Rufinamide in children and adults in routine clinical practice

Rufinamide, a Triazole-Derived Antiepileptic Drug, Stimulates Ca2+-Activated K+ Currents While Inhibiting Voltage-Gated Na+ Currents

Rufinamide (RFM) is a clinically utilized antiepileptic drug that, as a triazole derivative, has a unique structure. The extent to which this drug affects membrane ionic currents remains incompletely understood. With the aid of patch clamp technology, we investigated the effects of RFM on the amplitude, gating, and hysteresis of ionic currents from pituitary GH₃ lactotrophs. RFM increased the amplitude of Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ currents (I_K(Ca)) in pituitary GH₃ lactotrophs, and the increase was attenuated by the further addition of iberiotoxin or paxilline. The addition of RFM to the cytosolic surface of the detached patch of membrane resulted in the enhanced activity of large-conductance Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ channels (BK_Ca channels), and paxilline reversed this activity. RFM increased the strength of the hysteresis exhibited by the BK_Ca channels and induced by an inverted isosceles-triangular ramp pulse. The peak and late voltage-gated Na⁺ current (I_Na) evoked by rapid step depolarizations were differentially suppressed by RFM. The molecular docking approach suggested that RFM bound to the intracellular domain of K_Ca1.1 channels with amino acid residues, thereby functionally affecting BK_Ca channels' activity. This study is the first to present evidence that, in addition to inhibiting the I_Na, RFM effectively modifies the I_K(Ca), which suggests that it has an impact on neuronal function and excitability.

Perampanel as adjuvant treatment in epileptic encephalopathies: A multicenter study in routine clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are a heterogeneous group of syndromes, including Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), which are refractory to multiple therapies. Perampanel efficacy has been reported in LGS but further real-world evidence is needed in DEEs.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, 1-year observational study in patients with DEEs on adjuvant perampanel treatment was conducted to assess perampanel safety and effectiveness in this type of patients in a real-world setting. Seizure types [focal onset seizures (FOS), generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), tonic seizures (TS), atonic seizures (AtS), atypical absences (AA), and myoclonic seizures (MS)] and seizure clusters were divided in different frequency groups: daily, weekly, and monthly seizures, and absent or seizure freedom. Patients could have more than one seizure type. For each frequency group, group change and seizure freedom were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients diagnosed with DEEs (45 males) of median age 22 [1-70] years were included. The most frequent DEEs were LGS (35.6%) and Lennox-like syndrome (37.9%). At baseline 20 patients had three to five types of seizures, 36 patients had two types of seizures and 31 patients had one predominant type of seizure. The mean number of seizure types per patient at baseline was 2.12 ± 0.97 which was reduced to 1.62 ± 0.91 at 12 months (p < 0.001). Overall, 51.7% of patients had a significant improvement in at least one seizure type. At baseline, 45 patients had GTCS, 42 FOS, 41 TS, 18 AA, 16 AtS, 11 MS, and 30 seizures clusters. Seizure freedom for each specific type at 12 months was significantly achieved by 35% of patients with GTCS (p < 0.001), 17% (p = 0.016) with TS and 37% with seizure clusters (p < 0.001). Patients achieved seizure freedom from other seizure types but with no statistical significance: 7% FOS-free, 28% AA-free, 6% Ats-free, and 18% MS-free. Regarding changes of group at 12 months, 22% of TS and 19% of FOS improved significantly to a group with lower seizure frequency (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02, respectively). In remaining groups (4% of GTCS, 11% of AA, 18% of Ats, 18% of MS, and 13% of seizure clusters), the improvement was not statistically significant. Twenty-nine patients discontinued perampanel: 18 (21%) due to AEs, 8 (9%) due to lack of efficacy, and 3 (3%) due to seizure worsening. Adverse events, mostly mild or moderate, were reported in 53% of patients, and irritability/mood changes (22%) and somnolence (17%) were the most frequent.

CONCLUSION

This is the first large-scale real-world study with perampanel across different seizure types in patients with DEEs. Perampanel was effective, especially in GTCS, TS, and FOS, as well as in seizure clusters. Perampanel was generally well-tolerated without unexpected AEs.

Orphan Drug Use in Patients With Rare Diseases: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: Orphan drugs are used for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of rare diseases that, in the European Union, are defined as disorders affecting no more than 5 persons in 10,000. So far, a total of around 800 orphan medicinal products have been approved by the European Medicines Agency, however the utilization profile of orphan drugs has yet to be explored. This study aimed at assessing the utilization profile of orphan drugs authorized for marketing by the Italian Medicines Agency using population-based data.

