How and when to use clozapine

Differential impact of intermittent versus continuous treatment with clozapine on fatty acid metabolism in the brain of an MK-801-induced mouse model of schizophrenia

Continuous antipsychotic treatment is often recommended to prevent relapse in schizophrenia. However, the efficacy of antipsychotic treatment appears to diminish in patients with relapsed schizophrenia and the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. Moreover, though the findings are inconclusive, several recent studies suggest that intermittent versus continuous treatment may not significantly differ in recurrence risk and therapeutic efficacy but potentially reduce the drug dose and side effects. Notably, disturbances in fatty acid (FA) metabolism are linked to the onset/relapse of schizophrenia, and patients with multi-episode schizophrenia have been reported to have reduced FA biosynthesis. We thus utilized an MK-801-induced animal model of schizophrenia to evaluate whether two treatment strategies of clozapine would affect drug response and FA metabolism differently in the brain. Schizophrenia-related behaviors were assessed through open field test (OFT) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) test, and FA profiles of prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Additionally, we measured gene expression levels of enzymes involved in FA synthesis. Both intermittent and continuous clozapine treatment reversed hypermotion and deficits in PPI in mice. Continuous treatment decreased total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and FAs in the PFC, whereas the intermittent administration increased n-6 PUFAs, SFAs and FAs compared to continuous administration. Meanwhile, continuous treatment reduced the expression of Fads1 and Elovl2, while intermittent treatment significantly upregulated them. This study discloses the novel findings that there was no significant difference in clozapine efficacy between continuous and intermittent administration, but intermittent treatment showed certain protective effects on phospholipid metabolism in the PFC.

Promoting safer and wider worldwide use of clozapine

This issue focuses on the past, the present and the future of clozapine. Of the 43 clozapine articles, nine are historical articles dealing with the past, 29 deal with the present and five with laboratory assays which may influence its future use. These 43 articles include 219 different authors from 56 countries/regions and five continents.

Gene expression imputation provides clinical and biological insights into treatment-resistant schizophrenia polygenic risk

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed the polygenic nature of treatment-resistant schizophrenia TRS. Gene expression imputation allowed the translation of GWAS results into regulatory mechanisms and the construction of gene expression (GReX) risk scores (GReX-RS).  In the present study we computed GReX-RS from the largest GWAS of TRS to assess its association with clinical features. We perform transcriptome imputation in the largest GWAS of TRS to find GReX associated with TRS using brain tissues. Then, for each tissue, we constructed a GReX-RS of the identified genes in a sample of 254 genotyped first episode of psychosis (FEP) patients to test its association with clinical phenotypes, including clinical symptomatology, global functioning and cognitive performance. Our analysis provides evidence that the polygenic basis of TRS includes genetic variants that modulate the expression of certain genes in certain brain areas (substantia nigra, hippocampus, amygdala and frontal cortex), which at the same time are related to clinical features in FEP patients, mainly persistence of negative symptoms and cognitive alterations in sustained attention, which have also been suggested as clinical predictors of TRS. Our results provide a clinical explanation of the polygenic architecture of TRS and give more insight into the biological mechanisms underlying TRS.

Side effects of clozapine in older adults with treatment-resistant schizophrenia compared to younger adults

OBJECTIVES

To study the differences in side effects of clozapine between older adults aged ≥55 years and younger adults aged 18-55 years with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study in a large mental health institute in the Netherlands. All patients diagnosed with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who started with clozapine between 2011 and 2020 (N = 284) were included. We compared the number and type of side effects reported in the electronic patient files as well as the number of treatment discontinuations and the time until discontinuation, both due to side effects, of older adults versus younger adults.

