Inducing effect of phenobarbital on clozapine metabolism in patients with chronic schizophrenia

Drug-drug interactions between antiseizure medications and antipsychotic medications: a narrative review and expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) and antipsychotic drugs are frequently coadministered with the potential for drug-drug interactions. Interactions may either be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic, resulting in a decrease or increase in efficacy and/or an increase or decrease in adverse effects.

AREAS COVERED

The clinical evidence for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics is reviewed based on the results of a literature search in MEDLINE conducted in April 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

There is now extensive published evidence for the clinical importance of interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics. Enzyme-inducing ASMs can decrease blood concentrations of many of the antipsychotics. There is also evidence that enzyme-inhibiting ASMs can increase antipsychotic blood concentrations. Similarly, there is limited evidence showing that antipsychotic drugs may affect the blood concentrations of ASMs through pharmacokinetic interactions. There is less available evidence for pharmacodynamic interactions, but these can also be important, as can displacement from protein binding. The lack of published evidence for an interaction should not be interpreted as meaning that the given interaction does not occur; the evidence is building continually. There is no substitute for careful patient monitoring and sound clinical judgment.

Association Between Clozapine Plasma Concentrations and Treatment Response: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine is recommended, its optimisation is often adjusted only on the basis of dosage. The aim of this study was to assess the link between clozapine plasma concentrations and clinical response by a meta-analysis of published studies and by an individual participant data meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a computerised search of bibliographic databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Clinical Trials, and Web of Science) to identify studies that assessed the relationship between clozapine serum or plasma concentrations and clinical efficacy. Using pooled data, we investigated the association between improvement of clinical outcome and clozapine or norclozapine plasma concentrations, the sum of clozapine and norclozapine plasma concentrations, and the coefficient of variation of clozapine plasma concentrations. Using available individual data, we assessed the relationship between clozapine plasma concentrations and clinical response (changes in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score) and identified a threshold level for a favourable clinical response.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies satisfied inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis showed that responders had clozapine plasma concentrations that were, on average, 117 ng/mL higher than non-responders. The patients with plasma clozapine concentrations above the thresholds identified in each study had a higher likelihood of responding (odds ratio = 2.94, p < 0.001). Norclozapine plasma concentrations were not associated with a clinical response. The meta-analysis of individual data supported this result and confirmed the link between clozapine concentrations and a change in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score and/or the probability of clinical response. Finally, with the analysis of the coefficient of variation of clozapine plasma concentrations, we found that a greater inter-individual fluctuation in plasma concentrations was associated with a loss of clinical response.

CONCLUSIONS

Our work confirmed that, in contrast to clozapine doses, clozapine plasma concentrations were related to a favourable clinical response, with a mean difference between responders and non-responders of 117 ng/mL. A threshold for a treatment response of 407 ng/mL was determined, with a high discriminatory capacity, and a sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 89.1%, respectively.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Antiseizure and Psychiatric Medications

Antiseizure medications and drugs for psychiatric diseases are frequently used in combination. In this context, pharmacokinetic interactions between these drugs may occur. The vast majority of these interactions are primarily observed at a metabolic level and result from changes in the activity of the cytochrome P450 (CYP). Carbamazepine, phenytoin, and barbiturates induce the oxidative biotransformation and can consequently reduce the plasma concentrations of tricyclic antidepressants, many typical and atypical antipsychotics and some benzodiazepines. Newer antiseizure medications show a lower potential for clinically relevant interactions with drugs for psychiatric disease. The pharmacokinetics of many antiseizure medications is not influenced by antipsychotics and anxiolytics, while some newer antidepressants, namely fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and viloxazine, may inhibit CYP enzymes leading to increased serum concentrations of some antiseizure medications, including phenytoin and carbamazepine. Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions may be anticipated by knowledge of CYP enzymes involved in the biotransformation of individual medications and of the influence of the specific comedication on the activity of these CYP enzymes. As a general rule, these interactions can be managed by careful evaluation of clinical response and, when indicated, individualized dosage adjustments guided by measurement of drugs serum concentrations, especially if pharmacokinetic interactions may cause any change in seizure control or signs of toxicity. Further studies are required to improve predictions of pharmacokinetic interactions between antiseizure medications and drugs for psychiatric diseases providing practical helps for clinicians in the clinical setting.

