1
|
Persaud A, Smith NR, Lindros J, Salmon J, Ventura G, Perkins M, Taveras EM, Fiechtner L, Simione M. Assessing the market viability of a packaged intensive health behavior and lifestyle treatment. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:ibad074. [PMID: 38066667 PMCID: PMC10724182 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In the USA, more than 14 million children are impacted by obesity. Despite intensive health behavior and lifestyle treatments being found effective, gaps exist in moving these interventions into widespread use. Focusing on market viability could improve the dissemination and sustainment of interventions. The purpose of this paper is to outline the process and results of our market viability assessment for the Healthy Weight Clinic (HWC), a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recognized Family Health Weight Program. We conducted a market viability assessment using the Speeding Research-test INTerventions (SPRINT) program to gain insights into the commercialization and marketplace for the HWC. Through the process of customer discovery, we interviewed 50 stakeholders to test our hypotheses pertaining to our business model. Key takeaways were the need for packaged interventions that offer support and training for providers, and interventions that are multidisciplinary and located within the medical home. We also learned that (i) the intervention goals must align with the healthcare organization's performance metrics; (ii) services need to be reimbursable; and (iii) the importance of understanding different customer segments (i.e. program users vs. organization decision-makers) and their unique needs. The market viability assessment is a critical step to transforming the HWC into a viable commercial product. The process we have outlined is replicable by others and by encouraging other teams to design for dissemination we can increase the number of evidence-based, packaged IHBLTs available to children with obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Persaud
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Mass General for Children, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Natalie Riva Smith
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeanne Lindros
- Institute for Healthy Childhood Weight, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL, USA
| | - Jeremiah Salmon
- Institute for Healthy Childhood Weight, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL, USA
| | - Giustina Ventura
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Mass General for Children, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meghan Perkins
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Mass General for Children, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elsie M Taveras
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Mass General for Children, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lauren Fiechtner
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Mass General for Children, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meg Simione
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Mass General for Children, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Designing for dissemination and sustainability (D4DS) refers to principles and methods for enhancing the fit between a health program, policy, or practice and the context in which it is intended to be adopted. In this article we first summarize the historical context of D4DS and justify the need to shift traditional health research and dissemination practices. We present a diverse literature according to a D4DS organizing schema and describe a variety of dissemination products, design processes and outcomes, and approaches to messaging, packaging, and distribution. D4DS design processes include stakeholder engagement, participatory codesign, and context and situation analysis, and leverage methods and frameworks from dissemination and implementation science, marketing and business, communications and visual arts, and systems science. Finally, we present eight recommendations to adopt a D4DS paradigm, reflecting shifts in ways of thinking, skills and approaches, and infrastructure and systems for training and evaluation. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health, Volume 43 is April 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany M. Kwan
- Department of Family Medicine and Adult & Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Ross C. Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Russell E. Glasgow
- Department of Family Medicine and Adult & Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Elaine H. Morrato
- Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health and Institute for Translational Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Douglas A. Luke
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chambers DA. Sharpening our focus on designing for dissemination: Lessons from the SPRINT program and potential next steps for the field. Transl Behav Med 2021; 10:1416-1418. [PMID: 31313812 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Few patients who smoke receive evidence-based smoking cessation treatment in outpatient clinics. A novel electronic referral to SmokefreeTXT, the National Cancer Institute stop-smoking text program, referred 14.4% of outpatients who smoke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Chambers
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yank V, Gale RC, Nevedal A, Okwara L, Koenig CJ, Trivedi RB, Dupke NJ, Kabat M, Asch SM. Improving Uptake of a National Web-Based Psychoeducational Workshop for Informal Caregivers of Veterans: Mixed Methods Implementation Evaluation. