Does Neck Disability Index Correlate With 12-Month Satisfaction After Elective Surgery for Cervical Radiculopathy? Results From a National Spine Registry

7 T MRI of the Cervical Neuroforamen: Assessment of Nerve Root Compression and Dorsal Root Ganglia in Patients With Radiculopathy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of 3-dimensional dual-echo steady-state (DESS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine at 7 T compared with 3 T in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy were prospectively recruited between March 2020 and January 2023 before undergoing surgical decompression and received 3-dimensional DESS imaging at 3 T and 7 T MRI. Cervical nerve root compression and the dimensions of the dorsal root ganglia were assessed by 2 radiologists independently. Signal intensity, visibility of nerve anatomy, diagnostic confidence, and image artifacts were evaluated with Likert scales. The degree of neuroforaminal stenosis was assessed on standard clinical 3 T scans. Statistics included the analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and interreader reliability. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (mean age, 57 ± 12 years; 22 women) were included in the study with the highest prevalence of severe neuroforaminal stenosis observed at C6 (n = 68) followed by C7 (n = 43). Direct evaluation of nerve root compression showed significantly higher diagnostic confidence and visibility of cervical nerve rootlets, roots, and dorsal root ganglia on 7 T DESS than on 3 T DESS (diagnostic confidence: P = 0.01, visibility: P < 0.01). Assessment of nerve root compression using 7 T DESS allowed more sensitive grading than standard clinical MRI ( P < 0.01) and improved the performance in predicting sensory or motor dysfunction (area under the curve combined: 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

7 T DESS imaging allows direct assessment of cervical nerve root compression in patients with radiculopathy, with a better prediction of sensory or motor dysfunction than standard clinical MRI. Diagnostic confidence and image quality of 7 T DESS were superior to 3 T DESS.

Abnormal Postoperative PROMIS Scores are Associated With Patient Satisfaction in Adult Spinal Deformity and Degenerative Spine Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate (1) patient satisfaction after adult spine surgery; (2) associations between the number of abnormal PROMIS domain scores and postoperative satisfaction; and (3) associations between the normalization of a patient's worst preoperative PROMIS domain score and postoperative satisfaction.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although "legacy" patient-reported outcome measures correlate with patient satisfaction after adult spine surgery, it is unclear whether PROMIS scores do.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 1119 patients treated operatively for degenerative spine disease (DSD) or adult spinal deformity (ASD) from 2014 to 2019 at our tertiary hospital who completed questionnaires preoperatively and at ≥1 postoperative time points up to two years. Postoperative satisfaction was measured in ASD patients using items 21 and 22 from the SRS 22-revised questionnaire and in DSD patients using the NASS Patient Satisfaction Index. The "Worst" preoperative PROMIS domain was that with the greatest clinically negative deviation from the mean. "Normalization" was a postoperative score within 1 SD of the general population mean. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors associated with satisfaction.

RESULTS

Satisfaction was reported by 88% of DSD and 86% of ASD patients at initial postoperative follow-up; this proportion did not change during the first year after surgery. We observed an inverse relationship between postoperative satisfaction and the number of abnormal PROMIS domains at all postoperative time points beyond 6 weeks. Only among ASD patients was normalization of the worst preoperative PROMIS domain associated with greater odds of satisfaction at all time points up to one year.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of DSD and ASD patients satisfied postoperatively did not change from six weeks to 1 year. Normalizing the worst preoperative PROMIS domain and minimizing the number of abnormal postoperative PROMIS scores may reduce the number of dissatisfied patients. PROMIS data can guide perioperative patient management to improve satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-3.

Pain Scales: What Are They and What Do They Mean

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

It is essential to have validated and reliable pain measurement tools that cover a wide range of areas and are tailored to individual patients to ensure effective pain management. The main objective of this review is to provide comprehensive information on commonly used pain scales and questionnaires, including their usefulness, intended purpose, applicability to different patient populations, and associated advantages and disadvantages.

RECENT FINDINGS

Acute pain questionnaires typically focus on measuring the severity of pain and the extent of relief achieved through interventions. Chronic pain questionnaires evaluate additional aspects such as pain-related functional limitations, psychological distress, and psychological well-being. The selection of an appropriate pain scale depends on the specific assessment objectives. Additionally, each pain scale has its strengths and limitations. Understanding the differences among these pain scales is essential for selecting the most appropriate tool tailored to individual patient needs in different settings.

CONCLUSION

Medical professionals encounter challenges in accurately assessing pain. Physicians must be familiar with the different pain scales and their applicability to specific patient population.

Neck Disability Index as a Prognostic Factor for Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to elucidate the potential relationship between neck disability index (NDI) and outcomes following cervical disk replacement (CDR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The use of preoperative disability scores as predictors of outcomes following spine surgery has previously been studied, yet no literature has been published regarding its use in CDR.

