1
|
Crosby KC, Rojas M, Sharma P, Johnson MA, Mazloom R, Kvitko BH, Smits THM, Venter SN, Coutinho TA, Heath LS, Palmer M, Vinatzer BA. Genomic delineation and description of species and within-species lineages in the genus Pantoea. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1254999. [PMID: 38029109 PMCID: PMC10665919 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1254999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
As the name of the genus Pantoea ("of all sorts and sources") suggests, this genus includes bacteria with a wide range of provenances, including plants, animals, soils, components of the water cycle, and humans. Some members of the genus are pathogenic to plants, and some are suspected to be opportunistic human pathogens; while others are used as microbial pesticides or show promise in biotechnological applications. During its taxonomic history, the genus and its species have seen many revisions. However, evolutionary and comparative genomics studies have started to provide a solid foundation for a more stable taxonomy. To move further toward this goal, we have built a 2,509-gene core genome tree of 437 public genome sequences representing the currently known diversity of the genus Pantoea. Clades were evaluated for being evolutionarily and ecologically significant by determining bootstrap support, gene content differences, and recent recombination events. These results were then integrated with genome metadata, published literature, descriptions of named species with standing in nomenclature, and circumscriptions of yet-unnamed species clusters, 15 of which we assigned names under the nascent SeqCode. Finally, genome-based circumscriptions and descriptions of each species and each significant genetic lineage within species were uploaded to the LINbase Web server so that newly sequenced genomes of isolates belonging to any of these groups could be precisely and accurately identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C. Crosby
- School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Mariah Rojas
- School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Parul Sharma
- School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
- Graduate Program in Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Computational Biology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Marcela A. Johnson
- School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
- Graduate Program in Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Computational Biology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Reza Mazloom
- Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Brian H. Kvitko
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| | - Theo H. M. Smits
- Environmental Genomics and System Biology Research Group, Institute of Natural Resource Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wädenswil, Switzerland
| | - Stephanus N. Venter
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Teresa A. Coutinho
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Centre for Microbial Ecology and Genomics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Lenwood S. Heath
- Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Marike Palmer
- School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States
- Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Boris A. Vinatzer
- School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aiying W, Ju L, Cilin W, Yuxuan H, Baojun Y, Jian T, Shuhua L. Establishment and application of the Recombinase-Aided Amplification-Lateral Flow Dipstick detection method for Pantoea ananatis on rice. AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY : APP 2023; 52:1-9. [PMID: 37363287 PMCID: PMC10193322 DOI: 10.1007/s13313-023-00918-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Pantoea ananatis is a major pathogen that causes the new bacterial blight in rice, and its symptoms very similar to rice bacterial blight. Therefore, there is a dire need for an accurate and rapid method for detecting P. ananatis. In this study, an early and rapid visual detection method for P. ananatis was established. Using GyrB gene as the target sequence, an innovative recombinase-aided amplification detection system integrated with a lateral flow dipstick (RAA-LFD) was constructed. The optimized RAA-LFD detection method can be initiated at body temperature and does not rely on precise instruments. It does not require DNA extraction and can be used directly with plant tissue fluids. The results can be visualized after 10 minutes of amplification. The specificity and sensitivity tests showed that the RAA-LFD method could detect P. ananatis, whereas other common plant pathogens were not detected, and its detection sensitivity for P. ananatis DNA reached 100 copies/µL. The detection of diseased tissues indicated that this method could accurately detect P. ananatis in artificially inoculated rice tissues in the early stages of infection before symptoms. The RAA-LFD detection system established in this study is simple and fast, with visual results, excellent specificity, and high sensitivity. It is semi-quantitative and should be used for the early detection and rapid field diagnosis of new leaf blight, which provides technical support for the early warning and real-time detection of field samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang Aiying
