The 95% effective dose of nalbuphine in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy compared to equivalent sufentanil

Effect of propofol combined with different anesthetic drugs on respiratory circulation function and erythrocyte immunity in patients undergoing intestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a difficult procedure with disadvantages of long operating time, intraoperative stimulation of sympathetic nerve excitation and postoperative pain, and suppression of immune function.

AIM

To investigate the effect of propofol combined with different anesthesia drugs in patients undergoing intestinal ESD.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty patients who planned to undergo intestinal ESD at our hospital from January 2019 to August 2022 were selected and randomly divided into three groups: A, B, and C, with 50 patients in each group. Group A was given propofol + sufentanil + nalbuphine, group B was given propofol + sufentanil, and group C was given propofol. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and respiratory and circulatory function (pressure airway, Paw), partial pressure of end-expiratory carbon dioxide (P_ETCO₂), bispectral index (BIS), red blood cell immunity [RBC immunocomplex rosette rate (RBC-ICR), erythrocyte cell membrane C3b receptor rosette rate (RBC-C3bR), and cooperative tumor erythrocyte rosette rate (ATER)], intraoperative and post-operative conditions, and adverse reactions were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

Paw and P_ETCO₂ in group A were significantly lower than those in group B and group C from T1 to T3 (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in BIS values among the three groups from T0 to T3 (P < 0.05). The amount of propofol used, the number of analgesic pump compressions within 48 h after surgery, and the consumption of analgesic pump drugs were significantly lower in group A than in group B and group C (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Propofol combined with sufentanil and nalbuphine can better alleviate respiratory and circulatory function inhibition, improve red cell immunity, and reduce the dosage of analgesic drugs in patients with intestinal ESD, with high safety.

Sufentanil Combined with Nalbuphine via Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Evaluation

Purpose

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy, opioid consumption, and safety profile of two patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) regimens (sufentanil combined with nalbuphine vs sufentanil alone) after cesarean section (CS).

Patients and Methods

Parturients (n = 1808) received sufentanil combined with nalbuphine (SN group) or sufentanil alone (S group) as PCIA after CS. The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score with movement (NRS-M) at 24 h after CS. Secondary outcomes were NRS scores at rest (NRS-R) at 24 and 48 h after CS, NRS-M at 48 h after CS, cumulative PCIA bolus times, and opioid consumption during the first 24 and 48 h postoperatively, which was measured in morphine-equivalent doses.

Results

The population comprised 993 and 815 subjects in the SN and S groups, respectively. At 24 and 48 h after CS, the respective NRS-M scores of the SN group (4.62, 3.37) were each significantly lower than those of the S group (5.18, 4.01; P < 0.01 for both). The corresponding NRS-S scores were similarly lower in the SN group (0.96, 0.19) than in the S group (2.05, 0.92; P < 0.01 for both). After adjusting for covariates, the SN group still had lower NRS-M than the S group at 24 h after CS (estimate adjusted = 0.565, P < 0.001). The PCIA bolus times were significantly lower in the SN group than in the S group. The rates of bradycardia and respiratory depression were lower in the SN group than in the S group. However, the rates of dizziness and postoperative hypotension were slightly higher in the SN group, and those of nausea/vomiting were comparable.

Conclusion

Compared with sufentanil alone, sufentanil combined with nalbuphine for PCIA provided superior analgesia in parturient women after CS.

Effects of Intravenous Analgesia Using Tramadol on Postoperative Depression State and Sleep Quality in Women Undergoing Abdominal Endoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

This study aimed to explore the effects of intravenous analgesia using tramadol on postoperative depression, anxiety, and sleep in women undergoing abdominal endoscopic surgery.

Patients and Methods

Two hundred female patients (100 in each group) who underwent abdominal endoscopic surgery were recruited to randomly receive intravenous analgesia with sufentanil combined with tramadol (tramadol group) or sufentanil (control group). The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative depression, which was assessed at 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery using the 13-item Beck Depression Inventory. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of anxiety and sleep quality, which were assessed using the 20-item Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Richards–Campbell Sleep Questionnaire.