METHODS

A retrospective database of a single orthopedic spine surgeon was searched for single-level CDR patients with preoperative NDI scores, excluding those with trauma, infection, or malignancy. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts by NDI score: Mild-Moderately Disabled (MD) (NDI<50) and Severely Disabled (NDI≥50). Patient-reported outcome measures were collected and compared within and between groups up to 1 year postoperatively and included Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function, 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score, visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, and NDI. MCID achievement rates were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

All PROM scores significantly improved for both cohorts at one or more postoperative time points compared with preoperative baseline ( P ≤0.049, all), with the exception of SF-12 Mental Component Score, which only significantly improved in the MD cohort at 2 postoperative points ( P ≤0.007, both). Between groups, the MD cohort reported significantly superior scores at one or more time points for all studied patient-reported outcome measures ( P ≤0.047, all). MCID achievement rate did not significantly vary for any outcome at any time between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of preoperative disability, both groups reported improvement in physical function, pain, and disability scores following CDR. While not finding significance, patients with severe disability preoperatively consistently demonstrated higher minimal clinically important difference achievement in NDI. These data do not promote the use of NDI as a prognostic factor for outcomes following CDR. Further study with larger patient populations may be useful to clarify this potential relationship.

Change in functioning profile after cervical surgery

The objectives are to (a) introduce an approach to use the Neck Disability Index (NDI) in a way, which is different and more International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-oriented than acommon practice - focusing on functional profile instead of composite score only, and (b) to describe the changes in functioning experienced by patients undergoing cervical surgery. This was a register-based study of almost 400 patients undergoing different cervical surgical procedures in a university hospital between 2018 and 2021. The patients responded to repeated surveys preoperatively and 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Linear regression test was performed to analyze the change of the NDI score. The changes in scores during a follow-up were statistically significant ( P < 0.001) for all the NDI items as well as for the total score. Each item demonstrated significant improvement postoperatively and a slight worsening between 1 and 2 years after the surgery. The observed slight decline in functioning at the end of follow-up remained below the baseline level for all the items. While the change in the composite score of the NDI was able to describe the overall change in functioning after the surgery, different areas of functioning were affected by the surgery differently. The results suggest that the use of functional profiles, in addition to composite scores, is justified among patients with cervical pathologies.

Depression and anxiety in cervical degenerative disc disease: Who are susceptible?

Background

Pre-operative depression and anxiety are associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes following cervical spine surgery. Identification of and interventions for these disorders are key to preventing related negative effects. However, most spine surgeons do not routinely evaluate mental health disorders. Few studies have investigated which patients with cervical degenerative disc diseases (CDDD) are susceptible to depression and anxiety.

Objective

To determine the factors associated with depression and anxiety in patients with CDDD.

Methods

Three hundred twelve patients with CDDD were recruited in this cross-sectional case-control study. Patients underwent a structured interview to acquire demographic and clinical characteristic information, which included the Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck/arm pain. Depression and anxiety were evaluated using the Zung Self-Rating Depression and Anxiety Scales. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with depression and anxiety.

Results

Of all patients, 102 (32.7%) had depression and 92 (29.5%) had anxiety. Two hundred six (66.0%) patients with neither depression nor anxiety were defined as the control group. Univariate analysis indicated that gender, educational level, occupation type, Charlson comorbidity index, symptom duration, symptomatology, surgery history, NDI, mJOA, VAS-neck, and VAS-arm scores were associated with depression and anxiety (except for symptom duration for anxiety). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that females [odds ratio (OR) 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-3.23], physical work (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.16-3.65), poor mJOA score (ORmoderate 2.67, 95% CI 1.40-5.07; ORsevere 7.63, 95% CI 3.85-15.11), and high VAS-neck score (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.39) were independent risk factors for depression. Physical work (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.01-3.35), poor mJOA score (ORmoderate 2.66, 95% CI 1.33-5.33; ORsevere 9.26, 95% CI 4.52-18.99), and high VAS-neck score (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.51) were independent risk factors for anxiety.

Conclusion

Approximately one-third of patients with CDDD had depression or anxiety. Patients who engaged in heavy work and had severe symptoms (poor mJOA and high VAS-neck scores) are susceptible to depression and anxiety. Additionally, female patients are susceptible to depression. Our findings may help identify CDDD patients with depression and anxiety in clinical practice.

Clinical outcomes after surgery for cervical radiculopathy performed in public and private hospitals : a nationwide relative effectiveness study

AIMS

The number of patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy has increased. In many countries, public hospitals have limited capacity. This has resulted in long waiting times for elective treatment and a need for supplementary private healthcare. It is uncertain whether the management of patients and the outcome of treatment are equivalent in public and private hospitals. The aim of this study was to compare the management and patient-reported outcomes among patients who underwent surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy in public and private hospitals in Norway, and to assess whether the effectiveness of the treatment was equivalent.

