.

RESULTS

Overall, quality of life was significantly better for the experimental group than for the control group (β = 47.23, p < 0.001). The percutaneous transluminal angioplasty rate was lower for the experimental group than for the control group (12.0% vs. 18.8%). However, no significant differences were found in access flow and pain level between the two groups over time.

CONCLUSION

Hemodialysis patients who received the rope ladder puncture technique had a lower percutaneous angioplasty rate and better quality of life than patients who received the area puncture technique, suggesting that the rope ladder technique could be implemented as a routine cannulation method in hemodialysis clinics.

Dialysis nurses’ knowledge, attitude, practice and self-efficacy regarding vascular access: A cross-sectional study in Singapore

Introduction:

Dialysis nurses play a paramount role in vascular access (VA) management. The aim of this study is to evaluate dialysis nurses’ knowledge, attitude, practice and self-efficacy (KACP-SE) pertaining to VA cannulation and evaluation.

Method:

An anonymous self-administered survey was administered to dialysis nurses from two tertiary hospitals (four dialysis units) and two community dialysis centres from April to May 2022. The 37-items survey consists of four dimensions of questions relating to VA cannulation and management: knowledge, attitude, practice and self-efficacy. The content validity and face validity of the survey was reviewed by three experienced VA professionals and five dialysis nurses respectively. The internal consistency and construct validity of the survey have been assessed with psychometric tests.

Results:

There were 23 and 47 nurses, working in the participated community and tertiary hospital dialysis centres respectively, responded to the survey. The internal consistency coefficients indicated acceptable reliability of the instrument (KR-20 coefficient was 0.55 and 0.76 for knowledge and practice domains; Cronbach’s α was 0.85 and 0.64 for self-efficacy and attitude domains). In the exploratory factor analysis for attitude and self-efficacy, the instrument could account for 64.0% and 53.0% of the total variance respectively. In the knowledge domain, five out of eight single-select multiple-choice questions were correctly answered by >70% of the participants. Overall, the mean (±SD) of participants’ total self-efficacy score was 24.3 (±3.1) over total score of 30. The majority of the participants (82.4%) either agreed or strongly agreed that ultrasound guidance is useful for cannulation.

Conclusion:

This KAP-SE instrument can be used to evaluate knowledge, attitude, practice and self-efficacy of dialysis nurses toward VA management. The participants demonstrated acceptable knowledge level, but with some knowledge gaps identified. It also revealed nurses’ good self-efficacy level and welcoming attitude towards adopting ultrasound in VA cannulation among the participants.

Effect of buttonhole cannulation versus rope-ladder cannulation in hemodialysis patients with vascular access: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/clinical controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Safe and effective arteriovenous fistula (AVF) puncture techniques must be used to reduce harm to hemodialysis patients. The relative benefits of buttonhole (BH) cannulation over those of rope ladder (RL) cannulation for AVF remain unclear and inconsistent.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature searches were conducted in June 2020 in multiple scientific databases including Cochrane library, CINAHL, PubMed/ Medline, Airiti Library, National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan, Google scholar, Embase, and ProQuest. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) that explored the efficacy of BH cannulation in hemodialysis patients. These included reports published in either English or Chinese that enrolled adults aged 18 years or older who underwent hemodialysis using an autogenous AVF. Studies that showed poor design, such as use of a self-control group or no control group, were excluded from analysis. The critical appraisal skills program checklist for RCTs were used to assess the quality of the evidence and RevMan software were used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (11 RCTs and 4 CCTs) met the inclusion criteria and were used for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that BH cannulation significantly reduced aneurysm formation (RR = 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.1, 0.32]), stenosis (RR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.25, 0.77]), thrombosis formation (RR = 0.4, 95% CI [0.2, 0.8]), and hematoma (RR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.40, 0.99]) and showed no differences in AVR infection (≦6 months, RR = 2.17, 95% CI [0.76, 6.23]; >6 months, RR = 2.7, 95% CI [0.92, 7.92]) compared to RL cannulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the benefits of BH, this meta-analysis found that BH cannulation should be recommended as a routine procedure for hemodialysis but that hospitals and hemodialysis clinics should strengthen staff knowledge and skills of BH cannulation to reduce the risk of AVF infection.

Direction- and Angle-Assisted Buttonhole Cannulation of Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Rationale & Objective

Arteriovenous fistula cannulation with the buttonhole technique is often preferred by patients but has been associated with an increased infection risk. Guidelines disagree on whether it should be abandoned, thus we assessed a technologically simple method to facilitate gentler arteriovenous fistula cannulation with potentially less discomfort and damage to the epithelial lining of the buttonhole tract.