RESULTS

In the younger age group (N = 183), the number of reported side effects was significantly higher in the first 3 months of treatment (Mann-Whitney U = 7341.5, p = 0.004) and after those 3 months (Mann-Whitney U = 5668.5, p < 0.001) compared with the number reported in the older age group (N = 101). Sedation, hypersalivation, dizziness, tachycardia, heartburn, nausea, weight gain, and constipation were reported significantly more often in the younger age group, and only extrapyramidal symptoms were reported significantly more often in the older age group. There was no significant difference in the number of treatment discontinuations due to side effects (23% vs. 21.8%, Chi-2 = 0.051, df = 1, p = 0.821) and time until discontinuation due to side effects (b = 0.091, SE = 0.335, p = 0.798) between younger and older adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Side effects of clozapine were reported significantly less often in older patients compared with younger patients. Older patients did not discontinue treatment due to side effects more often or earlier than younger patients. Older patients with schizophrenia may not be more vulnerable to side effects than younger adults.

The association between exposure to clozapine, olanzapine, and quetiapine and the outcomes perimyocarditis and heart failure: A population-based cohort study

The risk of cardiac adverse events following clozapine use is debated and is unknown for the chemically related and widely used antipsychotics olanzapine and quetiapine. National Swedish registers were used to identify all patients 16-75 years old with antipsychotic dispensations between 2005 and 2018. The short-term outcome was a diagnosis of perimyocarditis (pericarditis and/or myocarditis) within two months of first dispensation, and the long-term outcome was heart failure (including cardiomyopathy) within three years. Cox regressions with time varying exposure were used to estimate hazard rates (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 201,045 individuals were included in the cohort. The risk of developing perimyocarditis during clozapine treatment tripled compared to no antipsychotic treatment (HR 3.4, CI 1.6-7.3), although the absolute rate remained comparably low. The long-term risk of heart failure during clozapine treatment was also elevated (HR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.7). Treatment with either or both olanzapine or quetiapine was not associated with an increased relative risk of perimyocarditis, or heart failure compared to no antipsychotic treatment. Clozapine use is therefore associated with a substantially elevated short-term risk of perimyocarditis and an increased risk of heart failure within three years.

Second to none: rationale, timing, and clinical management of clozapine use in schizophrenia

Despite its enduring relevance as the single most effective and important evidence-based treatment for schizophrenia, underutilization of clozapine remains considerable. To a substantial degree, this is attributable to a reluctance of psychiatrists to offer clozapine due to its relatively large side-effect burden and the complexity of its use. This underscores the necessity for continued education regarding both the vital nature and the intricacies of clozapine treatment. This narrative review summarizes all clinically relevant areas of evidence, which support clozapine's wide-ranging superior efficacy - for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and beyond - and make its safe use eminently feasible. Converging evidence indicates that TRS constitutes a distinct albeit heterogeneous subgroup of schizophrenias primarily responsive to clozapine. Most importantly, the predominantly early onset of treatment resistance and the considerable decline in response rates associated with its delayed initiation make clozapine an essential treatment option throughout the course of illness, beginning with the first psychotic episode. To maximize patients' benefits, systematic early recognition efforts based on stringent use of TRS criteria, a timely offer of clozapine, thorough side-effect screening and management as well as consistent use of therapeutic drug monitoring and established augmentation strategies for suboptimal responders are crucial. To minimize permanent all-cause discontinuation, re-challenges after neutropenia or myocarditis should be considered. Owing to clozapine's unique efficacy, comorbid conditions including substance use and most somatic disorders should not dissuade but rather encourage clinicians to consider clozapine. Moreover, treatment decisions need to be informed by the late onset of clozapine's full effects, which for reduced suicidality and mortality rates may not even be readily apparent. Overall, the singular extent of its efficacy combined with the high level of patient satisfaction continues to distinguish clozapine from all other available antipsychotics.