Results

The incidence of depression (Beck depression scale≥4) during the 3-day follow-up in the control group was 51%, which was significantly higher than that in the tramadol group of 28% (relative risk [RR]=0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38–0.79; P=0.001). No difference was found in the incidence of anxiety state (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale≥40) between the tramadol and control groups (7%vs 5%; RR=1.40; 95% CI, 0.46–4.25; P=0.552). All of the Richards–Campbell sleep scales of patients in the tramadol group at 1 (77.4±15.2 vs 64.2±20.1, P<0.001), 2 (84.1±14.9 vs 71.8±18.8, P<0.001), and 3 days (87.0±12.2 vs 70.3±21.0, P<0.001) after surgery were higher than those in the control group.

Conclusion

Intravenous analgesia using tramadol can effectively improve the postoperative depression and sleep status of women undergoing abdominal endoscopic surgery. Tramadol is recommended for use in postoperative analgesia when improving postoperative mood, and sleep is needed in clinical practice.

Application of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined with Nalbuphine Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia in Postoperative Analgesia After Laparotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction

Pain is a common postoperative complication. The ideal postoperative analgesia is awake, safe, mobile, and without side effects. The objective of this study is to provide new ideas for postoperative analgesia by observing the safety and analgesic effect of different analgesic methods in patients undergoing laparotomy after surgery.

Methods

Patients, who underwent laparotomy between September 2019 and December 2020, were randomly divided into three groups: group S received sufentanil, group N received nalbuphine, group T + N received postoperative bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and nalbuphine. The primary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) score and the use of postoperative analgesic pump. Secondary outcomes included quality of life recovery (QoR-15) scale score and incidence of postoperative adverse reactions.

Results

Compared with group S and N, there were significant differences in the resting VAS score within 48 h after surgery, dynamic VAS score within 12 h after surgery, the first compression time, and cumulative use of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) drugs at 24 h in group T + N (P < 0.05). The QoR-15 score within 48 h after surgery in group T + N was significantly higher than group N (P < 0.05). The first exhaust time and the incidence of nausea and vomiting in group T + N were significantly lower than those in group N (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Sufentanil PCIA and nalbuphine PCIA have equivalent analgesic effects, while TAPB combined with nalbuphine PCIA can ensure a good analgesic effect, thereby reducing the incidence of adverse reactions.

Analgesic Effects of Different κ-Receptor Agonists Used in Daytime Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background

Comparing the effect of two different κ-receptor agonists, nalbuphine and oxycodone, and regular morphine in patients for prophylactic analgesia of acute pain after daytime laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-four patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive nalbuphine (group N), oxycodone (group O), and morphine (group M). The three groups were all given intravenous injection (iv.) of 0.15 mg/kg injection before incision and 0.05 mg/kg injection at the end of pneumoperitoneum. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores (incision, visceral, and shoulder) and Ramsay sedation scores at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours after surgery, the time of extubation, the incidence of postoperative adverse events, the satisfaction of pain treatment, and the duration of stay after surgery were all recorded.

Results

Compared with group M, the VAS scores of visceral pain at rest decreased in group N and group O at 1-8 h after surgery (P < 0.05). The VAS scores of visceral pain at movement in group N decreased longer than those in group O (P < 0.05). Compared with that of group M, the postoperative time in Ramsay sedation score of group O increased longer than that of group N (P < 0.05). Compared with group N, patients had worse sleep quality in group O, longer length of stay in group M, and lower satisfaction in both groups.

Conclusion

Compared with morphine, prophylactic use of the κ-receptor agonists, nalbuphine and oxycodone, during laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce postoperative visceral pain. Furthermore, the nalbuphine group had fewer adverse reactions, better analgesia, and better satisfaction.

Comparison of Analgesic Effects between Nalbuphine and Sufentanil in First-Trimester Surgical Abortion: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

Introduction

Surgical abortion is one of the commonly conducted procedures worldwide. Nevertheless, pregnant women still complain of procedural and postoperative pain despite the use of advanced anesthesia. It is vital to women’s reproductive healthcare to improve postsurgical pain management to achieve the lowest level of pain.