Do Indian patients with schizophrenia need half the recommended clozapine dose to achieve therapeutic serum level? An exploratory study

Inter-racial differences in serum clozapine have received less scientific importance, as there are fewer studies on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) from Asia. We measured the serum clozapine levels in 142 patients with schizophrenia and related disorders at a tertiary care psychiatric institute in India. The clozapine concentration per milligram (mg) of oral clozapine dose (C/D ratio) was calculated, and the C/D ratio was used to estimate oral clozapine dose needed to achieve therapeutic serum clozapine level (350 ng/ml). This study examined Indian patients only and compared the results with weighted mean serum clozapine and its correlates in Caucasian population, based on published scientific literature. The median C/D ratio in our sample was 2.5 (n = 142), and the clozapine dose needed to achieve therapeutic serum clozapine level was 140 mg/d. The median C/D ratio of our subjects was nearly two and a half times higher than the weighted mean C/D ratio of Caucasians (2.5 v/s 1.07) reported elsewhere. After excluding the significant pharmacokinetic interactions and stratifying according to gender and smoking status, the estimated clozapine dose to achieve therapeutic serum level in male smokers (n = 9) and female non-smokers (n = 38) were 238 mg/d (C/D ratio; 1.47) and 120 mg/d (C/D ratio:2.93) respectively. On comparing, male smokers (600 mg/d versus 238 mg/d) and female non-smokers (300 mg/d versus 120 mg/d) in our study needed about 40% of the recommended clozapine dose for Caucasians to achieve therapeutic serum clozapine level. The pharmacogenetic correlates of lesser clozapine dose requirement in the Indian population require further research.

Can valproic acid be an inducer of clozapine metabolism?

INTRODUCTION

Prior clozapine studies indicated no effects, mild inhibition or induction of valproic acid (VPA) on clozapine metabolism. The hypotheses that (i) VPA is a net inducer of clozapine metabolism, and (ii) smoking modifies this inductive effect were tested in a therapeutic drug monitoring study.

METHODS

After excluding strong inhibitors and inducers, 353 steady-state total clozapine (clozapine plus norclozapine) concentrations provided by 151 patients were analyzed using a random intercept linear model.

RESULTS

VPA appeared to be an inducer of clozapine metabolism since total plasma clozapine concentrations in subjects taking VPA were significantly lower (27% lower; 95% confidence interval, 14-39%) after controlling for confounding variables including smoking (35% lower, 28-56%).

DISCUSSION

Prospective studies are needed to definitively establish that VPA may (i) be an inducer of clozapine metabolism when induction prevails over competitive inhibition, and (ii) be an inducer even in smokers who are under the influence of smoking inductive effects on clozapine metabolism.