METHODS

This was a comparative study using prospectively collected data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. A total of 4,750 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and were followed for 12 months were included. Case-mix adjustment between those managed in public and private hospitals was performed using propensity score matching. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) between baseline and 12 months postoperatively. A mean difference in improvement of the NDI score between public and private hospitals of ≤ 15 points was considered equivalent. Secondary outcome measures were a numerical rating scale for neck and arm pain and the EuroQol five-dimension three-level health questionnaire. The duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean improvement from baseline to 12 months postoperatively of patients who underwent surgery in public and private hospitals was equivalent, both in the unmatched cohort (mean NDI difference between groups 3.9 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 5.6); p < 0.001) and in the matched cohort (4.0 points (95% CI 2.3 to 5.7); p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes showed similar results. The duration of surgery and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in public hospitals. Those treated in private hospitals reported significantly fewer complications in the unmatched cohort, but not in the matched cohort.

CONCLUSION

The clinical effectiveness of surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy performed in public and private hospitals was equivalent 12 months after surgery.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):64-71.

A nationwide study of patients operated for cervical degenerative disorders in public and private hospitals

During the last decades, there has been an increase in the rate of surgery for degenerative disorders of the cervical spine and in the use of supplementary private health insurance. Still, there is limited knowledge about the differences in characteristics of patients operated in public and private hospitals. Therefore, we aimed at comparing sociodemographic-, clinical- and patient management data on patients operated for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and degenerative cervical myelopathy in public and private hospitals in Norway. This was a cross-sectional study on patients in the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery operated for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and degenerative cervical myelopathy between January 2012 and December 2020. At admission for surgery, we assessed disability by the following patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): neck disability index (NDI), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and numerical rating scales for neck pain (NRS-NP) and arm pain (NRS-AP). Among 9161 patients, 7344 (80.2%) procedures were performed in public hospitals and 1817 (19.8%) in private hospitals. Mean age was 52.1 years in public hospitals and 49.7 years in private hospitals (P < 0.001). More women were operated in public hospitals (47.9%) than in private hospitals (31.6%) (P < 0.001). A larger proportion of patients in private hospitals had high education (≥ 4 years of college or university) (42.9% vs 35.6%, P < 0.001). Patients in public hospitals had worse disease-specific health problems than those in private hospitals: unadjusted NDI mean difference was 5.2 (95% CI 4.4 – 6.0; P < 0.001) and adjusted NDI mean difference was 3.4 (95% CI 2.5 – 4.2; P < 0.001), and they also had longer duration of symptoms (P < 0.001). Duration of surgery (mean difference 29 minutes, 95% CI 27.1 – 30.7; P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (mean difference 2 days, 95% CI 2.3 – 2.4; P < 0.001) were longer in public hospitals. In conclusion, patients operated for degenerative cervical spine in private hospitals were healthier, younger, better educated and more often men. They also had less and shorter duration of symptoms and seemed to be managed more efficiently. Our findings indicate that access to cervical spine surgery in private hospitals could be skewed in favour of patients with higher socioeconomic status.

Using Wearable Technology to Measure the Association Between Neck Posture and Neck Pain During Urologic Open and Robotic Surgery

PURPOSE

Chronic neck pain is the most prevalent work-related musculoskeletal injury among surgeons. Urologists may be at higher risk of neck injury due to extended time spent operating in deep anatomical structures during open surgery. Our goal was to use wearable technology to quantify the relationship between neck posture and pain during open and robotic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Urologic attendings and residents who spent at least 1 day per week performing surgery for over 6 hours took part in this study. Neck posture was measured in real time during surgery using inertial measurement devices attached at the occipital protuberance and 7th cervical vertebrae. Self-reported neck pain scores were obtained throughout their workday.

RESULTS

30 participants and 202 hours of surgery were included in the study (21 attendings, 9 residents). There was a significant association between neck posture and pain (p = 0.04). Surgeons performing open procedures spent on average 147 minutes with their head in neck flexion postures of 30° or greater compared to 68 minutes for those performing robotic procedures (p =0.007). Surgeons performing open procedures reported a mean change in neck pain of 2.0 on the numeric analogue scale, compared to 1.3 for those performing robotic procedures (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Real time measurements of neck flexion during urologic surgery shows that greater duration and higher degree of neck flexion were associated with increased neck pain. Raising awareness about ergonomics in the operating room during residency will enable future generations of surgeons to make conscious decisions regarding their neck posture in surgery.

Outcomes and value in elective cervical spine surgery: an introductory and practical narrative review

How we determine a successful clinical outcome and the value of a spine intervention are two major questions surrounding clinical spine research. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), both LEGACY and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures, are becoming ubiquitous throughout the literature. Spine surgeons need a facile understanding of the financial landscape of their environment to influence change. In the current introductory, narrative review on outcomes and value in cervical spine surgery, we aim to: (I) define relevant outcome and cost terminology, (II) review recent cervical spine surgery literature, divided by specific pathology with a focus on LEGACY and PROMIS measures, and (III) discuss value and cost as they pertain to postoperative return to work and ambulatory surgery centers surgeries.