Methods: A total of 21 orphan drugs used in outpatient settings, approved in the European Union before or during the 2008–2018 period and involving 15 rare diseases, were included in the study. The monitored population included patients with one of the conditions surveilled by the population-based Tuscany Registry of Rare Diseases and diagnosed between 2000–2018. A multi-database approach was applied, by linking data from the registry with information collected in drug prescriptions databases. The prevalence and intensity of use were estimated for the selected orphan drugs and other non-orphan medications, used to treat the same rare disease and for which a change in the prevalence of use was hypothesized after authorization of the orphan drug.

Results: For some diseases (acquired aplastic anemia, tuberous sclerosis complex, most metabolic diseases) a low prevalence of orphan drugs use was observed (range between 1.1–12.5%). Conversely, orphan drugs were frequently used in hemophilia B, Wilson disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (maximum of 78.3, 47.6 and 41.8%, respectively). For hemophilia B and Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy, there are currently no other medications used in clinical practice in addition to orphan drugs. Six orphan drugs were used for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, appearing the elective therapy for this disease, albeit with different utilization profiles (range of prevalence 1.7–55.6%).

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the utilization profile of orphan drugs prescribed in a defined geographical area, and providing relevant information to monitor over time potential changes in the prevalence of these medications as well as in the health care decision making.

Efficacy and safety of antiseizure medication for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

AIM

To compare and rank the efficacy and safety of antiseizure medication (ASM) in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS).

METHOD

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of ASM for LGS compared with placebo or with each other. The efficacy and safety were reported in terms of an at least 50% monthly seizure frequency reduction in drop seizures, dropout, and serious adverse events. Outcomes were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

RESULTS

A total of eight RCTs with 1171 patients were included, involving six ASMs: lamotrigine, rufinamide, cannabidiol, topiramate, clobazam, and felbamate. The calculated SUCRA showed that rufinamide, cannabidiol, and topiramate had the highest probability of achieving a response; however, no significant differences were found among these treatments. Cannabidiol, topiramate, and rufinamide were more likely to result in dropouts; moreover, a significantly greater percentage of patients receiving cannabidiol experienced premature discontinuation as compared to placebo, clobazam, and lamotrigine.

INTERPRETATION

All ASMs showed a significantly higher response rate than placebo. SUCRA ranking demonstrated that rufinamide and cannabidiol are more efficacious than other treatments in reducing drop seizures. However, there was no significant difference between these treatments.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Rufinamide in Epileptic Children Younger Than 4 Years

BACKGROUND

Rufinamide, a triazole derivative, is a new-generation antiseizure medication with a novel mechanism of action. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of rufinamide treatment in children with epilepsy younger than 4 years at our center.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included children younger than 4 years who had pharmacologically resistant epilepsy and were treated with rufinamide at Boston Children's Hospital between June 2010 and June 2018. Safety and efficacy of rufinamide treatment were assessed immediately prior to initiation of rufinamide and at the last follow-up visit. Responders were defined as patients who had greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency on follow-up as compared to baseline.

RESULTS

We reviewed records of 128 children and included 103 with complete information. Patients consisted of 60 boys (58%), with a median age of 20 months (interquartile range 13-28, range 2-36). Median treatment duration was 15 months, and median rufinamide dosage at the last follow-up was 42 mg/kg/d (interquartile range 34-56). At the last follow-up, seizure frequency decreased (450 vs 90, P<.001) and overall seizure reduction was 54%. Fifty-one patients (49.5%) were responders with 94% seizure reduction, including 20 (19.4%) who achieved seizure freedom. Treatment retention rate at 12 months was 63%. Thirty patients (29%) developed adverse events and 41 patients (39.8%) discontinued rufinamide because of adverse events (15; 14.5%) and lack of efficacy (26; 25%).

CONCLUSION

Rufinamide is effective in reducing seizure frequency in pediatric epilepsy patients younger than 4 years, and overall well tolerated.

Medical Management in Focal versus Generalized Epilepsy

About 70% of children with new-onset epilepsy have the potential to become seizure-free on antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy with appropriately selected first-line medication. In ideal world, physician is expected to achieve best possible seizure control without impacting the quality of life. There is rapid increase in number of AEDs available over last couple of decades. Although not necessarily all of them are superior to old generation drugs in terms of seizure control, certainly there is change in landscape from perspective of tolerability and side-effect profile. Physicians must therefore be familiar with safety, tolerability, therapeutic effects, synergistic combinations as well as AEDs to avoid in specific circumstances. The article attempts to give general overview of available AEDs under broad umbrella of effectiveness against focal and generalized seizures as well as drugs with “broad spectrum.” The emergence of newer AEDs with broad spectrum and favorable side-effect profile is welcome. However, the future lies in better understanding of underlying diverse pathophysiology of clinical symptom “epilepsy” and developing new compounds acting on molecular targets as well as individualizing therapy. Technological advances in molecular genetics research are bringing precision medicine to the fore.

