Routine HIV Test Results in 6 US Clinical Laboratories Using the Recommended Laboratory HIV Testing Algorithm With Geenius HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay

Assessment of the performance regarding confirmatory diagnosis and initiation of antiretroviral therapy under a modified national HIV testing algorithm and pay-for-performance program in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

A pay-for-performance plan for rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) commencement was initiated in 2018, while a modified testing algorithm offers immunochromatographic test (ICT) to replace Western blot (WB), and simultaneous testing with ICT and Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) for HIV-positive sera was adopted in 2019 in Taiwan.

METHODS

Serum specimens collected from 1117 suspected or confirmed HIV infection cases in 2016-2019 were reassessed the performance of WB, ICT, and NAAT. We reviewed the medical records of 10,732 individuals diagnosed with HIV in 2015-2021 to determine the time from screening to confirmatory diagnosis, followed by ART commencement.

RESULTS

All 860 WB-positives were also positive by ICT and NAAT. The positive detection percentages were 37.0% by ICT and 51.4% by NAAT for 257 WB-indeterminate and -negative sera. The sensitivity for WB and ICT was 93.8% and 95.5%, respectively. In the people living with HIV (PLHIV) cohort, the median time from initial positive to confirmatory diagnosis decreased from 5 to 6 days before 2019 to 1 day in 2021. The median time from initial positive to ART initiation decreased from 37 days in 2015, 14 days in 2018, to 6 days in 2021. Compared to 2015-2017, the time to ART initiation was 91.48 days lower in 2018 (P < 0.001) and 100.66 days lower in 2019-2021 (P < 0.001) by the adjusted linear regression model.

CONCLUSION

A significant decrease in the time to ART initiation was observed after initiation of the pay-for-performance program and optimized testing algorithm in Taiwan.

Isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology in HIV detection

Nucleic acid testing for HIV plays an important role in the early diagnosis and monitoring of antiretroviral therapy outcomes in HIV patients and HIV-infected infants. Currently, the main molecular diagnostic methods employed are complex, time-consuming, and expensive to operate in resource-limited areas. Isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology overcomes some of the shortcomings of traditional assays and makes it possible to use point-of-care tests for molecular HIV detection. Here, we summarize and discuss the latest technological advances in isothermal nucleic acid amplification for HIV detection, with the intent of providing guidance for the development of subsequent HIV assays with high sensitivity and specificity.

Performance of HIV rapid testing algorithm in Nigeria: Findings from a household-based Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS)

BACKGROUND

The Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS), a cross-sectional household survey, was conducted in 2018 with primary objectives to estimate HIV prevalence, HIV-1 incidence, and status of UNAIDS 90-90-90 cascade. We conducted retrospective analysis of the performance of HIV rapid tests and the national HIV testing algorithm used in Nigeria.

METHODS

The national algorithm included Determine HIV-1/2 as test 1 (T1), Unigold HIV-1/2 as test 2 (T2), and StatPak HIV-1/2 as the tie-breaker test (T3). Individuals reactive with T1 and either T2 or T3 were considered HIV-positive. HIV-positive specimens from the algorithm were further confirmed for the survey using supplemental test Geenius HIV-1/2. If Geenius did not confirm HIV-positive status, HIV-1 Western blot was performed. We calculated the concordance between tests and positive predictive value (PPV) of the algorithm on unweighted data.

RESULTS

Of 204,930 participants (ages ≥18 months) 5,103 (2.5%) were reactive on T1. Serial testing of T1 reactive specimens with T2 or if needed by tiebreaker T3 identified 2958 (1.44%) persons as HIV-positive. Supplemental testing confirmed 2,800 (95%) as HIV-positive (HIV-1 = 2,767 [98.8%]; HIV-2 = 5 [0.2%]; dual infections = 22 [0.8%]). Concordance between T1 and T2 was 56.6% while PPV of the national algorithm was 94.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show high discordant rates and poor PPV of the national algorithm with a false-positive rate of about 5.5% in the NAIIS survey. Considering our findings have major implications for HIV diagnosis in routine HIV testing services, additional evaluation of testing algorithm is warranted in Nigeria.

An HIV Diagnostic Testing Algorithm Using the cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 Qualitative Assay for HIV Type Differentiation and Confirmation

Human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2) diagnostic testing algorithms recommended by the Centers for Disease Control involve up to three tests and rely mostly on detection of viral antigen and host antibody responses. HIV-1 p24 antigen/HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody-reactive specimens are confirmed with an immunochromatographic HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation assay, and negative or indeterminate results from the differentiation assay are resolved by an HIV-1-specific nucleic acid amplification test (NAT). The performance of a proposed alternative algorithm using the cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 qualitative NAT as the differentiation assay was evaluated in subjects known to be infected with HIV-1 (n = 876) or HIV-2 (n = 139), at low (n = 6,017) or high (n = 1,020) risk of HIV-1 infection, or at high-risk for HIV-2 infection (n = 498) (study A). The performance of the cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 qualitative test was also evaluated by comparison to an HIV-1 or HIV-2 alternative NAT (study B). The HIV-1 and HIV-2 overall percent agreements (OPA) in study A ranged from 95% to 100% in all groups. The positive percent agreements (PPA) for HIV-1 and HIV-2 were 100% (876/876) and 99.4% (167/168), respectively, for known positive groups. The negative percent agreement in the HIV low-risk group was 100% for both HIV-1 and HIV-2. In study B, the HIV-1 and HIV-2 OPA ranged from 99% to 100% in all groups evaluated (n = 183 to 1,030), and the PPA for HIV-1 and HIV-2 were 100% and 99.5%, respectively, for known positive groups. The cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 qualitative assay can discriminate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 based on HIV RNA and can be included in an alternative diagnostic algorithm for HIV.