Study Design

8-week, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

Setting & Participants

Patients with buttonhole tracts receiving hemodialysis at 7 dialysis centers in Norway were randomized to the intervention group (43 patients, 658 cannulations) or control group (40 patients, 611 cannulations).

Intervention

Direction and angle of the established buttonhole tract were marked on the forearm skin in the intervention group, whereas the control group had no structured cannulation information system.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was successful cannulation, defined as correct placement of both blunt needles at the first attempt without needing to change needles, perform extra perforations, or reposition the needle. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported difficulty of cannulation (verbal rating scale: 1 = very easy, 6 = impossible) and intensity of pain (numeric rating scale: 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain).

Results

After a 2-week run-in period, successful cannulation was achieved in 73.9% and 74.8% of the patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.12; P = 0.85). However, the probability of a difficult arterial cannulation (verbal rating scale, 3-6) was significantly lower in the intervention group (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P = 0.001). There were no improvements for venous cannulations. Furthermore, the probability of a painful cannulation (numeric rating scale, 3-10) was lower in the intervention group (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.02; P = 0.06).

Limitations

Unable to evaluate hard end points such as infections and thrombosis owing to the small sample size.

Conclusions

Marking direction and angle of cannulation did not improve cannulation success rates; however, patients more often reported an unproblematic procedure and less pain.

Funding

None.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01536548).

A time-saving method of creating AVF buttonholes: indwelling trocar technique

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the convenience and practicality of the method of establishing buttonholes with indwelling trocars.

BACKGROUND

Compared with rope-ladder technique, buttonhole cannulation has better applicability for haemodialysis patients, and the method of buttonhole establishment is particularly important.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational and cohort study.

METHODS

We conducted a 12-month observational study on 30 patients who used sharp needles to establish buttonholes and 33 patients who used indwelling trocars to establish buttonholes, and compared the differences between the two groups in the buttonhole formation time, patient-reported cannulation pain, buttonhole success rate, AVF-related infection and patency of AVF. The study adhered to STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

The buttonhole formation time of the indwelling trocar group is less than that of the sharp needle group (5.48 ± 0.51 vs. 23.23 ± 3.07, p < .01). When the buttonhole was used for the first time, the cannulation pain of the indwelling trocar group was less than that of the sharp needle group (4.94 ± 1.50 vs. 6.03 ± 1.13, p = .002), but there was no significant difference in this result after 1 month (sharp needle group with 4.50 ± 0.94 vs. indwelling trocar group with 4.12 ± 1.19, p = .169). Compared with all the buttonholes in the indwelling trocar group were established successfully, there were 5 unsuccessful buttonholes in the sharp needle group (p = .02). Three cases of unsuccessful buttonhole patients in the sharp needle group developed AVF-related infection, this result did not appear in the indwelling trocar group (p = .102). The difference in arterial pressure and venous pressure between the two groups was not significant (p = .061, p = .222).

CONCLUSIONS

Our new method can help buttonhole patients get less track formation time, less cannulation pain, and less fistula infection, thereby bringing them a more comfortable dialysis experience.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The new method used in this study not only meets the needs of patients to protect AVF, but also provides convenience for clinical work. In addition, this study analyzed the causes of the AVF infection in buttonhole patients, and provided directions for future research.

Puncture Site Necrosis Over Hemodialysis Native and Prosthetic Vascular Accesses

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to detail our experience in the management of skin necrosis/ulceration over hemodialysis vascular accesses.

METHODS

We collected demographics and operative data about patients undergoing surgery for skin necrosis over native or prosthetic vascular accesses. The different procedural techniques used and outcomes achieved were analyzed.

RESULTS

Over a six-year period (2013-2019), 593 hemodialysis accesses were created and 16 patients (50%, 8 male; median age 63.6 years, range 42-87; 12 native and 4 prosthetic accesses) were emergently/urgently treated for skin necrosis with danger of rupture (n 9), minor active bleeding (n 4) or life-threatening hemorrhage (n 3). Underlying causes were local infection, aneurysm/pseudo-aneurysm formation and venous stenosis. Most accesses were preserved. Rescue procedures consisted in excision of skin necrosis in association with aneurysmorrhaphy (n 1, 6.3%), simple closure of the venous breach (n 2, 12.5%) or resection and direct re-anastomosis (n 7, 43.8%). Concomitant endoluminal dilatation of venous outflow was needed in 7 (43.8%) cases. No intraoperative complications were observed. At a median of 13 months (range 1-39), 90% of rescued accesses were still functional.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin necrosis/ulceration over vascular access requires prompt surgical intervention ahead the risk of life-threatening hemorrhage. The rescue of a functional access is possible in most patients and provides an efficient dialysis in postoperative period.