Clinically significant drug interactions with atypical antipsychotics

Atypical antipsychotics [also known as second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs)] have become a mainstay therapeutic treatment intervention for patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorders and other psychotic conditions. These agents are commonly used with other medications--most notably, antidepressants and antiepileptic drugs. Drug interactions can take place by various pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmaceutical mechanisms. The pharmacokinetic profile of each SGA, especially with phase I and phase II metabolism, can allow for potentially significant drug interactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions arise when agents have comparable receptor site activity, which can lead to additive or competitive effects without alterations in measured plasma drug concentrations. Additionally, the role of drug transporters in drug interactions continues to evolve and may effect both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Pharmaceutical interactions occur when physical incompatibilities take place between agents prior to drug absorption. Approximate therapeutic plasma concentration ranges have been suggested for a number of SGAs. Drug interactions that markedly increase or decrease the concentrations of these agents beyond their ranges can lead to adverse events or diminished clinical efficacy. Most clinically significant drug interactions with SGAs occur via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. Many but not all drug interactions with SGAs are identified during drug discovery and pre-clinical development by employing a series of standardized in vitro and in vivo studies with known CYP inducers and inhibitors. Later therapeutic drug monitoring programmes, clinical studies and case reports offer methods to identify additional clinically significant drug interactions. Some commonly co-administered drugs with a significant potential for drug-drug interactions with selected SGAs include some SSRIs. Antiepileptic mood stabilizers such as carbamazepine and valproate, as well as other antiepileptic drugs such as phenobarbital and phenytoin, may decrease plasma SGA concentrations. Some anti-infective agents such as protease inhibitors and fluoroquinolones are of concern as well. Two additional important factors that influence drug interactions with SGAs are dose and time dependence. Smoking is very common among psychiatric patients and can induce CYP1A2 enzymes, thereby lowering expected plasma levels of certain SGAs. It is recommended that ziprasidone and lurasidone are taken with food to promote drug absorption, otherwise their bioavailability can be reduced. Clinicians must be aware of the variety of factors that can increase the likelihood of clinically significant drug interactions with SGAs, and must carefully monitor patients to maximize treatment efficacy while minimizing adverse events.

Interactions between antiepileptics and second-generation antipsychotics

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions (DIs) can occur between antiepileptics (AEDs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAPs). Some AED and SGAP pharmacodynamic mechanisms are poorly understood. AED-SGAP combinations are used for treating comorbid illnesses or increasing efficacy, particularly in bipolar disorder.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a comprehensive review of the interactions between antiepileptics and second-generation antipsychotics. The authors cover pharmacokinetic AED-SGAP DI studies, the newest drug pharmacokinetics in addition to the limited pharmacodynamic DI studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Dosing correction factors and measuring SGAP levels can help to compensate for the inductive properties of carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone. Further studies are needed to establish the clinical relevance of combining: i) AED strong inducers with amisulpride, asenapine, iloperidone, lurasidone and paliperidone; ii) valproate with aripiprazole, asenapine, clozapine and olanzapine; iii) high doses of oxcarbazepine (≥ 1500 mg/day) or topiramate (≥ 400 mg/day) with aripiprazole, lurasidone, quetiapine, risperidone, asenapine and olanzapine. Two pharmacodynamic DIs are beneficial: i) valproate-SGAP combinations may have additive effects in bipolar disorder, ii) combining topiramate or zonisamide with SGAPs may decrease weight gain. Three pharmacodynamic DIs contributing to decreased safety are common: sedation, weight gain and swallowing disturbances. A few AED-SGAP combinations may increase risk for osteoporosis or nausea. Three potentially lethal but rare pharmacodynamic DIs include pancreatitis, agranulocytosis/leukopenia and heat stroke. The authors believe that collaboration is needed from drug agencies and pharmaceutical companies, the clinicians using these combinations, researchers with expertise in meta-analyses, grant agencies, pharmacoepidemiologists and DI pharmacologists for future progression in this field.

Factors affecting interindividual differences in clozapine response: a review and case report

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine is the most powerful new‐generation antipsychotic. Although this drug leads to great therapeutic benefits, two types of undesirable conditions frequently occur with its use: side effects and resistance to treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine would be very useful to avoid both these situations. The necessity of monitoring the therapy is the result of a wide interindividual variability in the metabolism of clozapine. In this review, we highlight all the conditions underlying this variability, analyzing them one by one.

METHODS

Relevant literature was identified through a search of MEDLINE and PubMed. In addition, the case of a treatment‐resistant patient with accelerated metabolism of clozapine is reported as representative of utility of therapeutic drug monitoring in terms of clozapine dose adjustment.

RESULTS

Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 enzymes and of neurotransmitter receptors; drug interactions; interactions of clozapine with other substances such as food and drink; smoking; and nonmodifiable variables such as age, ethnicity, and gender have been examined in relation to the existing scientific literature. The laboratory techniques that clinicians could use to identify these variables and adequate therapies are also reviewed.

