Diagnosis of remnant hyperlipidaemia

Dietary recommendations for dysbetalipoproteinemia: A need for better evidence

The increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is well documented and is associated with the dysfunctional metabolism of remnant lipoproteins. Although these patients are known to respond well to lipid-lowering medication including statins and fibrates, the best dietary approach to lower remnant lipoprotein accumulation and to prevent cardiovascular outcomes remain unclear. Indeed, current evidence is based on studies published mainly in the 1970s, which comprise small sample sizes and methodological limitations. This review aims to summarize nutritional studies performed in DBL patients to date and to discuss potential avenues in this field and future areas of research.

Dysbetalipoproteinemia Is Associated With Increased Risk of Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease

CONTEXT

Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is a disorder in which remnant lipoproteins accumulate in the plasma due to a genetic apolipoprotein E dysfunction in conjunction with the presence of secondary metabolic factors. An increased risk of both coronary and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) has been observed in these patients in retrospective studies.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to compare the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and PVD in a cohort of patients with DBL compared with normolipidemic controls. As a secondary objective, the incidence of ASCVD and PVD was compared between patients with DBL and patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

METHODS

A total of 221 patients with DBL, 725 patients with FH, and 1481 normolipidemic controls were included in the study. The data were obtained by review of medical records.

RESULTS

In patients with DBL, there was an overall excess risk of PVD (hazard ratio [HR] 13.58, 95% CI 4.76-38.75) and ASCVD (HR 3.55, 95% CI 2.17-5.83) (P < .0001) when compared with normolipidemic controls. When compared with patients with FH, an increased risk of PVD (HR 3.89, 95% CI 1.20-12.55, P = .02) was observed in patients with DBL.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that the risks of ASCVD and PVD in DBL are >3-fold and >13-fold higher, respectively, than normolipidemic controls. Furthermore, the risk of PVD is ∼4-fold higher in DBL than in FH. Adequate screening of DBL is imperative to improve the clinical care of these patients by preventing the development of ASCVD.