Relationship between clozapine exposure and the onset of appendicitis in schizophrenia patients: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine may cause serious side effects despite benefits in patients with schizophrenia. Thus, an accurate understanding of the side-effect profile of clozapine is extremely important in the management of its administration to patients with schizophrenia. Our aim was to validate the relationship between clozapine exposure and appendicitis onset in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively compared the incidence and cumulative incidence of appendicitis in patients with schizophrenia with and without a history of clozapine exposure. Among the patients with schizophrenia who visited our hospital between June 2009 and August 2021, we extracted those with a history of clozapine treatment. Patients with a history of taking clozapine were defined as the clozapine exposure group, while the others were defined as the clozapine non-exposure group. Patients with a history of appendectomy before their initial visit to our hospital or with a history of clozapine use at other hospitals were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 65 patients in the clozapine exposure group and 400 patients in the clozapine non-exposure group who met the inclusion criteria. The exposure group exhibited a remarkably higher incidence of appendicitis during the observation period than the non-exposure group (863 cases vs. 124 cases per 100,000 person-years). In particular, if limited to the period of clozapine exposure, the incidence of appendicitis is extremely high, at 2,086 cases per 100,000 person-years. Moreover, multivariable analysis showed that clozapine exposure was an independent factor contributing to the onset of appendicitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine exposure is associated with appendicitis onset in patients with schizophrenia.

Adverse Drug Reactions in Relation to Clozapine Plasma Levels: A Systematic Review

Clozapine is the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Serious and even life-threatening adverse effects, mostly granulocytopenia, myocarditis, and constipation, are of great clinical concern and constitute a barrier to prescribing clozapine, thus depriving many eligible patients of a lifesaving treatment option. Interestingly, clozapine presents variable pharmacokinetics affected by numerous parameters, leading to significant inter- and intra-individual variation. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma clozapine levels confers a significant benefit in everyday clinical practice by increasing the confidence of the prescribing doctor to the drug and the adherence of the patient to the treatment, mainly by ensuring effective treatment and limited dose-related side effects. In the present systematic review, we aimed at identifying how a full range of adverse effects relates to plasma clozapine levels, using the Jadad grading system for assessing the quality of the available clinical evidence. Our findings indicate that EEG slowing, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, heart rate variability, hyperinsulinemia, metabolic syndrome, and constipation correlate to plasma clozapine levels, whereas QTc, myocarditis, sudden death, leucopenia, neutropenia, sialorrhea, are rather unrelated. Rapid dose escalation at the initiation of treatment might contribute to the emergence of myocarditis, or leucopenia. Strategies for managing adverse effects are different in these conditions and are discussed accordingly.

Association between previous and future antipsychotic adherence in patients initiating clozapine: real-world observational study

BACKGROUND

Although recognised as the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, clozapine remains underused. One reason is the widespread concern about non-adherence to clozapine because of poor adherence before initiating clozapine.

AIMS

To determine if prior poor out-patient adherence to treatmentbefore initiating clozapine predisposes to poor out-patient adherence to clozapine or to any antipsychotics (including clozapine) after its initiation.

METHOD

This cohort study included 3228 patients with schizophrenia living in Quebec (Canada) initiating (with a 2-year clearance period) oral clozapine (index date) between 2009 and 2016. Using pharmacy data, out-patient adherence to treatment was measured by the medication possession ratio (MPR), over a 1-year period preceding and following the index date. Five groups of patients were formed based on their prior MPR level (independent variable). Two dependent variables were defined after clozapine initiation (good out-patient adherence to any antipsychotics and to clozapine only). Along with multiple logistic regressions, state sequence analysis was used as a visual representation of antipsychotic-use trajectories over time, before and after clozapine initiation.

RESULTS

Although prior poor adherence to antipsychotics was associated with poor adherence after clozapine initiation, the absolute risk of subsequent poor adherence remained low, regardless of previous adherence level. Most patients adhered to their treatment after initiating clozapine (>68% to clozapine and >84% to any antipsychotics).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that poor adherence prior to initiating clozapine is widely recognised by clinicians as a barrier for the prescription of clozapine, the current study supports the initiation of clozapine in all eligible patients.

Medication Gaps and Antipsychotic Polypharmacy in Previously Hospitalized Schizophrenia Patients: An Electronic Cohort Study in Three Canadian Provinces

BACKGROUND

Real world evidence about antipsychotics focuses on rehospitalization. Modeling the time course of pharmacotherapy would show patients' adherence to medications and physicians' adherence to medication guidelines. We aimed to calculate the cumulative time spent in second generation antipsychotics (SGAs), gaps, antipsychotic polypharmacy, and clozapine in discharged schizophrenia patients.