Metabolic drug interactions with newer antipsychotics: a comparative review

Newer antipsychotics introduced in clinical practice in recent years include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and amisulpride. These agents are subject to drug-drug interactions with other psychotropic agents or with medications used in the treatment of concomitant physical illnesses. Most pharmacokinetic interactions with newer antipsychotics occur at the metabolic level and usually involve changes in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in their biotransformation, i.e. the cytochrome P450 (CYP) monooxygenases and/or uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Clozapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2, with additional contribution by other CYP isoforms. Risperidone is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A4. Olanzapine undergoes both direct conjugation and CYP1A2-mediated oxidation. Quetiapine is metabolized by CYP3A4, while sertindole and aripiprazole are metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Ziprasidone pathways include aldehyde oxidase-mediated reduction and CYP3A4-mediated oxidation. Amisulpride is primarily excreted in the urine and undergoes relatively little metabolism. While novel antipsychotics are unlikely to interfere with the elimination of other drugs, co-administration of inhibitors or inducers of the major enzymes responsible for their metabolism may modify their plasma concentrations, leading to potentially significant effects. Most documented metabolic interactions involve antidepressant and anti-epileptic drugs. Of a particular clinical significance is the interaction between fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and clozapine. Differences in the interaction potential among the novel antipsychotics currently available may be predicted based on their metabolic pathways. The clinical relevance of these interactions should be interpreted in relation to the relative width of their therapeutic index. Avoidance of unnecessary polypharmacy, knowledge of the interaction profiles of individual agents, and careful individualization of dosage based on close evaluation of clinical response and, possibly, plasma drug concentrations are essential to prevent and minimize potentially adverse drug interactions in patients receiving newer antipsychotics.

Use of psychotropic drugs in patients with epilepsy: interactions and seizure risk

It is now accepted that patients with epilepsy are more prone than the general population to develop psychiatric disorders, being significantly at risk due to psychosocial reasons, the presence of electrophysiologic and anatomopathologic abnormalities mainly in the limbic system, and because they are taking antiepileptic drugs which may have negative psychotropic effects. It is also known that many patients with epilepsy sometimes receive psychotropic medications on account of their psychiatric symptoms. This review focuses on the main problems that a clinician may encompass when treating psychiatric disorders in patients with epilepsy. On one hand, the effects of antiepileptic drugs on mood and behavior for a correct differential diagnosis of psychiatric symptoms. On the other hand, the main factors that may affect choice of therapy, patients' response and compliance, when prescribing antidepressants or antipsychotic drugs, drug interactions and the potential proconvulsive risk are reviewed.

Interactions between Antiepileptic and Antipsychotic Drugs

Antiepileptic and antipsychotic drugs are often prescribed together. Interactions between the drugs may affect both efficacy and toxicity. This is a review of human clinical data on the interactions between the antiepileptic drugs carbamazepine, valproic acid (sodium valproate), vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, pregabalin, felbamate, zonisamide, phenobarbital and phenytoin with the antipsychotic drugs risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, clozapine, amisulpride, sulpiride, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, haloperidol and chlorpromazine; the limited information on interactions between antiepileptic drugs and zuclopenthixol, periciazine, fluphenazine, flupenthixol and pimozide is also presented. Many of the interactions depend on the induction or inhibition of the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, but other important mechanisms involve the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoenzymes and protein binding. There is some evidence for the following effects. Carbamazepine decreases the plasma concentrations of both risperidone and its active metabolite. It also decreases concentrations of olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, haloperidol, zuclopenthixol, flupenthixol and probably chlorpromazine and fluphenazine. Quetiapine increases the ratio of carbamazepine epoxide to carbamazepine and this may lead to toxicity. The data on valproic acid are conflicting; it may either increase or decrease clozapine concentrations, and it appears to decrease aripiprazole concentrations. Chlorpromazine possibly increases valproic acid concentrations. Lamotrigine possibly increases clozapine concentrations. Phenobarbital decreases clozapine, haloperidol and chlorpromazine concentrations. Phenytoin decreases quetiapine, clozapine, haloperidol and possibly chlorpromazine concentrations. There are major gaps in the data. In many cases there are no published clinical data on interactions that would be predicted on theoretical grounds.

