Cognitive screening tests for organic mental disorders in psychiatric inpatients. A hopeless task?

Effect of the adapted Virtual Reality cognitive training program among Chinese older adults with chronic schizophrenia: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of the adapted virtual reality cognitive training program in older adults with chronic schizophrenia.

METHODS

Older adults with chronic schizophrenia were recruited from a long-stay care setting and were randomly assigned into intervention (n = 12) and control group (n = 15). The intervention group received 10-session of VR program that consisted of 2 VR activities using IREX. The control group attended the usual programs in the setting.

RESULTS

After the 10-session intervention, older adults with chronic schizophrenia preformed significantly better than control in overall cognitive function (p .000), and in two cognitive subscales: repetition (p .001) and memory (p .040). These participants engaged in the VR activities volitionally. No problem of cybersickness was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study indicate that engaging in the adapted virtual reality cognitive training program offers the potential for significant gains in cognitive function of the older adults with chronic schizophrenia.

A comparison of two mental status examinations in an inpatient psychiatric sample

This study compares the psychometric properties and clinical use of the Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) and the Modified MMSE (3MS) in patients admitted to an acute medical-psychiatric inpatient unit. Internal consistencies were .56 for the estimated MMSE and .72 for the 3MS. Regression analyses revealed that the 3MS was a significant predictor of both length of hospital stay (LOS) and the need for additional services postdischarge. Regressions were also used to evaluate the contribution of the four new items contained in the 3MS: Word Generation, Similarities, Second Recall, and Date and Place of Birth. The 3MS was a significant predictor of LOS and the need for discharge services, whereas the MMSE did not contribute to any regression model. Word Generation was found to be a significant predictor of patients' needing posthospital services. Results support prior findings of the 3MS's superiority over the (estimated) MMSE and help to demonstrate the continued importance of cognitive screening in psychiatric samples.

The clinical applications of Mini-Mental State Examination in geropsychiatric inpatients

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the association between Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and diagnosis, computerized tomographic scans or electroencephalogram findings in geropsychiatric inpatients (age > or = 65).

METHOD

We analyzed the MMSE records of patients sixty-five and older who had been hospitalized in our psychiatric ward during a nine-year period. Case data were collected by review of chart records.

RESULTS

In these patients, MMSE scores were significantly different among the seven diagnostic groups included. Demented patients had the lowest MMSE scores. Patients who had abnormal findings on computerized tomographic scans or electroencephalogram had lower MMSE than patients with normal findings.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the MMSE is a useful screening instrument for organicity in the geropsychiatric inpatients. However, because of the lower average MMSE score in geropsychiatric inpatients, the optimal cut-offpoint of MMSE for dementia should be lower than those used in other populations.

The prevalence of dementia in a statewide sample of new nursing home admissions aged 65 and older: diagnosis by expert panel. Epidemiology of Dementia in Nursing Homes Research Group

This study estimated the prevalence of dementia in 2,285 new admissions age 65+ to a statewide sample of 59 nursing homes in Maryland, 1992-1995. Dementia was ascertained according to DSM-III-R criteria by an expert panel of geriatric psychiatrists, neurologists, and a geriatrician using detailed information collected by trained lay evaluators from residents, family, staff, and medical records. Admissions to Maryland nursing homes are similar to admissions to nursing homes elsewhere in the United States. The prevalence of dementia was 48.2% (CI: 43.6-52.8) with an upper bound estimated at 54.5% (CI: 49.9-59.1). Prevalence is highest in facilities with <50 beds versus 200+ beds (65.5% vs 39.6%) and those in urban versus rural areas (50.0% vs 39.1%). Those who are non-White, married, and with fewer years of education are more likely to be demented. Prevalence is highest among those with 4+ physical impairments versus 0-1 (60.3% vs 27.7%) and lowest in those with 4+ comorbidities versus 0-1 (44.8% vs 52.0%). There was considerable overlap in the comorbid status of demented and nondemented admissions, and both groups contained members with only a few functional limitations. Results suggest that the level of medical supervision provided in nursing homes may not be required for some residents with dementia.

