HPV Test as Test of Cure After Conization for CIN2+: A Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study

Performance of Different Follow-Up Strategies and Genotype-Based Recurrence Risk After Treatment of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the performance of different follow-up strategies after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3, including human papillomavirus (HPV) detection, cytology, or colposcopy, as well as their combinations. Additionally, we compared the influence of the persistence of HPV 16/18 versus that of other high-risk HPV genotypes (HR-HPV) in the recurrence risk.

METHODS

Retrospective register-based study, including women who had an excision of the transformation zone for CIN2 or CIN3 at our institution, between January 2011 and December 2022. The outcome assessed was histopathological recurrence/persistence of CIN2 or worse.

RESULTS

Of the 721 women included, 6.8% (49/721) had recurrence/persistence. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the HPV test were 97.4%, 80%, 22.3%, and 99.8%, respectively, whereas for cotesting (HR-HPV and cytology), 86.8%, 90.1%, 34.4%, and 99.1%, respectively. The referral rates for colposcopy were 24.3% and 14.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of colposcopy was low (40.0%).Women who were initially positive for non-16/18 genotypes at baseline who became HPV16/18 positive during follow-up, had a statistically significant increased risk of CIN2 or worse, compared with those who tested positive only for other HR-HPV genotypes during both stages (hazard ratio = 4.98; 95% CI = 1.66-14.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Human papillomavirus testing is the best strategy for follow-up after treatment of cervical HSIL. The addition of cytology triage decreases by more than 40% the referrals for colposcopy, without significantly missing cases of recurrence/persistence. Human papillomavirus 16/18 in the follow-up, regardless of being previously positive, is associated with higher risk of recurrence/persistence of HSIL.

Post-conization surveillance in an organized cervical screening program with more than 23,000 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is preventable through screening and vaccination against high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV). For a screening program to be successful it is vital that the clinical management and follow-up regime of patients with abnormal screening results is well developed and that the attendance rate for follow-up is high. The aim of the study was to analyze how effective conization with recommended follow-up was in preventing subsequent cervical cancer, and to evaluate how clinical follow-up recommendations are obeyed in the region of Skåne, Sweden.

METHODS

All women (n = 8835) who had undergone conization in the region of Skåne, Sweden, between the years of 2015 and 2021 were identified. Individuals with confirmed cervical cancer in the conization material were referred for additional treatment (n = 114), leaving 8721 included in the follow-up. Adherence to follow-up and cytological, histopathological and HPV status at follow-up were collected at eight, 12 and 24 months post-conization. The total follow-up time was from January 1, 2015, to January 30, 2023.

RESULTS

Within 12 months post-conization, 90% of the patients conducted a cytological cervical sample. The rates of a negative test of cure (HPV negative and normal cytology) were 69.7%, 76.3% and 84.4% at eight, 12 and 24 months post-conization respectively. The clearance of HPV was 79.6%, 80.8% and 87.8% at eight, 12 and 24 months post-conization respectively. Out of 5613 patients with a negative test of cure within one year after conization, no cervical cancer was found during follow-up and 11 (0.2%) women developed high-grade intraepithelial lesions/adenocarcinoma in situ (HSIL/AIS) with an average time from conization to new diagnosis of 42 months. The mean follow-up time was 32.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The clearance rate of hr-HPV post cervical conization due to dysplasia appears to be high within eight months. With a negative test of cure post cervical conization, the risk of cervical cancer within the following three years seems to be extremely low and the risk of developing HSIL/AIS was lower than the incidence of HSIL/AIS in the general screening population.

Timing of HPV vaccination as adjuvant treatment of CIN2+ recurrence in women undergoing surgical excision: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

OBJECTIVE

The main aim was to determine the overall vaccine effectiveness (VE) against recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) including specific VE associated with timing of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination using data from published studies.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis and meta-regression.

DATA SOURCES

A computerised literature search was undertaken using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Derwent Drug File, ProQuest Science and Technology, Cochrane and MedRxiv databases. To be eligible, the studies, with no language restrictions, had to be published between 1 January 2001 and 25 May 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

Included were studies with an unvaccinated reference group that assessed CIN2+ recurrence irrespective of the HPV genotype in women undergoing conisation provided. The present study was carried out in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. The risk of study bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidelines were used to assess the strength of evidence for the primary outcome. Data synthesis was conducted using meta-analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 14 322 publications, 20 studies with a total of 21 estimates were included. The overall VE against recurrent CIN2+ irrespective of the HPV genotype achieved 69.5% (95% CI: 54.7% to 79.5%). While the HPV vaccine valency, follow-up duration, type of study including its risk of bias had no effect on VE, the highest VE of 78.1% (95% CI: 68.7% to 84.7%) was reported for women receiving their first dose not earlier than the day of excision. This outcome was supported by additional analyses and a VE prediction interval ranging from 67.1% to 85.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of this meta-analysis and meta-regression convincingly showed the beneficial effect of post-excisional HPV vaccination against CIN2+ recurrence. Studies published to date have been unable to determine whether or not vaccination, completed or initiated before conisation, would be associated with more favourable results.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022353530.