[Pharmacological treatment of psychosis in epilepsy]

Epilepsy is one of the main causes of functional disability, and it is usually associated to psychiatric comorbidity, such as psychosis of epilepsy (POE). POE requires more careful pharmacological treatment, considering the propensity of the antipsychotics (AP) to provoke seizures and the risk of pharmacokinetic interaction with anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). We discussed the classification and the main types of POE, as well as some characteristics of AP typical and atypical, its potential to decrease the epileptogenic threshold (ET) and possible interactions between AP and AED. Atypical AP, except clozapine, disclosed smaller influence on ET than typical AP. Regarding pharmacokinetic interactions, AEDs are related with a significant increase of the AP metabolism. Therefore, in spite of the risk for AP induced convulsions be dose-dependent, higher doses of AP can be necessary in the treatment of POE.

Metabolic drug interactions with new psychotropic agents

New psychotropic drugs introduced in clinical practice in recent years include new antidepressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and 'third generation' antidepressants, and atypical antipsychotics, i.e. clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and amisulpride. These agents are extensively metabolized in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and are therefore susceptible to metabolically based drug interactions with other psychotropic medications or with compounds used for the treatment of concomitant somatic illnesses. New antidepressants differ in their potential for metabolic drug interactions. Fluoxetine and paroxetine are potent inhibitors of CYP2D6, fluvoxamine markedly inhibits CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, while nefazodone is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. These antidepressants may be involved in clinically significant interactions when coadministered with substrates of these isoforms, especially those with a narrow therapeutic index. Other new antidepressants including sertraline, citalopram, venlafaxine, mirtazapine and reboxetine are weak in vitro inhibitors of the different CYP isoforms and appear to have less propensity for important metabolic interactions. The new atypical antipsychotics do not affect significantly the activity of CYP isoenzymes and are not expected to impair the elimination of other medications. Conversely, coadministration of inhibitors or inducers of the CYP isoenzymes involved in metabolism of the various antipsychotic compounds may alter their plasma concentrations, possibly leading to clinically significant effects. The potential for metabolically based drug interactions of any new psychotropic agent may be anticipated on the basis of knowledge about the CYP enzymes responsible for its metabolism and about its effect on the activity of these enzymes. This information is essential for rational prescribing and may guide selection of an appropriate compound which is less likely to interact with already taken medication(s).

Clinically important drug interactions in epilepsy: interactions between antiepileptic drugs and other drugs

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly prescribed for long periods, up to a lifetime, and many patients will require treatment with other agents for the management of concomitant or intercurrent conditions. When two or more drugs are prescribed together, clinically important interactions can occur. Among old-generation AEDs, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone are potent inducers of hepatic enzymes, and decrease the plasma concentration of many psychotropic, immunosuppressant, antineoplastic, antimicrobial, and cardiovascular drugs, as well as oral contraceptive steroids. Most new generation AEDs do not have clinically important enzyme inducing effects. Other drugs can affect the pharmacokinetics of AEDs; examples include the stimulation of lamotrigine metabolism by oral contraceptive steroids and the inhibition of carbamazepine metabolism by certain macrolide antibiotics, antifungals, verapamil, diltiazem, and isoniazid. Careful monitoring of clinical response is recommended whenever a drug is added or removed from a patient's AED regimen.