Methods

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial compared the analgesic effects between nalbuphine and sufentanil in patients who underwent first-trimester surgical abortion. In total, 224 patients were allocated randomly into (a) the sufentanil group that received sufentanil (0.1 ug/kg) combined propofol, and (b) the nalbuphine group that received nalbuphine (0.1 mg/kg) combined propofol. Postoperative pain scores, propofol injection pain, intraoperative analgesic effect, adverse events, and degree of satisfaction were recorded as outcome measures.

Results

The pain scores in the nalbuphine group were lower than those in the sufentanil group at 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, and 6 h after surgical abortion. In addition, the incidence and intensity of propofol injection pain were lower in the nalbuphine group. The degree of satisfaction of the patients in the nalbuphine group was higher than that in the sufentanil group. The intraoperative analgesic effect, hemodynamic fluctuation, and adverse events were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions

Nalbuphine combined with propofol is superior to sufentanil combined with propofol for first-trimester abortion surgeries.

Clinical Trial Registration

The trial was registered at www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2000040243.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00334-0.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of nalbuphine with single injection and patient-controlled analgesia mimic method in healthy Chinese volunteers

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Nalbuphine is a mu (μ) receptor partial antagonist/kappa (κ) receptor agonist analgesic and can be administered as a single injection or using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the clinical setting. However, differences in the pharmacokinetics of the two administration methods are unclear. Here, a clinical trial was performed to compare the pharmacokinetic characteristics and superiority of nalbuphine with a single-injection or PCA-mimic method to provide a reference for the selection of an appropriate administration method.

METHODS

Twenty healthy individuals were divided into two groups and injected with 10 mg nalbuphine intravenously using a single-injection or a PCA-mimic method (2 mg once for five times with a 30-min interval). Blood samples were collected, and safety was investigated. The liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was adopted to determine the concentration of nalbuphine in plasma.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The maximum concentration (C_max ) and area under concentration-time curve (AUC_0-t ) values of nalbuphine in the single-injection and PCA groups were as follows: C_max , 81.3 ± 24.7 and 39.8 ± 6.4 ng/ml, respectively; moreover, AUC_0-t , 110.3 ± 19.5 and 128.3 ± 23.0 h ng/ml, respectively. The effective analgesic concentration durations (EACDs) for the two administration methods were 1.39 ± 0.64 and 1.96 ± 0.91 h, respectively. Nalbuphine was well tolerated, and improvements were observed in the PCA group.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Compared with those in the single-injection group, the AUC_0-t and EACDs in the PCA group were similar, whereas C_max was decreased significantly. Therefore, the PCA method was more suitable for the clinical application of nalbuphine injection owing to the superiority of lower concentration fluctuation and the improved safety profile.

Analgesic Effect Comparison Between Nalbuphine and Sufentanil for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section

Background: Efficient maternal pain relief after cesarean delivery remains challenging, but it is important to improve outcomes for the mother and the newborn during the puerperium. We compared the analgesic effect of nalbuphine (a κ receptor agonist/μ receptor antagonistic) with that of sufentanil (a µ-receptor agonist) in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after cesarean section.

Methods: We enrolled 84 patients scheduled for elective cesarean sections with spinal anesthesia and randomized them into either nalbuphine or sufentanil groups (42 patients each). Pain scores, PCIA drug consumptions, degree of satisfaction, and adverse events were recorded as outcome measures.

Results: The pain scores at rest and uterine cramping pain scores in the nalbuphine group were lower than those in the sufentanil group at 6, 12, and 24 h after the operation. Also, the pain scores while switching to a seated position were lower in the nalbuphine group than in the sufentanil group at 6 and 12 h after the operation (p < 0.05). We found no significant differences in the PCIA drug consumption between the two groups. The degree of satisfaction in patients in the nalbuphine group was higher than that of patients in the sufentanil group (p = 0.01). Adverse events did not differ in the two groups.

Conclusion: PCIA with nalbuphine provides better analgesia and higher patient satisfaction than sufentanil after cesarean section.