Decreased EEG microstate duration and anteriorisation of the brain electrical fields in mild and moderate dementia of the Alzheimer type

Spatially oriented segmentation allows researchers to break down the continuous stream of the ongoing EEG into microstates with stable topography of the brain electrical landscapes. The resulting microstates were shown to be related to conscious mental experience as well as to psychiatric disorders typically associated with thought disorders. In the present study, the microstates of the resting EEG of patients presenting with mild or moderate probable dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) were investigated. A significant anteriorisation of the centers of gravity of the microstate fields, an increase of the microstates' optimal window size and a reduced duration of sustained microstates were found. These differences were statistically more robust than the typical changes in the frequency domain (diffuse slowing) and were significantly correlated with the cognitive decline. The adaptive spatial segmentation into microstates is discussed as a method to extract meaningful EEG parameters for the early diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease.

Cognitive screening of psychiatric patients

The goal of the present study was to explore characteristic cognitive profiles which distinguish between psychiatric patients with and without organic mental disorder (OMD), using Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE), a brief screening battery. A mild degree of cognitive deficits was found to be common in the Non-OMD psychiatric group. The deficit was especially pronounced in the Memory domain. Patients in the OMD group demonstrated a higher frequency of moderate and severe impairment. The best discriminator was the scale assessing visuospatial constructional ability and visual memory. Verbal memory deficit in OMD patients was more severe than in Non-OMD patients. Implications for improving diagnostic sensitivity of cognitive screening are discussed.

Validation of the Quick Cognitive Screening Test

Reports in the literature suggest that 70% to 80% of cognitive deficits with probable organic basis are undetected in patients at risk, especially if symptoms are minimal. Studies have shown that clinically convenient beside screening tests show low sensitivity with a high rate of false-negative results. The purpose of this study was to validate a sensitive mid-range cognitive screening test to detect cognitive deficits, including those not usually identified by bedside mental status examinations. The Quick Cognitive Screening Test (QCST) was initially developed and subsequently adapted from original unpublished work by the late John McFie. The test was designed to detect global cognitive dysfunction and specific areas of cognitive dysfunction. Areas assessed included orientation, attention and concentration, memory, language, construction, perception, spatial ability, and abstract reasoning. Scoring is multidimensional, each subtest having a score, plus summary and global scores. Thirty-eight neurological patients with a cerebrovascular accident, traumatic brain injury, and other miscellaneous diagnoses, were recruited from a tertiary care center for physical rehabilitation. Fifteen residents from a psychiatric rehabilitation center were also recruited. Thirty-two healthy volunteers from the community served as age-matched controls. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) was used to establish reliability and validity of the QCST. The National Adult Reading Test (NART) was used to estimate premorbid intellectual functioning. Results showed that the QCST identified cognitive impairment in all of the neurological and psychiatric patients assessed. Oneway analyses of variance of five summary scores showed significant differences between the groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aspects of validity and reliability of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE) in assessment of psychiatric patients

The validity and reliability of the NCSE were assessed on a sample of 192 psychiatric patients from a county general hospital with a mean age of 33.5 years and mean education of 12 years. The analyses revealed that demographic and general health factors need to be taken into consideration in interpreting the NCSE results. Predictive accuracy of the screening items for subsequent performance on metric items across different scales ranged from good to poor. A comparison of success versus failure on the screen for Construction scale with scores on metric items for this scale revealed a high number of false negative errors made using the screening item. Administration of both screen and metric items on this scale for all patients was recommended. Indices of internal consistency of the Orientation scale were adequate. A factor analysis on the scale scores extracted two factors. The second factor identified a subset of scales which assess the patients' functional capacity in dealing with the demands of everyday environment. Test-retest reliability of the NCSE assessed on a subsample of 28 subjects, was high for 7 scales, whereas low stability was demonstrated by Construction, Memory and Calculation scales (r = .79, .52 and .81, respectively). Practice effect and fluctuating attention might contribute to the low stability of these scales. These modifications in the test administration procedure would improve the accuracy of assessment of cognitive deficits in psychiatric patients.