Antiepileptic-antipsychotic drug interactions: a critical review of the evidence

The potential for drug-drug interactions in psychiatry and patients with epilepsy is very high. Moreover, antiepileptic drugs are widely used outside epilepsy as psychotropic agents and their spectrum of activity on behavior is of considerable interest to psychopharmacology. In both neurologic and psychiatric practice, pharmacotherapy combinations are commonly used to treat comorbid psychiatric and neurologic disorders, to reduce or control the adverse effects of a medication or to increase its efficacy. This paper focuses on the metabolic pharmacokinetic interactions between two classes of psychotropic drugs: antiepileptic and antipsychotic drugs. The degree of documentation varies for many interactions from clinical case-report experiences to well established research outcomes. The evidence and the clinical significance of these interactions are reviewed. In general, it is better to use as few drugs as possible, as multicolored politherapies increase the possible adverse effects of drug interactions and reduce patient compliance.

Clinical significance of pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic and psychotropic drugs

As antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and psychotropic agents are increasingly used in combination, the possibility of pharmacokinetic interactions between these compounds is relatively common. Most pharmacokinetic interactions between AEDs and psychoactive drugs occur at a metabolic level, and usually involve changes in the activity of the cytochrome P450 mixed-function oxidases (CYP) involved in their biotransformation. As a consequence of CYP inhibition or induction, plasma concentrations of a given drug may reach toxic or subtherapeutic levels, and dosage adjustments may be required to avoid adverse effects or clinical failure. Enzyme-inducing AEDs, such as carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), and barbiturates, stimulate the oxidative biotransformation of many concurrently prescribed psychotropics. In particular, these AEDs may decrease the plasma concentrations of tricyclic antidepressants, many antipsychotics, including traditional compounds, i.e., haloperidol and chlorpromazine, and newer agents, i.e., clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone, and some benzodiazepines. Conversely, new AEDs appear to have a lower potential for interactions with all psychotropic drugs. While antipsychotics and anxiolytics do not significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of most AEDs, some newer antidepressants, such as viloxazine, fluoxetine, and fluvoxamine, may lead to higher serum levels of some AEDs, namely CBZ and PHT, through inhibition of CYP enzymes. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions have been documented between AEDs and lithium. Information about CYP enzymes responsible for the biotransformation of individual agents and about the effects of these compounds on the activity of specific CYP enzymes may help in predicting and avoiding clinically significant interactions. Apart from careful clinical observation, serum level monitoring of AEDs and psychotropic drugs can be useful in determining the need for dosage adjustments, especially if there is any change in seizure control, or possible toxicity.

Clozapine serum concentrations are lower in smoking than in non-smoking schizophrenic patients

Serum concentrations of clozapine and its main metabolite demethylclozapine were measured in 44 schizophrenic inpatients, of whom ten were non-smokers and 34 smokers. When comparing their clozapine dose and body weight-related serum drug levels, we found that clozapine and demethylclozapine concentrations were about 40% lower in the smoking than in the non-smoking group, probably due to an inducing effect of smoking on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, which is involved in the metabolism of clozapine. We conclude that dosage adjustment may be necessary in clozapine-treated smokers.

Small effects of valproic acid on the plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites in patients with schizophrenic or affective disorders

Two separate studies were carried out to assess the effect of valproic acid on the steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites norclozapine and clozapine N-oxide in psychotic patients. In the first study, concentrations of clozapine and metabolites were compared between patients treated with clozapine in combination with sodium valproate (n = 15) and control patients treated with clozapine alone (n = 22) and matched for sex, age, body weight, and antipsychotic dosage. Patients comedicated with valproate tended to have higher clozapine levels and lower norclozapine levels, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. In a subsequent study, plasma concentrations of clozapine and its metabolites were determined in 6 patients with schizophrenia stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/d) before and after treatment with sodium valproate (900-1200 mg/d) for 4 weeks. Mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and its metabolites did not change significantly throughout the study, but there was a trend for clozapine levels to be higher and for norclozapine levels to be lower after valproate. Overall, these findings suggest that valproic acid may have an inhibiting effect on the CYP1A2- or CYP3A4-mediated conversion of clozapine to norclozapine. However, the interaction is unlikely to be clinically significant.