High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Is Not Associated With Acute Cellular Rejection After Heart Transplantation

Association Between High Sensitivity Troponin Levels Following Pediatric Orthotopic Heart Transplantation and Intensive Care Unit Resource Utilization

The utility of troponin levels, including high sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), after orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) is controversial. Conflicting data exist regarding its use as a marker of acute rejection. Few studies have examined possible associations of hs-TnT levels immediately after OHT with metrics of intensive care unit (ICU) resource utilization or risk of acute rejection. We performed a retrospective cohort chart review including all OHT recipients < 20 years of age at our center between June 2019 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on supra- or sub-median initial hs-TnT levels (median 3462.5 ng/L). Primary outcome was days requiring ICU-level care, secondary outcomes included days intubated, days requiring positive pressure ventilation (PPV), days on inotropic medications, actual ICU length of stay, Vasoactive Inotrope Scores (VIS) on postoperative days (POD) 0 through 7, and acute rejection at 30 days and one year after OHT. Patients with higher hs-TnT required ICU level care for longer [13.5 (10-17.5) vs. 9.5 (8-12) days, p = 0.01] and spent more days intubated [6 (4-7) vs. 3 (3-5) days, p < 0.001], on PPV [9 (6-15) vs. 6 (5-8.5) days, p = 0.02], and on inotropes [11 (9-14) vs. 8 (7-11) days, p = 0.025]. VIS was only different between groups on POD7 [5 (3-7) vs. 3 (0-5), p = 0.04]. There was no difference in rejection between the groups. Higher hs-TnT immediately following pediatric OHT may predict higher ICU resource utilization, despite no difference in VIS, although it does not predict acute rejection in the first year after OHT.

Clinical Interpretation of Serum Troponin in the Era of High-Sensitivity Testing

Cardiac troponin (Tn) plays a central role in the evaluation of patients with angina presenting with acute coronary syndrome. The advent of high-sensitivity assays has improved the analytic sensitivity and precision of serum Tn measurement, but this advancement has come at the cost of poorer specificity. The role of clinical judgment is of heightened importance because, more so than ever, the interpretation of serum Tn elevation hinges on the careful integration of findings from electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, physical exam, interview, and other imaging and laboratory data to formulate a weighted differential diagnosis. A thorough understanding of the epidemiology, mechanisms, and prognostic implications of Tn elevations in each cardiac and non-cardiac etiology allows the clinician to better distinguish between presentations of myocardial ischemia and myocardial injury-an important discernment to make, as the treatment of acute coronary syndrome is vastly different from the workup and management of myocardial injury and should be directed at the underlying cause.

A gentler approach to monitor for heart transplant rejection

Despite developments in circulating biomarker and imaging technology in the assessment of cardiovascular disease, the surveillance and diagnosis of heart transplant rejection has continued to rely on histopathologic interpretation of the endomyocardial biopsy. Increasing evidence shows the utility of molecular evaluations, such as donor-specific antibodies and donor-derived cell-free DNA, as well as advanced imaging techniques, such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, in the assessment of rejection, resulting in the elimination of many surveillance endomyocardial biopsies. As non-invasive technologies in heart transplant rejection continue to evolve and are incorporated into practice, they may supplant endomyocardial biopsy even when rejection is suspected, allowing for more precise and expeditious rejection therapy. This review describes the current and near-future states for the evaluation of heart transplant rejection, both in the settings of rejection surveillance and rejection diagnosis. As biomarkers of rejection continue to evolve, rejection risk prediction may allow for a more personalized approach to immunosuppression.

The utilization of molecular microscope in management of heart transplant recipients in the era of noninvasive monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring for graft rejection is a fundamental tenet of post-transplant follow-up. In heart transplantation (HT) in particular, rejection has been traditionally assessed with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). EMB has potential complications and noted limitations, including interobserver variability in interpretation. Additional tests, such as basic cardiac biomarkers, cardiac imaging, gene expression profiling (GEP) scores, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and the novel molecular microscope diagnostic system (MMDx) have become critical tools in rejection surveillance beyond standard EMB.

METHODS

This paper describes an illustrative case followed by a review of MMDx within the context of other noninvasive screening modalities for rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest MMDx be used to assist with early detection of rejection in cases of discordance between EMB and other noninvasive studies.

Selection and Interpretation of Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Transplantation

The number of heart transplants performed annually in the United States and worldwide continues to increase, but there has been little change in graft longevity and patient survival over the past 2 decades. The reference standard for diagnosis of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection includes histologic and immunofluorescence evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy samples, despite invasiveness and high interrater variability for grading histologic rejection. Circulating biomarkers and molecular diagnostics have shown substantial predictive value in rejection monitoring, and emerging data support their use in diagnosing other posttransplant complications. The use of genomic (cell-free DNA), transcriptomic (mRNA and microRNA profiling), and proteomic (protein expression quantitation) methodologies in diagnosis of these posttransplant outcomes has been evaluated with varying levels of evidence. In parallel, growing knowledge about the genetically mediated immune response leading to rejection (immunogenetics) has enhanced understanding of antibody-mediated rejection, associated graft dysfunction, and death. Antibodies to donor human leukocyte antigens and the technology available to evaluate these antibodies continues to evolve. This review aims to provide an overview of biomarker and immunologic tests used to diagnose posttransplant complications. This includes a discussion of pediatric heart transplantation and the disparate rates of rejection and death experienced by Black patients receiving a heart transplant. This review describes diagnostic modalities that are available and used after transplant and the landscape of future investigations needed to enhance patient outcomes after heart transplantation.

Noninvasive biomarkers in heart transplant: 2020-2021 year in review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), the current gold standard for cardiac allograft monitoring is invasive, may have a low sensitivity and is associated with significant variability in histopathologic interpretation. Fortunately, on-going research is identifying noninvasive biomarkers that address some of these limitations. This review provides an update on noninvasive blood-based methods for rejection surveillance and diagnosis in heart transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies highlight good test performance to detect acute rejection for donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and microRNAs (miR). dd-cfDNA is sensitive, nonspecific, and has a high negative predictive value for acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection. Clinical utility trials are being planned to test its role as a rule-out test for acute rejection as compared to the EMB. miRs may have an added advantage as it may phenotype the subtypes of rejection alleviating the need for an EMB or permitting the initiation of targeted therapy while awaiting the results of the EMB.

SUMMARY

In this review, we discuss recent advances in the field of noninvasive biomarkers to detect allograft rejection after heart transplant. We provide a perspective of additional studies needed to prove their clinical utility and bring these biomarkers to widescale clinical use.