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e16495. [PMID: 33410759 PMCID: PMC7819783 DOI: 10.2196/16495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although web-based psychoeducational programs may be an efficient, accessible, and scalable option for improving participant well-being, they seldom are sustained beyond trial publication. Implementation evaluations may help optimize program uptake, but few are performed. When the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched the web-based psychoeducational workshop Building Better Caregivers (BBC) for informal caregivers of veterans nationwide in 2013, the workshop did not enroll as many caregivers as anticipated. OBJECTIVE This study aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of initial implementation, strategies likely to improve workshop uptake, whether the VA adopted these strategies, and whether workshop enrollment changed. METHODS We used mixed methods and the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) implementation evaluation framework. In stage 1, we conducted semistructured interviews with caregivers, local staff, and regional and national VA leaders and surveys with caregivers and staff. We collected and analyzed survey and interview data concurrently and integrated the results to identify implementation strengths and weaknesses, and strategies likely to improve workshop uptake. In stage 2, we reinterviewed national leaders to determine whether the VA adopted recommended strategies and used national data to determine whether workshop enrollment changed over time. RESULTS A total of 54 caregivers (n=32, 59%), staff (n=13, 24%), and regional (n=5, 9%) and national (n=4, 7%) leaders were interviewed. We received survey responses from 72% (23/32) of caregivers and 77% (10/13) of local staff. In stage 1, survey and interview results were consistent across multiple PARIHS constructs. Although participants from low-enrollment centers reported fewer implementation strengths and more weaknesses, qualitative themes were consistent across high- and low-enrollment centers, and across caregiver, staff, and leadership respondent groups. Identified strengths included belief in a positive workshop impact and the use of some successful outreach approaches. Implementation weaknesses included missed opportunities to improve outreach and to better support local staff. From these, we identified and recommended new and enhanced implementation strategies-increased investment in outreach and marketing capabilities; tailoring outreach strategies to multiple stakeholder groups; use of campaigns that are personal, repeated, and detailed, and have diverse delivery options; recurrent training and mentoring for new staff; and comprehensive data management and reporting capabilities. In stage 2, we determined that the VA had adopted several of these strategies in 2016. In the 3 years before and after adoption, cumulative BBC enrollment increased from 2139 (2013-2015) to 4030 (2016-2018) caregivers. CONCLUSIONS This study expands the limited implementation science literature on best practices to use when implementing web-based psychoeducational programs. We found that robust outreach and marketing strategies and support for local staff were critical to the implementation success of the BBC workshop. Other health systems may want to deploy these strategies when implementing their web-based programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Yank
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Randall C Gale
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Andrea Nevedal
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Leonore Okwara
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Christopher J Koenig
- Department of Communication Studies, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ranak B Trivedi
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Nancy J Dupke
- VA Caregivers Support Program, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Margaret Kabat
- VA Caregivers Support Program, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Steven M Asch
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
King DK, Shoup JA, Raebel MA, Anderson CB, Wagner NM, Ritzwoller DP, Bender BG. Planning for Implementation Success Using RE-AIM and CFIR Frameworks: A Qualitative Study. Front Public Health 2020; 8:59. [PMID: 32195217 PMCID: PMC7063029 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) dissemination and implementation frameworks define theory-based domains associated with the adoption, implementation and maintenance of evidence-based interventions. Used together, the two frameworks identify metrics for evaluating implementation success, i.e., high reach and effectiveness resulting in sustained practice change (RE-AIM), and modifiable factors that explain and enhance implementation outcomes (CFIR). We applied both frameworks to study the implementation planning process for a technology-delivered asthma care intervention called Breathewell within an integrated care organization. The goal of the Breathewell intervention is to increase the efficiency of delivering resource-intensive asthma care services. Methods: We reviewed historical documents (i.e., meeting agendas; minutes) from 14 months of planning to evaluate alignment of implementation team priorities with RE-AIM domains. Key content was extracted and analyzed on topics, frequency and amount of discussion within each RE-AIM domain. Implementation team members were interviewed using questions adapted from the CFIR Interview Guide Tool to focus their reflection on the process and contextual factors considered during pre-implementation planning. Documents and transcripts were initially coded using RE-AIM domain definitions, and recoded using CFIR constructs, with intent to help explain how team decisions and actions can contribute to adoption, implementation and maintenance outcomes. Results: Qualitative analysis of team documents and interviews demonstrated strong alignment with the RE-AIM domains: Reach, Effectiveness, and Implementation; and with the CFIR constructs: formal inclusion of provider and staff stakeholders in implementation planning, compatibility of the intervention with workflows and systems, and alignment of the intervention with organizational culture. Focus on these factors likely contributed to RE-AIM outcomes of high implementation fidelity. However, team members expressed low confidence that Breathewell would be adopted and maintained post-trial. A potential explanation was weak alignment with several CFIR constructs, including tension for change, relative priority, and leadership engagement that contribute to organizational receptivity and motivation to sustain change. Conclusions: While RE-AIM provides a practical framework for planning and evaluating practice change interventions to assure their external validity, CFIR explains why implementation succeeded or failed, and when used proactively, identifies relevant modifiable factors that can promote or undermine adoption, implementation, and maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane K. King
- Center for Behavioral Health Research and Services, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, United States
| | - Jo Ann Shoup
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Marsha A. Raebel
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Courtney B. Anderson
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Nicole M. Wagner
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Debra P. Ritzwoller
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Bruce G. Bender
- Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|