METHODS

Hospitalization and pharmacy dispensing data from 2008-2018 in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia were linked and an electronic cohort (N = 2,997) was created (mean follow-up: 49 months, SD = 38). Cohort members were required to have a minimum of 6 weeks medicated with aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone.

RESULTS

The multistate model predicted that schizophrenia patients accumulated 44 months in SGA monotherapy, 4 months in polypharmacy, 11 months in medication gaps and 17 days in clozapine over a 5-year period. The majority of transitions were between SGA and medication gap. Accumulated time in medication gaps was seven times as much as in clozapine. Each 10% delay in SGA initiation post-discharge was associated with a 2, 1, and 6% higher risk for polypharmacy (95% CI: 1.01-1.02), gap (95% CI: 1.01-1.01), and clozapine (95% CI: 1.04-1.08), respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Schizophrenia patients accumulated more time unmedicated and in polypharmacy compared to clozapine. Either treatment guidelines for schizophrenia are not followed, or real-world challenges hamper their implementation.

Clozapine prescribing barriers in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia is prevalent and difficult to manage, as patients fail multiple antipsychotic trials before being considered as treatment-resistant. Currently clozapine is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia but remains under-prescribed. The purpose of this study is to investigate recent literature on clozapine in order to identify barriers to prescribing clozapine and categorize the recommended solutions.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using free text and the medical subject headings, we searched MEDLINE/PubMed electronic bibliographic database from 2017 until 2020. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed English language articles with multiple methodologies aiming to identify clozapine barriers in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We used search terms combining clozapine AND treatment OR treatment-resistant schizophrenia AND barriers AND prescribing OR prescription OR prescriber. We merged search results in a citation manager software, removed duplicates, and screened the remaining articles based on the study eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

We retrieved 123 studies, however, only 10 articles exclusively met the study inclusion criteria for full text review. These studies represented 20 countries; 6 were exclusively conducted in the US. The top barriers delineated by the studies include: providers' lack of knowledge and training (n = 7), concern about side effects (n = 8), and poor adherence (n = 7). All studies described more than 1 barrier. Other barriers included prescriber-perceived barriers (n = 4), administrative barriers (n = 5), and other healthcare systems-related barriers (n = 3). Top recommendations to overcome clozapine prescription barriers included improving prescriber clozapine education/training, utilizing interdisciplinary teams and providing integrated care via clozapine clinics, and simplifying blood test monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine remains under-prescribed for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia due to multiple barriers related to the individual prescriber, system of care, and technology. It is recommended that by improving prescriber knowledge and training, use of integrated care, and use of technology that can enable continuous, real-time blood test monitoring, these barriers may be overcome.

Clozapine levels as a predictor for therapeutic response: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Clozapine levels may be a more useful predictor of therapeutic response than the dose, given the variability in clozapine metabolism between individuals. We therefore systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the impact of clozapine levels on response and/or relapse to provide guidance on optimal clozapine levels.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, PsycInfo and Embase for studies exploring clozapine levels and response and/or relapse. Our primary meta-analysis was rates of response above and below clozapine level thresholds of 350 ng/ml and 600 ng/ml. Secondary analyses were undertaken of mean clozapine levels, dose and concentration/dose (C/D) ratio and response and/or relapse. A meta-regression by study duration was conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty studies met inclusion criteria. Clozapine levels above 350 ng/ml were associated with statistically significantly higher rates of response (OR 2.27 95% CI 1.40-3.67, p < 0.001), but not above 600 ng/ml (OR 1.40 95% CI 0.85-2.31, p = 0.19). Higher mean clozapine levels were associated with better rates of response (SMD 0.24, 95% CI 0.00-0.49, p = 0.05), and lower rates of relapse (SMD -0.72, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.19, p = 0.008). By contrast, neither clozapine dose nor C/D ratio was associated with differing rates of response. Similarly, study duration did not affect outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are in keeping with current guidelines that recommend targeting clozapine levels above 350 ng/ml before augmentation is considered. As some clozapine associated ADRs are dose dependent, levels above 600 ng/ml may have an unfavourable risk-benefit ratio.