- State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006 China
| | - Luo Ju
- State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006 China
| | - Wang Cilin
- State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006 China
| | - Hou Yuxuan
- State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006 China
| | - Yang Baojun
- State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006 China
| | - Tang Jian
- State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006 China
| | - Liu Shuhua
- State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006 China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bragard C, Baptista P, Chatzivassiliou E, Di Serio F, Gonthier P, Jaques Miret JA, Justesen AF, MacLeod A, Magnusson CS, Milonas P, Navas‐Cortes JA, Parnell S, Potting R, Stefani E, Thulke H, Van der Werf W, Civera AV, Yuen J, Zappalà L, Migheli Q, Vloutoglou I, Maiorano A, Streissl F, Reignault PL. Pest categorisation of Pantoea ananatis. EFSA J 2023; 21:e07849. [PMID: 36895574 PMCID: PMC9989851 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The EFSA Plant Health Panel performed a pest categorisation of Pantoea ananatis, a Gram-negative bacterium belonging to the Erwiniaceae family. P. ananatis is a well-defined taxonomic unit; nonetheless, its pathogenic nature is not well defined and non-pathogenic populations are known to occupy several, very different environmental niches as saprophytes, or as plant growth promoting bacteria or biocontrol agents. It is also described as a clinical pathogen causing bacteraemia and sepsis or as a member of the gut microbiota of several insects. P. ananatis is the causal agent of different diseases affecting numerous crops: in particular, centre rot of onion, bacterial leaf blight and grain discoloration of rice, leaf spot disease of maize and eucalyptus blight/dieback. A few insect species have been described as vectors of P. ananatis, among them, Frankliniella fusca and Diabrotica virgifera virgifera. This bacterium is present in several countries in Europe, Africa, Asia, North and South America, and Oceania from tropical and subtropical regions to temperate areas worldwide. P. ananatis has been reported from the EU territory, both as pathogen on rice and maize and as an environmental, non-pathogenic bacterium in rice marshes and poplar rhizosoil. It is not included in EU Commission Implementing Regulation 2019/2072. The pathogen can be detected on its host plants using direct isolation, or PCR-based methods. The main pathway for the entry of the pathogen into the EU territory is host plants for planting, including seeds. In the EU, there is a large availability of host plants, with onion, maize, rice and strawberry being the most important ones. Therefore, disease outbreaks are possible almost at any latitude, except in the most northern regions. P. ananatis is not expected to have frequent or consistent impact on crop production and is not expected to have any environmental impact. Phytosanitary measures are available to mitigate the further introduction and spread of the pathogen into the EU on some hosts. The pest does not satisfy the criteria, which are within the remit for EFSA to evaluate whether the pest meets the definition of a Union quarantine pest. P. ananatis is probably widely distributed in different ecosystems in the EU. It may impact some specific hosts such as onions while on other hosts such as rice it has been reported as a seed microbiota without causing any impact and can even be beneficial to plant growth. Hence, the pathogenic nature of P. ananatis is not fully established.