Laparoscopic approach as a safe and effective option for incarcerated femoral hernias

Comparison of mesh repair and suture repair for the treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia: a retrospective, single-center study

BACKGROUND

Femoral hernias often present with incarceration or strangulation that requires emergency surgery. However, recommendations vary regarding optimal approaches for incarcerated femoral hernia. The aim of this study is to compare clinical efficacy between mesh repair and suture repair for the treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center analysis of the clinical data from 48 patients with incarcerated femoral hernia, including 16 patients who underwent mesh repair (mesh repair group) and 32 patients who underwent traditional suture repair (suture repair group).

RESULTS

The mean age, body mass index, incarceration duration, hernia sac size, operation duration, and the rates of postoperative incision infection, recurrence, chronic pain, and mortality were not significantly different between the suture repair and mesh repair groups (P > 0.05 for all). In contrast, the female/male ratio; the rates of bowel obstruction, coexisting diseases, and nighttime operation; and the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade were higher and the rate of prophylactic antibiotic use and the mean cost of hospitalization were lower in the suture repair group than in the mesh repair group (P < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

The surgical approach should be chosen based on the patient's condition. Mesh repair for the emergency treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia is safe and effective, whereas suture repair is suitable for elderly patients, those with more coexisting diseases, and those with limited life expectancy.

Application of spatial replacement method in the treatment of laparoscopic incarcerated femoral hernia – A case report

Introduction

Incarcerated femoral hernia is a common surgical acute abdominal disease. Laparoscopic surgery is considered a safe and effective method for treating incarcerated femoral hernias, which have different surgical approaches to releasing the contents of the hernia.

Presentation of case

We report the case of a 65-year-old female with a right incarcerated femoral hernia with an irreducible mass in the right femoral region for 2 days diagnosed by physical examination and abdominal ultrasonography. We used a catheter to inject normal saline into the hernia sac during surgery. Injury and rupture of the small intestine were avoided, and the polypropylene mesh was successfully repaired.

Discussion

Incarcerated femoral hernias is a common surgical emergency that can lead to intestinal obstruction, strangulation, or infarction. Laparoscopy is advantageous for treating incarcerated femoral hernias. In our case, spatial replacement theory was used to release the incarcerated small intestine. The principle is that changing the internal and external pressures of the hernial sac returns the hernia contents. The non-necrotic small intestine did not lead to intraperitoneal infection, and the standard transabdominal preperitoneal repair was simultaneously performed with a polypropylene mesh.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic incarcerated femoral hernia repair is a common emergency surgery that is safe and feasible for treating incarcerated femoral hernia using the spatial replacement method, the most beneficial to patients.

•

Laparoscopic exploration to determine bowel activity in incarcerated femoral hernias

•

Using the space replacement method to successfully release the incarcerated small intestine can avoid iatrogenic intestinal damage

•

The non-necrotic small intestine will not cause intra-abdominal infection, and at the same time use polypropylene mesh for standard TAPP repair to avoid secondary hernia repair