Clozapine Management in Schizophrenia Inpatients: A 5-Year Prospective Observational Study of Its Safety and Tolerability Profile

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is well known for its efficacy and clinical superiority compared to other antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). However, it is frequently underutilized worldwide because of its acute adverse events, as well as for its long-term cardiometabolic and hematological consequences.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate 5-year safety in chronic TRS inpatients with continuous clozapine use.

METHODS

Patients with TRS and clozapine treatment were evaluated for 5 years. All participants were assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-effect Scale for Clozapine (GASS-C), Social Performance Scale (PSP) and Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). Clinical, cardiometabolic and hematological data were collected periodically. General linear models (GLM) repeated measures controlling for CLZ dose were utilized to determine differences in variables across the time.

RESULTS

Overall, 189 inpatients were screened for study participation. The final sample included twenty-one TRS patients (16 males, 76%) with an average age of 57.6 years, all with 5-year continuous use of clozapine (mean dose 266 mg/day). There was not a significant effect of time on BPRS (p=0.774), PSP (p=0.855) and SPMSQ (p=0.066); differences remained not significant after controlling for CLZ dose (p=0.585, p=0.467 and p=0.105, respectively). No changes were found in blood and clinical parameters except for red blood cell count, which decreased over time (p=0.024; η2= 0.952). Patients reported a significant BMI decrease (-8.98 kg, p=0.008) between baseline and 5 years last observation.

CONCLUSION

The findings show how the application of a structured dietary, clinical and therapeutic monitoring program in psychiatric care facilities could allow the safe and effective long-term cardiometabolic and hematological management of clozapine. The unique role that clozapine plays in the current treatment of patients with TRS requires greater clinical awareness. Although its acute and chronic side effects are notorious, its safety management is feasible and broadens its potential practical application.

Treatment patterns and appropriateness of antipsychotic prescriptions in patients with schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a chronic mental condition presenting a wide range of symptoms. Although it has a low prevalence compared to other mental conditions, it has a negative impact on social and occupational functions. This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of antipsychotic medications administered to schizophrenic patients and describe current treatment patterns for schizophrenia. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in all patients over the age of 15 with an active diagnosis of schizophrenia and treated with antipsychotics between 2008 and 2013 in the Valencia region. A total of 19,718 patients were eligible for inclusion. The main outcome assessed was inappropriateness of the pharmacotherapeutic management, including polypharmacy use. Altogether, 30.4% of patients received antipsychotic polypharmacy, and 6.8% were prescribed three or more antipsychotics. Overdosage affected 318 individuals (1.6%), and 21.5% used concomitant psychotropics without an associated psychiatric diagnosis. Women and people with a comorbid condition like anxiety or depression were less likely to receive antipsychotic polypharmacy. In contrast, increased polypharmacy was associated with concomitant treatment with other psychoactive drugs, and only in user on maintenance therapy, with more visits to the mental health hospital. Overall, we observed a high level of inappropriateness in antipsychotic prescriptions. Greater adherence to guidelines could maximize the benefits of antipsychotic medications while minimizing risk of adverse effects.

Elevated Clozapine Concentrations in Clozapine-Treated Patients with Hypersalivation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hypersalivation is a common, clozapine-related adverse drug reaction with a serious impact on quality of life. Pharmacokinetic correlates of clozapine-related hypersalivation have evaded attention. The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between clozapine-treated patients with vs. without hypersalivation from a large therapeutic drug monitoring database.