Cognitive, adaptive, and behavioral effects of adjunctive rufinamide in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A prospective observational clinical study

INTRODUCTION

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe pediatric epilepsy syndrome characterized by multiple drug-resistant seizure types. Children with LGS usually experience cognitive regression, and LGS is almost always associated with moderate to severe cognitive impairment. Rufinamide (RFM) was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2007 for the adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with LGS in patients ≥4 years of age. The primary objective of our study was to assess cognitive, adaptive, and behavior functioning of patients with LGS after 12 months of RFM therapy.

METHODS

This was an observational, multicenter, prospective study involving 16 patients diagnosed with LGS aged between 7 and 58 years (mean = 22 ± 16.3). Fourteen of 16 patients were already on therapy with 3 antiseizure drugs and 2/16 with 4 antiseizure drugs; RFM has been added with 100 mg/week increments up to a dose of 300-2400 mg/day. The participants and their parents underwent a neuropsychological evaluation for the assessment of intellectual, adaptive, and emotional/behavioral functioning (Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised (LEITER-R), Vineland, and Child Behavior CheckList (CBCL), respectively) before the RFM introduction (baseline) and 12 months after the RFM therapy (T2). Physical and neurological examination, electroencephalography (EEG) recording, seizure type and frequency, and adverse reactions were also considered.

RESULTS

After 12 months, the total intelligence quotient (IQ) assessed by LEITER-R did not show statistical significant changes, such as there were no statistically significant changes in adaptive functions, assessed by Vineland. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant changes in internalizing and externalizing problems assessed by CBCL.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive treatment with RFM did not negatively affect cognitive, adaptive function, and emotional profile in patients with LGS after 1 year of follow-up.

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a comprehensive review

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is considered an epileptic encephalopathy and is defined by a triad of multiple drug-resistant seizure types, a specific EEG pattern showing bursts of slow spike-wave complexes or generalized paroxysmal fast activity, and intellectual disability. The prevalence of LGS is estimated between 1 and 2% of all patients with epilepsy. The etiology of LGS is often divided into two groups: identifiable (genetic-structural-metabolic) in 65 to 75% of the patients and LGS of unknown cause in others. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome may be considered as secondary network epilepsy. The seizures in LGS are usually drug-resistant, and complete seizure control with resolution of intellectual and psychosocial dysfunction is often not achievable. Reduction in frequency of the most incapacitating seizures (e.g., drop attacks and tonic-clonic seizures) should be the major objective. Valproate, lamotrigine, and topiramate are considered to be the first-line drugs by many experts. Other effective antiepileptic drugs include levetiracetam, clobazam, rufinamide, and zonisamide. The ketogenic diet is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option. For patients with drug resistance, a further therapeutic option is surgical intervention. Corpus callosotomy is a palliative surgical procedure that aims at controlling the most injurious seizures. Finally, vagus nerve stimulation offers reasonable seizure improvement. The long-term outcome for patients with LGS is generally poor. This syndrome is often associated with long-term adverse effects on intellectual development, social functioning, and independent living.

Real-world data on rufinamide treatment in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Results from a European noninterventional registry study

INTRODUCTION

Rufinamide is approved for the adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) in patients aged ≥4years. The objective of this study was to provide real-world, long-term data on patients with LGS initiating rufinamide as add-on therapy and patients with LGS receiving other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHODS

A Phase IV, noninterventional, multicenter registry study was conducted in patients with LGS aged ≥4years requiring modification to any AED treatment, including initiation of add-on rufinamide therapy. Safety/tolerability was assessed by evaluating treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and efficacy was assessed using a generic seizure frequency scale.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients from 64 sites in 8 European countries were included, of whom 64 initiated rufinamide ("rufinamide" group) and 21 did not receive rufinamide at any time during the study ("no-rufinamide" group). Mean ages were 16.1years (rufinamide) and 15.0years (no rufinamide). The median duration of follow-up was >2years (range: 1.3-46.4months). Antiepileptic drug-related TEAEs were reported for 40.6% (rufinamide) and 33.3% (no rufinamide) of patients and led to discontinuation of 7.8% and 4.8%, respectively. The most frequently reported rufinamide-related TEAEs (≥5% patients) were somnolence (7.8%) and decreased appetite (6.3%). There were no unexpected safety/tolerability findings. At month 12, the proportion of patients with improvement in all seizures ("much improved" or "very much improved") was 28.6% (12/42) for the rufinamide group and 14.3% (2/14) for the no-rufinamide group.

CONCLUSION

The study provided valuable information on LGS and its management, and evidence that rufinamide has a consistent and generally favorable safety/tolerability profile when used in routine clinical practice. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01991041.