1
|
Grabe-Heyne K, Henne C, Mariappan P, Geiges G, Pöhlmann J, Pollock RF. Intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an overview of epidemiology, burden, and unmet needs. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1170124. [PMID: 37333804 PMCID: PMC10272547 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1170124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer ranks among the most common cancers globally. At diagnosis, 75% of patients have non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Patients with low-risk NMIBC have a good prognosis, but recurrence and progression rates remain high in intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC, despite the decades-long availability of effective treatments for NMIBC such as intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). The present review provides an overview of NMIBC, including its burden and treatment options, and then reviews aspects that counteract the successful treatment of NMIBC, referred to as unmet treatment needs. The scale and reasons for each unmet need are described based on a comprehensive review of the literature, including insufficient adherence to treatment guidelines by physicians because of insufficient knowledge, training, or access to certain therapy options. Low rates of lifestyle changes and treatment completion by patients, due to BCG shortages or toxicities and adverse events as well as their impact on social activities, represent additional areas of potential improvement. Highly heterogeneous evidence for the effectiveness and safety of some treatments limits the comparability of results across studies. As a result, efforts are underway to standardize treatment schedules for BCG, but intravesical chemotherapy schedules remain unstandardized. In addition, risk-scoring models often perform unsatisfactorily due to significant differences between derivation and real-world cohorts. Reporting in clinical trials suffers from a lack of consistent outcomes reporting in bladder cancer clinical trials, paired with an under-representation of racial and ethnic minorities in many trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery (EBCS), Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Longo N, Celentano G, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Capece M, Califano G, Collà Ruvolo C, Mangiapia F, Fusco F, Morra S, Turco C, Di Bello F, Fusco GM, Cirillo L, Cacciapuoti C, Spirito L, Calogero A, Sica A, Sagnelli C, Creta M. Metastasis-Directed Radiation Therapy with Consolidative Intent for Oligometastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102373. [PMID: 35625979 PMCID: PMC9139743 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Patients with oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma represent a challenging subset of subjects to manage. Herein we summarized evidence about the role of metastasis-directed radiation therapy in this clinical setting. Available preliminary evidence supports the role of metastasis-directed radiation therapy as a safe and efficacious option as it has the potential to facilitate local disease control and overall survival. However, in the absence of data from high-quality trials, definitive recommendations cannot be provided, and patients should be counseled on an individual basis. Abstract The management of patients with oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) represents an evolving field in uro-oncology, and the role of metastasis-directed therapies, including metastasectomy and metastasis-directed radiation therapy (MDRT), is gaining increasing attention. Herein, we summarize available evidence about the role of MDRT with consolidative intent in oligometastatic UC patients. A systematic review was performed in December 2021. Six studies involving 158 patients were identified. Most patients (n = 120, 90.2%) had a history of bladder cancer and the most frequent sites of metastases were lymph nodes (n= 61, 52.1%) followed by the lungs (n = 34, 29%). Overall, 144 metastases were treated with MDRT. Median follow-up ranged from 17.2 to 25 months. Local control rates ranged from 57% to 100%. Median Overall Survival (OS) ranged from 14.9 to 51.0 months and median progression-free survival ranged from 2.9 to 10.1 months. Rates of OS at one and two years ranged from 78.9% to 96% and from 26% to 63%, respectively. Treatment-related toxicity was recorded in few patients and in most cases a low-grade toxicity was evident. MDRT with consolidative intent represents a potential treatment option for selected patients with oligometastatic UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0817462611
| | - Roberto La Rocca
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Marco Capece
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Francesco Mangiapia
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Ferdinando Fusco
- Department of Woman, Child and General, Specialized Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.F.); (L.S.)
| | - Simone Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Carmine Turco
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Giovanni Maria Fusco
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Luigi Cirillo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Crescenzo Cacciapuoti
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Lorenzo Spirito
- Department of Woman, Child and General, Specialized Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.F.); (L.S.)
| | - Armando Calogero
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Va Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Antonello Sica
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Caterina Sagnelli
- Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Largo Madonna delle Grazie n. 1, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yamamoto A, Kawashima A, Uemura T, Yamamichi G, Tomiyama E, Koh Y, Matsushita M, Kato T, Hatano K, Uemura M, Nonomura N. Biological distinction between grades 2 and 3 with respect to intravesical recurrence in T1 high-grade bladder tumors: a retrospective study. BMC Urol 2022; 22:59. [PMID: 35413902 PMCID: PMC9006582 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01000-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pathological grading system for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is based on the WHO 2004/2016 classification system (low-grade: LG/high-grade: HG) and the WHO 1973 classification system (Grade 1: G1/Grade 2: G2/Grade 3: G3). Recently, the usefulness of combining both systems and classifying the tumors as LG/G1, LG/G2, HG/G2, and HG/G3 has been demonstrated. In this study, we compared the prognosis of intravesical recurrence in relation to different treatment intensities between HG/G2 and HG/G3 bladder cancers. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and therapeutic outcomes of 145 patients diagnosed with T1 HG bladder cancer between 2000 and 2020. We classified 145 patients into three groups: (1) patients with T1 HG/G2 and HG/G3 who received intravesical instillation therapy (n = 76), (2) patients with T1 HG/G2 who did not receive intravesical instillation therapy (n = 32), and (3) patients with T1 HG/G3 who did not receive intravesical instillation therapy (n = 37). RESULTS The median intravesical recurrence-free survival for all patients was 34.2 months. The number of tumors, the presence of intravesical instillation therapy, and tumor grade were significant prognostic factors for intravesical recurrence in all cases. Groups 2 and 3 showed significantly worse prognosis than group 1 in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Regarding intravesical recurrence, intravesical instillation therapy is necessary for both T1 HG/G3 and T1 HG/G2 bladder cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akinaru Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Atsunari Kawashima
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Toshihiro Uemura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Gaku Yamamichi
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Eisuke Tomiyama
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yoko Koh
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Makoto Matsushita
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Taigo Kato
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Koji Hatano
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Motohide Uemura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|