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cui L, Zou C, Zhang Z, Duan L, Huang J, Wang L, Xiao W, Yang X, Xiang Y, Li W, Li X, Zhang H. First Report of Maize White Spot Disease Caused by Pantoea ananatis in China. PLANT DISEASE 2022; 107:210. [PMID: 35678622 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-01-22-0152-pdn] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important crops in China. Since 2020, a new leaf spot disease has occurred in southwest China in areas such as Yunnan, Sichuan and Hubei provinces. Typical symptoms appeared after tasseling. The spots are scattered on the leaf surface, round to oval in shape with diameter range 3-20 mm. Spots are initially water-soaked, gradually turning yellow or white. In 2021, diseased leaf samples with typical white spot were collected for pathogen isolation and identification in Qujing, Yunnan province. Four small pieces of leaf tissue (about 0.25 cm2 in area) were excised from the edge of the necrotic lesion of each plant, surface sterilized with 75% ethanol for 1 min, rinsed three times with sterile distilled water, and soaked in sterile distilled water for 5 min. The solution was plated on Luria Broth medium (LB) plate (Shin et al. 2022) . After incubation at 28°C for 24 h, round, smooth-edged yellow colonies appeared in the LB plate. The bacterium isolated was gram-negative, negative for oxidase, positive for peroxidase, indole, citrate (Wells et al. 1987). Three strains (PA21QJ01, PA21QJ02 and PA21QJ03) showed identical colony morphology. PA21QJ01 was used for further molecular analyses. DNA was extracted from fresh colonies cultured in LB(Shin et al. 2022), and the fragments at the 16S rDNA, gyrB and rpoB loci were amplified using primers 27F/1492R (Galkiewicz and Kellogg 2008), UP-1/UP-2r (Yamamoto and Harayama 1995) and rpoBCM81-F/rpoBCM32b-R (Brady et al. 2008), respectively. The sequences of fragments of 16S rDNA, gyrB and rpoB from isolate PA21QJ01 were was deposited in GenBank (accession number: OM184301.1, OM302500, OM302499). A search for homologous sequences using BLAST resulted in 99.9, 99.6 and 99.8% identity of 16S rDNA, gyrB and rpoB, respectively, with sequences from the NN08200 of Pantoea ananatis (GenBank accession numbers: MK415050.1 for 16S rDNA, CP035034.1 for gyrB and CP035034.1.1 for rpoB). Above molecular results indicated that PA21QJ01 isolated from maize white spot is P. ananatis. Pathogenicity tests were performed on tasseled plants of the suscptible maize variety Wugu1790. After culture in LB medium plate at 30°C for 12 h, the bacterial solution was used for inoculation at a concentration of 1 × 108 CFU ml-1. After 7 days of inoculation, the leaves of the plants appeared water-soaked. After 10 days, white spot developed with brown margin. In contrast, the control plants remained healthy and symptomless. The same P. ananatis was reisolated in the inoculated maize plants, fulfilled Koch's law. In the last decade, P. ananatis has been reported to cause maize white spot in South Africa, Mexico, Poland, Argentina, Brazil (Sauer et al. 2015), and Ecuador (Toaza et al.2021). It has caused crop diseases with other crops, such as onion, rice, pineapple, melon, and sorghum, and others (Sauer et al. 2015). It caused leaf blight and leaf steak in rice in China (Yu et al. 2021). This is the first report of maize white spot caused by P. ananatis in China. However, to our knowledge, this is the first report of maize white spot disease in China. Attentions should be paid to screening for disease-resistant resources and breeding disease-resistant hybrids. Reference: Wells, J. M. et al. 1987. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:136-143. Shin, G. Y. et al. 2022. Plant Dis. Doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-21-1810-SC. Brady, C., et al. 2008. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 31:447. Galkiewicz, J. P., and Kellogg, C. A. 2008. APPL ENVIRON MICROB, 74.24: 7828-7831. Toaza, A. et al. 2021. Plant Dis. Doi:10.1094/PDIS-02-21-0298-PDN Yamamoto, S., and Harayama, S. 1995. APPL ENVIRON MICROB, 61:1104.L. Sauer, A. V. et al. 2015. Agronomy Science and Biotechnology. Doi:10.33158/ASB.2015v1i1p21 Yu et al. 2021. Plant Dis. Doi:10.1094/PDIS-05-21-0988-PDN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Cui
- Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China;
| | - Chengjia Zou
- Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China;
| | - Zhenyu Zhang
- Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, China;
| | - Luyao Duan
- Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China;
| | - Jimei Huang
- Qujing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qujing, Yunnan, China;
| | - Liming Wang
- Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 585277, Enshi, Hubei , China;
| | - Weihua Xiao
- Dehong Agricultural Science InstituteDehong, Mangshi, Yunnan, China;
| | - Xiaorong Yang
- Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China;
| | - Yunjia Xiang
- Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China;
| | - Wenyi Li
- Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China;
| | - Xiao Li
- Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, China;
| | - Haiyan Zhang
- Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, China;
| |
Collapse
|