1
|
D'Elia N, Vogrin S, Brennan AL, Dinh D, Lefkovits J, Reid CM, Stub D, Bloom J, Haji K, Noaman S, Kaye DM, Cox N, Chan W. Electrocardiographic patterns and clinical outcomes of acute coronary syndrome cardiogenic shock in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention - A propensity score analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2024:S1553-8389(24)00075-7. [PMID: 38448259 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the influence of presenting electrocardiographic (ECG) changes on prognosis in acute coronary syndrome cardiogenic shock (ACS-CS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary angiography (PCI). BACKGROUND The effect of initial ECG changes such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) versus non-STEMI among patients ACS-CS on prognosis remains unclear. METHODS We analysed data from consecutive patients with ACS-CS enrolled in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes registry between 2014 and 2020. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (IPTW) was used to assess the effect of ECG changes on 30-day mortality. RESULTS Of 1564 patients with ACS-CS who underwent PCI, 161 had non-STEMI and 1403 had STEMI on ECG. The mean age was 66 ± 13 years, and 74 % (1152) were males. Patients with non-STEMI compared to STEMI were older (70 ± 12 vs 65 ± 13 years), had higher rates of diabetes (34 % vs 21 %), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (14 % vs 3.3 %), peripheral arterial disease (10.6 % vs 4.1 %, p < 0.01), and lower baseline eGFR (53.8 [37.1, 75.4] vs 65.3 [46.3, 87.8] ml/min/1.73m2), all p ≤ 0.01. Non-STEMI patients were more likely to have a culprit left circumflex artery (29 % vs 20 %) and more often underwent multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (30 % vs 20 %) but had lower rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (21 % vs 39 %), all p ≤ 0.01. Propensity score analysis with IPTW confirmed that non-STEMI ECG was associated with lower odds for 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 0.47 [0.32, 0.69], p < 0.001), and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (OR 0.48 [0.33, 0.70]). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing PCI, Non-STEMI as compared to STEMI on index ECG was associated with approximately half the relative risk of both 30-day mortality and 30-day MACCE and could be a useful variable to integrate in ACS-CS risk scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D'Elia
- Western Health Department of Cardiology, Victoria, Australia; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sara Vogrin
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela L Brennan
- Centre of Cardiovascular Research & Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Diem Dinh
- Centre of Cardiovascular Research & Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Lefkovits
- Centre of Cardiovascular Research & Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher M Reid
- Centre of Cardiovascular Research & Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Dion Stub
- Western Health Department of Cardiology, Victoria, Australia; School Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason Bloom
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kawa Haji
- Western Health Department of Cardiology, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samer Noaman
- Western Health Department of Cardiology, Victoria, Australia; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - David M Kaye
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas Cox
- Western Health Department of Cardiology, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, Western Health, University of Melbourne, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
| | - William Chan
- Western Health Department of Cardiology, Victoria, Australia; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, Western Health, University of Melbourne, St Albans, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khorsand S, Helou MF, Satyapriya V, Kopanczyk R, Khanna AK. Not all Shock States Are Created Equal: A Review of the Diagnosis and Management of Septic, Hypovolemic, Cardiogenic, Obstructive, and Distributive Shock. Anesthesiol Clin 2023; 41:1-25. [PMID: 36871993 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
Shock in the critically ill patient is common and associated with poor outcomes. Categories include distributive, hypovolemic, obstructive, and cardiogenic, of which distributive (and usually septic distributive) shock is by far the most common. Clinical history, physical examination, and hemodynamic assessments & monitoring help differentiate these states. Specific management necessitates interventions to correct the triggering etiology as well as ongoing resuscitation to maintain physiologic milieu. One shock state may convert to another and may have an undifferentiated presentation; therefore, continual re-assessment is essential. This review provides guidance for intensivists for management of all shock states based on available scientific evidence.