Viable C5 and C6 Proximal Stump Use in Reconstructive Surgery of the Adult Brachial Plexus Traction Injuries

Validation of the Root Analysis Score for C5 Viability in Patients With Pan-Brachial Plexus Injury

PURPOSE

Pan-brachial plexus injury patients present a reconstructive challenge. The root analysis score, developed from parsimonious multivariable modeling of 311 pan-brachial plexus injury patients, determines the probability of having a viable C5 nerve based on four categories: positive C5 Tinel test, intact C5 nerve on computed tomography myelogram, lack of hemidiaphragmatic elevation, and absence of midcervical paraspinal fibrillations.

METHODS

Root analysis scores were calculated for a separate cohort of patients with pan-brachial plexus injuries. Scores were validated by the presence or absence of a graftable C5 root, based on supraclavicular exploration and intraoperative electrophysiologic testing. Receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, and concordance statistic of the scores were calculated. Patients were divided into three root analysis score cohorts: less than 50 (low), 50-75 (average), and 75-100 points (high) based on dividing the score into quartiles and combining the lowest two. The probability, sensitivity, and specificity of each cohort having an available C5 nerve were based on the intraoperative assessment.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (mean age, 33.1 years; 15 women and 65 men) were included. Thirty-one patients (39%) had a viable C5 nerve. The root analysis calculator had an overall accuracy of 82.5%, a receiver operating characteristic of 0.87, and a concordance statistic of 0.87, demonstrating high overall predictive value; 6.5% of patients with a score of less than 50 (94% sensitivity and 43% specificity), 16.1% of patients with a score of 50-75 (94% sensitivity and 67% specificity), and 77.4% of patients with a score of 75-100 (77% sensitivity and 90% specificity) had a graftable C5 nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

The root analysis score demonstrated high accuracy and predictive power for a viable C5 nerve. In patients with a score of less than 50, the necessity of supraclavicular root exploration should balance patient factors, presentation timing, and concomitant injuries.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnosis II.

A Brief History of Peripheral Nerve Surgery in Serbia

Peripheral nerve surgery in Serbia has become the most fruitful subsection of national neurosurgery, with international recognition of Serbian surgeons and institutions. We chronicle landmark events in the history of the field in Serbia, highlighting the development of the field over time and outlining future prospects. This manuscript provides an example of the development of peripheral nerve surgery and associated training in a challenging social, political, and economic context and may guide the development of peripheral nerve surgery care and training in other settings.

Peripheral nerve surgery in Serbia: "Think global, act local" and the privilege of service

Introduction

The phrase "think globally, act locally", which has often been used to refer to conservation of the environment, highlights the importance of maintaining a holistic perspective and stipulates that each individual has a role to play in their community and larger world. Although peripheral nerve surgery has been largely unemphasized in global neurosurgical efforts, a wide disparity in peripheral nerve surgery is presumed to exist between high-income and low- and middle-income countries. Serbia is an upper middle-income country with a long history of peripheral nerve surgery.

Research question

How can understanding the development of peripheral nerve surgery in Serbia advance global education and improve peripheral nerve surgery worldwide?

Material and methods

An anecdotal and narrative review of recent advances in peripheral nerve surgery in Serbia was conducted. The World Federation of Neurosurgical Society (WFNS) Peripheral Nerve Surgery Committee discussions on improving peripheral nerve surgery education were summarized.

Results

In this manuscript, we describe the application of "think globally, act locally" to peripheral nerve surgery by providing an account of the development of peripheral nerve surgery in Serbia. Then, we report measures taken by the WFNS Peripheral Nerve Surgery Committee to improve education on peripheral nerve surgery in LMICs.

Discussion and conclusion

Viewing the development of peripheral nerve surgery in Serbia through the lens of "think globally, act locally" may guide the development of peripheral nerve surgery in LMICs.

Radial to Axillary Nerve Transfer Outcomes in Shoulder Abduction: A Systematic Review

Background

Brachial plexus and axillary nerve injuries often result in paralysis of the deltoid muscle. This can be functionally debilitating for patients and have a negative impact on their activities of daily living. In these settings, transferring the branch of the radial nerve innervating the triceps to the axillary nerve is a viable treatment option. Additional nerve transfers may be warranted. This study sought to determine the efficacy of nerve transfer procedures in the setting of brachial plexus and axillary nerve injuries and factors affecting clinical outcomes.

Methods

The U.S. National Library of Medicine's website "PubMed" was queried for "radial to axillary nerve transfer" and "brachial plexus nerve transfer." An initial review by two authors was performed to identify relevant articles followed by a third author validation utilizing inclusion and exclusion criteria. Individual patient outcomes were recorded and pooled for final analysis.

Results

Of the 80 patients, 66 (82.5%) had clinical improvement after surgical nerve transfer procedures. Significant difference in clinical improvement following nerve transfer procedures was correlated with patient age, mechanism of injury, brachial plexus vs isolated axillary nerve injuries, multiple nerve transfers vs single nerve transfers, and surgery within the first 7 months of injury. The branch of the radial nerve supplying the triceps long head showed improved clinical results compared with the branch of the radial nerve supplying the triceps medial head and anconeus.

Conclusion

Nerve transfers have been shown to be effective in restoring shoulder abduction in both isolated axillary nerve injuries and brachial plexus injuries.

Surgical reconstructions for adult brachial plexus injuries. Part I: Treatments for combined C5 and C6 injuries, with or without C7 injuries

Brachial plexus injuries will cause a significantly decreased quality of life. Patients with upper arm type brachial plexus injuries, which means C5 and C6 roots injury, will lose their shoulder elevation/abduction/external rotation, and elbow flexion function. Additional elbow, wrist, and hand extension function deficit will occur in patients with C7 root injury. With the advances of reconstructive procedures, the upper arm brachial plexus injuries can be successfully restored through nerve repair, nerve grafting, nerve transfer, muscle / tendon transfer and free functioning muscle transfer. In this review article, we summarized the various reconstructive procedures to restore the function of shoulder and elbow. Nowadays, the upper arm type BPI can be treat with satisfied outcomes (80-90% successful rate).