Considerations in Access Cannulation: Traditional and Evolving Approaches

Needle cannulation of hemodialysis access is the soft underbelly of hemodialysis access care that has remained unchanged for a long time. Cannulation error results in complications such as infiltration, hematoma, subsequent revision procedures, and potential loss of hard-earned access. The "best" cannulation method is contingent upon access type and characteristics along with local expertise. The rope ladder technique of cannulation, characterized by successive rotation of puncture sites with each hemodialysis session, permits sufficient time for healing of prior cannulation sites, and reduction in complications such as bleeding, infection, and aneurysm development. A steeper needle angle, higher blood flow rates, and deep needle tip can lead to wall stress on the posterior wall and up to 10 cm from the needle cannulation site. Plastic cannulas provide a viable alternative to metallic needles; they have lower complications and a favorable cost-benefit ratio. There is lack of evidence to support an optimal arterial needle direction configuration. Needle injury may promote intimal thickening, but its effect on access outcomes is currently unknown. Percutaneous creation of arteriovenous fistula presents new challenges in dialysis access cannulation. Point-of-care ultrasound-guided cannulation will likely lead to a paradigm shift in access cannulation. Novel care delivery using cannulation stations is a promising development.

Identifying critically important vascular access outcomes for trials in haemodialysis: an international survey with patients, caregivers and health professionals

Background

Vascular access outcomes reported across haemodialysis (HD) trials are numerous, heterogeneous and not always relevant to patients and clinicians. This study aimed to identify critically important vascular access outcomes.

Method

Outcomes derived from a systematic review, multi-disciplinary expert panel and patient input were included in a multilanguage online survey. Participants rated the absolute importance of outcomes using a 9-point Likert scale (7–9 being critically important). The relative importance was determined by a best–worst scale using multinomial logistic regression. Open text responses were analysed thematically.

Results

The survey was completed by 873 participants [224 (26%) patients/caregivers and 649 (74%) health professionals] from 58 countries. Vascular access function was considered the most important outcome (mean score 7.8 for patients and caregivers/8.5 for health professionals, with 85%/95% rating it critically important, and top ranked on best–worst scale), followed by infection (mean 7.4/8.2, 79%/92% rating it critically important, second rank on best–worst scale). Health professionals rated all outcomes of equal or higher importance than patients/caregivers, except for aneurysms. We identified six themes: necessity for HD, applicability across vascular access types, frequency and severity of debilitation, minimizing the risk of hospitalization and death, optimizing technical competence and adherence to best practice and direct impact on appearance and lifestyle.

Conclusions

Vascular access function was the most critically important outcome among patients/caregivers and health professionals. Consistent reporting of this outcome across trials in HD will strengthen their value in supporting vascular access practice and shared decision making in patients requiring HD.

Bacteriology of the Buttonhole Cannulation Tract in Hemodialysis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The buttonhole cannulation technique for arteriovenous fistulas is widely used, but has been associated with an increased rate of vascular access-related infections. We describe the frequency and type of bacterial colonization of the buttonhole tract over time and associated clinical infections.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational cohort study with 9 months of follow-up.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

84 in-center hemodialysis patients using the buttonhole cannulation technique at 2 Danish dialysis centers.

OUTCOMES

Bacterial growth from the buttonhole tract and dialysis cannula tip and clinically important infections during follow-up.

MEASUREMENTS

On 3 occasions 1 month apart, cultures before dialysis (from the skin surrounding the buttonhole before disinfection and from the cannulation tract after disinfection and scab removal) and the cannula tip after dialysis. Patients with positive cultures from the buttonhole tract or cannula tip had repeat cultures within 1 week, along with blood cultures.

RESULTS

Growth from the cannulation tract and/or cannula tip at each of the 3 monthly sets of cultures was found in 18%, 20%, and 17% of patients, respectively. 38% of patients had at least 1 positive culture from the buttonhole tract. Sustained growth was detected in 11% of patients, whereas asymptomatic bacteremia was seen in 30% of those with positive buttonhole cultures. Staphylococci species were the most common pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, 25%; and Staphylococcus epidermidis, 41%). Colonization-positive buttonholes had more localized redness and slightly more tenderness. During follow-up, significantly more access-related infections were diagnosed among those with positive buttonhole cultures (P<0.001).

LIMITATIONS

No comparison to area puncture cannulation technique. Blood cultures were obtained only from patients with positive buttonhole bacteriology.

CONCLUSIONS

Transient or sustained colonization of the buttonhole tract by staphylococci and asymptomatic bacteremia is common in hemodialysis patients, implying a substantial risk for access-related infections among patients using a buttonhole cannulation technique. These findings suggest the possible value of surveillance of buttonhole colonization.