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lindholm MG, Hongisto M, Lassus J, Spinar J, Parissis J, Banaszewski M, Silva-Cardoso J, Carubelli V, Salvatore D, Sionis A, Mebazaa A, Veli-Pekka H, Kober L. Serum Lactate and A Relative Change in Lactate as Predictors of Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - Results from the Cardshock Study. Shock 2020; 53:43-9. [PMID: 30973460 DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction has a very high mortality. Our present study focuses on serial measurement of lactate during admission due to cardiogenic shock and the prognostic effect of lactate and a relative change in lactate in patients after admission and the institution of intensive care treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS This is a secondary analysis of the CardShock study. Data on lactate at baseline were available on 217 of 219 patients.In the study population, the median baseline lactate was 2.8 mmol/L (min-max range, 0.5-23.1 mmol/L).At admission, lactate was predictive of 30-day mortality with an adjusted Hazard ratio (HR) of 1.20 mmol/L (95% confidence interval, CI 1.14-1.27). Within the first 24 h of admission, baseline lactate remained predictive of 30-day mortality. Lactate at 6 h had a HR of 1.14 (95% CI 1.06-1.24) and corresponding values at 12 and 24 h had a HR of 1.10 (1.04-1.17), and of HR 1.19 (95% CI 1.07-1.32), respectively. A 50% reduction in lactate within 6 h resulted in a HR of 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.94). Corresponding hazard ratios at 12 and 24 h, were 0.87 (95% CI 0.76-0.98) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.60-0.91), respectively. CONCLUSION The main findings of the present study are that baseline lactate is a powerful predictor of 30-day mortality, lactate at 6, 12, and 24 h after admission are predictors of 30-day mortality, and a relative change in lactate is a significant predictor of survival within the first 24 h after instituting intensive care treatment adding information beyond the information from baseline values.
Collapse
|
6
|
Javanainen T, Tolppanen H, Lassus J, Nieminen MS, Sionis A, Spinar J, Silva-Cardoso J, Greve Lindholm M, Banaszewski M, Harjola VP, Jurkko R. Predictive value of the baseline electrocardiogram ST-segment pattern in cardiogenic shock: Results from the CardShock Study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2018; 23:e12561. [PMID: 29846022 DOI: 10.1111/anec.12561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most common aetiology of cardiogenic shock (CS) is acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but even up to 20%-50% of CS is caused by other disorders. ST-segment deviations in the electrocardiogram (ECG) have been investigated in patients with ACS-related CS, but not in those with other CS aetiologies. We set out to explore the prevalence of different ST-segment patterns and their associations with the CS aetiology, clinical findings and 90-day mortality. METHODS We analysed the baseline ECG of 196 patients who were included in a multinational prospective study of CS. The patients were divided into 3 groups: (a) ST-segment elevation (STE). (b) ST-segment depression (STDEP). (c) No ST-segment deviation or ST-segment impossible to analyse (NSTD). A subgroup analysis of the ACS patients was conducted. RESULTS ST-segment deviations were present in 80% of the patients: 52% had STE and 29% had STDEP. STE was associated with the ACS aetiology, but one-fourth of the STDEP patients had aetiology other than ACS. The overall 90-day mortality was 41%: in STE 47%, STDEP 36% and NSTD 33%. In the multivariate mortality analysis, only STE predicted mortality (HR 1.74, CI95 1.07-2.84). In the ACS subgroup, the patients were equally effectively revascularized, and no differences in the survival were noted between the study groups. CONCLUSION ST-segment elevation is associated with the ACS aetiology and high mortality in the unselected CS population. If STE is not present, other aetiologies must be considered. When effectively revascularized, the prognosis is similar regardless of the ST-segment pattern in ACS-related CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuija Javanainen
- Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heli Tolppanen
- Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johan Lassus
- Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Markku S Nieminen
- Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Alessandro Sionis
- Acute and Intensive Cardiovascular Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute IIB-Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBER-CV, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jindrich Spinar
- University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - José Silva-Cardoso
- Department of Cardiology, CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, São João Medical Center, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Matias Greve Lindholm
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marek Banaszewski
- Institute of Cardiology, Intensive Cardiac Therapy Clinic, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Veli-Pekka Harjola
- Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Raija Jurkko
- Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|