METHODS

Out of a large therapeutic drug monitoring dataset of clozapine-treated patients, we compared a group of patients with hypersalivation (n = 72) and a control group of patients without any adverse reactions in this regard (n = 323). Comparisons included plasma concentrations and concentrations-by-dose as well as demographic characteristics between groups. Post-hoc analyses were performed separately in smokers and non-smokers. We used the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-square test, while effects of confounders were assessed using a bootstrapping analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Patients with hypersalivation had higher clozapine plasma concentrations and concentrations-by-dose (p < 0.001 for the Mann-Whitney U test in both cases). Groups did not differ regarding demographic characteristics except for clozapine daily dose and percentage of smokers (p = 0.005 for the Mann-Whitney U test and p = 0.028 for the chi-square test, respectively). There were fewer smokers across patients with hypersalivation compared with patients without and daily doses were higher in patients with hypersalivation. After analysis of covariance, differences remained for both plasma concentrations and concentrations-by-dose (p < 0.001 for both). Post hoc analyses in smokers and non-smokers separately reported similar findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated clozapine plasma concentrations and higher concentrations-by-dose were observed in patients with hypersalivation. A potential role for therapeutic drug monitoring in the prevention or management of clozapine-related hypersalivation is suggested.

The physical health and side-effect monitoring of patients prescribed clozapine: data from a clinical audit conducted in UK mental health services

BACKGROUND

In addition to mandatory haematological monitoring, treatment guidelines recommend routine monitoring of adverse effects and physical health in patients prescribed clozapine.

METHODS

NHS trusts/healthcare organisations participated in a clinical audit in the context of a UK quality improvement programme addressing clozapine-prescribing practice.

RESULTS

Data relating to 6948 adult patients prescribed clozapine were submitted by 63 NHS trusts/healthcare organisations. Of 481 patients treated with clozapine for up to 18 weeks, there was documented pretreatment screening of blood pressure, heart rate and ECG in at least 90%, and body weight, plasma lipids, plasma glucose/glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and physical examination in approximately 80%. During the first 2 weeks of clozapine treatment there was documented daily measurement of both heart rate and blood pressure in 82% and body temperature in 77%. In a subsample of 411 patients, of the 72% who had weekly side-effect assessments documented in the first month of treatment, a structured assessment tool had been used in 29%. Treatment monitoring up to 18 weeks included an ECG in 90%, C-reactive protein (CRP) or creatine kinase in 42%, and troponin or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in 29%. In the 5908 patients prescribed clozapine for at least 1 year, blood pressure and body weight/body mass index were documented in at least 80%, plasma lipids in 78% and plasma glucose in 73%, with an ECG in 55%. Two-thirds were prescribed medication to manage side effects of clozapine and one third of those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were prescribed a second antipsychotic medication.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that for most patients treated with clozapine in UK mental health services, physical health screening and side-effect monitoring follow recommended practice, but there was limited use of structured side-effect assessment tools. Monitoring for clozapine-induced myocarditis during the early risk period using markers of inflammation such as CRP, and cardiac damage such as troponin and BNP, was less consistent. This may partly reflect the variation in guideline recommendations for monitoring for myocarditis and partly the selected use of such tests when prompted by cardiac symptoms. The relatively common coprescription of medications for the majority of people on longer-term clozapine treatment may well further increase side-effect burden and physical health risks, reinforcing the need for continuing systematic monitoring.

Clozapine-related drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe, multiorganic, and potentially life-threatening drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction, linked to several common drugs, including antiepileptics, antibiotics, and several psychotropic drugs, including clozapine. Due to the importance of clozapine in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, a systematic review and characterization of clozapine-related DRESS syndrome is long overdue.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Library databases were independently reviewed up to 1 November 2019 for articles reporting clozapine-related DRESS syndrome cases. The RegiSCAR score system was applied to systematically characterize the clinical presentations of selected studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Clozapine-related DRESS syndrome was reported in six patients from four articles. Five patients received polypharmacy. Skin rash and liver involvement with elevated liver enzymes were very common. No fatal cases were found. Treatment mainly included clozapine discontinuation and immunosuppression. The mismatch between incidences of DRESS with other responsible drugs, the common misdiagnosis of this syndrome, and the fact that an extensive literature search only identified six cases suggests that clozapine-related DRESS may be overlooked. It is, therefore, necessary to optimize diagnostic strategies to identify immune-related side effects of clozapine.