The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: psychometric properties in use with psychiatric inpatients

The present investigation sought to enhance clinical utility of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE; Northern California Neurobehavioral Group, Inc.) by providing reference scores for an inpatient psychiatric sample and assessing construct validity. A total of 866 patients (aged 15-92 years) received an NCSE 2 to 4 days after admission. Examination of means, standard deviations, z scores, and percent who passed each screening item revealed consistently poorer performance for psychiatric patients relative to the original normative sample. Pearson product-moment correlations between age and each NCSE subtest similarly yielded significant negative correlations, particularly on tests predicted to be differentially sensitive to aging. Intercorrelations between subtests, however, failed to yield expected patterns of performance. We conclude that the NCSE provides a moderately valid screening instrument for cognitive impairment.

The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of information accumulated over the past 26 years regarding the psychometric properties and utility of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

PARTICIPANTS

The reviewed studies assessed a wide variety of subjects, ranging from cognitively intact community residents to those with severe cognitive impairment associated with various types of dementing illnesses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The validity of the MMSE was compared against a variety of gold standards, including DSM-III-R and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, clinical diagnoses, Activities of Daily Living measures, and other tests that putatively identify and measure cognitive impairment.

RESULTS

Reliability and construct validity were judged to be satisfactory. Measures of criterion validity showed high levels of sensitivity for moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment and lower levels for mild degrees of impairment. Content analyses revealed the MMSE was highly verbal, and not all items were equally sensitive to cognitive impairment. Items measuring language were judged to be relatively easy and lacked utility for identifying mild language deficits. Overall, MMSE scores were affected by age, education, and cultural background, but not gender.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the MMSE fulfilled its original goal of providing a brief screening test that quantitatively assesses the severity of cognitive impairment and documents cognitive changes occurring over time. The MMSE should not, by itself, be used as a diagnostic tool to identify dementia. Suggestions for the clinical use of the MMSE are made.

The psychosocial review of systems

Psychosocial problems have a significant impact on the course and cost of medical illness. However, many of these areas are generally neglected in medical interviews. This manuscript presents a condensed review of the major psychosocial domains, which together constitute what we term a psychosocial review of systems (PROS). Selected references are provided which document the importance of these areas to medical care, and serve as background reading for further inquiry. The psychosocial areas which are covered include: substance use, stress and life events, subjective views of symptoms, daily activity, social support, sexual concerns, finances, psychiatric history and symptoms, cultural issues, and functional status. The Psychosocial Review of Systems (PROS) can serve as a basic overview for the psychosocial aspects of medical education, and also as a content based instrument which has potential for development as an assessment tool to measure physician competence in eliciting relevant psychosocial data.

Primary or depressive dementia: mental status screening

In the course of interviewing a patient, several aspects of everyday functioning must be covered to provide a range of observations necessary to suggest a provisional diagnosis. First organized by Adolf Meyer, the mental status examination consists of several techniques which, in recent times, have been shortened, structured and standardized to cover maximal ground in minimal time. In this article, the most popular scales are reviewed psychometrically for their capacity to detect, as first-stage instruments, cognitive impairment suggestive of primary dementia in the context of varying prevalence rates and confounding factors like sensory impairments, sociodemographics and depressive states. Several of the measures are found adequate in some respects though not in others, but all of the better ones, when used as front line implements during clinical intake, regularly improve detection over base rates. An analytical method modelled on ROC procedures is then described contrasting two of them before newer instruments are considered which aim to improve sensitivity at relatively little cost to specificity.

Head CT in new geriatric psychiatry patients: a prospective study

Computed tomography of the head (HCT) was studied prospectively in 42 new geriatric psychiatry patients. Scans were obtained in 88% of the sample. Subjects underwent a complete evaluation by a geriatric psychiatrist who was blind to the HCT results. The HCT was abnormal in 32 (86%) of the 37 patients who had a scan. The most frequent finding was atrophic changes, which were discovered in ten (27%) of the 37 patients. Subcortical vascular disease was found in 14 patients (38%). Mixed pictures with both vascular disease and atrophic changes were found in nine (24%). The only statistically significant predictor of an abnormal HCT was an abnormal neurobehavioral examination. While the information gained from the HCT did not add appreciably to the clinical evaluation in determining whether there was an organic or idiopathic psychiatric syndrome, it was crucial in determining the location and nature of the central nervous system lesions.